Last Updated: September 24, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR RASAGILINE MESYLATE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for rasagiline mesylate

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00104273 ↗ Rasagiline 1 mg and 2 mg Added to Aricept 10 mg Daily in Patients With Mild to Moderate Alzheimer's Disease (AD) Completed Eisai Inc. Phase 2 2004-08-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of two dose levels of rasagiline mesylate versus placebo in patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's Disease who are taking Aricept.
NCT00104273 ↗ Rasagiline 1 mg and 2 mg Added to Aricept 10 mg Daily in Patients With Mild to Moderate Alzheimer's Disease (AD) Completed Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. Phase 2 2004-08-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of two dose levels of rasagiline mesylate versus placebo in patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's Disease who are taking Aricept.
NCT00104273 ↗ Rasagiline 1 mg and 2 mg Added to Aricept 10 mg Daily in Patients With Mild to Moderate Alzheimer's Disease (AD) Completed Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Phase 2 2004-08-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of two dose levels of rasagiline mesylate versus placebo in patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's Disease who are taking Aricept.
NCT00203034 ↗ Multicenter Study of Rasagiline in Parkinson's Disease Patients Using Levodopa and Experiencing Motor Fluctuations Completed Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. Phase 3 2000-05-01 Study for patients currently using Levodopa/Carbidopa who will be assigned to receive either Rasagiline or Placebo
NCT00203034 ↗ Multicenter Study of Rasagiline in Parkinson's Disease Patients Using Levodopa and Experiencing Motor Fluctuations Completed Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Phase 3 2000-05-01 Study for patients currently using Levodopa/Carbidopa who will be assigned to receive either Rasagiline or Placebo
NCT00203060 ↗ Effectiveness, Tolerability and Safety of Rasagiline in Early Parkinson's Disease Patients Not Treated With Levodopa Completed Teva Neuroscience, Inc. Phase 3 1997-07-01 Study to look at the effectiveness, tolerability and safety of two doses of Study Medication in Early Parkinson's Disease (PD) Patients who have not been treated with Levodopa.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for rasagiline mesylate

Condition Name

Condition Name for rasagiline mesylate
Intervention Trials
Parkinson's Disease 11
Sleep Disturbances 1
Alzheimer's Disease 1
Dementia 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for rasagiline mesylate
Intervention Trials
Parkinson Disease 12
Parasomnias 1
Alzheimer Disease 1
Dyssomnias 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for rasagiline mesylate

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for rasagiline mesylate
Location Trials
United States 68
Canada 12
Israel 4
Germany 3
South Africa 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for rasagiline mesylate
Location Trials
California 6
New York 5
Illinois 5
Pennsylvania 4
Texas 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for rasagiline mesylate

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for rasagiline mesylate
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 2
Phase 3 7
Phase 2 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for rasagiline mesylate
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 14
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for rasagiline mesylate

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for rasagiline mesylate
Sponsor Trials
Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. 12
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries 12
Teva Neuroscience, Inc. 3
[disabled in preview] 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for rasagiline mesylate
Sponsor Trials
Industry 30
Other 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial
Last updated: July 27, 2026

Rasagiline Mesylate Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Exclusivity/Patent Outlook

What is rasagiline mesylate and where is it in the clinical pipeline?

Rasagiline mesylate is an oral monoamine oxidase-B (MAO-B) inhibitor indicated for Parkinson’s disease (PD) as a monotherapy and as an adjunct to levodopa in most markets. The drug is no longer a “late-stage” new molecular entity from a clinical-trials perspective: major development has historically centered on phase 3 efficacy and safety leading to initial approval, plus post-marketing commitments and formulation/real-world evidence.

Clinical development status (market-relevant):

  • No broadly reported, regulator-defining phase 3 readout cadence for rasagiline specifically is typically visible in the way newer PD agents show ongoing phase 3 registrational programs.
  • The dominant sources of incremental data in recent years are usually post-marketing safety, adherence/real-world effectiveness, pharmacokinetic studies (formulation and food effects), and health-economic evaluations, which can influence payer positioning rather than label expansion.

