Last Updated: May 31, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR PROMETHAZINE HYDROCHLORIDE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for promethazine hydrochloride

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00270777 ↗ Improving Safety of Antivenom in People Bitten by Snakes Completed University of Kelaniya Phase 4 2005-03-01 A study to increase the safety of polyvalent antivenom involving 1000 patients in three centres: low dose adrenaline, promethazine, & hydrocortisone (alone and in combination) to prevent acute adverse reactions to antivenom in people bitten by snakes: randomised, double blind, placebo-controlled trial.
NCT00293215 ↗ Biodistribution Study of CMD-193 in Patients With Advanced Tumours Expressing the Lewis-Y Antigen Terminated Wyeth is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer Phase 1 2006-02-01 This was a Phase 1 dose-escalation study of CMD-193, a humanized monoclonal antibody linked to the toxin calicheamicin, in subjects with advanced tumors expressing the Lewis-Y antigen. The primary study objective was to determine the biodistribution and pharmacokinetics (PK) of 111-In-CMD-193 (i.e., CMD-193 tagged with a small amount of radioactive Indium [111-In]), with secondary objectives of determining changes in tumor metabolism and describing the antitumor responses to CMD-193.
NCT00293215 ↗ Biodistribution Study of CMD-193 in Patients With Advanced Tumours Expressing the Lewis-Y Antigen Terminated Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research Phase 1 2006-02-01 This was a Phase 1 dose-escalation study of CMD-193, a humanized monoclonal antibody linked to the toxin calicheamicin, in subjects with advanced tumors expressing the Lewis-Y antigen. The primary study objective was to determine the biodistribution and pharmacokinetics (PK) of 111-In-CMD-193 (i.e., CMD-193 tagged with a small amount of radioactive Indium [111-In]), with secondary objectives of determining changes in tumor metabolism and describing the antitumor responses to CMD-193.
NCT00429832 ↗ A RCT of Ondansetron and Promethazine in the Treatment of Nausea and Vomiting in the Emergency Department Completed GlaxoSmithKline Phase 4 2003-10-01 This was a trial comparing two commonly used medications for nausea and vomiting, ondansetron and promethazine, in the Emergency Department.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for promethazine hydrochloride

Condition Name

Condition Name for promethazine hydrochloride
Intervention Trials
Nausea 12
Vomiting 7
Pain 5
Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting 4
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for promethazine hydrochloride
Intervention Trials
Nausea 20
Vomiting 17
Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting 8
Pain, Postoperative 8
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for promethazine hydrochloride

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for promethazine hydrochloride
Location Trials
United States 39
Iran, Islamic Republic of 3
Canada 2
Lebanon 2
Australia 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for promethazine hydrochloride
Location Trials
Texas 9
Pennsylvania 6
New York 2
Massachusetts 2
Florida 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for promethazine hydrochloride

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for promethazine hydrochloride
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 2
PHASE3 1
PHASE2 4
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for promethazine hydrochloride
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 31
Terminated 9
Recruiting 8
[disabled in preview] 6
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for promethazine hydrochloride

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for promethazine hydrochloride
Sponsor Trials
Charleston Laboratories, Inc 5
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center 3
Montefiore Medical Center 2
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for promethazine hydrochloride
Sponsor Trials
Other 72
Industry 14
U.S. Fed 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Promethazine Hydrochloride: Clinical Trial Update, Market Analysis, and Projections

Last updated: April 26, 2026

What is promethazine hydrochloride in the market context?

Promethazine hydrochloride is a first-generation antihistamine with additional antiemetic, sedative, and anticholinergic activity. It is widely marketed as an established generic across multiple dosage forms, including oral tablets/syrup, suppositories, and injectable products in several jurisdictions.

From a patent and commercial standpoint, promethazine hydrochloride is mature: late-stage clinical innovation is limited because the active ingredient is off-patent in most markets, while lifecycle competition concentrates in formulation changes, route-of-administration improvements, and fixed-dose product positioning rather than new molecular entities.

What is the clinical trials update for promethazine hydrochloride?

Promethazine hydrochloride clinical research is active primarily through:

  • Comparative efficacy/safety studies for antiemetic indications.
  • Dose-form and bioavailability work for generic approvals and formulation refinements.
  • Safety monitoring and real-world evidence activities that do not typically lead to label expansions for a new active ingredient.

A full, trial-by-trial update requires a live registry pull. No such registry dataset is provided in the prompt, so a complete trial list, timelines, and outcomes cannot be produced without risking omissions.

What is the market analysis for promethazine hydrochloride?

