Last Updated: June 7, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR PRAVASTATIN SODIUM


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for pravastatin sodium

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00000941 ↗ A Study on Possible Interactions Between Protease Inhibitors (Anti-HIV Drugs) and Drugs Which Lower the Level of Fat in Your Blood Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Phase 1 1969-12-31 The purpose of this study is to find out whether taking protease inhibitors (anti-HIV drugs) together with lipid-lowering drugs (drugs which lower the amount of fat in the blood) has an effect on the level of drugs found in the blood compared to when these drugs are taken separately. The three protease inhibitors given in this study are ritonavir, saquinavir, and nelfinavir. The lipid-lowering drugs given are pravastatin, simvastatin, and atorvastatin. Anti-HIV drug therapy using protease inhibitors has become very common treatment for HIV-positive patients. Recently, however, serious side effects involving how the body uses fat have been reported in people taking protease inhibitors. Examples of these side effects are redistribution of body fat and development of diabetes. People taking protease inhibitors have been found to have higher levels of fat in their blood than is normal, which can cause heart problems. It is hoped that giving lipid-lowering drugs can help prevent serious heart problems. First, however, it is important to see what happens when protease inhibitors and lipid-lowering drugs are given together.
NCT00006412 ↗ Safety and Effectiveness of Fenofibrate and Pravastatin in HIV-Positive Patients With Abnormal Blood Lipids Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Phase 3 1969-12-31 The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and effectiveness of fenofibrate and pravastatin in treating HIV-positive patients who have abnormal levels of fat (lipids) in the blood. Increased lipids in the blood associated with HIV infection and anti-HIV drugs is a growing problem. The drugs used in this study are known to reduce certain lipids, but little is known about their safety and effectiveness. This study will see if one of the drugs is safer and more effective than the other, or if combining the drugs is the safest and most effective way to lower lipids. This study has been changed. On June 26, 2001, this study was reviewed by the Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB). The DSMB is an independent board monitoring the progress of the study. The review showed that neither pravastatin nor fenofibrate alone were effective in reaching all the cholesterol and triglyceride goals. There were no safety concerns. It is not known if the combination of fenofibrate and pravastatin is effective and safe. Therefore, it is important to continue this study.
NCT00017758 ↗ The Effect of Efavirenz and Nelfinavir on the Blood Levels of Certain Lipid-Lowering Drugs Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Phase 1 1969-12-31 The purpose of this study is to find out whether certain anti-HIV drugs (efavirenz [EFV] and nelfinavir [NFV]) affect the amount of certain fat-lowering drugs (atorvastatin, pravastatin, and simvastatin) in the blood. Protease inhibitors (PIs), a type of anti-HIV drug, are known to cause increased lipids (fats) in the blood of HIV-infected patients. EFV also is known to increase blood fats. HIV-infected patients who take PIs and/or EFV may need to take fat-lowering drugs to correct this problem. So it is important to look at possible drug interactions when these drugs are taken together. This study will see if taking EFV or NFV, a protease inhibitor, affects the blood level of simvastatin, atorvastatin, or pravastatin (all fat-lowering drugs). To obtain results more quickly, the study population will be healthy HIV-negative volunteers.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for pravastatin sodium

Condition Name

Condition Name for pravastatin sodium
Intervention Trials
Healthy 6
HIV Infections 4
Adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia With 11q23 (MLL) Abnormalities 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for pravastatin sodium
Intervention Trials
HIV Infections 4
Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute 3
Leukemia, Myeloid 3
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for pravastatin sodium

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for pravastatin sodium
Location Trials
United States 83
Canada 7
Greece 5
United Kingdom 3
Puerto Rico 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for pravastatin sodium
Location Trials
Washington 6
California 6
Maryland 5
New York 4
Colorado 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for pravastatin sodium

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for pravastatin sodium
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 1
Phase 4 5
Phase 3 4
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for pravastatin sodium
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 23
Recruiting 3
Active, not recruiting 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for pravastatin sodium

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for pravastatin sodium
Sponsor Trials
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) 4
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA 4
National Cancer Institute (NCI) 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for pravastatin sodium
Sponsor Trials
Other 27
Industry 15
NIH 9
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Pravastatin Sodium: Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis and 2026-2035 Projection

Last updated: April 24, 2026

Pravastatin sodium is an established, off-patent statin with extensive clinical documentation and a mature, highly competitive global market. Near-term demand is driven by guideline-based secondary prevention, generic penetration, and switching from branded statins rather than by new therapeutic differentiation. Pipeline activity exists primarily as incremental formulations, dosing studies, and comparative effectiveness work rather than as new mechanism innovation. Market growth over the next decade is expected to be modest and value growth will lag unit growth in most regions because pricing compresses with generics and payer pressure.

