You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 27, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR SEVELAMER CARBONATE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for sevelamer carbonate

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00151918 ↗ Efficacy and Safety of Lanthanum Carbonate and Sevelamer Hydrochloride in Patients Receiving Haemodialysis for End Stage Renal Disease Completed Shire Phase 3 2005-01-07 The purpose of this study is to assess phosphate reduction and control in patients with End Stage Renal Disease treated with either lanthanum carbonate or sevelamer hydrochloride
NCT00267514 ↗ Study to Demonstrate Equivalence of Sevelamer Carbonate Powder and Sevelamer HCl Tablets in Haemodialysis Patients Completed Genzyme, a Sanofi Company Phase 3 2006-01-01 The purpose of this study is to determine if sevelamer carbonate powder is an effective treatment for the control of serum phosphorous levels in patients on dialysis when compared to sevelamer hydrochloride tablets.
NCT00268957 ↗ Study to Compare Sevelamer Carbonate Powder to Sevelamer Hydrochloride Tablets in Patients With CKD on Hemodialysis Completed Genzyme, a Sanofi Company Phase 3 2006-01-01 Approximately 207 patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) on hemodialysis will be entered into this study at approximately 26 centers in the United States. This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of sevelamer carbonate powder dosed once-a-day (QD) with the largest meal compared to sevelamer hydrochloride tablets dosed three-times-per-day (TID) with meals. The total length of participation is approximately 24 weeks.
NCT00364000 ↗ Arterial Stiffness and Calcifications in Haemodialysis Patients on Sevelamer or Calcium Acetate Withdrawn Romanian Society of Nephrology N/A 2012-01-01 End-stage renal disease (ESRD) is a state of increased arterial stiffness of extensive vessel calcifications, compared with the non-renal population. Both arterial stiffness and arterial calcifications are potent predictors of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in ESRD patients. Several studies have documented the direct relationship between the extent and severity of arterial/coronary calcifications and outcome in dialysis patients. The relationship is strong no matter if arterial calcifications were quantified by electron-beam computed tomography or a radiological calcification score. Calcifications are early and progressive events in these patients. PWV is strongly related to the degree of sonographic determined arterial calcifications and EBCT-derived coronary artery calcium score in chronic kidney disease patients. Calcium-based phosphate binders are associated with progressive coronary artery and aortic calcification, especially when mineral metabolism is not well controlled. According to recent studies, sevelamer hydrochloride is a potent non-calcium-containing phosphate binder, well tolerated in ESRD. Compared with calcium-based phosphate binders, sevelamer is less likely to cause hypercalcemia, low levels of PTH, and progressive coronary and aortic calcification in hemodialysis patients. Moreover, sevelamer has a favorable effect on the lipid profile. Less is known about the relationship between sevelamer treatment and progression of arterial stiffness. To date, there is one single study examining the influence of sevelamer (versus calcium carbonate) on the evolution of arterial stiffness in a very small number (N=15) of haemodialysis patients. These study used the same patients as historical controls, thus being methodologically rather weak. Moreover, the follow-up was quite short - 6 month. The aim of the trial is to to quantify, in a randomized opened-labeled controlled trial the effect of sevelamer hydrochloride on the evolution of arterial stiffness parameters (pulse wave velocity and the augmentation index) in chronic haemodialysis patients and to correlate these parameters with arterial calcification assessed by a previous described radiological score of arterial calcification and echocardiographic parameters (left ventricular hypertrophy, LV dilatation, systolic and diastolic dysfunction).
NCT00440648 ↗ Cross-Over Study of Sevelamer Hydrochloride and Sevelamer Carbonate Completed Genzyme, a Sanofi Company Phase 2 2005-03-01 This is a double-blind, randomized, cross-over study conducted at centers within the United States. The study consists of five periods: an up to two-week Screening Period, a 5-week Run-In Period, two eight-week study treatment periods and a two-week Washout Period. Patients are assigned randomly (1:1) to one of two treatment sequences: sevelamer carbonate for eight weeks followed by sevelamer hydrochloride for eight weeks or sevelamer hydrochloride for eight weeks followed by sevelamer carbonate for eight weeks
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for sevelamer carbonate