Market drivers

  • Perioperative and emergency medicine use: promethazine is used for nausea and vomiting and as a sedating antihistamine in practice patterns where formularies and clinician preference support it.
  • Broad generic availability: multiple manufacturers and routes reduce pricing power and cap premium pricing.
  • Formulary inclusion: hospital supply contracts typically favor dependable, cost-effective generics.
  • Competition from alternative antiemetics: agents such as ondansetron, metoclopramide, prochlorperazine, and others compete by guideline positioning and payer preferences.

Market constraints

  • Low differentiation ceiling: for the active ingredient, differentiation is mainly in excipients, stability, delivery system, and packaging.
  • Price pressure: generic competition compresses gross margins and increases volume dependence.
  • Regulatory and safety labeling: sedative and anticholinergic effects require careful age and route restrictions in many jurisdictions, limiting some target populations.

Commercial implications

For business planning, promethazine hydrochloride behaves like a high-volume, low-to-moderate margin generic where:

  • Revenue growth depends on utilization stability and contract wins.
  • Product expansion concentrates on route (IV/IM vs oral), concentration, and ease of procurement.
  • Strategy should emphasize manufacturing reliability, supply continuity, and formulary access rather than blockbuster-like therapeutic innovation.

What market projection is defensible for promethazine hydrochloride?

A credible projection requires at least one of the following: baseline sales by geography, historical volumes/pricing, or a dataset of recent trial launches and generic entry timing. None is included in the prompt. Without those inputs, any numeric forecast would be fabricated.

What can be projected at a non-numeric level, based on typical behavior of established generics:

  • Top-line growth is likely to track population growth and healthcare utilization, with limited real growth due to price compression.
  • Unit volumes can remain stable or grow modestly where antiemetic use is persistent, but revenues usually decline without pricing support.
  • Competitive risk stays concentrated in generic entry and substitution at the formulary level.

How do you position R&D or investment when the drug is off-patent?

With promethazine hydrochloride, the realistic R&D paths typically fall into:

  • Formulation and route improvements (stability, reduced variability, administration convenience).
  • Bioequivalence and interchangeability packages that support broad market access.
  • Clinical utility studies that target a narrower use case for differentiation, usually not new mechanism-of-action claims.

From a diligence perspective, the investment case rests on execution metrics:

  • Manufacturing scale readiness for tenders and hospital procurement cycles
  • Cost of goods and yield in sterile vs non-sterile products
  • Regulatory success rate for generic submissions in priority geographies
  • Tender pricing strategy and distributor relationships

What would a patent and exclusivity screen typically show?

Promethazine hydrochloride is expected to have:

  • No enforceable composition-of-matter protection for the active ingredient in major markets.
  • Potentially limited exclusivity remaining only for specific combinations, specific dosage forms, or specific manufacturing processes in certain jurisdictions, which would be identified through country-by-country patent and regulatory exclusivity searches.

No registry or patent dossier inputs were supplied, so a jurisdiction-specific exclusivity map cannot be stated here without risking incorrect claims.

Key Takeaways

  • Promethazine hydrochloride is an established, widely generic antihistamine/antiemetic with commercially mature use patterns.
  • Clinical activity is most likely concentrated in formulation, comparative, and utilization studies rather than new molecular-innovation programs.
  • Market outcomes are primarily shaped by generic competition, formulary contracting, and procurement reliability.
  • Numeric clinical and market projections cannot be produced accurately from the information provided.

FAQs

  1. Is promethazine hydrochloride still being studied in clinical trials?
    Yes, but most activity typically centers on comparative studies, formulation/bioequivalence, and safety monitoring rather than new mechanism-driven development.

  2. What drives demand for promethazine hydrochloride in hospitals?
    Nausea and vomiting treatment patterns, perioperative practice, and formularies that favor reliable low-cost generics.

  3. How does generic competition affect pricing and margins?
    It compresses pricing and shifts growth toward volume, contract wins, and supply continuity.

  4. Where can differentiation occur for promethazine hydrochloride?
    Route-of-administration options, dosage form stability, excipient optimization, and procurement-focused packaging and availability.

  5. Can a numeric market forecast be made without baseline sales data?
    Not reliably. A defensible projection requires starting revenue/volume and historical pricing or procurement/tender data.

References

[1] U.S. National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov. https://clinicaltrials.gov/
[2] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Orange Book: Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/daf/
[3] World Health Organization. WHO Model List of Essential Medicines (context for established medicines). https://www.who.int/teams/health-product-and-policy-standards/standards-and-specifications/essential-medicines
[4] European Medicines Agency. EPAR and related medicines information. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.