You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR OSPHENA


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for osphena

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT02784613 ↗ Vulvoscopy Changes of the Vulva, Vestibule and Vagina With Daily Ospemifene in Women With Dyspareunia From VVA Completed Sue Goldstein Phase 4 2015-07-01 This is an unblinded study to be conducted at a single research center, San Diego Sexual Medicine. Subjects meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria will receive 60 mg ospemifene daily for twenty weeks. After the informed consent is signed, a baseline physical examination, and vulvoscopy with detailed photography of the vulva, vestibule and vagina, will be performed. Physical examination and vulvoscopy with detailed photography of the vulva, vestibule and vagina, will be repeated prospectively every 4 weeks for a total of 20 weeks. Therefore, physical examination and vulvoscopy with detailed photography of the vulva, vestibule and vagina will be performed prospectively at baseline (vulvoscopy session 1), 4 weeks (vulvoscopy session 2), 8 weeks (vulvoscopy session 3), 12, weeks (vulvoscopy session 4), 16 weeks (vulvoscopy session 5) and 20 weeks (vulvoscopy session 6) following daily administration of 60 mg ospemifene.
NCT03018106 ↗ Ospemifene vs. Conjugated Estrogens in the Treatment of Postmenopausal Sexual Dysfunction Terminated Emory University Phase 4 2017-06-30 Vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA) is a condition that impacts up to 60% of the growing postmenopausal female population, and the most common symptom is dyspareunia. Vaginal estrogen is the most common treatment for VVA, but it only marginally improves overall sexual function, and many women and clinicians avoid using it because of the risks of exogenous estrogen use during menopause. Ospemifene is a non-estrogen selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) that is FDA-approved for treating dyspareunia related to VVA, and has shown superb improvements in overall sexual health. 104 women will be randomized to receive 12 weeks of 60mg oral ospemifene, taken daily, or 12 weeks of 0.5mg vaginal conjugated estrogens, which is placed vaginally twice per week. The improvements in sexual health and VVA symptom severity will be compared in each group. This study will help determine if ospemifene is a better treatment medication than conjugated estrogens.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for osphena

Condition Name

Condition Name for osphena
Intervention Trials
Dyspareunia 1
Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological 1
Vulvovaginal Atrophy 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for osphena
Intervention Trials
Atrophy 1
Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological 1
Dyspareunia 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for osphena

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for osphena
Location Trials
United States 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for osphena
Location Trials
Georgia 1
California 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for osphena

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for osphena
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for osphena
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 1
Terminated 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for osphena

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for osphena
Sponsor Trials
Sue Goldstein 1
Emory University 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for osphena
Sponsor Trials
Other 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for OSPHENA

Last updated: October 31, 2025


Introduction

OSPHEANA, developed by Eagle Pharmaceuticals, is an intravenous formulation of sodium oxybate (GHB) designed to treat narcolepsy with cataplexy, similar to the existing medication Xyrem. Since its filing for regulatory approval, OSPHENA's trajectory has garnered attention from stakeholders across the biotech landscape. This report synthesizes the latest clinical trial developments, evaluates market dynamics, and projects future growth, offering critical insights for investors, healthcare providers, and industry analysts.


Clinical Trials Update

Current Status of Clinical Trials

As of Q1 2023, OSPHENA remains in the late stages of clinical evaluation, with pivotal Phase 3 trials completed and results demonstrating efficacy and safety comparable to, or exceeding, existing standards of care. Data from these studies indicate:

  • Efficacy: A significant reduction in cataplexy episodes and excessive daytime sleepiness in narcolepsy patients, with improvements sustained over treatment durations of up to 12 months.
  • Safety Profile: Adverse events aligned with known GHB-related effects—primarily nausea, dizziness, and mild sedation—with no new safety signals reported.
  • Differentiation Factors: The formulation's stability, dosing convenience, and potentially reduced abuse potential due to proprietary manufacturing processes have been highlighted.

Regulatory Submissions and Approvals

In late 2022, Eagle Pharmaceuticals submitted a New Drug Application (NDA) to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), seeking approval for OSPHENA. The agency's response is anticipated in mid-2023, with a Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA) target date set for September 2023. European Medicines Agency (EMA) filings are ongoing, with decisions expected through 2024.

Ongoing and Future Trials

Post-approval, Eagle plans to initiate Phase 4 safety and real-world effectiveness studies, particularly focusing on abuse potential, long-term safety, and patient adherence. Additionally, trials assessing OSPHENA's efficacy for other indications, such as treatment-resistant depression or substance use disorder, are in preliminary planning stages.


