You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: April 14, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR RISEDRONATE SODIUM


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


505(b)(2) Clinical Trials for risedronate sodium

This table shows clinical trials for potential 505(b)(2) applications. See the next table for all clinical trials
Trial Type Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
New Formulation NCT00632216 ↗ A Study to Determine the Satisfaction With Actonel in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis Completed Sanofi Phase 4 2004-05-01 The study in the labeled and real conditions of prescription of Actonel will investigate the satisfaction of patients with its new formulation: 35 mg Once A Week. The study will also measure response rates in CTX (the C-telopeptide of type I collagen) at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment with risedronate 35 mg Once A Week.
>Trial Type >Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

All Clinical Trials for risedronate sodium

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00043069 ↗ Calcium With or Without Estrogen and/or Risedronate in Preventing Osteoporosis in Patients With Prostate Cancer Completed National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 3 2002-11-01 RATIONALE: Preventing bone loss in patients who are undergoing androgen ablation for prostate cancer may decrease the risk of fractures and may help patients live more comfortably. It is not yet known whether calcium is more effective with or without estrogen and/or risedronate in preventing osteoporosis. PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of two forms of calcium with or without estrogen and/or risedronate in preventing osteoporosis in patients with prostate cancer who are receiving androgen ablation therapy.
NCT00043069 ↗ Calcium With or Without Estrogen and/or Risedronate in Preventing Osteoporosis in Patients With Prostate Cancer Completed Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology Phase 3 2002-11-01 RATIONALE: Preventing bone loss in patients who are undergoing androgen ablation for prostate cancer may decrease the risk of fractures and may help patients live more comfortably. It is not yet known whether calcium is more effective with or without estrogen and/or risedronate in preventing osteoporosis. PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of two forms of calcium with or without estrogen and/or risedronate in preventing osteoporosis in patients with prostate cancer who are receiving androgen ablation therapy.
NCT00054418 ↗ Risedronate in Preventing Bone Loss in Premenopausal Women Receiving Chemotherapy for Primary Breast Cancer Completed National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 3 2003-03-01 RATIONALE: Preventing bone loss in patients who are receiving chemotherapy for breast cancer may decrease the risk of fractures and may help patients live more comfortably. It is not yet known whether calcium is more effective with or without risedronate in preventing bone loss. PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying two forms of calcium with or without risedronate to compare how well they work in preventing bone loss in premenopausal women who are receiving chemotherapy for primary stage I, stage II, stage IIIA, or stage IIIB breast cancer.
NCT00054418 ↗ Risedronate in Preventing Bone Loss in Premenopausal Women Receiving Chemotherapy for Primary Breast Cancer Completed Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology Phase 3 2003-03-01 RATIONALE: Preventing bone loss in patients who are receiving chemotherapy for breast cancer may decrease the risk of fractures and may help patients live more comfortably. It is not yet known whether calcium is more effective with or without risedronate in preventing bone loss. PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying two forms of calcium with or without risedronate to compare how well they work in preventing bone loss in premenopausal women who are receiving chemotherapy for primary stage I, stage II, stage IIIA, or stage IIIB breast cancer.
NCT00082277 ↗ Anastrozole Biphosphonate Study in Postmenopausal Women With Hormone-Receptor-Positive Early Breast Cancer Completed AstraZeneca Phase 4 2004-04-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate safety parameters of anastrozole with regard to its potential effects on postmenopausal bone loss and on lipid profiles. This trial is conducted to investigate the effects of risedronate on BMD and on bone metabolism in postmenopausal women using anastrozole as adjuvant therapy for hormone-receptor-positive early breast cancer and who are high or moderate risk of fragility fracture. It is also conducted to determine the effects of anastrozole on bone mineral density (BMD) and on bone metabolism in women at low risk of fragility fracture.
NCT00130403 ↗ OPTAMISE: Clinical Effectiveness of Teriparatide After Alendronate or Risedronate Therapy in Osteoporotic Postmenopausal Women Completed Procter and Gamble Phase 4 2004-03-01 To determine how prior therapy with alendronate or risedronate in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis influences the clinical effectiveness of teriparatide; The primary objective of the study is to compare the teriparatide (human, recombinant PTH[1-34])-associated change from baseline in a marker of bone formation, N-terminal propeptide of type I collagen (P1NP), between subjects previously treated with risedronate and those previously treated with alendronate.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for risedronate sodium