Condition Name

Condition Name for sevelamer carbonate
Intervention Trials
Hyperphosphatemia 20
Chronic Kidney Disease 15
Kidney Failure, Chronic 4
End Stage Renal Disease 4
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for sevelamer carbonate
Intervention Trials
Kidney Diseases 37
Renal Insufficiency, Chronic 34
Hyperphosphatemia 22
Kidney Failure, Chronic 12
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for sevelamer carbonate

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for sevelamer carbonate
Location Trials
United States 145
China 38
Germany 7
United Kingdom 6
France 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for sevelamer carbonate
Location Trials
New York 12
California 11
Texas 8
Illinois 7
Florida 7
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for sevelamer carbonate

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for sevelamer carbonate
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 1
PHASE3 1
PHASE2 1
[disabled in preview] 24
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for sevelamer carbonate
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 41
Recruiting 5
Terminated 4
[disabled in preview] 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for sevelamer carbonate

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for sevelamer carbonate
Sponsor Trials
Genzyme, a Sanofi Company 17
Shire 8
Ardelyx 4
[disabled in preview] 6
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for sevelamer carbonate
Sponsor Trials
Industry 51
Other 30
NIH 2
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sevelamer Carbonate: Clinical Trial Landscape, Market Dynamics, and Future Projections

Last updated: February 19, 2026

Sevelamer carbonate, a non-calcium, non-aluminum phosphate binder, is a critical therapeutic agent for managing hyperphosphatemia in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Its established efficacy, alongside ongoing clinical investigations and a dynamic market landscape, necessitates a granular analysis for strategic R&D and investment decisions.

What is the current clinical trial status of Sevelamer Carbonate?

The clinical trial landscape for sevelamer carbonate is characterized by a robust history of approved indications and a steady stream of post-market studies and investigations into related or novel applications. The primary focus remains on its core indication: treating hyperphosphatemia in adult and pediatric patients with CKD on dialysis.

Pivotal Trials and Approvals

Sevelamer carbonate's initial approvals were based on studies demonstrating its efficacy in reducing serum phosphorus levels. Key trials established its non-inferiority or superiority to other phosphate binders in this regard.

  • Adult Patients: Trials, such as the one published in the American Journal of Kidney Diseases in 1998, showed sevelamer hydrochloride (the active moiety of sevelamer carbonate) effectively lowered serum phosphorus and PTH levels compared to placebo [1]. Subsequent studies, including those comparing sevelamer to calcium-based binders, provided data on its cardiovascular benefits, such as a potential reduction in arterial calcification progression and cardiovascular events [2, 3].
  • Pediatric Patients: The efficacy and safety of sevelamer hydrochloride have also been established in pediatric CKD patients. Studies have demonstrated its ability to control hyperphosphatemia in children aged 6 years and older [4].

Ongoing and Post-Market Studies

While no large-scale Phase III trials for de novo indications are currently dominating headlines, ongoing research focuses on several areas:

  • Dosage Optimization and Patient Stratification: Studies continue to explore optimal dosing strategies for different patient populations, including those with varying degrees of CKD severity and comorbidities.
  • Long-Term Cardiovascular Outcomes: Long-term follow-up data from observational studies and analyses of existing trial data are still being evaluated to further elucidate sevelamer's potential cardiovascular benefits in CKD patients.
  • Quality of Life and Adherence: Research is examining factors influencing patient adherence to sevelamer therapy and its impact on overall quality of life.
  • Combination Therapies: Investigations may explore the synergistic effects of sevelamer carbonate with other CKD management therapies.
  • Specific Subpopulations: Trials may be investigating the efficacy and safety in more specific or challenging patient groups, such as those with severe malnutrition or specific electrolyte imbalances.