What is the current clinical-trials landscape for pravastatin sodium?

How much trial activity is ongoing?

Pravastatin sodium trial activity is dominated by:

  • Comparative effectiveness and real-world evidence studies of statin strategies
  • Subgroup and adherence studies in secondary prevention
  • Safety and tolerability studies tied to long-term use
  • Studies in special populations (for example, elderly and co-morbid patients)

A key constraint for interpreting “clinical-trials momentum” is that pravastatin is not a new biological entity. Most new studies aim to answer operational and comparative questions in routine care rather than to support first-in-class mechanism claims.

What do the core clinical claims still rest on?

Pravastatin’s clinical foundation is long-established and anchored by:

  • Large outcomes trials demonstrating cardiovascular event reduction with LDL lowering and risk reduction in high-risk populations
  • Safety data supporting long-term use

A current update on the “what” of efficacy still maps to the statin class benefit model: lowering LDL cholesterol reduces major adverse cardiovascular events. This class-consistent framework shapes how new trials are designed (endpoints often center on lipids, adherence, and safety signals in real-world or comparative settings).

Which trial types are most relevant to investors and R&D planners?

Comparative effectiveness rather than new mechanism

Because pravastatin’s mechanism is mature, most new evidence is structured around:

  • Head-to-head comparisons with other statins (effect on LDL reduction, muscle symptoms, discontinuation)
  • Switching strategies (tolerability-driven changes across statins)
  • Payer-relevant endpoints like adherence and persistence

Safety monitoring in routine use

Pravastatin’s long use history reduces the “discovery” role of new trials, but safety monitoring remains central:

  • Muscle-related adverse events (reporting rate, discontinuation)
  • Liver enzyme monitoring practices
  • Drug-drug interaction management in polypharmacy populations

Special-population evidence

Additional studies often target populations with higher clinical complexity:

  • Older adults
  • Patients with multiple comorbidities
  • Patients on concomitant medications that raise interaction concerns

What is the current market structure for pravastatin sodium?

How is the market segmented?

The pravastatin market is effectively segmented into:

  • Generic volume: dominant share globally due to patent expiration dynamics and market normalization
  • Branded residues: limited, regionally dependent
  • Channel mix: retail and chronic disease management programs where statins are standard of care

What drives demand?

Demand drivers remain consistent:

  • Prevalence and treatment coverage of cardiovascular disease
  • Guideline adherence for secondary prevention and high-risk primary prevention
  • Clinician preference for statins with tolerability and interaction profiles

What constrains growth?

Growth constraints are structural:

  • Generic competition and price erosion
  • Substitution toward other statins with perceived cost-benefit advantages under formularies
  • Intensification of lipid-lowering strategies (higher-potency statins and combination therapy) in some regions

Market analysis: where does pravastatin sodium fit by geography?

North America

Pravastatin is widely used as a generic statin. Market value is pressured by low-cost generics and payer formularies that steer preferred statins where possible. Growth is expected to be largely unit-driven, with modest value growth.

Europe

Europe shows high statin penetration and strong use of generic medicines. Forecasts typically show slower value growth due to price regulation and ongoing generic competition. Volumes remain supported by secondary prevention uptake.

Asia-Pacific

Asia-Pacific has the strongest long-term volume opportunity because of demographic aging and expanding cardiovascular prevention programs. Pricing pressure still caps value growth, but unit growth can be resilient.

Rest of World

Middle-income markets show mixed reimbursement structures. Growth is typically supported by increasing detection and treatment of hyperlipidemia, with value constrained by local pricing and generic availability.

What is the realistic 2026-2035 growth profile?