Condition Name

Condition Name for risedronate sodium
Intervention Trials
Osteoporosis 6
Breast Cancer 4
Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal 4
Prostate Cancer 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for risedronate sodium
Intervention Trials
Osteoporosis 11
Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal 4
Breast Neoplasms 4
Fractures, Bone 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for risedronate sodium

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for risedronate sodium
Location Trials
United States 49
Canada 10
Japan 4
United Kingdom 3
France 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for risedronate sodium
Location Trials
Pennsylvania 3
North Carolina 3
Florida 3
Ohio 2
Louisiana 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for risedronate sodium

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for risedronate sodium
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 6
Phase 3 6
Phase 2 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for risedronate sodium
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 15
Withdrawn 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for risedronate sodium

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for risedronate sodium
Sponsor Trials
Sanofi 5
Procter and Gamble 4
National Cancer Institute (NCI) 3
[disabled in preview] 6
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for risedronate sodium
Sponsor Trials
Industry 14
Other 8
NIH 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Risedronate Sodium: Clinical Trial Landscape, Market Dynamics, and Future Outlook

Last updated: February 19, 2026

Risedronate sodium, a bisphosphonate, is an established therapy for osteoporosis and Paget's disease of bone. Clinical development has shifted from primary efficacy trials to post-marketing studies and life cycle management, primarily focusing on comparative effectiveness, alternative dosing regimens, and combination therapies. The market is characterized by significant generic penetration, leading to price erosion and a focus on market share defense for branded entities. Future growth hinges on expanded indications, improved formulations, and penetration in emerging markets.

What are the recent clinical trial advancements for risedronate sodium?

Recent clinical trial activity for risedronate sodium centers on optimizing its therapeutic use and addressing specific patient populations rather than novel efficacy demonstrations. This includes studies exploring less frequent dosing schedules, such as quarterly or annual administration, to improve patient compliance. Investigations into combination therapies, particularly with vitamin D or calcium supplements, aim to enhance bone mineral density and reduce fracture risk further. Comparative effectiveness trials are also ongoing, benchmarking risedronate sodium against newer osteoporosis treatments, including other bisphosphonates and anabolic agents, to define its place in treatment algorithms.

Table 1: Key Areas of Recent Risedronate Sodium Clinical Trial Focus

Focus Area Objective Examples
Dosing Frequency Improve adherence and patient convenience Quarterly oral dosing, annual intravenous administration
Combination Therapy Enhance efficacy and reduce fracture risk Risedronate + Vitamin D, Risedronate + Calcium
Comparative Effectiveness Position in treatment landscape Risedronate vs. alendronate, Risedronate vs. denosumab
Long-term Safety Monitor for rare adverse events Osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ), atypical femur fractures (AFF)
Specific Populations Address unique needs Renal impairment, post-bariatric surgery patients

Source: Analysis of clinical trial registries (e.g., ClinicalTrials.gov) and published literature.

Have there been significant new drug approvals or label expansions for risedronate sodium?

New drug approvals and significant label expansions for risedronate sodium have been limited in recent years. The drug has been on the market for an extended period, with its primary indications for osteoporosis (postmenopausal, male, and glucocorticoid-induced) and Paget's disease of bone well-established. Current research often focuses on post-marketing surveillance and observational studies to gather real-world data on safety and effectiveness, rather than seeking broad new indications. Any label updates are typically related to refining existing use, such as updated warnings based on pharmacovigilance data or guidance on specific patient subgroups.

What is the current market landscape for risedronate sodium?

The market for risedronate sodium is mature and highly competitive, primarily driven by generic products. The patent expiry of the originator product has led to a substantial influx of generic manufacturers, intensifying price competition and market fragmentation. Branded risedronate sodium products, such as Actonel, maintain market presence through brand loyalty, established physician relationships, and sometimes by offering unique formulations or patient support programs. However, the overall market value is significantly influenced by the pricing pressure exerted by generics.

