Last Updated: May 11, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR PROCAINE HYDROCHLORIDE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for procaine hydrochloride

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00189384 ↗ Efficacy Study of Community-Based Treatment of Serious Bacterial Infections in Young Infants Unknown status Aga Khan University Phase 3 2003-11-01 Approximately one-third of neonatal deaths in developing countries are due to infections acquired through the birth canal and/or exposure to an unclean environment soon after birth. Current World Health Organization recommendations for the management of infants younger than 2 months of age who have serious bacterial infections involve hospitalization and parenteral therapy for at least 10 days with antibiotic regimens containing penicillin or ampicillin combined with an aminoglycoside.However, in many settings throughout the developing world, this is not currently possible, nor is this standard of care likely to be feasible in the near future. Several studies have reported that for a variety of sociocultural reasons many families are unable or unwilling to access hospital-based care and their sick young infants do not get hospitalized, and instead, receive a variety of home-based antibiotic therapies, or none at all. In our community field sites, approximately 70% of families refuse hospital referral for a sick newborn, despite provision of transport. Thus, there is an urgent need to define the role of community/first-level facility-based care versus hospitalization for the management of young infants with serious bacterial infections, and the potential for community-based parenteral antibiotics as an alternative strategy in resource poor areas with high neonatal mortality rates. Bang and colleagues have demonstrated significant reductions in neonatal mortality from infections in an underdeveloped rural district in Maharashtra, India by a field-based case management approach which used oral cotrimoxazole and intramuscular gentamicin given for 7 days as treatment for neonates with sepsis. This study is an equivalence randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing once daily IM ceftriaxone injection to once daily IM procaine penicillin and gentamicin injection, to once daily intramuscular gentamicin injection and twice daily oral cotrimoxazole, given for 7 days in babies with clinically-diagnosed possible serious bacterial infection (pneumonia, or sepsis with or without local infections such as skin or umbilical infections) whose families refused referral to a hospital. After supplementary informed consent, patients meeting specific inclusion and exclusion criteria are randomly allocated to one of the three regimens being tested. The study hypothesis is that all 3 regimens will perform equally well in the treatment of sepsis in a first-level facility setting.
NCT00299338 ↗ A Dose Response and Safety Study of Procaine HCl in HIV-Infected Patients Completed Samaritan Pharmaceuticals, Inc Phase 1/Phase 2 1997-09-01 This a Phase I/II non-randomized, open-label clinical study of 8 weeks duration using SP01A in HIV positive patients on a stable antiretroviral regimen. Dose response and safety associated with oral administration of four doses (200 mg, 400 mg, 600 mg, and 800 mg daily) of SP01A will be studied in a total of 24 study subjects. In addition, six HIV-negative subjects will be recruited as a control for cortisol secretion only and will not receive study medication.
NCT00299897 ↗ SP01A: The Study of an Oral Entry Inhibitor in Treatment-Experienced HIV Patients Unknown status Samaritan Pharmaceuticals, Inc Phase 2 2006-03-01 This is a 28-day, multi-center, placebo-controlled study designed to look at the dose response, efficacy, and safety of SP01A, given as a pill to be swallowed, in the treatment of HIV-infected subjects. Samaritan has discovered that SP01A affects cholesterol binding, which is directly implicated in the pathogenesis of HIV. It has also been established that drugs of this nature exert an anti-HIV effect in-vitro. These data suggest that SP01A has the potential to reduce HIV virus replication. One measurement of an HIV infected person's risk of progressing to AIDS is the number of viral particles of HIV in their blood (called a "viral load"). This study is designed to see if SP01A will lower the amount of HIV in an infected individual's blood. Patients will be assigned by chance to 1 of 4 groups. Neither the patient nor the study doctor or nurse will know which dose of the study drug the patient is taking or if he/she is receiving the placebo (a capsule that looks like the study drug but does not contain any active ingredient). Study drug administration will continue for 28 days. At the end of the 28-day study, the patient will be offered testing of his/her virus for resistance to approved drugs (genotype).
NCT00844337 ↗ Simplified Antibiotic Regimens for Outpatient Treatment of Suspected Sepsis in Neonates and Young Infants in Bangladesh Completed Dhaka Shishu Hospital N/A 2009-03-01 The primary aim is to establish the non-inferiority of several simplified, home-based antibiotic regimens compared to the standard course of parenteral antibiotics for the empiric treatment of suspected sepsis in Bangladeshi young infants whose parents refuse hospitalization. Three alternative regimens will be compared with a standard (reference) regimen of injectable procaine-benzyl penicillin and gentamicin once daily each for seven days. Alternative regimens are (1) injectable gentamicin once daily and oral amoxicillin twice daily for seven days; (2) injectable penicillin and gentamicin once daily for two days followed by oral amoxicillin twice daily for five days; and (3) injectable gentamicin once daily and oral amoxicillin twice daily for two days followed by oral amoxicillin twice daily for five days. Hypothesis The proportion who fails treatment will be 10 percent in the reference group and the alternative treatment groups. An alternative therapy will be considered non-inferior to the standard therapy if the failure rate in the alternative therapy exceeds the failure rate in the injectable therapy by less than 5 absolute percentage points. Secondary Objectives: - To identify baseline clinical predictors of treatment failure in severe infections in young infants. - To determine the proportion of relapse (young infants who were considered cured by day 7 but developed any of the signs of suspected severe infection by day 14).
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for procaine hydrochloride

Condition Name

Condition Name for procaine hydrochloride
Intervention Trials
Sepsis 3
HIV Infections 2
Infection 1
Cesarean Section 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for procaine hydrochloride
Intervention Trials
Sepsis 3
Toxemia 2
HIV Infections 2
Pain, Postoperative 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for procaine hydrochloride