Pravastatin’s profile is that of an off-patent, guideline-class statin. The relevant forecast is therefore not “new uptake,” but:

  • how much incremental patient population gets treated
  • how well pravastatin retains share against other generics and formulary preferences
  • how fast pricing declines in each region

Projection methodology (market mechanics, not breakthrough assumptions)

A practical forecasting model for off-patent statins treats demand as the product of:

  • Treated patient population growth (epidemiology and screening)
  • Adherence and persistence (treatment continuation rates)
  • Market share retention versus other statins
  • Price trend for generics in the region

Because the drug is off-patent, the largest uncertainty is share retention under formulary management and the pace of price erosion.

2026-2035 market projection (base-case)

The projection below uses an “off-patent statin” growth logic: moderate unit growth, slower value growth, and no premium pricing tailwind.

Global outlook

  • Units: low-to-mid single-digit CAGR range in the base case, with Asia-Pacific contributing the majority of incremental volume.
  • Value: mid-single digit below unit growth, with value CAGR typically low single digits globally due to pricing pressure.

Regional outlook

  • North America: stable volumes with slight growth; value growth minimal because generic pricing compresses.
  • Europe: stable to modest volume growth; value growth constrained by tendering and reference pricing.
  • Asia-Pacific: highest volume CAGR potential; value CAGR still muted by generics and local pricing controls.
  • Rest of World: modest volume growth with uneven value growth tied to reimbursement maturation.

Competitive positioning: what matters in formularies?

Payer decision factors

For pravastatin, payer preference is influenced by:

  • Copay and net price (generic acquisition cost and rebate structures)
  • Formulary placement and step therapy rules
  • Clinical criteria for statin intolerance or specific interaction risk

Clinical positioning

Clinicians keep pravastatin in the therapeutic set when:

  • Patients have tolerability issues with other statins
  • Drug-drug interaction risk is a concern
  • A conservative lipid-lowering approach is preferred for specific patients

Key implications for R&D and investment

What is the highest-value “clinical” work for an off-patent statin?

The highest ROI evidence categories are:

  • Real-world comparative effectiveness and adherence studies tied to health-economic outcomes
  • Pharmacovigilance strengthening and subgroup safety profiling
  • Formulation work that improves persistence or reduces switching (only if it changes adherence economics)

What is the likely path of commercialization?

Commercialization is expected to remain a generic scale business with:

  • label expansions that broaden use in practice settings (if any occur)
  • formulation lifecycle optimization
  • tender and reimbursement strategy rather than new clinical differentiation

Key Takeaways

  • Pravastatin sodium is a mature off-patent statin with trial activity focused on comparative effectiveness, safety in routine care, and operational questions like adherence.
  • Market growth to 2035 should track treated-population growth more than innovation because differentiation is limited and pricing is pressured by generics.
  • The base case is modest global value growth with stronger unit growth, led by Asia-Pacific volume expansion and constrained by formulary switching dynamics in mature markets.
  • The main strategic levers are reimbursement access, retention of formulary share versus other statins, and evidence that supports tolerability and persistence in real-world care.

FAQs

1) Is pravastatin sodium still actively studied in clinical trials?
Yes. Current studies generally focus on comparative effectiveness, safety, adherence, and special-population evidence rather than new mechanism claims.

2) What drives demand for pravastatin rather than new clinical breakthroughs?
Guideline-based secondary prevention, continued statin adherence in chronic care, and expanded treatment coverage for hyperlipidemia.

3) How do generic dynamics affect market value forecasts?
They compress net pricing and cap value growth, so projections typically show value growth lagging unit growth.

4) Where is growth most likely to come from through 2035?
From expanding treated populations in Asia-Pacific, with North America and Europe contributing more to stabilization than to acceleration.

5) What evidence types matter most for competitive advantage?
Real-world outcomes, tolerability comparisons, persistence/adherence analytics, and health-economic endpoints tied to payer decision-making.


References

[1] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Drug Approval Packages: Pravachol (pravastatin sodium). FDA access data.
[2] Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Collaboration. Efficacy and safety of statin therapy: meta-analyses and pooled outcomes evidence (class effects).
[3] World Health Organization. Cardiovascular disease risk and prevention guidance and burden context for treated prevalence.
[4] American Heart Association / American College of Cardiology. Cholesterol management guideline framework and risk-based statin use.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.