You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 14, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR OXYCODONE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


505(b)(2) Clinical Trials for oxycodone

This table shows clinical trials for potential 505(b)(2) applications. See the next table for all clinical trials
Trial Type Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
OTC NCT00245375 ↗ A Trial Comparing Combination Therapy of Acetaminophen Plus Ibuprofen Versus Tylenol #3 for the Treatment of Pain After Outpatient Surgery Completed McNeil Consumer & Specialty Pharmaceuticals, a Division of McNeil-PPC, Inc. N/A 2005-01-01 Increasingly in general surgery, the investigators are conducting outpatient day surgery. Ambulatory surgery currently comprises 60 to 70% of surgeries performed in North America. These patients all require some form of analgesia which can be taken at home in the first few days after the surgery. The current standard at the investigators' centre and many others in the maritime provinces is to provide a prescription for oral acetaminophen plus codeine or oxycodone (Tylenol #3®, Percocet ®). Some patients may receive more potent opioids such as oral hydromorphone (Dilaudid®). Unfortunately, the most commonly prescribed medication (Tylenol #3®) is often poorly tolerated by patients, has several undesirable side effects, and may not provide effective pain relief. In the investigators' experience, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are uncommonly a routine addition to the home analgesic regimen. Tylenol #3®, in the investigators' experience and opinion, is a poor post surgical pain medication. They hope to show that a combination of ibuprofen and acetaminophen is better for pain relief after these procedures. The combination of acetaminophen and ibuprofen would be a safe, cheap, and readily available regimen. Unfortunately, as the prescribing practices of surgeons are old habits, it will require a very convincing argument to get them to change their practices. A randomized controlled trial comparing these two regimens, the investigators hope, would be a powerful enough argument. The hypothesis of this study, therefore, is that the pain control provided by a combination of acetaminophen plus ibuprofen (650 mg/400 mg four times per day) will be superior to Tylenol #3® (600 mg acetaminophen/60 mg codeine/15 mg caffeine four times per day). This study will attempt to enroll 150 patients in total. Eligible patients will be identified by their attending surgeon and contacted by study personnel. Patients who enroll in the study will undergo their surgery in the usual manner. After the surgery, in the recovery room, once they are ready to go home, they will be randomized to receive combination A or B and be given a week's worth of pain medication. They will then go home and take this medication as directed. They will record their pain intensity and pain relief once per day using a diary provided in the study package. One week after their surgery, they will return to the hospital clinic and be seen by the study nurse. They will hand over the diary and any unused medication. They will also be asked several questions regarding their overall satisfaction, incidence of side effects, and how long until they were pain free. The risks of participating in this study are minimal from the risks inherent to the procedures and medications the patients would receive within the standard of care. Ibuprofen is a commonly used NSAID which is widely available over the counter and has an established safety profile. The most common adverse effects of ibuprofen and other NSAIDs are gastrointestinal bleeding and ulceration. Other less common adverse effects include nephrotoxicity, hypersensitivity reactions, hepatic dysfunction (longterm use), and cognitive dysfunction. The investigators' patients will be selected to exclude those most at risk for these complications (see exclusion criteria). Acetaminophen has few side effects, with no adverse effects on platelet function and no evidence of gastric irritation.
OTC NCT00245375 ↗ A Trial Comparing Combination Therapy of Acetaminophen Plus Ibuprofen Versus Tylenol #3 for the Treatment of Pain After Outpatient Surgery Completed Nova Scotia Health Authority N/A 2005-01-01 Increasingly in general surgery, the investigators are conducting outpatient day surgery. Ambulatory surgery currently comprises 60 to 70% of surgeries performed in North America. These patients all require some form of analgesia which can be taken at home in the first few days after the surgery. The current standard at the investigators' centre and many others in the maritime provinces is to provide a prescription for oral acetaminophen plus codeine or oxycodone (Tylenol #3®, Percocet ®). Some patients may receive more potent opioids such as oral hydromorphone (Dilaudid®). Unfortunately, the most commonly prescribed medication (Tylenol #3®) is often poorly tolerated by patients, has several undesirable side effects, and may not provide effective pain relief. In the investigators' experience, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are uncommonly a routine addition to the home analgesic regimen. Tylenol #3®, in the investigators' experience and opinion, is a poor post surgical pain medication. They hope to show that a combination of ibuprofen and acetaminophen is better for pain relief after these procedures. The combination of acetaminophen and ibuprofen would be a safe, cheap, and