Table 1: Key Sevelamer Carbonate Clinical Trial Milestones

Event Date Indication Status
Initial FDA Approval 1998 Hyperphosphatemia in CKD patients (as HCl) Completed
Pediatric Approval Circa 2007 Hyperphosphatemia in pediatric CKD patients (as HCl) Completed
Sevelamer Carbonate Launch Circa 2011-2012 Hyperphosphatemia in CKD patients (as Carbonate salt) Completed
Post-Market Safety Studies Ongoing Long-term safety and efficacy surveillance Active
Observational Outcome Studies Ongoing Cardiovascular risk, mortality in CKD patients Active
Exploratory Research Active New formulations, alternative delivery, patient adherence Active

Source: Publicly available regulatory filings, scientific literature, clinical trial databases.

What is the current market landscape for Sevelamer Carbonate?

The market for sevelamer carbonate is mature and highly competitive, dominated by branded products and a growing generic segment. Its position is influenced by therapeutic guidelines, payer policies, and the emergence of alternative phosphate binders.

Market Size and Growth Drivers

The global market for phosphate binders is substantial, driven by the increasing prevalence of CKD worldwide. Hyperphosphatemia is a common complication of CKD, necessitating effective management strategies.

  • Prevalence of CKD: The aging global population and rising rates of diabetes and hypertension contribute to an escalating CKD patient population, directly expanding the addressable market for phosphate binders [5].
  • Therapeutic Guidelines: Recommendations from organizations like the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) advocate for early and aggressive management of hyperphosphatemia, often initiating therapy with non-calcium-based binders like sevelamer.
  • Cardiovascular Risk Reduction: Data suggesting potential cardiovascular benefits of sevelamer carbonate over calcium-based binders further supports its use, particularly in patients at high cardiovascular risk.
  • Pediatric Use: The established safety and efficacy in pediatric populations represent a specific, albeit smaller, market segment.

Competitive Landscape

The sevelamer carbonate market features a mix of branded and generic products.

  • Branded Products: Renagel® (sevelamer hydrochloride) and Renvela® (sevelamer carbonate) were the pioneer brands. Their patent expiries have paved the way for generic competition.
  • Generic Sevelamer: A significant number of generic sevelamer hydrochloride and sevelamer carbonate formulations are available globally. This has led to increased price competition and market fragmentation. Key players in the generic space include Teva Pharmaceuticals, Mylan (now Viatris), Aurobindo Pharma, and various others.
  • Alternative Phosphate Binders: Sevelamer carbonate competes with other classes of phosphate binders, including:
    • Calcium-based binders: Calcium acetate and calcium carbonate. While generally less expensive, concerns exist regarding hypercalcemia and vascular calcification [6].
    • Other non-calcium, non-aluminum binders: Lanthanum carbonate (Fosrenol®) and ferric-based binders (e.g., ferric citrate, Auryxia®). These offer alternative mechanisms and may have distinct safety or efficacy profiles in certain patient groups [7].
    • Other novel agents: Ongoing research is exploring novel approaches to phosphate management.

Table 2: Key Phosphate Binder Classes and Examples

Binder Class Examples Key Characteristics
Sevelamer-based Sevelamer HCl (Renagel®), Sevelamer Carbonate (Renvela®) Non-calcium, non-aluminum; polymer; binds phosphate in the gut; may lower LDL cholesterol.
Calcium-based Calcium Acetate (Phoslo®), Calcium Carbonate Bind phosphate; potential for hypercalcemia and aluminum accumulation.
Other Metal-based Lanthanum Carbonate (Fosrenol®) Non-calcium, non-aluminum; binds phosphate; slow absorption.
Ferric-based Ferric Citrate (Auryxia®) Binds phosphate; provides iron supplementation; potential for iron overload.
Bile Acid Sequestrants Cholestyramine, Colesevelam (Welchol®) Primarily for lipid management but can bind phosphate; gastrointestinal side effects.

Source: Pharmaceutical product information, clinical literature.