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for procaine hydrochloride
Location Trials
United States 6
China 2
Pakistan 2
Canada 2
Bangladesh 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for procaine hydrochloride
Location Trials
California 2
Oregon 1
Tennessee 1
Pennsylvania 1
Florida 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for procaine hydrochloride

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for procaine hydrochloride
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE3 1
Phase 4 1
Phase 3 3
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for procaine hydrochloride
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 7
Unknown status 6
Active, not recruiting 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for procaine hydrochloride

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for procaine hydrochloride
Sponsor Trials
Aga Khan University 2
Samaritan Pharmaceuticals, Inc 2
Azidus Brasil 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for procaine hydrochloride
Sponsor Trials
Other 22
Industry 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Procaine hydrochloride Market Analysis and Financial Projection

Last updated: April 30, 2026

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection: Procaine Hydrochloride

Procaine hydrochloride is a local anesthetic with long-standing clinical use. It is available as generic product in multiple jurisdictions; patent estates for new procaine formulations are typically limited and fragmented versus next-generation local anesthetic platforms.

What is the current clinical-trials footprint for procaine hydrochloride?

A comprehensive, current “clinical trials update” requires an authoritative live query of clinical registries (for example, ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO ICTRP) with inclusion criteria set to “procaine hydrochloride” as the intervention and to active/recruiting/completed trials in a defined time window. This response contains no registry-derived trial counts or status splits because no such dataset is provided in the request context.

What is the market structure for procaine hydrochloride today?

Procaine is a mature commodity local anesthetic. Market dynamics are shaped by generic availability, pricing pressure, and regulatory requirements for sterile injectables and local anesthesia dosing guidance.

Competitive structure (typical for mature generics):

  • Generic manufacturers across multiple regions
  • Low differentiation at the API level (procaine hydrochloride)
  • Differentiation drivers limited to formulation presentation (strength, volume), packaging, sterility assurance, and supply reliability

Demand anchors:

  • Procedural local anesthesia in settings that still use older ester-class anesthetics
  • Adjunct regional/peripheral anesthesia practices where supply cost and formulary inclusion favor generics
  • Surgical and dental use in markets where procaine is stocked versus alternatives

Key market constraint:

  • Many geographies have shifted formularies toward lidocaine and other amide-class anesthetics, which can compress procaine pricing and volumes.

What do credible revenue “projections” look like for a mature generic API?

A defensible market projection needs at least one anchor:

  • current global or regional sales (units or value), and
  • forecast inputs (growth, substitution rates, pricing erosion, tender dynamics).

This response provides no numeric projection because no baseline market size, shipment data, pricing indices, or registry-confirmed pipeline exists in the provided context.

Market Model: How procaine hydrochloride typically evolves in a forecast

Even without numeric baselines, the forecast mechanics for procaine generally follow a mature generic pattern:

  1. Price erosion dominates early horizon

    • Ongoing generic competition reduces net pricing
    • Hospital and tender contracts push margins down
  2. Volume growth is constrained by substitution

    • Ester-class use can decline when formularies prefer alternatives (lidocaine/bupivacaine/ropivacaine)
    • Volume can also be stable where procaine is embedded in legacy protocols
  3. Mix effects can offset pricing pressure

    • Sterile injectable presentation improvements
    • Contract manufacturing capacity and supply continuity can win tenders

Is there a patent or exclusivity-driven upside for procaine hydrochloride?

Without a specific patent landscape dataset (application/publication numbers, expiry dates by jurisdiction, and formulation/process claims), no exclusivity-based market upside can be stated accurately.

Actionable business takeaways for R&D and investing

R&D

  • If pursuing differentiation, procaine hydrochloride alone is rarely the differentiator. Competitive advantage would need to be tied to formulation attributes, device delivery, stability, or controlled-release exposure changes. Those would be evidenced by product-specific dossiers and clinical bridging studies, which are not provided here.

Commercial

  • Treat procaine as a cost-driven procurement product.
  • Value capture likely depends on contract tender wins, distribution reach, and reliable sterile manufacturing rather than brand premium.

Portfolio

  • For investors, procaine typically behaves like a mature generic with limited upside unless there is a specific supply disruption, regional tender advantage, or a differentiated downstream product with regulatory exclusivity.

Key Takeaways

  • Procaine hydrochloride is a mature, generic local anesthetic; current clinical-trials and market-size numeric projections cannot be produced without registry and sales baseline inputs.
  • The market is structurally price-competitive and constrained by substitution toward other local anesthetics.
  • Forecasts for procaine generally follow price erosion plus limited volume growth, with mix and tender execution as the main levers.

FAQs

  1. Is procaine hydrochloride still used clinically?
    Yes. It remains used in local anesthesia contexts where older ester-class anesthetics are stocked and protocols support its use.

  2. Does procaine hydrochloride have meaningful pipeline opportunity?
    Pipeline upside depends on product-specific differentiation and regulatory strategy; procaine as a commodity API typically does not generate sustained exclusivity.

  3. What drives market share for procaine generics?
    Tender and formulary inclusion, sterile supply reliability, pricing, and distribution access are the primary drivers.

  4. What is the main risk in projecting procaine sales?
    Substitution effects and pricing erosion in generics constrain revenue growth assumptions.

  5. What would make procaine more investable than a typical generic?
    Evidence of supply constraints, differentiated formulation with data support, or jurisdiction-specific exclusivity that changes competitive dynamics.


References

[1] World Health Organization. International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP). https://trialsearch.who.int/
[2] U.S. National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov. https://clinicaltrials.gov/

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.