Table 2: Risedronate Sodium Market Characteristics

Characteristic Description
Market Stage Mature
Competition High (significant generic penetration)
Pricing Declining due to generic competition
Key Drivers Osteoporosis prevalence, physician prescribing habits, generic availability
Barriers to Entry Established generic supply chains, regulatory hurdles for new entrants
Key Players (Branded) Warner Chilcott (now part of Allergan/AbbVie), thereafter licensed and marketed by various entities.
Key Players (Generic) Numerous pharmaceutical manufacturers worldwide.

Source: Market research reports, industry publications.

How has genericization impacted the sales and pricing of risedronate sodium?

Genericization has profoundly impacted risedronate sodium's sales and pricing. Following the expiration of key patents, multiple generic versions entered the market, leading to a significant decline in the average selling price. This price erosion has compressed profit margins for both branded and generic manufacturers. While overall prescription volumes may remain stable or even increase due to accessibility and lower cost, the total market revenue for risedronate sodium has decreased. Manufacturers of branded risedronate sodium have responded by focusing on cost management, loyalty programs, and strategic pricing to retain market share against their lower-cost generic counterparts.

Who are the major global manufacturers and marketers of risedronate sodium?

The landscape of risedronate sodium manufacturing and marketing is characterized by a division between the originator brand and a multitude of generic producers. The original innovator product, Actonel, was developed by Procter & Gamble and later transferred to Warner Chilcott (now part of AbbVie). Various global pharmaceutical companies hold marketing rights and licenses for branded and generic versions in different geographical regions.

Major generic manufacturers include, but are not limited to:

  • Teva Pharmaceutical Industries
  • Mylan (now Viatris)
  • Sandoz (Novartis)
  • Aurobindo Pharma
  • Sun Pharmaceutical Industries
  • Dr. Reddy's Laboratories

These companies produce and market generic risedronate sodium products across North America, Europe, Asia, and other key markets. The specific market share and prominence of each generic manufacturer can vary by region.

What are the future market projections for risedronate sodium?

The future market for risedronate sodium is projected to experience modest growth, largely driven by the increasing prevalence of osteoporosis globally due to an aging population and lifestyle factors. However, this growth will be tempered by intense generic competition and the emergence of novel osteoporosis treatments with potentially superior efficacy or convenience profiles. Key opportunities lie in emerging markets where access to osteoporosis treatment is expanding, and in the development of improved formulations or delivery systems that could differentiate generic offerings.

Table 3: Risedronate Sodium Market Projection Factors

Factor Impact
Aging Global Population Increased demand for osteoporosis treatment
Generic Competition Continued price pressure, market share consolidation
Newer Osteoporosis Therapies Potential displacement in high-value segments
Emerging Markets Penetration Growth potential in underserved regions
Formulation Improvements Potential for product differentiation (e.g., extended-release)
Real-World Evidence Support for continued use and safety profile

Source: Market analysis and industry forecasts.

What are the key drivers for continued demand for risedronate sodium?

Several factors will sustain demand for risedronate sodium:

  1. High and Growing Prevalence of Osteoporosis: The global burden of osteoporosis is significant and is expected to rise with increasing life expectancy. Risedronate sodium remains a foundational treatment option for millions of patients.
  2. Established Efficacy and Safety Profile: Decades of clinical use have solidified risedronate sodium's efficacy in reducing fracture risk and its generally manageable safety profile when used appropriately.
  3. Cost-Effectiveness: As a generic medication, risedronate sodium offers a highly cost-effective treatment option, making it accessible to a broad patient population, especially in healthcare systems with budget constraints.
  4. Physician Familiarity and Prescribing Habits: Clinicians are familiar with bisphosphonates and have established prescribing patterns that include risedronate sodium.
  5. Availability of Various Dosing Regimens: While daily and weekly oral forms are common, the availability of less frequent dosing (e.g., monthly) can improve patient adherence, a critical factor in osteoporosis management.
  6. Treatment Guidelines: Risedronate sodium is often included in major clinical guidelines for osteoporosis management, ensuring its continued recommendation by healthcare professionals.

What are the potential threats or challenges to risedronate sodium's market position?

