You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: April 1, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR PRAVASTATIN SODIUM


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for pravastatin sodium

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00000941 ↗ A Study on Possible Interactions Between Protease Inhibitors (Anti-HIV Drugs) and Drugs Which Lower the Level of Fat in Your Blood Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Phase 1 1969-12-31 The purpose of this study is to find out whether taking protease inhibitors (anti-HIV drugs) together with lipid-lowering drugs (drugs which lower the amount of fat in the blood) has an effect on the level of drugs found in the blood compared to when these drugs are taken separately. The three protease inhibitors given in this study are ritonavir, saquinavir, and nelfinavir. The lipid-lowering drugs given are pravastatin, simvastatin, and atorvastatin. Anti-HIV drug therapy using protease inhibitors has become very common treatment for HIV-positive patients. Recently, however, serious side effects involving how the body uses fat have been reported in people taking protease inhibitors. Examples of these side effects are redistribution of body fat and development of diabetes. People taking protease inhibitors have been found to have higher levels of fat in their blood than is normal, which can cause heart problems. It is hoped that giving lipid-lowering drugs can help prevent serious heart problems. First, however, it is important to see what happens when protease inhibitors and lipid-lowering drugs are given together.
NCT00006412 ↗ Safety and Effectiveness of Fenofibrate and Pravastatin in HIV-Positive Patients With Abnormal Blood Lipids Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Phase 3 1969-12-31 The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and effectiveness of fenofibrate and pravastatin in treating HIV-positive patients who have abnormal levels of fat (lipids) in the blood. Increased lipids in the blood associated with HIV infection and anti-HIV drugs is a growing problem. The drugs used in this study are known to reduce certain lipids, but little is known about their safety and effectiveness. This study will see if one of the drugs is safer and more effective than the other, or if combining the drugs is the safest and most effective way to lower lipids. This study has been changed. On June 26, 2001, this study was reviewed by the Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB). The DSMB is an independent board monitoring the progress of the study. The review showed that neither pravastatin nor fenofibrate alone were effective in reaching all the cholesterol and triglyceride goals. There were no safety concerns. It is not known if the combination of fenofibrate and pravastatin is effective and safe. Therefore, it is important to continue this study.
NCT00017758 ↗ The Effect of Efavirenz and Nelfinavir on the Blood Levels of Certain Lipid-Lowering Drugs Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Phase 1 1969-12-31 The purpose of this study is to find out whether certain anti-HIV drugs (efavirenz [EFV] and nelfinavir [NFV]) affect the amount of certain fat-lowering drugs (atorvastatin, pravastatin, and simvastatin) in the blood. Protease inhibitors (PIs), a type of anti-HIV drug, are known to cause increased lipids (fats) in the blood of HIV-infected patients. EFV also is known to increase blood fats. HIV-infected patients who take PIs and/or EFV may need to take fat-lowering drugs to correct this problem. So it is important to look at possible drug interactions when these drugs are taken together. This study will see if taking EFV or NFV, a protease inhibitor, affects the blood level of simvastatin, atorvastatin, or pravastatin (all fat-lowering drugs). To obtain results more quickly, the study population will be healthy HIV-negative volunteers.
NCT00039663 ↗ Endothelial Dysfunction as a Risk Factor in HIV Study Completed National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (CC) Phase 1 2002-05-01 Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) has proven effective in altering the natural history of HIV infection in many patients. However, this therapy may not be sustainable because of the toxicities of the medications. Evidence suggests that HIV-infected patients on HAART may be at risk for premature coronary artery disease. The exact cause is unknown. It is possible that the medications directly affect the endothelium (the lining of the arteries that supply blood to the heart) and lead to premature heart disease. Or because the medications cause lipid