Last Updated: August 8, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR PREDNISOLONE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


505(b)(2) Clinical Trials for prednisolone

This table shows clinical trials for potential 505(b)(2) applications. See the next table for all clinical trials
Trial Type Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
New Combination NCT00373815 ↗ Everolimus in Combination With Cyclosporine A and Prednisolone for the Treatment of Graft Versus Host Disease Terminated University Hospital Tuebingen Phase 1 2006-09-01 The present protocol is a dose-finding and toxicity study in preparation of a randomised study comparing current standard treatment CSA/prednisolone with the new combination CSA/prednisolone/everolimus.
New Combination NCT01884428 ↗ Study of Combination of PIGEV Before Autologous Stem Cell Transplant in Patients With Hodgkin's Lymphoma Unknown status Armando Santoro, MD Phase 1 2011-07-01 study to assess maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety, tolerability and activity of IGEV (Ifosfamide, Gemcitabine,Vinorelbine, Prednisolone) + Panobinostat new combination in order to determine the recommended phase II dose
New Indication NCT05283954 ↗ Use of a Combined Regimen of Fluoxetine, Prednisolone and Ivermectin in the Treatment of Mild COVID-19 to Prevent Disease Progression Progression in Papua New Guinea Not yet recruiting Fundación FLS de Lucha Contra el Sida, las Enfermedades Infecciosas y la Promoción de la Salud y la Ciencia Phase 2/Phase 3 2022-05-01 The Fluo-Pred-Iver clinical trial will test the efficacy of a combined regimen of Fluoxetine, Prednisolone and Ivermectin (Fluo-Pred-Iver), as treatment for ambulatory patients with mild COVID-19. The overarching idea of the work proposed herein is to investigate the use of Fluo-Pred-Iver to treat COVID-19, conducting a randomized controlled clinical trial to evaluate a new indication for these widely available drugs. It is estimated to include 954 participants.
>Trial Type >Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

All Clinical Trials for prednisolone

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00000138 ↗ Herpetic Eye Disease Study (HEDS) I Unknown status National Eye Institute (NEI) Phase 3 1989-05-01 To evaluate the efficacy of topical corticosteroids in treating herpes simplex stromal keratitis in conjunction with topical trifluridine. To evaluate the efficacy of oral acyclovir in treating herpes simplex stromal keratitis in patients receiving concomitant topical corticosteroids and trifluridine. To evaluate the efficacy of oral acyclovir in treating herpes simplex iridocyclitis in conjunction with treatment with topical corticosteroids and trifluridine.
NCT00000730 ↗ Comparison of Three Treatments for Pneumocystis Pneumonia in AIDS Patients Terminated National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Phase 3 1969-12-31 This study compares three different therapies for treatment of refractory Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP) in patients with AIDS. "Refractory" means that the patient has failed to respond to at least 4 days of treatment with either of two standard therapies: (1) sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim (SMX/TMP) or (2) pentamidine (PEN). This study compares therapy with trimetrexate (TMTX) and leucovorin (LCV) to standard therapy and standard therapy plus high-dose steroids (methylprednisolone). The purpose is to find better and safer forms of treatment for PCP in AIDS patients. There is at present no scientific information about the best treatment for an AIDS patient with PCP who is not improving while receiving the standard therapies (SMX/TMP or PEN). New drug treatments are available, including steroid therapy and TMTX, but there is no information proving that these new treatments work better than the standard therapies.
NCT00001409 ↗ Genetically Modified Lymphocytes to Treat HIV-Infected Identical Twins - Study Modifications Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Phase 1 1994-09-01 Certain patients enrolled in NIH protocol 94-I-0206 at the Clinical Center may be eligible to participate in one or more of the following new options: - Donor/recipient extension phase - Both the recipient (HIV-infected twin) and donor (non-infected twin) will participate in this extension of the CD4-zeta gene therapy study. It will evaluate the safety and activity of infusing gene-modified CD4+ cells as well as the modified CD8+ cells. - Corticosteroid administration - A corticosteroid, such as prednisone, hydrocortisone or prednisolone, will be added to the interleukin-2 (IL-2) regimen for preventing or treating side effects of IL-2 such as fever and other flu-like symptoms. - Extended follow-up - A more intensive follow-up will be scheduled for patients with substantial numbers of lymphocytes that harbor the CD4-zeta gene. Every 3 months, participants will have blood tests and specialized tests of CD4 counts, HIV-1 viral load and numbers of circulating cells containing the CD4-zeta gene every 3 months> the frequency of follow-up visits may be reduced as time goes by. - IL-2 continuation - Participants will continue to receive periodic treatment with IL-2 to see how long the genetically modified cells persist in the bloodstream and to evaluate the long-term response to IL-2. - Home treatment with interleukin-2 - Participants may receive future IL-2 treatment cycles at home. Home treatment involves less frequent data and safety monitoring and no medical evaluations at the Clinical Center except at the beginning of each cycle.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for prednisolone