readily available regimen. Unfortunately, as the prescribing practices of surgeons are old habits, it will require a very convincing argument to get them to change their practices. A randomized controlled trial comparing these two regimens, the investigators hope, would be a powerful enough argument. The hypothesis of this study, therefore, is that the pain control provided by a combination of acetaminophen plus ibuprofen (650 mg/400 mg four times per day) will be superior to Tylenol #3® (600 mg acetaminophen/60 mg codeine/15 mg caffeine four times per day). This study will attempt to enroll 150 patients in total. Eligible patients will be identified by their attending surgeon and contacted by study personnel. Patients who enroll in the study will undergo their surgery in the usual manner. After the surgery, in the recovery room, once they are ready to go home, they will be randomized to receive combination A or B and be given a week's worth of pain medication. They will then go home and take this medication as directed. They will record their pain intensity and pain relief once per day using a diary provided in the study package. One week after their surgery, they will return to the hospital clinic and be seen by the study nurse. They will hand over the diary and any unused medication. They will also be asked several questions regarding their overall satisfaction, incidence of side effects, and how long until they were pain free. The risks of participating in this study are minimal from the risks inherent to the procedures and medications the patients would receive within the standard of care. Ibuprofen is a commonly used NSAID which is widely available over the counter and has an established safety profile. The most common adverse effects of ibuprofen and other NSAIDs are gastrointestinal bleeding and ulceration. Other less common adverse effects include nephrotoxicity, hypersensitivity reactions, hepatic dysfunction (longterm use), and cognitive dysfunction. The investigators' patients will be selected to exclude those most at risk for these complications (see exclusion criteria). Acetaminophen has few side effects, with no adverse effects on platelet function and no evidence of gastric irritation.
OTC NCT01588158 ↗ Patient Satisfaction With Pain Relief After Ambulatory Hand Surgery Terminated Massachusetts General Hospital Phase 4 2012-07-01 Adequate pain relief has been a priority of the Joint Commission and is featured on national inpatient surveys such as the H-CAHPS. When considering methods for improving satisfaction with pain relief in the United States, a great deal of emphasis has been placed on opioid pain medications. Some of this emphasis on opioid pain medication is driven by the pharmaceutical industry and by advocacy groups with ties to the pharmaceutical industry. There is evidence that the "pain is the fifth vital sign" campaign of the Joint Commission led to an increased incidence of prescription of opioids, but there is less evidence of improved satisfaction with pain relief. There is some evidence of an increase in opioid-related adverse events. As the sales of opioids have tripled from 1999-2008, so has the number of deaths caused by opioid overdose; 14,800 in 2008. The number of visits to the Emergency Department for opioid overdose doubled between 2004 and 2008. Patients in other countries take far less opioid pain medication and are equally satisfied with pain relief. For instance, Lindenhovius et al. found in a retrospective study that Dutch patients take a weak (Tramadol) or no opioid pain medication after ankle fracture surgery and have comparable or better satisfaction with pain relief than American patients, most of whom take oxycodone. That study was repeated prospectively (unpublished) and confirmed that Dutch patients do not feel their pain is undertreated. A study of morphine use after a femur fracture demonstrated that American patients used far more than Vietnamese patients (30 mg/kg versus 0.9 mg/kg), but were more dissatisfied with their pain relief. These sociological differences are striking and suggest strongly that personal factors may be the most important determinant of satisfaction with pain relief. It is our impression that most American hand surgeons give patients a prescription for an opioid pain medication after carpal tunnel release, and that is certainly true in our practice. This seems to be based primarily on the outliers, and intended to avoid confrontation with patients that desire opioids; however, most patients take little or no narcotic pain medication, and many who do use the opioids complain of the side effects-nausea and pruritis in particular. It is therefore not clear whether routine opioids is the optimal pain management strategy after carpal tunnel release. In the study of Stahl et al. from Israel, patients were prescribed acetaminophen rather than opioids after carpal tunnel release and only 20 of 50 patients used acetaminophen; 30 patients did not use acetaminophen or other pain medication at all after the operation. Our aim is to determine if there is a difference in satisfaction with pain relief between patients advised to take opioids compared to patients advised to use over the counter acetaminophen after carpal tunnel release under local anesthesia. A secondary aim is to determine if personal factors account for more of the variability in satisfaction with pain relief than opioid strategy.
>Trial Type >Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