abnormalities (high cholesterol) and a condition of relative insulin resistance, in which the body has a difficult time processing sugars; known risk factors for endothelial dysfunction and heart disease. Therapeutic intervention that reverses these lipid abnormalities and/or insulin resistance may lower these risk factors, normalize endothelial function, and decrease the risk of heart disease. This protocol aims to assess endothelial function among a group of HIV-infected patients with varying degrees of viral activity and levels of immune function on a variety of HAART regimens. It also aims to evaluate the effect of three different medications on lipids, insulin resistance, and thus endothelial function. Understanding the factors involved in causing endothelial dysfunction will help better characterize the relative risks and benefits of early versus late and continuous versus intermittent HAART therapy. The research may offer some insights into the causes of premature heart disease among HIV-infected patients on HAART that could be more thoroughly investigated in subsequent clinical trials. A total of 75 patients will be recruited: 25 for each arm of the study. Each arm evaluates the potential benefit of a particular medication and will enroll sequentially. An endothelial function test will be performed on an outpatient basis. The first 25 patients will be assigned at random to receive pravastatin sodium or placebo; the next 25 will receive gemfibrozil or placebo; the final 25 will receive rosiglitazone or placebo. Patients will take the pills for 6 weeks, no pills for the next 4 weeks, and then the opposite treatment for 6 more weeks. Two weeks after the start of the study drug, blood will be taken to check for potential toxic side effects. After each 6-week treatment, blood will be drawn and endothelial function tests will be performed.
NCT00232882 ↗ Pharmacodynamic Influences of Candesartan, Atenolol, Hydrochlorothiazide and Drug Combinations in Hypertensive Patients. Completed Ottawa Hospital Research Institute Phase 4 2003-12-01 Angiotensin receptor antagonists (ARA), beta-blockers and diuretics do not seem to confer equivalent cardiovascular protection in hard outcomes clinical trials (beta blockers inferior). These results may be explained by differences in their effects on sympathetic activity, oxidative stress, inflammation and renin angiotensin system activation. How diuretic addition to first line therapy with ARAs and beta-blockers modulates neurohumoral and hemodynamic parameters is not well understood. The main hypothesis of this study is that an ARA (candesartan) combined or not with a diuretic will not increase sympathetic activity as much as a beta blocker (atenolol). Secondary hypothesis are of similar nature but relate to hemodynamic parameters, oxidative stress markers, inflammatory markers, or the renin angiotensin system. The main objective of this study is to assess and compare the effects of candesartan and atenolol and their combination with low dose diuretic therapy on the autonomic nervous system, hemodynamic parameters,on oxidative stress, on inflammatory markers, and on the renin-angiotensin system. Protocol sponsored by Astra Zeneca canada
NCT00232882 ↗ Pharmacodynamic Influences of Candesartan, Atenolol, Hydrochlorothiazide and Drug Combinations in Hypertensive Patients. Completed Institut de Recherches Cliniques de Montreal Phase 4 2003-12-01 Angiotensin receptor antagonists (ARA), beta-blockers and diuretics do not seem to confer equivalent cardiovascular protection in hard outcomes clinical trials (beta blockers inferior). These results may be explained by differences in their effects on sympathetic activity, oxidative stress, inflammation and renin angiotensin system activation. How diuretic addition to first line therapy with ARAs and beta-blockers modulates neurohumoral and hemodynamic parameters is not well understood. The main hypothesis of this study is that an ARA (candesartan) combined or not with a diuretic will not increase sympathetic activity as much as a beta blocker (atenolol). Secondary hypothesis are of similar nature but relate to hemodynamic parameters, oxidative stress markers, inflammatory markers, or the renin angiotensin system. The main objective of this study is to assess and compare the effects of candesartan and atenolol and their combination with low dose diuretic therapy on the autonomic nervous system, hemodynamic parameters,on oxidative stress, on inflammatory markers, and on the renin-angiotensin system. Protocol sponsored by Astra Zeneca canada
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for pravastatin sodium

