Last Updated: August 10, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR SCOPOLAMINE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for scopolamine

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00006399 ↗ Effects of Estrogen on Memory in Post-Menopausal Women and Patients With Alzheimer's Disease Completed Alzheimer's Association Phase 2 1999-09-01 The goal of this study is to examine whether the administration of estrogen to post-menopausal women and women with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease will enhance their memory and their capacity for learning.
NCT00006399 ↗ Effects of Estrogen on Memory in Post-Menopausal Women and Patients With Alzheimer's Disease Completed Eisai Inc. Phase 2 1999-09-01 The goal of this study is to examine whether the administration of estrogen to post-menopausal women and women with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease will enhance their memory and their capacity for learning.
NCT00006399 ↗ Effects of Estrogen on Memory in Post-Menopausal Women and Patients With Alzheimer's Disease Completed Pfizer Phase 2 1999-09-01 The goal of this study is to examine whether the administration of estrogen to post-menopausal women and women with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease will enhance their memory and their capacity for learning.
NCT00006399 ↗ Effects of Estrogen on Memory in Post-Menopausal Women and Patients With Alzheimer's Disease Completed National Center for Research Resources (NCRR) Phase 2 1999-09-01 The goal of this study is to examine whether the administration of estrogen to post-menopausal women and women with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease will enhance their memory and their capacity for learning.
NCT00055575 ↗ Cholinergic Modulation of Condition and Emotion in Mood Disorders: Functional Neuroimaging Studies Terminated National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) Phase 2 2003-02-27 This study looks at the role of a specific brain chemical system in the mood and attention symptoms seen in major depression and bipolar disorders using functional brain imaging.
NCT00130026 ↗ Caffeine in the Prevention of Post-operative Nausea and Vomiting Completed Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center N/A 2005-03-01 The objective of this study is to determine if caffeine 500 mg intravenously is efficacious when added to standard anti-emetic prophylaxis in the prevention of post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in patients undergoing ambulatory surgery under general anesthesia.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for scopolamine

Condition Name

Condition Name for scopolamine
Intervention Trials
Motion Sickness 12
Healthy 6
Vomiting 4
Alzheimer Disease 4
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for scopolamine
Intervention Trials
Motion Sickness 15
Vomiting 12
Nausea 10
Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting 8
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for scopolamine

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for scopolamine
Location Trials
United States 59
China 6
Israel 4
France 4
Egypt 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for scopolamine
Location Trials
California 12
Texas 9
Connecticut 5
Massachusetts 4
Maryland 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for scopolamine

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for scopolamine
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE2 2
Phase 4 15
Phase 3 11
[disabled in preview] 32
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for scopolamine
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 40
Recruiting 15
Unknown status 9
[disabled in preview] 17
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for scopolamine

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for scopolamine
Sponsor Trials
Repurposed Therapeutics, Inc. 11
University of California, Los Angeles 3
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. 3
[disabled in preview] 8
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for scopolamine
Sponsor Trials
Other 71
Industry 34
NIH 6
[disabled in preview] 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial
Last updated: August 1, 2026

Clinical trials update, market analysis and projection for scopolamine: status, pipeline, exclusivity, and commercialization outlook

Scopolamine (hyoscine) is a historically established antimuscarinic used for motion sickness, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and, in some settings, as an adjunct for GI/urogenital spasm. Current market and clinical-trial visibility is fragmented by product form (transdermal, oral, injectable) and by indication, with most “pipeline” activity concentrating on reformulations, delivery-system changes, and trial re-runs rather than new molecular entity development. Near-term commercial impact is therefore driven more by (1) availability and manufacturing scale of existing products, (2) label expansion or reassignment of supply, and (3) competition from generics/biosimilars is not generally applicable to scopolamine (small molecule).

Because scopolamine is not a single, uniquely branded modern pharma asset, “clinical trials update” and “market projection” depend on the exact scopolamine product and indication. Without that product specificity, any attempt to produce a complete trial- and patent-tied view risks producing an incomplete or misleading answer.

What clinical trials are ongoing for scopolamine and when will results read out?

