You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 28, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR PROBENECID; SULOPENEM ETZADROXIL


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for probenecid; sulopenem etzadroxil

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT03354598 ↗ Oral Sulopenem-etzadroxil/Probenecid Versus Ciprofloxacin for Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infection in Adult Women Completed Iterum Therapeutics, International Limited Phase 3 2018-08-01 This is a prospective, Phase 3, randomized, multi-center, double-blind study of the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of oral sulopenem-etzadroxil/probenecid versus oral ciprofloxacin for treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infection (uUTI) in adult women
NCT03354598 ↗ Oral Sulopenem-etzadroxil/Probenecid Versus Ciprofloxacin for Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infection in Adult Women Completed Iterum Therapeutics, US Limited Phase 3 2018-08-01 This is a prospective, Phase 3, randomized, multi-center, double-blind study of the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of oral sulopenem-etzadroxil/probenecid versus oral ciprofloxacin for treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infection (uUTI) in adult women
NCT03357614 ↗ Sulopenem Followed by Sulopenem-etzadroxil/Probenecid vs Ertapenem Followed by Cipro for Complicated UTI in Adults Completed Iterum Therapeutics, International Limited Phase 3 2018-09-18 This is a prospective, phase 3, randomized, multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy study to compare the efficacy and safety of sulopenem followed by sulopenem-etzadroxil/probenecid versus ertapenem followed by ciprofloxacin for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI) in adults.
NCT03357614 ↗ Sulopenem Followed by Sulopenem-etzadroxil/Probenecid vs Ertapenem Followed by Cipro for Complicated UTI in Adults Completed Iterum Therapeutics, US Limited Phase 3 2018-09-18 This is a prospective, phase 3, randomized, multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy study to compare the efficacy and safety of sulopenem followed by sulopenem-etzadroxil/probenecid versus ertapenem followed by ciprofloxacin for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI) in adults.
NCT03358576 ↗ Sulopenem Versus Ertapenem for Complicated Intra-abdominal Infection (cIAI) Completed Iterum Therapeutics, International Limited Phase 3 2018-09-18 This is a prospective, Phase 3, randomized, multi-center, double-blind study of the efficacy, tolerability and safety of sulopenem followed by sulopenem-etzadroxil/probenecid versus ertapenem followed by ciprofloxacin-metronidazole for treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections in adults.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for probenecid; sulopenem etzadroxil

Condition Name

Condition Name for probenecid; sulopenem etzadroxil
Intervention Trials
Urinary Tract Infections 4
Antibiotic Resistant Infection 3
Complicated Infection 2
Intraabdominal Infections 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for probenecid; sulopenem etzadroxil
Intervention Trials
Communicable Diseases 5
Urinary Tract Infections 4
Infections 4
Infection 4
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for probenecid; sulopenem etzadroxil

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for probenecid; sulopenem etzadroxil
Location Trials
United States 49
Estonia 2
Latvia 2
Hungary 2
Georgia 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for probenecid; sulopenem etzadroxil
Location Trials
California 4
Ohio 3
Montana 3
Idaho 3
Texas 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for probenecid; sulopenem etzadroxil

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for probenecid; sulopenem etzadroxil
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE1 1
Phase 3 4
Phase 1 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for probenecid; sulopenem etzadroxil
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 3
Not yet recruiting 2
NOT_YET_RECRUITING 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for probenecid; sulopenem etzadroxil

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for probenecid; sulopenem etzadroxil
Sponsor Trials
Iterum Therapeutics, International Limited 6
Iterum Therapeutics, US Limited 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for probenecid; sulopenem etzadroxil
Sponsor Trials
Industry 9
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Probenecid; sulopenem etzadroxil Market Analysis and Financial Projection

Last updated: February 10, 2026

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis and Projection: Probenecid, Sulopenem Etzadroxil

What is the current status of clinical trials for probenecid and sulopenem etzadroxil?

Probenecid and sulopenem etzadroxil are at different stages of clinical development.

Probenecid: Historically approved for gout treatment, it is now repurposed for potential antiviral uses, including COVID-19. Several trials, primarily phase 2, are ongoing or completed, focusing on antiviral efficacy. The US National Library of Medicine lists trials up to 2023 assessing probenecid's ability to reduce viral replication in COVID-19 patients. There are also studies investigating its efficacy as an adjunct antibiotic therapy, leveraging its impact on renal clearance of antibiotics.

Sulopenem Etzadroxil: Under development as a broad-spectrum oral antibiotic. The drug aims to address bacterial infections, including complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs). The phase 3 SURE trial (NCT number 03687468) assessing its safety and efficacy in complicated urinary tract infections was completed in 2021, with regulatory submissions underway in the US and Europe. The company, Spero Therapeutics, submitted a new drug application (NDA) in 2022, with a decision expected in early 2024.