Condition Name

Condition Name for prednisolone
Intervention Trials
Lymphoma 33
Asthma 21
Prostate Cancer 20
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for prednisolone
Intervention Trials
Lymphoma 105
Prostatic Neoplasms 47
Leukemia 39
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for prednisolone

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for prednisolone
Location Trials
United Kingdom 265
Japan 146
Canada 142
Germany 139
China 134
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for prednisolone
Location Trials
California 76
New York 63
Texas 58
Ohio 49
Florida 48
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for prednisolone

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for prednisolone
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 19
PHASE3 12
PHASE2 23
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for prednisolone
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 335
Recruiting 175
Unknown status 112
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for prednisolone

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for prednisolone
Sponsor Trials
GlaxoSmithKline 24
Hoffmann-La Roche 17
National Cancer Institute (NCI) 14
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for prednisolone
Sponsor Trials
Other 1108
Industry 319
NIH 32
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Prednisolone Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Exclusivity/Patent Projection (2026)

Last updated: July 28, 2026

What is the current clinical trial landscape for prednisolone?

Prednisolone is a widely used oral corticosteroid (and active ingredient in multiple ophthalmic, otic, and anti-inflammatory combination products). Clinical trial activity is concentrated in (1) new formulations (including ophthalmic delivery systems), (2) pediatric and dosing optimization, and (3) trials positioned for label expansions in inflammatory indications.

What to expect in a 2026 readout pattern

  • Sponsor-heavy trials focus on local delivery or alternative regimens, not new systemic corticosteroid mechanisms.
  • Trials are more likely to be smaller, formulation or comparative in design.
  • Regulatory filings tend to follow “bridging” or comparative endpoints for bioavailability and local pharmacodynamic activity rather than full novel mechanism studies.

Clinical trial types most likely to be active

  • Reformulation: taste-masked or pediatric-friendly oral presentations; controlled-release variants (where pursued).
  • Local therapy: ophthalmic or otic prednisolone acetate formulations in inflammation-related indications.
  • Pediatrics: dosing studies and safety/efficacy in narrower age bands.
  • Switch/regimen trials: shortened tapers, equivalent steroid exposure arms, or real-world adherence studies.

Key implication for R&D investors

  • The probability-weighted ROI is tied to differentiation via formulation, delivery system, or specific label niches, not “new prednisolone” innovation.

Which indications drive prednisolone demand and phase-out risk?

Prednisolone demand is driven by breadth of established use: anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive therapy across allergic, respiratory, dermatologic, gastrointestinal, hematologic, rheumatologic, and ophthalmic inflammatory pathways. Because the active ingredient is long genericized, demand is driven by:

  • Standard-of-care inclusion in treatment algorithms
  • Pediatric and rescue use (where dosing flexibility matters)
  • Formulary retention and switch costs at payers
  • Availability of brand-linked combination products (for specific ocular/otic regimens)

Exclusivity profile impacts indication-level dynamics

  • For systemic prednisolone, brand-level exclusivity is structurally limited today due to generic availability.
  • For ophthalmic prednisolone acetate and combinations, product-level intellectual property can still affect substitution timing.

What is the commercial market for prednisolone in the US and EU?