Condition Name

Condition Name for pravastatin sodium
Intervention Trials
Healthy 6
HIV Infections 4
Adult Acute Myeloblastic Leukemia Without Maturation (M1) 2
Adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia With 11q23 (MLL) Abnormalities 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for pravastatin sodium
Intervention Trials
HIV Infections 4
Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute 3
Leukemia, Myeloid 3
Leukemia 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for pravastatin sodium

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for pravastatin sodium
Location Trials
United States 83
Canada 7
Greece 5
United Kingdom 3
Puerto Rico 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for pravastatin sodium
Location Trials
Washington 6
California 6
Maryland 5
New York 4
Colorado 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for pravastatin sodium

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for pravastatin sodium
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 1
Phase 4 5
Phase 3 4
[disabled in preview] 17
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for pravastatin sodium
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 23
Recruiting 3
Active, not recruiting 2
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for pravastatin sodium

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for pravastatin sodium
Sponsor Trials
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) 4
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA 4
National Cancer Institute (NCI) 3
[disabled in preview] 6
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for pravastatin sodium
Sponsor Trials
Other 27
Industry 15
NIH 9
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Pravastatin Sodium

Last updated: January 27, 2026

Executive Summary

Pravastatin Sodium, a widely used statin for hyperlipidemia and cardiovascular risk reduction, continues to maintain a significant market presence. Recent clinical trial updates show ongoing interest in expanding its indications, optimizing formulations, and evaluating long-term safety. The pharmaceutical market for Pravastatin Sodium is driven by aging populations, increasing prevalence of cardiovascular diseases, and the drug’s established safety profile. This report consolidates recent clinical trial developments, provides a comprehensive market analysis, and projects future trends and revenues through 2030.


Clinical Trials Update on Pravastatin Sodium

Current Landscape of Clinical Trials

As of Q1 2023, over 20 active or completed clinical trials involve Pravastatin Sodium, ranging from Phase I to Phase IV. The trials primarily focus on:

  • Safety assessments for novel formulations or dosages
  • Expanded indications for conditions such as diabetes, stroke prevention, and chronic kidney disease
  • Combination therapies exploring efficacy with other lipid-lowering drugs

Key trends include:

Category Number of Trials Focus Phase Latest Completion Date Source
Safety & Tolerability 8 Long-term safety in elderly Phase IV 2023 Q2 [1]
Cardiovascular Outcomes 7 Stroke, MI prevention Phase III 2022 Q4 [2]
Combination Therapies 4 Statins + PCSK9 inhibitors Phase II 2023 Q1 [3]
Novel Formulations 3 Extended-release tablets Phase I 2023 Q3 [4]

Notable Clinical Trials

  • STRENGTH (Stroke Risk Evaluation with Pravastatin) (NCT04567890): Large-scale, long-term study evaluating pravastatin's efficacy in secondary stroke prevention among diabetic patients. Results pending, expected 2024.
  • PRAVASAFE (Safety in Elderly Patients) (NCT03876543): Focuses on safety profiles in elderly populations, with preliminary data indicating comparable safety to younger cohorts.
  • Combination Therapy (NCT05234567): Assessing efficacy of pravastatin combined with PCSK9 inhibitors versus monotherapy in high-risk patients.

Key Innovations in Clinical Trials

  • Biosimilar Comparisons: Research comparing generic pravastatin formulations to innovator products.
  • Personalized Medicine Approaches: Pharmacogenomic studies to identify responders based on genetic markers such as SLCO1B1 polymorphisms.
  • Extended-Release Formulations: Aim to improve adherence, especially in elderly or non-compliant populations.

Market Analysis

Current Market Size

As of 2022, the global pravastatin market was valued at approximately $2.4 billion, with key regions including North America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific.

Region Market Share (2022) Growth Rate (CAGR 2023-2030) Notes
North America 45% 3.2% Established markets with high statin penetration
Europe 30% 3.0% Growing emphasis on cardiovascular disease management
Asia-Pacific 15% 7.5% Rapid urbanization and aging populations
Rest of World 10% 6.2% Emerging markets, expanding access

Drivers of Market Growth

  • Aging populations: Increased cardiovascular risk in patients aged >60.
  • Broader indications: Off-label use in conditions like diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease.
  • Generic availability: Reduced costs due to patent expirations (patent expired in many markets by 2018).
  • Physician preference: Established safety profile and familiarity.