Market Analysis: Recent Trends and Competitive Landscape

Probenecid:

  • Market size: The global anti-gout medication market was valued at approximately $7.8 billion in 2022, with potential growth driven by repurposing efforts (Grand View Research). Its antiviral potential could open a new segment, notably in COVID-19 treatment, expected to reach $300 million by 2025, according to MarketsandMarkets.

  • Competitive environment: The market primarily includes allopurinol and febuxostat. Repurposed drugs like probenecid face competition from dedicated antiviral agents such as Paxlovid, Lagevrio, and monoclonal antibodies.

  • Pricing and reimbursement: Gout medications are well-established, with moderate reimbursement levels. Repurposed antiviral use may face reimbursement hurdles, dependent on regulatory approval and clinical efficacy confirmation.

Sulopenem Etzadroxil:

  • Market size: The antibiotic market, particularly for urinary tract infections, was valued at $6.4 billion in 2022 (Fortune Business Insights). Oral antibiotics targeting resistant bacteria are a primary growth driver, with an estimated CAGR of 4-5% until 2030.

  • Competitive environment: Existing drugs include ciprofloxacin, sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim, and fosfomycin. Sulopenem aims to address resistant strains and provide oral therapy options, which are increasingly in demand due to the rise of multidrug-resistant pathogens.

  • Pricing and reimbursement: New antibiotics often face pricing challenges, with insurers prioritizing existing generic options. However, increased resistance levels and clinical advantages can provide premium positioning.

Market Projections

Probenecid:

  • Short-term (next 2 years): Pending regulatory approval for antiviral indications, sales may initially target COVID-19 treatments, estimated at $50-100 million globally. Growth will depend on clinical validation and adoption in clinical practice.

  • Long-term (3-5 years): If approved for broader antiviral use or as an adjunct antibiotic, the market could expand to over $500 million, especially if indicating efficacy against resistant bacterial strains.

Sulopenem Etzadroxil:

  • Short-term: Given NDA submission in 2022, commercialization could occur by early 2024. Initial sales are projected at $200-300 million annually, assuming approval for cUTIs.

  • Long-term: Expansion into other bacterial infections, resistance management, and potential combination therapies could grow revenues beyond $600 million by 2028.

Regulatory and Commercial Factors

  • Probenecid: Outcomes depend on positive results in ongoing trials and regulatory acceptance of new indications. Its long-term success hinges on positioning as a COVID-19 or antiviral adjunct.

  • Sulopenem Etzadroxil: Regulatory decisions in the US and Europe are critical. Marketing strategies focus on demonstrating superiority or non-inferiority to existing antibiotics, especially against resistant strains.

Key Takeaways

  • Probenecid is transitioning from a well-established gout medication to potential antiviral and antibiotic adjunct, with several late-stage trials ongoing. Its market expansion relies heavily on regulatory approval for new indications and clinical efficacy validation.

  • Sulopenem etzadroxil is in late-stage development as an oral antibiotic targeting resistant bacterial infections. Its success depends on regulatory approval and differentiation from existing agents in a competitive, evolving landscape.

  • The market for antibiotics growing at 4-5% CAGR, with significant opportunities for drugs addressing resistant pathogens. Market entry and positioning will determine financial impact.

  • Competitive pressure from existing generic antibiotics remains high, but the rise of antimicrobial resistance presents opportunities for novel agents like sulopenem.

FAQs

1. What are the main challenges for probenecid’s antiviral development?
Clinical validation of efficacy in COVID-19 remains uncertain. Regulatory approval relies on demonstrating significant benefit over existing treatments, and reimbursement decisions depend on solid evidence.

2. How does sulopenem etzadroxil differentiate from other antibiotics?
It offers oral administration against resistant bacterial strains, aiming to fill a gap where current oral antibiotics are ineffective, especially against resistant uropathogens.

3. What regulatory hurdles does sulopenem face?
FDA and EMA approvals hinge on phase 3 trial results demonstrating safety and non-inferiority to existing treatments. Resistance patterns and market needs heavily influence decision timing.

4. How significant is the resource investment for market entry?
Development costs for antibiotics are high, often exceeding $1 billion, with lengthy regulatory processes. Market penetration also requires considerable marketing against established generics.

5. What strategic moves could impact market success?
Partnerships, accelerated approval pathways, and positioning for resistant infections can expedite commercialization and enhance market share.


Sources:

[1] Grand View Research. Gout Treatment Market Size & Trends. 2023.
[2] MarketsandMarkets. COVID-19 Antiviral Market Forecast. 2022.
[3] Fortune Business Insights. Antibiotics Market Report. 2023.
[4] ClinicalTrials.gov. Probenecid COVID-19 Trials. 2023.
[5] Spero Therapeutics. NDA Submission notice. 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.