Prednisolone market dynamics are dominated by low-cost generics. Profit pools concentrate in:

  • Brand-protected combination products (when present)
  • Patent-protected formulations (where still active)
  • Channels where pharmacists can substitute less freely (pediatric dosing forms, specific strengths, local products)

Market structure

  • Systemic: primarily generic tablets and liquid suspensions
  • Ophthalmic: prednisolone acetate eye drops (often in generic competition, with some product-level variation)
  • Combination products: where prednisolone is paired with antibiotics or other actives (market segmentation matters)

Competitive outcome

  • Price compression is expected for systemic prednisolone, with mild stabilization only where reimbursement or supply constraints create temporary lock-in.

How strong is prednisolone’s IP landscape and what patents still matter?

At the active ingredient level, prednisolone is long off innovator exclusivity in most major markets. Value now rests on:

  • Formulation patents (particle size, solubilization, suspension stability, viscosity control)
  • Delivery system patents (ocular residence time improvements, tear-film residence, depot concepts)
  • Method-of-use patents (specific dosing schedules, disease subsets, steroid-sparing regimens) where still present
  • Brand-specific product packaging/combination patents

What matters for “How strong is the patent estate?”

  • Prednisolone’s core molecule claims rarely drive current blocking positions.
  • The actionable patent estate is product-level: specific dosage forms and specific strengths.

Actionable diligence target

  • In any prednisolone business case, the key is mapping patent protection by dosage form and route: oral systemic versus ophthalmic versus combination products.

When does prednisolone lose exclusivity and what is the practical generic entry window?

For systemic prednisolone tablets/liquids: exclusivity is generally not a gating constraint for new generics. For ophthalmic and combination products: exclusivity and Orange Book-related protections can still delay AB-rated substitution depending on current listings.

Practical entry timing for generics

  • If a prednisolone product is already widely genericized, launch risk is low but pricing is pressured.
  • If a specific prednisolone ophthalmic presentation remains under formulation-related patent protection, Paragraph IV strategies (where applicable) can be relevant, but settlement dynamics tend to reflect that the market is low-margin.

Business projection lens

  • New entrants usually pursue:
    • Differentiated product-level patents (to avoid immediate price collapse), or
    • Manufacturing or supply-chain advantages (to win tender formularies)

What is the Orange Book status of prednisolone products?

Orange Book protection is product- and label-specific. The active ingredient prednisolone itself does not imply a single uniform Orange Book posture.

What to check in Orange Book for prednisolone

  • Drug product active ingredient entries for each route (oral vs ophthalmic)
  • Listed patents by formulation and method-of-use
  • Patent expiration dates
  • Whether any patents are Orange Book-listed for the specific dosage form and strength of interest

Commercial consequence

  • Orange Book status determines whether an FDA-approved generic can be immediately marketed at launch or whether it must wait for patent expiry or obtain an effective paragraph IV outcome.

What prednisolone clinical trial readouts could change labels in 2026?

Label changes for prednisolone typically follow one of three paths:

  1. Pediatric expansions: safety and efficacy data for age bands and dosing regimens.
  2. Local delivery improvements: dosing frequency adjustments or improved tolerability endpoints in ophthalmic inflammation.
  3. Comparative regimen studies: equivalency claims that support formulary adoption (for example, shorter tapers with similar outcomes).

Likelihood ranking for 2026

  • Higher probability: pediatric regimen or tolerability updates; formulation equivalency with bridging packages.
  • Lower probability: new mechanism-of-action claims (rare for a core corticosteroid without a differentiated delivery and novel endpoint).

What patent litigation affects prednisolone generics and biosimilar risk?

Prednisolone is a small-molecule corticosteroid, so biosimilar risk does not apply. Litigation, where present, is usually tied to:

  • Product formulation patents
  • Method-of-use schedules
  • Combination product patents (prednisolone paired with other actives)

Typical litigation effect in low-cost small molecules

  • Settlement agreements often reflect near-term market timing rather than large damages.
  • The main commercial impact is delayed competition in a specific dosage form, not across the entire prednisolone universe.

How does prednisolone compare with other corticosteroids in clinical development and market value?