Featured-snippet answer: Publicly tracked scopolamine trials are typically small, short-duration studies tied to formulation performance (bioavailability, skin permeation), symptomatic endpoints (motion sickness, nausea), or safety/tolerability, with timelines that vary by region and by product form.

Which scopolamine indications are most likely to run trials now?

Long-tail search demand aligns with these scopolamine use cases:

  • Motion sickness prevention (often transdermal or oral)
  • PONV prevention or rescue (often injectable)
  • Antispasmodic use in GI/urinary settings (less consistently tracked as “clinical trials” in recent years)
  • Pre-procedural anticholinergic use in anesthesia workflows (trial activity is more likely in perioperative studies than in scopolamine-specific branding)

What trial designs dominate scopolamine studies?

Common patterns for scopolamine trials:

  • Bioequivalence and pharmacokinetic comparisons for generic transdermal/oral products
  • Randomized, placebo-controlled symptomatic studies using standardized nausea scoring or motion sickness symptom scales
  • PK bridging when manufacturers change manufacturing site or process for transdermal systems

How fast do scopolamine clinical results typically translate to labeling changes?

For generics and reformulations, readouts can be relatively quick because endpoints are often tied to PK/BE and clinical safety, which can support variations rather than new-labeled claims. For brand-new indication expansions, timelines generally lengthen due to larger, powered efficacy datasets.

How big is the scopolamine market and what share is driven by transdermal vs injectable?

Featured-snippet answer: Scopolamine’s market is best modeled as a patchwork across formats and indication pockets rather than one unified “brand” market. Transdermal shares are usually associated with travel and motion sickness segments; injectable sales track perioperative and acute symptomatic needs.

Market segmentation that matters for projection accuracy

  • Product form
    • Transdermal patches (motion sickness, sometimes prophylaxis frameworks)
    • Injectable vials/ampules (PONV, perioperative use)
    • Oral tablets/capsules (motion sickness and antispasmodic use in some markets)
  • Geography
    • US, EU, UK for labeling and tender-driven procurement
    • High-tourism and long-distance travel markets where transdermal demand is more stable
  • Channel
    • Hospital/ambulatory surgery centers (injectable)
    • Retail pharmacies (transdermal/oral)

Key drivers that influence demand

  • Travel frequency and consumer preference for non-drowsy or longer-wear options (still within anticholinergic constraints)
  • Hospital protocols and anesthesia standard-of-care patterns for PONV prophylaxis
  • Supply continuity (scopolamine manufacturing can be sensitive to raw material and sterile fill-finish capacity, affecting effective market availability)

What is the scopolamine market growth forecast through 2030?

Featured-snippet answer: Growth is generally expected to be low-to-moderate and primarily volume-led, with pricing constrained by generic penetration and procurement competition.

Growth model components for scopolamine (practical levers)

  • Volume
    • Travel and elective surgery volumes
    • Protocol adoption and formulary inclusion
  • Price
    • Generic price pressure
    • Tender dynamics in hospitals
  • Mix
    • Switch from oral to transdermal for adherence and convenience
    • Preferred dosing regimens that favor transdermal steady exposure

What could push growth above the baseline?

  • Label expansions with strong guideline uptake
  • Launch of differentiated transdermal technologies (rate-controlled delivery, improved tolerability)
  • Supply stabilization that avoids shortages and lost demand

What could depress growth?

  • Substitution by competing antiemetic/motion sickness agents in protocols
  • Stockouts or delayed supply leading to lost contract volume
  • Formulation issues that trigger recalls and short-term channel disruptions

Which scopolamine formulations have the best commercialization prospects?

Featured-snippet answer: Transdermal scopolamine remains the most commercially differentiated format because it ties to adherence and convenience; injectable concentrates capture institutional demand but face procurement-based pricing.

Transdermal systems: what performance traits sell?

  • Longer wear time and predictable absorption
  • Skin tolerability and reduced local irritation
  • Easy-use packaging to support travel use cases

Injectable: what matters for formulary wins?

  • Sterile supply reliability
  • Consistent concentration and dosing
  • Compatibility with PONV pathways and perioperative order sets

Oral: why is it harder to differentiate?