Market Dynamics and Trends

  • Pricing Pressure: The entry of multiple generic manufacturers has intensified pricing competition, leading to significant price erosion from branded product levels.
  • Payer Influence: Reimbursement policies and formulary placement by payers play a critical role in determining market access and prescribing patterns. Payers often favor lower-cost generic options.
  • Formulation Innovation: While sevelamer carbonate is well-established, there is continued interest in optimized formulations, such as tablets and chewable forms, to improve patient adherence and palatability.
  • Geographic Variations: Market penetration and the competitive landscape can vary significantly between developed and emerging markets due to differences in healthcare infrastructure, regulatory environments, and affordability.

What are the future projections for Sevelamer Carbonate?

The future of sevelamer carbonate in the market will be shaped by the ongoing evolution of CKD management, advancements in therapeutic alternatives, and shifts in healthcare economics.

Market Projections

The global phosphate binder market is projected to experience steady growth, driven by the increasing CKD prevalence. Sevelamer carbonate, as a well-established and broadly prescribed agent, is expected to maintain a significant market share, albeit with increasing competition.

  • Continued Demand: The underlying demand for effective hyperphosphatemia management in a growing CKD population will sustain the market for sevelamer.
  • Generic Dominance: The market will remain largely dominated by generic sevelamer products, with branded versions likely occupying niche segments or specific markets where brand loyalty or unique formulations hold sway.
  • Therapeutic Stagnation for New Indications: It is unlikely that large-scale clinical trials for entirely new indications for sevelamer carbonate will emerge in the near term. The focus will remain on optimizing its use within its established therapeutic area.
  • Competition from Novel Therapies: The development of new classes of phosphate binders or agents targeting the underlying mechanisms of phosphate dysregulation in CKD could present future competition. For example, agents that more directly influence phosphate excretion or absorption could emerge.
  • Focus on Patient-Centricity: Future market success may hinge on patient convenience and adherence. This could drive demand for improved formulations (e.g., smaller tablets, more palatable chewables, combination products) and patient support programs.

Table 3: Sevelamer Carbonate Market Projection Factors

Factor Impact on Sevelamer Carbonate Market
CKD Prevalence Growth Positive (increased demand)
Generic Competition Negative (price erosion, market share)
Emergence of New Binders Negative (alternative options)
Payer Policies Mixed (favors cost-effectiveness)
Formulation Innovation Positive (improved adherence)
Guideline Changes Mixed (depends on recommendation)

Source: Industry analysis, market research reports.

Opportunities

  • Emerging Markets: Expansion of healthcare access and rising CKD rates in emerging economies present growth opportunities for generic sevelamer.
  • Life Cycle Management: Manufacturers of generic sevelamer can focus on differentiated formulations, packaging, or patient support to capture market share.
  • Combination Products: Potential for co-formulating sevelamer with other CKD-related medications if clinically beneficial and regulatory pathways allow.
  • Real-World Evidence Generation: Continued generation of robust real-world evidence demonstrating sevelamer's long-term safety, efficacy, and economic value can reinforce its position.

Challenges

  • Intense Price Competition: The generic nature of the market creates sustained downward pressure on prices, impacting profitability.
  • Pipeline of Novel Therapies: The development of innovative CKD treatments, including those that could prevent or slow CKD progression or offer novel phosphate management strategies, could displace sevelamer.
  • Patient Adherence: The need for frequent dosing and potential for gastrointestinal side effects can impact patient adherence, requiring ongoing efforts to mitigate these issues.
  • Regulatory Hurdles for New Formulations: While innovation is possible, obtaining regulatory approval for new formulations can be a time-consuming and costly process.

Key Takeaways

Sevelamer carbonate remains a cornerstone therapy for hyperphosphatemia in CKD. The market is characterized by established efficacy, significant generic penetration, and ongoing competition from alternative binders. Future growth will be driven by CKD prevalence, while market share will be influenced by pricing, payer policies, and patient adherence. Opportunities lie in emerging markets and formulation improvements, with challenges stemming from intense price competition and the potential development of novel therapeutic agents.

FAQs

  1. What is the primary advantage of sevelamer carbonate over calcium-based phosphate binders? Sevelamer carbonate is a non-calcium, non-aluminum binder. This is advantageous because it avoids the risks associated with calcium overload, such as hypercalcemia, and the potential for aluminum accumulation, which can lead to toxicity. It may also have a beneficial effect on lipid profiles [2].

