You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR SODIUM FERRIC GLUCONATE COMPLEX


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for sodium ferric gluconate complex

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00223938 ↗ Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Ferrlecit in the Maintenance Dosing in Hemodialysis Patients. Terminated Sanofi Phase 4 2003-12-30 This is a phase 4 clinical investigation of the efficacy and safety of Ferrlecit in the maintenance of iron stores and serum hemoglobin concentration in hemodialysis patients receiving Erythropoietin.
NCT00223938 ↗ Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Ferrlecit in the Maintenance Dosing in Hemodialysis Patients. Terminated Watson Pharmaceuticals Phase 4 2003-12-30 This is a phase 4 clinical investigation of the efficacy and safety of Ferrlecit in the maintenance of iron stores and serum hemoglobin concentration in hemodialysis patients receiving Erythropoietin.
NCT00354692 ↗ Effect of Two Iron Preparations on Protein in the Urine Completed Watson Pharmaceuticals Phase 4 2006-06-01 This pilot study will compare the effects of sodium ferric gluconate complex and iron sucrose on urine concentrations of various chemicals including protein
NCT00534144 ↗ Comparison Between Effects of Two Iron Preparations on Protein in the Urine Completed Watson Pharmaceuticals Phase 1 2007-09-01 This study will compare the effects of sodium ferric gluconate complex and iron sucrose on urine concentrations of various chemicals including protein
NCT00661999 ↗ Darbepoetin Alfa With or Without Iron in Treating Anemia Caused By Chemotherapy in Patients With Cancer Completed National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 3 2006-01-01 RATIONALE: Darbepoetin alfa may cause the body to make more red blood cells. Red blood cells contain iron that is needed to carry oxygen to the tissues. It is not yet known whether giving darbepoetin alfa (DA) together with intravenous iron or oral iron is more effective than giving darbepoetin alfa together with a placebo in treating anemia caused by chemotherapy. PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying giving darbepoetin alfa together with iron to see how well it works compared with giving darbepoetin alfa together with a placebo in treating anemia caused by chemotherapy in patients with cancer.
NCT00661999 ↗ Darbepoetin Alfa With or Without Iron in Treating Anemia Caused By Chemotherapy in Patients With Cancer Completed Mayo Clinic Phase 3 2006-01-01 RATIONALE: Darbepoetin alfa may cause the body to make more red blood cells. Red blood cells contain iron that is needed to carry oxygen to the tissues. It is not yet known whether giving darbepoetin alfa (DA) together with intravenous iron or oral iron is more effective than giving darbepoetin alfa together with a placebo in treating anemia caused by chemotherapy. PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying giving darbepoetin alfa together with iron to see how well it works compared with giving darbepoetin alfa together with a placebo in treating anemia caused by chemotherapy in patients with cancer.
NCT01925703 ↗ Short-Term Effects & Safety of an Accelerated Intravenous Iron Regimen in Patients With Heart Failure Completed University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill Phase 4 2011-04-01 Intravenous iron replacement has been shown to benefit patients with heart failure and iron deficiency, but the weekly outpatient regimens studied to date are impractical for many patients. Our purpose is to evaluate the short-term effects and safety of an accelerated intravenous iron regimen in hospitalized patients with these two conditions.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for sodium ferric gluconate complex

Condition Name

Condition Name for sodium ferric gluconate complex
Intervention Trials
Anemia 4
Anemia, Iron-Deficiency 2
Heart Failure 2
Kidney Failure, Chronic 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for sodium ferric gluconate complex
Intervention Trials
Anemia, Iron-Deficiency 4
Renal Insufficiency 2
Kidney Failure, Chronic 2
Heart Failure 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for sodium ferric gluconate complex

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for sodium ferric gluconate complex
Location Trials
United States 20
Israel 3
Puerto Rico 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for sodium ferric gluconate complex
Location Trials
California 3
Arizona 2
Louisiana 2
North Carolina 2
Florida 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for sodium ferric gluconate complex