Implication for forecasting: market growth for rasagiline is more sensitive to generic/brand price erosion, distribution and formulary inclusion, and competition from newer MAO-B inhibitors and DAs/COMT inhibitors than to a near-term label-expanding phase 3 program.


What clinical trials have reported results for rasagiline mesylate in recent years?

A comprehensive, up-to-date trial-by-trial feed requires access to live clinical-trials registries. Without that live cross-check, only a stable, non-time-sensitive summary can be stated: the core pivotal evidence base is established from earlier phase 3 programs that led to approval (efficacy in PD symptom control and safety as an MAO-B inhibitor). Current “updates” in practice generally take the form of:

  • Post-marketing observational studies documenting discontinuation, persistence, and adverse-event rates in routine care.
  • Subgroup analyses across age bands, disease stage, and concomitant levodopa use.
  • Pharmacokinetic and bioequivalence work that supports generics and any new dosage forms (where applicable).
  • Real-world adherence and time-on-therapy assessments that influence payer management.

Because the question requests a clinical trials update, the actionable part for market projection is this: there is no clear pattern that would re-rate rasagiline as a “next wave” clinical investment unless a specific registrational trial is underway to expand indication, line of therapy, or dosing regimen. In absence of that, clinical activity does not drive major market inflection.


How strong is the patent estate for rasagiline mesylate?

A defensible patent/ORANGE-Book-style estate analysis depends on a current list of Orange Book entries by NDA and related patents, plus jurisdiction-specific filings (US, EP, IN, etc.). Rasagiline is an older compound, and in most developed markets the compound patent window is effectively closed; remaining exclusivity is usually limited to:

  • Formulation patents (specific tablet compositions, release profiles, excipients)
  • Polymorph/crystal form patents (if still in-force in certain jurisdictions)
  • Process patents (manufacturing routes)
  • Method-of-use patents (if any were pursued and granted)

Market-relevant bottom line: unless a specific, still-in-force formulation or method-of-use patent is tied to a still-exclusive brand product in a given country, rasagiline’s economics typically shift from “patent moat” to “generic parity and price competition.”


When does rasagiline mesylate lose exclusivity, and what does that mean for generics entry?

Rasagiline is widely available in multiple countries as branded and generic product. For market projections, the key driver is the difference between:

  • Patent/legal exclusivity (end dates vary by jurisdiction and by the last-in-force formulation/method-of-use patent)
  • Regulatory exclusivity (typically limited for small molecules)
  • Commercial exclusivity (managed inventory, formulary switches, payer contracting cycle)

Projection logic used by payers and manufacturers:

  • If compound exclusivity has ended, generics typically enter at scale after the last relevant patent barrier clears in that jurisdiction.
  • Even after legal clearance, price erosion is phased by contracting, tender cycles, and substitution rules.

Without a jurisdiction-specific Orange Book listing and the last in-force US/EU/UK patent-by-patent expiry dates, a numeric exclusivity timeline cannot be produced with accuracy here.


What patents protect rasagiline mesylate formulations and dosing?

Patent protection most often concentrates on:

  • Tablet composition (API particle size parameters, excipient blends, compression parameters)
  • Film coating specifications
  • Manufacturing processes (granulation and drying windows, impurity limits)
  • Stability and polymorph control (where relevant)

However, a “how many patents” and “which numbers are in force” answer requires a verified patent register and/or regulator listing tied to each marketed dosage form.


What generic entry risks exist for rasagiline mesylate?

Generic entry risk in PD is usually low once patent barriers clear because:

  • The molecule is small-molecule MAO-B inhibition and is not biologically complex.
  • Bioequivalence is generally feasible with standard formulation approaches.
  • Manufacturing scale and quality systems are mature in mature markets.

The residual risks are legal and commercial rather than technical:

  • Patent thicket around formulation/procedure can delay entry in specific jurisdictions.
  • Brand behavior (rebates, preferred formulary placement, contracting) can slow price normalization.

What is the Orange Book status of rasagiline mesylate in the US?

An accurate Orange Book status requires the latest list of:

  • NDA number(s)
  • Listed patents
  • Patent expiration dates
  • Any 180-day exclusivity holders
  • Method-of-use vs formulation/process classifications

Those details are not provided in the prompt and cannot be reconstructed without a current Orange Book pull.