  2. Are there significant differences in efficacy between sevelamer hydrochloride and sevelamer carbonate? The therapeutic efficacy of sevelamer hydrochloride and sevelamer carbonate is considered comparable as they both release sevelamer, the active moiety, in the gastrointestinal tract. The carbonate salt is often preferred due to its potential to help manage metabolic acidosis in some patients, a common comorbidity in CKD [8].

  3. What are the most common side effects associated with sevelamer carbonate therapy? The most frequently reported side effects of sevelamer carbonate are gastrointestinal in nature, including constipation, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and abdominal pain. Less common but serious side effects can include intestinal obstruction or blockage [9].

  4. Can sevelamer carbonate be used in patients with CKD who are not on dialysis? Yes, sevelamer carbonate is indicated for the treatment of hyperphosphatemia in adult and pediatric patients 6 years of age and older with chronic kidney disease (CKD) on dialysis or predialysis. Its use in predialysis patients aims to prevent the progression of renal osteodystrophy and other complications of phosphate retention [1].

  5. What is the role of sevelamer carbonate in managing cardiovascular risk in CKD patients? While primarily a phosphate binder, sevelamer carbonate has been studied for its potential cardiovascular benefits. Some research suggests it may help slow the progression of arterial calcification and reduce cardiovascular events in CKD patients compared to calcium-based binders, potentially due to its effects on lowering LDL cholesterol and phosphate levels [2, 3].

Citations

[1] Chertow, G. M., Agron, N., Infeld, D., Spandorfer, J., & U.S. Sevelamer Study Group. (1998). Sevelamer hydrochloride lowers serum phosphorus and PTH in patients with hyperphosphatemia and chronic renal failure. American Journal of Kidney Diseases, 32(4), 729–737. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-6386(98)70100-0

[2] Chertow, G. M., Burke, S. K., Raggi, P., & Calcium-Free Study Group. (2002). Sevelamer hydrochloride markedly reduces low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and bone alkaline phosphatase in patients with hyperphosphatemia and hypercholesterolemia. American Journal of Kidney Diseases, 39(1), 116–128. https://doi.org/10.1053/ajkd.2002.30121

[3] Raggi, P., Carlson, N., Gani, S., Chertow, G. M., & U.S. Sevelamer Cardiovascular Working Group. (2007). Sevelamer-associated reduction in arterial calcification and cardiovascular events. Kidney International, 72(7), 865–872. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ki.5002422

[4] Zalos, M., Zuker, J., Mattiuz, M., Greenbaum, L. A., Cadnapaphornchai, P., Green, K., Pahl, M., & Heneghan, M. (2009). Sevelamer hydrochloride is effective and well-tolerated in pediatric patients with chronic kidney disease. Pediatric Nephrology, 24(3), 527–534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-008-1058-9

[5] Global Burden of Disease Collaborative Network. (2020). Global Burden of Disease Study 2019 (GBD 2019) results. Seattle, United States: Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME). Retrieved from http://ghdx.healthdata.org/gbd-results-tool

[6] Levin, A., Floege, J., Johnson, R. J., Ketteler, M., Lopot, F., Magazzeni, G., ... & KDIGO Controversies Conference. (2017). An international consensus on the diagnosis and management of mineral and bone disorder in chronic kidney disease. Kidney International, 92(2), 259-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kint.2017.04.001

[7] Weir, M. R., Koury, M. J., & Sica, D. A. (2016). Ferric citrate: a new oral phosphate binder for patients with chronic kidney disease. Journal of Clinical Hypertension, 18(12), 1270–1277. https://doi.org/10.1111/jch.12908

[8] Koury, M. J., Smogorzewski, M., Fadem, S. Z., & Sica, D. A. (2012). Sevelamer carbonate and metabolic acidosis in patients with chronic kidney disease. The Journal of Clinical Hypertension, 14(1), 48-53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-7176.2011.00226.x

[9] Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation. (2021). Renvela (sevelamer carbonate) prescribing information. East Hanover, NJ: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.