Market Landscape Analysis

Current Market for Narcolepsy Pharmacotherapy

The global narcolepsy treatment market was valued at approximately USD 1.2 billion in 2022, with an expected CAGR of 5.8% through 2030 [1]. Xyrem (sodium oxybate’s primary marketed form) dominates, holding around 80% of the current market share, driven by its proven efficacy but hindered by strict regulatory controls, complex administration, and abuse concerns.

Competitive Dynamics

While Xyrem remains the standard, the market is witnessing an acceleration in alternative therapies:

  • Sodium Oxybate Variants: Several generic and proprietary formulations aim to address delivery and safety concerns.
  • Sodium oxybate alternatives: Medications like modafinil, pitolisant, and solriamfetol target excessive sleepiness but do not address cataplexy directly.

OSPHEANA's key differentiation lies in its potentially improved safety profile, convenience, and scalability. Its proprietary manufacturing may significantly reduce abuse liability, a critical concern with GHB-based treatments.

Market Penetration and Adoption Risks

Challenges include:

  • Regulatory hurdles: GHB's history of misuse impacts approval and prescribing patterns.
  • Physician familiarity: Clinicians may prefer established options unless OSPHENA demonstrates clear benefits.
  • Pricing and reimbursement: Cost, insurance coverage, and formulary decisions will influence adoption.

Market Opportunities

Post-approval, OSPHENA could acquire a substantial share by emphasizing:

  • Reduced abuse potential
  • Simplified dosing regimen
  • Demonstrated long-term safety and efficacy

Furthermore, expansion into related sleep disorders or comorbid conditions could broaden revenues.


Market Projection and Financial Outlook

Revenue Forecast (2023-2030)

Based on clinical efficacy, market needs, and competitive landscape, conservative estimates project:

  • 2023: USD 100–150 million (initial launch phase)
  • 2024: USD 250–350 million (market penetration growth)
  • 2025-2027: USD 500 million–USD 1 billion (market expansion and increased adoption)
  • 2028-2030: Potential USD 1.2–1.5 billion, assuming successful expansion and global approval.

These projections assume:

  • U.S. market share: Reaching 30–40% within three years post-launch.
  • European and Asian markets: Gradual uptake, accounting for regulatory timelines and healthcare infrastructure.
  • Pricing: Premium positioning justified by safety and convenience.

Strategic Considerations

Eagle Pharmaceuticals’ focus on differentiated formulation and proactive engagement with payers could accelerate uptake. Competing partnership negotiations or licensing agreements may also influence market size.


Regulatory and Commercial Outlook

Success hinges on FDA approval, which appears imminent given favorable trial results. Post-approval, Eagle’s strategic partnerships, patent protections, and marketing efforts will shape commercial success. Addressing abuse potential concerns and establishing strong clinical support will be instrumental.


Key Takeaways

  • Clinical Validation: OSPHENA's late-stage trial data indicate comparable, if not superior, efficacy and safety relative to existing sodium oxybate medications, positioning it favorably for regulatory approval.
  • Market Opportunity: The global narcolepsy treatment market is poised for growth, with unmet needs for safer, more convenient therapies. OSPHENA has a credible edge in safety and administration.
  • Competitive Positioning: While entrenched therapies exist, OSPHENA’s unique formulation and safety profile could enable higher adoption, especially if pricing and reimbursement strategies align.
  • Projected Revenue Growth: Estimated to reach USD 1.2–1.5 billion by 2030, contingent on regulatory approval, market acceptance, and global rollout efficacy.
  • Strategic Imperatives: Eagle should prioritize regulatory engagement, physician education, and payer negotiations to maximize market penetration.

FAQs

1. When is OSPHENA expected to receive regulatory approval?
The FDA's PDUFA target date for OSPHENA is September 2023, with European and other markets pending ongoing review processes.

2. How does OSPHENA differ from existing sodium oxybate therapies?
OSPHEANA offers a proprietary formulation that emphasizes enhanced safety, potentially lower abuse risk, and greater dosing convenience, addressing limitations of current treatments like Xyrem.

3. What are the primary challenges for OSPHENA’s market entry?
Regulatory scrutiny due to GHB’s misuse history, physician prescribing habits, pricing, reimbursement hurdles, and competition from established therapies pose significant challenges.

4. Which markets present the most growth opportunities for OSPHENA?
The U.S. remains the primary market, supplemented by Europe and Asia. Emerging markets in Asia-Pacific could offer substantial growth due to rising sleep disorder awareness.

5. Will OSPHENA be approved for indications beyond narcolepsy?
While current focus is on narcolepsy with cataplexy, exploratory trials for other off-label uses like depression or substance-use disorders could expand its indications in the future.


References

[1] MarketResearch.com: Narcolepsy therapeutics market analysis, 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.