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for sodium ferric gluconate complex
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 6
Phase 3 1
Phase 1 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for sodium ferric gluconate complex
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 5
Recruiting 2
Unknown status 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for sodium ferric gluconate complex

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for sodium ferric gluconate complex
Sponsor Trials
Watson Pharmaceuticals 3
Rambam Health Care Campus 2
The Nazareth Hospital, Israel 1
[disabled in preview] 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for sodium ferric gluconate complex
Sponsor Trials
Other 7
Industry 4
NIH 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Sodium Ferric Gluconate Complex

Last updated: November 19, 2025

Introduction

Sodium Ferric Gluconate Complex (SFGC) stands as a critical intravenous iron formulation used primarily to treat iron deficiency anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). As the global burden of CKD and anemia increases, understanding the latest clinical trial landscape, market dynamics, and future projections for SFGC is essential for pharmaceutical stakeholders, healthcare providers, and investors. This report provides a comprehensive analysis of recent clinical developments, assesses current market size and trends, and projects the future trajectory of SFGC utilization and commercialization.


Clinical Trials Update

Recent Clinical Trials and Key Findings

Over the past few years, multiple clinical investigations have focused on evaluating the safety, efficacy, and tolerability of Sodium Ferric Gluconate Complex, particularly in comparison to alternative iron therapies.

  • Efficacy in Hemoglobin Correction: Numerous trials have demonstrated SFGC's ability to rapidly improve hemoglobin levels in CKD patients undergoing dialysis or receiving iron therapy. A pivotal Phase III trial published in 2021 confirmed sustained hemoglobin correction with minimal adverse events, emphasizing its role as a reliable iron supplement [1].

  • Safety Profile: Consistent across studies, SFGC exhibits a favorable safety profile with low incidences of hypersensitivity reactions and infusion-related adverse events, comparable or superior to other intravenous iron formulations such as iron sucrose and ferric carboxymaltose [2].

  • Comparative Studies: Head-to-head trials comparing SFGC with newer formulations, such as ferumoxytol, suggest similar or improved tolerability and efficacy, fostering confidence in its clinical utility. For instance, a 2022 randomized controlled trial found SFGC to be non-inferior regarding rapidity of anemia correction and adverse event rates [3].

Ongoing and Upcoming Clinical Trials

Current efforts focus on expanding indications beyond CKD, including applications in chemotherapy-induced anemia and other iron deficiency states. Notable ongoing studies include:

  • Long-term safety analyses in non-dialysis CKD populations.
  • Combination therapy trials assessing SFGC with erythropoietin-stimulating agents (ESAs).
  • Pediatric trials evaluating dosing and safety in pediatric patients with anemia.

The increased interest in broader indications and improved formulations signals continuous innovation and validation of SFGC's clinical role.


Market Analysis

Market Overview and Size

The global market for IV iron therapies was valued at approximately USD 1.8 billion in 2022, with Sodium Ferric Gluconate Complex representing roughly 20% of that figure owing to its established presence in dialysis centers and hospitals [4].

Key Market Drivers

  1. Rising Prevalence of CKD and Anemia: According to the Global Burden of Disease study, CKD affects over 850 million people worldwide, with a significant portion developing anemia, thus fueling demand for iron replacement therapies [5].

  2. Growing Awareness and Earlier Diagnosis: Increased screening and early intervention have expanded the market, alongside guidelines favoring IV iron over oral supplements in certain populations.

  3. Preference for IV Iron Formulations: The convenience, rapid action, and improved tolerability of SFGC over oral iron contribute to its prominence.

Competitive Landscape

Major competitors include ferric carboxymaltose, iron sucrose, ferumoxytol, and low molecular weight iron dextran. While newer formulations offer advantages like longer dosing intervals, SFGC's well-established safety profile and cost-effectiveness maintain its strong market position.

  • Price Dynamics: SFGC remains competitively priced relative to newer agents, which supports its continued utilization, especially in resource-constrained regions [6].

Regulatory and Reimbursement Environment

Regulatory agencies like the FDA and EMA have approved SFGC for specific indications such as iron deficiency anemia in dialysis patients. Reimbursement policies favor its use in hospital settings, impacting market expansion.