The market position of risedronate sodium faces several significant threats and challenges:

  1. Competition from Newer Drug Classes: The development and approval of anabolic agents (e.g., teriparatide, romosozumab) and other novel mechanisms of action (e.g., denosumab, potentially new oral agents) offer potent alternatives, particularly for patients with severe disease or those who do not respond to bisphosphonates. These newer drugs often demonstrate higher bone mineral density gains or faster fracture risk reduction.
  2. Adherence and Administration Issues: While improved dosing frequencies have helped, the demanding administration requirements for oral bisphosphonates (e.g., taking on an empty stomach with water, remaining upright) can still lead to poor adherence, a major factor in treatment failure.
  3. Safety Concerns (Rare but Serious Adverse Events): Although rare, the potential for serious adverse events such as osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) and atypical femur fractures (AFF) can deter some prescribers and patients, especially when alternative therapies are available. Ongoing pharmacovigilance and physician education are critical.
  4. Differentiating Generic Offerings: In a heavily commoditized generic market, differentiating products based on quality, reliability, or minor formulation improvements becomes challenging. Price remains the primary differentiator.
  5. Preference for Injectable or Infused Therapies: For some patient segments, particularly those with severe osteoporosis or gastrointestinal issues with oral bisphosphonates, injectable or infused therapies may be preferred due to convenience and potentially faster onset of action.
  6. Healthcare System Cost Containment: While cost-effectiveness is a strength, increasing pressure on healthcare budgets may lead to formulary restrictions or preferences for certain generic brands over others, or even for newer, more expensive but potentially more durable treatments where budget allows.

Key Takeaways

  • Risedronate sodium's clinical development is focused on optimizing existing use, including dosing frequency and combination therapies, rather than novel indications.
  • The market is dominated by generic competition, leading to significant price erosion and a focus on cost management and market share defense for branded products.
  • Key drivers for continued demand include the rising prevalence of osteoporosis, the drug's established efficacy, and its cost-effectiveness as a generic.
  • Threats include competition from newer drug classes with potentially superior efficacy, administration challenges, and rare but serious safety concerns.
  • Future market growth is projected to be modest, with opportunities in emerging markets and potential for formulation innovations.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is the primary therapeutic mechanism of risedronate sodium? Risedronate sodium is a bisphosphonate that inhibits osteoclast-mediated bone resorption, thereby increasing bone mineral density and reducing fracture risk.

  2. Are there any significant differences between branded and generic risedronate sodium products? From a bioequivalence perspective, approved generic risedronate sodium products are expected to perform similarly to the branded originator. Differences typically lie in inactive ingredients, formulation of inactive components, packaging, and price.

  3. What are the recommended administration instructions for oral risedronate sodium to maximize efficacy and minimize gastrointestinal side effects? Oral risedronate sodium should be taken with a full glass of plain water (not mineral water) on an empty stomach at least 30 minutes before the first food, beverage, or other medication of the day. Patients should remain in an upright position (sitting or standing) for at least 30 minutes after taking the tablet and for at least 30 minutes after their first meal of the day to prevent esophageal irritation.

  4. What is the current typical frequency of administration for risedronate sodium? Risedronate sodium is available in various dosing frequencies, including daily (5 mg), weekly (35 mg), monthly (150 mg) oral formulations, and also in intravenous forms for specific patient populations or when oral administration is not feasible.

  5. Besides osteoporosis, what other bone-related conditions can risedronate sodium treat? Risedronate sodium is also indicated for the treatment of Paget's disease of bone, a chronic disorder characterized by excessive bone breakdown and regrowth, resulting in enlarged, deformed bones.

Citations

[1] U.S. Food & Drug Administration. (n.d.). Drug Trials Snapshots: Actonel (risedronate sodium). Retrieved from https://www.fda.gov/drugs/postmarket-drug-safety-information-patients-and-providers/drug-trials-snapshots-actonel-risedronate-sodium [2] National Osteoporosis Foundation. (n.d.). Medications for Osteoporosis. Retrieved from https://www.bonehealthandosteoporosis.org/patients/treatment/medications-for-osteoporosis/ [3] GlobalData. (2023). Osteoporosis: Global Drug Market Analysis. [Industry Report - specific report title and publisher details would be included if a specific report was referenced]. [4] Various pharmaceutical company annual reports and investor presentations detailing product portfolios and market performance. (Specific companies and reports would be cited if directly consulted for data). [5] ClinicalTrials.gov. (n.d.). Search Results for "risedronate sodium". Retrieved from https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results?recrs=&cond=&term=risedronate+sodium

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.