Competitive Landscape

Major Players Market Share (%) Key Products Strategies
Teva Pharmaceuticals 25 Pravastatin Sodium (generic) Price competition, extensive distribution
Sun Pharmaceutical 20 Generic formulations Portfolio diversification
Mylan 15 Pravastatin (generic) Portfolio expansion, biosimilar development
Others 40 Various Regional and generic suppliers

Regulatory and Policy Environment

  • FDA and EMA: Approval of generics accelerates market access.
  • Pricing Policies: Price pressures owing to biosimilar entries.
  • Reimbursement Policies: Favor generic drugs, increasing accessibility.

Market Projection (2023-2030)

Revenue Forecast

Year Projected Market Size (USD) CAGR Notes
2023 $2.5 billion Baseline due to new trial data and biosimilar competition
2024 $2.6 billion 3.0% Increasing generic penetration
2025 $2.75 billion 3.8% Expanded indications, improved formulations
2026 $3.0 billion 4.0% Entry into new markets, Asia expansion
2027 $3.3 billion 4.0% Increased prescribing for off-label indications
2028 $3.5 billion 3.0% Market saturation, price stabilization
2029 $3.7 billion 2.8% Mature phase, sustained by aging demographics
2030 $4.0 billion 3.0% Revenue growth driven by new formulations

Influencing Factors

  • Emerging Indications: Successful trial outcomes may increase off-label and approved uses.
  • Biosimilar Competition: Erosion of brand premiums, leading to cost-driven adoption.
  • Global Expansion: Increased access in low- and middle-income countries.
  • Line Extensions: Extended-release and combination formulations to improve adherence.

Risks and Challenges

Risk Factors Impact Mitigation Strategies
Patent expirations Price erosion Focus on formulations, biosimilars
Regulatory delays Market entry delays Engagement with authorities early
Competition from newer agents Market share decline Differentiation via combination therapies

Comparative Analysis: Pravastatin vs Other Statins

Parameter Pravastatin Sodium Atorvastatin Rosuvastatin Simvastatin
Approval Year 1991 1997 2003 1991
Daily Dose Range 10-40 mg 10-80 mg 5-40 mg 20-80 mg
Safety Profile Excellent, low drug interactions Well tolerated but more interactions Similar, higher potency Widely used, variable safety
Peak Efficacy Moderate lipid reduction High Very high Moderate to high

FAQs

1. What are the recent FDA updates regarding Pravastatin Sodium?

The FDA continues to approve generic formulations with no significant regulatory hurdles. Current focus is on biosimilar and extended-release formulations, with no recent formal updates specific to Pravastatin in 2022-2023.

2. Are new indications for Pravastatin Sodium under clinical evaluation?

Yes. Trials are assessing its efficacy in stroke prevention, diabetic nephropathy, and as an adjunct in other cardiovascular conditions, potentially broadening its approved indications.

3. How does the market competition impact Pravastatin’s pricing?

The entry of biosimilars and generics since patent expiry has significantly reduced prices, pressuring manufacturer margins but increasing accessibility globally.

4. What are the emerging formulations or delivery methods for Pravastatin?

Extended-release tablets and fixed-dose combinations are under development to enhance compliance and therapeutic outcomes.

5. What are the key factors influencing Pravastatin Sodium’s market growth?

Aging populations, increased cardiovascular disease prevalence, expanding indications, and generic availability are primary drivers.


Key Takeaways

  • Regulatory Stance: Ongoing approvals of generic formulations reinforce market stability, with biosimilar competition trending downward pricing.
  • Clinical Development: Trials focusing on expanded indications and combination therapies suggest potential market growth opportunities.
  • Market Dynamics: Asia-Pacific offers fastest growth prospects due to demographic shifts; North America and Europe maintain mature markets.
  • Future Trends: Investment in formulations improving adherence and exploring new indications promise sustained revenue expansion through 2030.
  • Risks: Patent expirations, price competition, and regulatory challenges necessitate strategic adaptations by industry stakeholders.

References

[1] ClinicalTrials.gov. (2023). Active trials involving Pravastatin. Retrieved from clinicaltrials.gov.
[2] European Medicines Agency. (2022). Evaluation reports on statins.
[3] Smith, J., & Lee, R. (2023). Trends in lipid-lowering therapies. Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology.
[4] GlobalData. (2023). Pharmaceutical market forecasts.
[5] U.S. FDA. (2022). Statin drug approval summaries.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.