All Clinical Trials for oxycodone

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00000273 ↗ A Laboratory Model for Heroin Abuse Medications - 8 Completed National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) Phase 2 1995-08-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of treatment medications (methadone, buprenorphine, LAAM, naltrexone, naltrexone microcapsules, and methoclocinnamox) on I.V. and smoked heroin self-administration."
NCT00000273 ↗ A Laboratory Model for Heroin Abuse Medications - 8 Completed New York State Psychiatric Institute Phase 2 1995-08-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of treatment medications (methadone, buprenorphine, LAAM, naltrexone, naltrexone microcapsules, and methoclocinnamox) on I.V. and smoked heroin self-administration."
NCT00027014 ↗ Herb-Opioid Interactions Completed National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH) Phase 4 2001-09-01 This is a series of studies in healthy volunteers to assess the potential for adverse interactions between St. John's wort (SJW) extract and two narcotic (opioid) pain medications: oxycodone and fentanyl. In the case of oxycodone, we are interested in whether SJW treatment promotes the metabolism of oxycodone, such that it lowers the effectiveness of standard doses of oxycodone in treating pain problems. For the fentanyl study, we will investigate whether SJW treatment will interfere with the delivery of fentanyl to the brain and diminish it's effectiveness to relieve pain. There is evidence to suggest that SJW treatment may increase the activity of a transporter protein, named P-glycoprotein (Pgp), in the blood-brain barrier (BBB) that protects the brain from exposure to drugs and other dietary and environmental toxins.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for oxycodone

Condition Name

Condition Name for oxycodone
Intervention Trials
Pain 95
Pain, Postoperative 59
Postoperative Pain 42
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for oxycodone
Intervention Trials
Pain, Postoperative 148
Opioid-Related Disorders 36
Osteoarthritis 31
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for oxycodone

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for oxycodone
Location Trials
China 49
Canada 37
Finland 27
Italy 17
Poland 17
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for oxycodone
Location Trials
New York 76
California 70
Texas 57
Pennsylvania 57
Florida 44
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for oxycodone

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for oxycodone
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 20
PHASE3 7
PHASE2 6
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for oxycodone
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 328
Recruiting 94
Not yet recruiting 51
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for oxycodone

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for oxycodone
Sponsor Trials
Purdue Pharma LP 23
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) 20
Grünenthal GmbH 19
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for oxycodone
Sponsor Trials
Other 559
Industry 248
NIH 32
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Oxycodone: Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Future Projections

Last updated: October 28, 2025

Introduction

Oxycodone, a potent semi-synthetic opioid analgesic, has remained a cornerstone in pain management due to its efficacy in treating moderate to severe pain. Its widespread usage, however, has been intertwined with a burgeoning opioid crisis, prompting regulatory scrutiny, market fluctuations, and ongoing clinical research. This article delivers a comprehensive analysis of the latest clinical trials, current market dynamics, regulatory landscape, and future projections for oxycodone, equipping stakeholders with critical insights for strategic decision-making.

Clinical Trials Update

Ongoing Research and New Developments

Despite extensive existing evidence showcasing oxycodone’s effectiveness, recent clinical trials have pivoted towards addressing its abuse potential, exploring formulations with reduced dependency, and evaluating novel delivery mechanisms.

  • Abuse-Deterrent Formulations (ADFs): Multiple phase III trials focus on developing abuse-deterrent oxycodone formulations. These include physical and chemical barriers designed to prevent crushing, dissolving, or injecting, which are common methods of misuse. For example, a notable trial (NCT04560760) assessed the efficacy of an oxycodone formulation embedded with naloxone, aimed at reducing parenteral abuse.

  • Pharmacokinetics and Bioavailability Studies: Recent phase I trials on modified-release formulations, such as ABBV-744, report improved pharmacokinetic profiles, potentially reducing peak plasma concentrations linked to euphoria, thus mitigating abuse risks.

  • Combination Therapies: Trials exploring oxycodone combined with non-opioid agents, such as acetaminophen or NSAIDs, continue to optimize pain management regimes, balancing analgesic efficacy with minimized overdose potential.

Regulatory and Safety-Related Trials

The opioid epidemic has spurred rigorous assessments of oxycodone’s safety profile:

  • The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) are funding studies that focus on identifying biomarkers for opioid dependency and adverse reactions.

  • Several observational studies are underway (e.g., NCT04496268), monitoring long-term effects of prescribed oxycodone, including addiction rates and overdose incidents.

AI-Driven Drug Development

Use of AI algorithms helps identify patient populations at higher risk of misuse, guiding the development of personalized prescribing strategies. Early-phase trials leverage machine learning to improve formulation design and predict abuse potential more accurately.

Market Analysis

Global Market Overview

The oxycodone market has demonstrated significant resilience despite regulatory challenges and opioid crises worldwide.

  • Market Size & Growth: The global oxycodone market was valued at approximately USD 4.2 billion in 2022, with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 4.5% projected through 2030 (Statista, 2023). North America dominates the market, accounting for nearly 70% of sales, driven by high opioid prescription rates.

  • Regional Dynamics:

    • North America: The US, as the largest consumer, faces ongoing regulatory reforms aimed at controlling misuse, including prescription limits and increased monitoring through Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs (PDMPs). Despite this, innovation in abuse-deterrent formulations sustains the market.
    • Europe: Regulatory agencies have adopted stricter opioid prescribing guidelines. However, high prevalence of chronic pain sustains demand.
    • Asia-Pacific: Rapid population growth and increasing access to healthcare expand market opportunities, with India and China emerging as key regions.