What is the FDA regulatory status of rasagiline mesylate and has it faced label changes?

Rasagiline has longstanding approval for Parkinson’s disease. The FDA regulatory “update” angle for forecasting typically centers on:

  • Safety labeling revisions (post-marketing signal monitoring)
  • Changes in contraindications/warnings
  • Any REMS requirement (generally uncommon for small molecules)
  • Updates to pharmacovigilance language

A precise “what changed and when” list requires label revision history and label versions from FDA systems.


How does rasagiline mesylate compare with other MAO-B inhibitors and PD oral therapies?

For market projection, competition is typically measured against:

  • Selegiline (another MAO-B inhibitor, older)
  • Other MAO-B inhibitors (where relevant by geography)
  • Levodopa combinations and adjuncts (COMT inhibitors, dopamine agonists)
  • Newer PD symptomatic agents that affect payer choices

Commercial positioning pattern: In many formularies, rasagiline is treated as a cost-effective oral option, with its share influenced by:

  • Step-therapy protocols
  • Generic pricing and interchangeability
  • Managed care preferences for once-daily regimens (where dosing schedules align)

A cross-drug quantified comparison requires revenue and market-share data by molecule for the target geography, not provided here.


Market size, revenue, and projection for rasagiline mesylate: what drives uptake?

A credible market projection for rasagiline mesylate depends on three measurable inputs:

  1. PD prevalence and treated patient penetration
  2. Formulary placement and payer coverage
  3. Net price trajectory after generic entry

Key drivers (directional):

  • PD patient growth supports baseline volume.
  • Generic substitution reduces price, often faster than volume increases.
  • Switching dynamics depend on tolerability, dosing convenience, and clinician familiarity.
  • Tender and reimbursement in major markets can cause short-term volatility in gross-to-net.

Without verified market revenue baselines for the brand/generic split and geography, a numerical forecast cannot be produced in a way that would be fit for licensing or investment decisions.


What market projection scenarios apply (base, downside, upside)?

Forecasting for an established small molecule typically uses three scenarios tied to reimbursement and substitution:

  • Base case: Continued generic availability with gradual price erosion; volume grows with PD prevalence; no major label expansion.
  • Downside: Faster-than-expected price compression due to additional generic entrants or aggressive contracting; slower patient adoption due to payer restriction or competition.
  • Upside: Sustained payer preference in certain formularies; slower erosion due to limited generic competition in some regions; stable clinician adherence.

Producing scenario ranges requires current net sales, unit volumes, and competitor pricing, none of which are included.


Which companies dominate rasagiline mesylate supply and what is the competitive landscape?

Competitive landscape analysis for rasagiline requires:

  • Market-specific branded/generic market-share
  • Manufacturer listings tied to product approvals
  • Contracting strength by payer

This cannot be assembled accurately from the prompt alone.


Key Takeaways

  • Rasagiline mesylate’s clinical “update” story is typically post-marketing evidence, real-world utilization, and formulation work rather than new registrational phase 3 programs.
  • Market outlook is driven primarily by PD prevalence, payer/formulary placement, and net price erosion from generic competition, not by imminent label expansion.
  • A precise patent/exclusivity and Orange Book status requires regulator listing and in-force patent data; the prompt does not include those inputs, so a numeric, date-specific exclusivity forecast cannot be stated accurately here.

FAQs

  1. What are the most common real-world safety findings for rasagiline in Parkinson’s disease?
  2. How does rasagiline dosing (monotherapy vs add-on to levodopa) affect persistence and discontinuation?
  3. Which payer restrictions most commonly impact MAO-B inhibitor coverage for PD?
  4. What are the main formulation strategies used for generic rasagiline tablets?
  5. How do price-contracting cycles in major markets typically change net sales for off-patent Parkinson’s drugs?

References

  1. FDA. Orange Book: Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations. U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
  2. ClinicalTrials.gov. Studies on rasagiline (rasagiline mesylate). U.S. National Library of Medicine.
  3. EMA. European public assessment reports and product information for rasagiline. European Medicines Agency.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.