Oral scopolamine competes directly on generic pricing and limited differentiation, unless a manufacturer introduces a clinically meaningful change in release profile or tolerability.

How long does scopolamine maintain exclusivity, and when do key patents expire?

Featured-snippet answer: Scopolamine as an active ingredient is old and does not typically have blockbuster-type exclusivity timelines by molecule. Exclusivity is usually tied to specific formulations, delivery systems (especially transdermal), or method-of-use claims, not to the base compound.

What does “exclusivity” mean for scopolamine products?

  • Patent exclusivity: formulation patents and device-like delivery patents may extend protection for specific products
  • Regulatory exclusivity: depends on specific NDA/ANDA history, which varies by format and jurisdiction
  • 180-day exclusivity for ANDAs: only relevant when an ANDA applicant is first-filing and eligible, and that is product-specific

Because scopolamine is widely generic, any defensible exclusivity story must be anchored to a named product, strength, and jurisdiction.

What is the Orange Book status of scopolamine products in the US?

Featured-snippet answer: Most scopolamine listings are expected to be generic (ANDA) or historical reference products with limited remaining patent life, with active listings clustered around specific transdermal and injectable strengths.

Why Orange Book status varies by strength and route

Each strength and dosage form can have different patent sets and “Orange Book” code associations (use patents, formulation patents, method-of-use patents). Supply and generic entry risk must therefore be measured by product identifier, not by “scopolamine” alone.

What patent and generic entry risks exist for scopolamine?

Featured-snippet answer: With scopolamine as a small molecule with long-standing use, generic entry risk is generally structural and routine; the more relevant risk is whether a specific scopolamine product’s formulation or device-like delivery patents block or delay specific ANDA launches.

How Paragraph IV challenges typically show up in scopolamine

  • If relevant patents remain on a transdermal delivery system, an ANDA challenger can file a Paragraph IV ANDA to the applicable listed patents.
  • Litigation risk then becomes product- and strength-specific.

Practical litigation exposure profile

  • Low probability of “bet-the-company” litigation compared with modern biologics
  • High sensitivity to whether any formulation or method-of-use patents are still listed and enforceable at the time of generic filing

What companies manufacture and sell scopolamine?

Featured-snippet answer: Scopolamine supply is shared across generic manufacturers and established pharmaceutical companies depending on country, with the main competitive axis typically being price, supply reliability, and transdermal performance/tolerability.

Commercial landscape by product form

  • Transdermal: competition among generic transdermal patch manufacturers
  • Injectable: sterile products supplied by multiple generic firms
  • Oral: broad generic coverage in many markets

Clinical trials and market outlook: what matters for investors?

Featured-snippet answer: Investors should model scopolamine economics as a commodity-like portfolio unless a company has differentiation in a specific transdermal or delivery-system product with still-live IP, strong supply contracts, or a meaningful distribution advantage.

Diligence checklist for market projection

  • Identify the exact scopolamine product unit economics (strength, route, packaging)
  • Track supply status (shortages, allocation, recall history)
  • Monitor payer/formulary placement for relevant indications (PONV protocols, motion sickness guideline usage)
  • Map remaining formulation/device patents per product

Key Takeaways

  • Scopolamine’s “pipeline” in clinicaltrials is mostly reformulation, delivery, and indication-support studies rather than new-molecule development.
  • Market growth through 2030 is likely low-to-moderate and mostly volume-driven, constrained by generic pricing and procurement competition.
  • Commercial differentiation is strongest in transdermal systems; injectable and oral are typically more price-competitive.
  • Exclusivity and patent risk are product- and formulation-specific, not tied to scopolamine as a molecule.

FAQs

1) Are there active scopolamine transdermal patch clinical trials in 2026?
2) What scopolamine delivery-system features reduce skin irritation and improve adherence?
3) How does scopolamine injection dosing differ across PONV prophylaxis protocols?
4) Which countries have the highest scopolamine patch utilization due to travel patterns?
5) What are the most common endpoints used in scopolamine motion sickness trials?

References

No sources were provided in the prompt, and no scopolamine product-specific identifiers (brand name, strength, route, jurisdiction) were included to support a complete, citation-backed clinical and market update.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.