Competitive Landscape

Major players include Purdue Pharma (market share historically), Teva Pharmaceuticals, Endo Pharmaceuticals, and Mallinckrodt. Recent mergers and patent expirations have intensified competition, fostering innovation in abuse-deterrent technologies.

Impact of Regulatory Policies

Stringent regulations in North America have curtailed conventional oxycodone prescribing, leading to a shift towards alternative pain management strategies and a focus on safer formulations.

  • The CDC’s 2016 guidelines significantly reduced oxycodone prescribing, but recent studies suggest a rebound in legitimate use, highlighting the delicate balance between access and abuse mitigation.

Market Trends and Challenges

Key Trends

  • Emergence of Abuse-Deterrent Formulations: Continuous R&D investments in formulations such as reformulated OxyContin® exemplify proactive industry responses.
  • Digital Health Integration: Telemedicine and digital prescriptions are improving controlled substance monitoring.
  • Alternative Pain Management: Increased focus on non-opioid analgesics (e.g., nerve blocks, neuromodulators) to reduce reliance on oxycodone.

Challenges

  • Regulatory Restrictions: Stricter prescribing guidelines threaten revenue streams.
  • Public Health Policies: Emphasis on combating opioid misuse limits market expansion.
  • Legal Risks: Companies face litigation related to opioid overuse and addiction liabilities.

Future Market Projections

Growth Drivers

  • Innovation in Safe Formulations: Continued development of abuse-resistant oxycodone products will sustain market demand.
  • Expanding Use in Palliative Care: Growing aging populations globally will augment need for potent analgesics.
  • Emerging Markets: Rising healthcare infrastructure and economic growth in Asia-Pacific will broaden consumer bases.

Forecasted Trends Up to 2030

  • A steady CAGR of approximately 3-5% is forecasted for the global oxycodone market, anticipating stabilization in mature markets and rapid growth in emerging regions.
  • Regulatory Evolution: Anticipated refinements in prescribing protocols and approval pathways for novel formulations will shape market trajectories.
  • Research Focus Shift: Increasing focus on non-addictive opioid alternatives may eventually diminish oxycodone’s dominant market share unless innovation addresses safety concerns.

Regulatory Landscape and Policy Outlook

Regulatory agencies worldwide are keen on balancing analgesic access and misuse prevention:

  • United States: The DEA continuously reviews scheduling statuses, with oxycodone remaining Schedule II, imposing strict prescribing and distribution controls.
  • European Union: Several countries enforce limitative prescribing policies and promote alternative therapies.
  • Global Initiatives: WHO's guidelines advocate for cautious use and comprehensive management, influencing national policies.

Efforts towards establishing centralized registries, tighter prescription controls, and public health campaigns are expected to mitigate overdose deaths associated with oxycodone.

Key Takeaways

  • Continuous innovation in abuse-deterrent formulations and combination therapies aims to reduce oxycodone’s misuse while maintaining clinical efficacy.
  • Market dynamics are shifting in response to regulatory restrictions, with a strategic emphasis on safer products and alternative pain management.
  • The global oxycodone market is projected to grow modestly, driven by technological innovations, demographic shifts, and emerging market opportunities.
  • Stakeholders must navigate complex regulatory environments and public health concerns, balancing commercial interests with safety imperatives.
  • Strategic investment in clinical research, particularly in formulations with minimized abuse potential, will be critical for future market success.

FAQs

1. What are the most recent advancements in oxycodone formulations?
Recent developments include abuse-deterrent formulations like reformulated oxycodone embedded with physical barriers or combined with antagonists such as naloxone, designed to prevent misuse via crushing or injection.

2. How is global regulation affecting oxycodone market growth?
Stringent prescription controls and stricter scheduling in major markets like North America and Europe have tempered growth rates but also spurred innovation in safer formulations and alternatives.

3. Are there ongoing clinical trials for non-addictive opioid analgesics related to oxycodone?
Yes, numerous trials are exploring non-opioid pain therapies and modifications of existing opioids to reduce dependency and adverse effects.

4. What is the outlook for oxycodone in emerging markets?
Ongoing infrastructure development and healthcare access improvements forecast significant growth opportunities, provided regulatory and safety considerations are managed effectively.

5. How are public health policies influencing oxycodone’s future availability?
Policymakers prioritize reducing misuse, which may limit availability; however, advancements in safety profiles and alternative therapies may sustain legitimate medical use.


Sources
[1] Statista. (2023). Global oxycodone market size and growth projections.
[2] ClinicalTrials.gov. Recent oxycodone clinical trials data.
[3] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Reports on opioid abuse-deterrent formulations.
[4] World Health Organization. Guidelines on pain management and opioid use.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.