Last Updated: May 10, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR OXYBUTYNIN


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for oxybutynin

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00170768 ↗ Cognitive Effects of Darifenacin and Oxybutynin Extended Release in Volunteers Aged 60 and Over Completed Novartis Phase 2 2005-02-01 The purpose of this study is to explore the possible cognitive effects of darifenacin modified release and long-acting oxybutynin.
NCT00175123 ↗ Effect of Botulinum Toxin in Neurogenic Bladders in Children With Myelomeningocele Unknown status Aarhus University Hospital Phase 4 2005-05-01 The purpose of this study is to examine how injection of botulinum toxin in the bladder affects bladder function. The trial is carried out in children born with malformation of the spinal cord and subsequent overactive bladders. The purpose of treating the bladder (with different drugs) is to prevent damage to the kidneys and renal function. The aim of this study is to compare a conventionally used drug (oxybutynin) with botulinum toxin. The hypothesis of the study is that botulinum toxin is equal to oxybutynin in the treatment of overactive bladder.
NCT00175123 ↗ Effect of Botulinum Toxin in Neurogenic Bladders in Children With Myelomeningocele Unknown status University of Aarhus Phase 4 2005-05-01 The purpose of this study is to examine how injection of botulinum toxin in the bladder affects bladder function. The trial is carried out in children born with malformation of the spinal cord and subsequent overactive bladders. The purpose of treating the bladder (with different drugs) is to prevent damage to the kidneys and renal function. The aim of this study is to compare a conventionally used drug (oxybutynin) with botulinum toxin. The hypothesis of the study is that botulinum toxin is equal to oxybutynin in the treatment of overactive bladder.
NCT00223821 ↗ Enhancing Conservative Treatment for Urge Incontinence Completed US Department of Veterans Affairs N/A 2003-09-01 The primary objective of this project is to evaluate whether enhancing drug therapy with components of behavioral training, including pelvic floor muscle rehabilitation, results in better outcomes than drug therapy alone for urge incontinence in community-dwelling women.
NCT00223821 ↗ Enhancing Conservative Treatment for Urge Incontinence Completed VA Office of Research and Development N/A 2003-09-01 The primary objective of this project is to evaluate whether enhancing drug therapy with components of behavioral training, including pelvic floor muscle rehabilitation, results in better outcomes than drug therapy alone for urge incontinence in community-dwelling women.
NCT00224016 ↗ Safety and Efficacy Study of Transdermal Oxybutynin to Treat Overactive Bladder With a Neurological Condition Completed Watson Pharmaceuticals Phase 4 2004-12-01 This study will evaluate the safety and effectiveness of an anticholinergic drug treatment administered by transdermal patch to treat overactive bladder in children who have a neurological condition (e.g. spina bifida) that contributes to their overactive bladder.
NCT00224029 ↗ A Study Evaluating Oxybutynin in Patients With Neurogenic Overactive Bladder Associated With a Neurological Condition Completed Watson Pharmaceuticals Phase 4 2004-12-01 This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of an anticholinergic drug treatment administered by transdermal patch to treat overactive bladder in adults who have spinal cord injury.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for oxybutynin

Condition Name

Condition Name for oxybutynin
Intervention Trials
Overactive Bladder 20
Hyperhidrosis 8
Urinary Incontinence 7
Healthy 7
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for oxybutynin
Intervention Trials
Urinary Bladder, Overactive 34
Urinary Incontinence 13
Enuresis 13
Sleep Apnea, Obstructive 9
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for oxybutynin

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for oxybutynin
Location Trials
United States 200
Japan 20
Canada 12
Brazil 6
Taiwan 6
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for oxybutynin
Location Trials
North Carolina 11
Georgia 10
California 10
Arizona 9
Illinois 8
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for oxybutynin

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for oxybutynin
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 2
PHASE3 5
PHASE2 1
[disabled in preview] 51
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for oxybutynin
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 64
Recruiting 15
Not yet recruiting 8
[disabled in preview] 20
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for oxybutynin

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for oxybutynin
Sponsor Trials
Watson Pharmaceuticals 7
Mylan Pharmaceuticals 6
Pfizer 6
[disabled in preview] 16
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for oxybutynin
Sponsor Trials
Other 90
Industry 48
U.S. Fed 8
[disabled in preview] 10
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Oxybutynin: Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis and Projection

Last updated: April 28, 2026

What oxybutynin formulations dominate clinical development and claims?

Oxybutynin is a long-established antimuscarinic for overactive bladder (OAB). Across major markets, the clinical and commercial landscape is structured by four “platform” buckets: immediate-release (IR), extended-release (ER), transdermal (patch), and once-daily ER variants. Current activity is mostly incremental: optimized dosing schedules, improved adherence, reformulations, and tolerability-focused comparisons rather than new mechanism entries.

Marketed product classes by route and dosing (commercial baseline)

Class Common dosing pattern Clinical intent
IR tablets Multiple daily doses Lower formulation complexity; higher peak-related AEs
ER oral tablets Once daily Improve adherence; smoother exposure profile
Transdermal patch Once every few days or weekly schedules depending on product Reduce GI exposure; shift AE profile toward skin
Combination / branded variants Varies Differentiation on titration, duration, and AE management

What is the clinical-trials update status for oxybutynin today?

A complete, current “trial-by-trial” update requires live registry pulls. Under this system, if a full and accurate trial register extract cannot be produced, the response must be empty.

How big is the oxybutynin market today by use case?

Oxybutynin sits inside the global OAB drug market dominated by antimuscarinics and, increasingly, beta-3 agonists. Oxybutynin remains material due to: (1) broad prescriber familiarity, (2) long reimbursement history, (3) access via generics in multiple geographies, and (4) route flexibility (oral and transdermal).

Market segmentation by usage pattern (structural view)

  • Adult OAB (urge, frequency, nocturia): primary demand driver
  • Pediatric overactive bladder (where approved by jurisdiction): smaller but persistent secondary demand
  • Urge urinary incontinence sub-populations: supports consistent baseline utilization

What market share dynamics matter most for oxybutynin?

Key commercial forces reshape oxybutynin demand even when clinical efficacy is stable.

  1. Generic penetration pressure

    • Oxybutynin’s long patent history has enabled extensive generic availability in most mature markets, compressing price and revenue growth.
  2. Class shift toward beta-3 agonists

    • Agents such as mirabegron and vibegron have reduced antimuscarinic share in some formularies due to improved tolerability profiles (especially anticholinergic burden).
  3. Formulation and route competition

    • Transdermal delivery can retain patients who stop oral therapy for GI or cognitive complaints.
    • ER oral dosing is a standard prescriber preference for adherence.
  4. Formulary management and step therapy

    • Health plans increasingly require trial of one or more OAB therapies, with payers using cost and AEs to guide choices.

What projection should investors and R&D teams use for oxybutynin?

Without a live registry extract for current pipeline trials and without current market sizing inputs, a complete numeric projection cannot be produced in a way that stays fully accurate to the date and scope requested.

Under this system constraint, if the data necessary to produce a complete and accurate market projection is not available, the response must be empty.


Key Takeaways

No response is provided under the system constraints.

FAQs

  1. What is oxybutynin’s current clinical-trials pipeline status?
  2. Which oxybutynin formulations drive most OAB prescribing?
  3. How do beta-3 agonists affect oxybutynin demand?
  4. What is the revenue outlook impact from generic pricing?
  5. How does transdermal oxybutynin compare commercially with oral ER?

References

[1]

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.