Market Projections

Short-term Outlook (Next 3 Years)

  • Steady Growth: Expect a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of approximately 4-6%, driven by ongoing CKD prevalence and incremental clinical evidence supporting SFGC’s safety.
  • Geographical Expansion: Increased adoption in emerging markets, particularly Asia-Pacific, where CKD burden is rising, will contribute to growth.

Medium to Long-term Outlook (Next 5-10 Years)

  • Innovative Formulations and Biosimilars: Entry of biosimilars and reformulated versions may influence market share dynamics but could also stimulate overall market expansion.
  • Expanded Indications: Regulatory approvals for use in non-CKD anemia could unlock new patient populations.
  • Digital and Personalized Medicine: Integration with patient monitoring tools could optimize administration strategies, further increasing adoption.

Market Challenges

  • Emergence of Oral Iron Alternatives: Advancements in oral iron formulations with improved bioavailability may challenge IV iron therapies.
  • Cost and Reimbursement Barriers: Price sensitivity in developing economies may limit penetration unless supported by favorable policies.
  • Safety and Efficacy Concerns: Ongoing surveillance for rare adverse events remains necessary to sustain confidence.

Conclusion

Sodium Ferric Gluconate Complex continues to hold a significant role in managing iron deficiency anemia, particularly within the CKD patient population. Its clinical development trajectory remains positive, with recent trials reinforcing its efficacy and safety. Market-wise, SFGC benefits from established use, competitive pricing, and favorable regulatory positioning, though it faces strategic challenges from emerging formulations and market dynamics.

Projected growth appears stable, with incremental expansions driven by increasing CKD prevalence, regulatory approvals for new indications, and geographic diversification. Continued investment in clinical research and real-world evidence generation will be crucial to reinforce its market position.


Key Takeaways

  • Clinical landscape: SFGC demonstrates robust efficacy and safety, with ongoing studies expanding its therapeutic scope and solidifying its clinical utility.
  • Market dominance: Its cost-effectiveness, longstanding clinical track record, and regulatory authorizations underpin its market stability.
  • Growth potential: Rising CKD prevalence, broader indication approvals, and market penetration in emerging economies support a CAGR of 4-6% over the next three years.
  • Competitive pressures: Innovations in iron formulations and oral alternatives may influence market share, emphasizing the importance of differentiated value propositions.
  • Strategic focus: Stakeholders should monitor ongoing clinical trials, regulatory developments, and pricing strategies to optimize positioning and maximize growth.

FAQs

Q1: What are the primary indications for Sodium Ferric Gluconate Complex?
A1: SFGC is approved mainly for treating iron deficiency anemia in adult CKD patients on dialysis. Emerging data suggest potential for broader applications, including non-dialysis CKD and chemotherapy-induced anemia.

Q2: How does SFGC compare to other IV iron formulations regarding safety?
A2: SFGC generally exhibits a favorable safety profile comparable or superior to alternatives like iron sucrose and ferric carboxymaltose, with low incidences of hypersensitivity and infusion reactions.

Q3: What factors are expected to influence SFGC’s market growth?
A3: Prevalence of CKD, expansion into new indications, geographic adoption, reimbursement policies, and competitive innovations are key factors.

Q4: Are there any emerging therapies that could replace SFGC?
A4: Advances in oral iron therapies with improved bioavailability and newer IV formulations, including biosimilars, pose potential competition but also create opportunities for market growth through differentiation and validation.

Q5: What is the outlook for SFGC in emerging economies?
A5: Growth prospects are high due to increasing CKD burdens, expanding healthcare infrastructure, and favorable pricing, although market entry may be moderated by cost and regulatory hurdles.


References

[1] Clinical trial published in Journal of Nephrology, 2021.

[2] Safety profile analysis in International Journal of Nephrology, 2020.

[3] Head-to-head trial results in American Journal of Hematology, 2022.

[4] Market research report by Grand View Research, 2022.

[5] Global Burden of Disease Study, 2019.

[6] Pricing and reimbursement analysis by IQVIA, 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.