In clinical development, prednisolone generally competes with:

  • Other oral corticosteroids (prednisone, dexamethasone)
  • Inhaled corticosteroids (different route, different market segments)
  • Ophthalmic steroid alternatives (differences in ocular penetration and adverse effect profiles)

Market-level comparison

  • Prednisolone systemic value is capped by generic competition.
  • Advantage may exist in formulation-specific niches and dosing flexibility.
  • Comparative differentiation tends to show up in specific presentation selection (pediatric-friendly suspensions, ocular drops with improved tolerability).

Market analysis and projection for prednisolone (2026-2031)

Base case projection (systemic prednisolone)

  • Volume is stable to modestly declining depending on guideline shifts and substitution to alternate steroids where clinically equivalent.
  • Revenue growth is primarily inflation and mix (strengths, package size, substitution frictions), not premium pricing.

Upside case

  • Short-term lift from supply normalization or payer contract cycles for specific strengths.
  • Local delivery growth where ophthalmic formulations maintain differentiated tolerability or compliance advantages.

Downside case

  • Continued price compression for oral generic products.
  • Increased payer substitution and tender standardization reduces margin further.

Forecast drivers

  • Contracting and tender cycles
  • Patent expiry of any specific ophthalmic or combination products
  • Supply disruptions and manufacturing capacity
  • Pediatric uptake where dosing forms are well aligned with formularies

Commercial projection framework for businesses

  • If the thesis is “new entry into systemic prednisolone”: focus on cost and supply chain; price competition dominates.
  • If the thesis is “product value capture”: focus on ophthalmic/combination differentiation and patentable formulation durability.

Key tables

1) Market segment map for prednisolone

Segment Main products Differentiation levers Main IP risk (if any) Commercial driver
Oral systemic Tablets, oral solution/suspension Pediatric dosing, taste masking, stability, packaging Low at API level; product-level depends on current listings Formularies and tender pricing
Ophthalmic Prednisolone acetate eye drops Viscosity, suspension stability, drop size consistency, dosing frequency Product-level formulation/method-of-use Prescribing habits and payer substitution
Combination products Prednisolone + antibiotic/other actives Fixed-dose regimen convenience Combination patents, method-of-use Indication fit and contract volume

2) Exclusivity and entry logic (practical)

Question Typical outcome for prednisolone Business implication
Can a systemic generic launch without waiting? Usually yes because core molecule exclusivity is long expired Compete on manufacturing and cost
Do product-level patents block ophthalmic/combination entry? Can, depending on current Orange Book listings Launch planning must map dosage form/strength
Does biosimilar risk exist? No None for prednisolone
Does Paragraph IV matter? Only for specific Orange Book-listed products Litigation and settlements are product-specific

Key Takeaways

  • Prednisolone clinical activity in 2026 is most likely concentrated in formulation, pediatric regimen optimization, and local delivery label refinements rather than new mechanisms.
  • Commercial growth is constrained by systemic generic competition; revenue lift depends on mix, contracting, and product presentation advantages.
  • IP value is product-level, especially for ophthalmic and combination prednisolone products where formulation or method-of-use patents can still influence substitution timing.
  • Biosimilar risk is not applicable; litigation risk is generally tied to specific dosage forms rather than the core active ingredient.

FAQs

  1. Which prednisolone dosage forms have the highest formulation IP leverage (oral vs ophthalmic)?
  2. What are the most common endpoints in prednisolone formulation and pediatric clinical trials?
  3. How do payer tender cycles typically affect prednisolone pricing in the US?
  4. What product-level patents most often drive settlements for prednisolone generic challenges?
  5. How should a company model time-to-market for a prednisolone ophthalmic generic under Orange Book constraints?

References

  1. FDA Orange Book: Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations. U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
  2. ClinicalTrials.gov. U.S. National Library of Medicine.
  3. FDA Guidance for Industry: Bioavailability and Bioequivalence Studies for Nasal Spray and Transdermal Delivery Systems (for topical formulation context where applicable). U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
  4. FDA Guidance for Industry: Bioavailability and Bioequivalence Studies for Orally Administered Drug Products. U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.