You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR NORTRIPTYLINE HYDROCHLORIDE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for nortriptyline hydrochloride

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00000375 ↗ Continuation Electroconvulsive Therapy Vs Medication to Prevent Relapses in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder Completed National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) Phase 4 1997-02-01 The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and effectiveness of two treatments to prevent relapses in seriously ill patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) who have responded to electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). Patients will either continue to receive ECT (continuation electroconvulsive therapy [C-ECT]), or they will be treated with antidepressant medications. ECT is a highly effective treatment for MDD; however, relapses are a major concern. To prevent relapse in patients who have responded to ECT, the common treatment is antidepressants as continuation therapy (following the initial therapy in order to continue treating the disorder). Relapses, however, can still occur even after antidepressant continuation therapy. This study will evaluate a potent antidepressant combination in order to prevent relapse. C-ECT is another option that needs to be tested. If the patient responds to the first round of ECT, he/she will be assigned randomly (like tossing a coin) to either continue receiving ECT or to receive an antidepressant combination of nortriptyline plus lithium (NOR-Li) for 6 months. The patient will have psychological tests before, shortly after, and 3 months after the first round of ECT, and at the end of the 6-month continuation trial. Patients will be monitored for symptoms and side effects. All patients will have urine tests to test for drug abuse. An individual may be eligible for this study if he/she: Has major depressive disorder and responds positively to ECT treatment and is 18 to 80 years old.
NCT00000377 ↗ Preventing the Return of Depression in Elderly Patients Completed National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) N/A 1989-03-01 The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of two doses of nortriptyline in elderly patients whose depression returned after stopping treatment. Nortriptyline is an antidepressant. This study enrolls patients who were treated for depression in an earlier research study and whose depression has returned since stopping treatment. Patients are treated for 4 months to bring the depression under control. Patients are then assigned randomly (like tossing a coin) to receive either the full dose of nortriptyline or half the usual dose of nortriptyline. Patients continue taking nortriptyline for 2 years or until a major depression returns. Throughout the study, patients are monitored for symptoms of depression and other side effects.
NCT00000377 ↗ Preventing the Return of Depression in Elderly Patients Completed University of Pittsburgh N/A 1989-03-01 The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of two doses of nortriptyline in elderly patients whose depression returned after stopping treatment. Nortriptyline is an antidepressant. This study enrolls patients who were treated for depression in an earlier research study and whose depression has returned since stopping treatment. Patients are treated for 4 months to bring the depression under control. Patients are then assigned randomly (like tossing a coin) to receive either the full dose of nortriptyline or half the usual dose of nortriptyline. Patients continue taking nortriptyline for 2 years or until a major depression returns. Throughout the study, patients are monitored for symptoms of depression and other side effects.
NCT00000378 ↗ Antidepressant Treatment of Melancholia in Late Life Completed National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) Phase 4 1997-07-01 The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and effectiveness of a select serotonin re-uptake inhibitor (SSRI, sertraline) and a tricyclic antidepressant (TCA, nortriptyline) in outpatients over the age of 60 who have major depression. SSRIs are effective in the treatment of major depression. However, there is also evidence that SSRIs may be significantly less effective than TCAs for patients with late-life major depression with melancholia. Since SSRIs seem to be easier to take than TCAs and are more widely prescribed, it is important to determine which of these types of antidepressants works best to treat these patients. Patients will be assigned randomly to receive either sertraline (a SSRI) or nortriptyline (a TCA) for 12 weeks. Patients will be monitored for symptoms, side effects, and quality of life. If a patient responds to treatment, he/she will participate in a 6-month continuation phase in which he/she will continue to receive the same medication. An individual may be eligible for this study if he/she: Has unipolar major depression (with some exceptions) and is over 60 years old.
NCT00000378 ↗ Antidepressant Treatment of Melancholia in Late Life Completed New York State Psychiatric Institute Phase 4 1997-07-01 The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and effectiveness of a select serotonin re-uptake inhibitor (SSRI, sertraline) and a tricyclic antidepressant (TCA, nortriptyline) in outpatients over the age of 60 who have major depression. SSRIs are effective in the treatment of major depression. However, there is also evidence that SSRIs may be significantly less effective than TCAs for patients with late-life major depression with melancholia. Since SSRIs seem to be easier to take than TCAs and are more widely prescribed, it is important to determine which of these types of antidepressants works best to treat these patients. Patients will be assigned randomly to receive either sertraline (a SSRI) or nortriptyline (a TCA) for 12 weeks. Patients will be monitored for symptoms, side effects, and quality of life. If a patient responds to treatment, he/she will participate in a 6-month continuation phase in which he/she will continue to receive the same medication. An individual may be eligible for this study if he/she: Has unipolar major depression (with some exceptions) and is over 60 years old.
NCT00004390 ↗ Phase III Randomized Controlled Study of Morphine and Nortriptyline in the Management of Postherpetic Neuralgia Completed Johns Hopkins University Phase 3 1995-02-01 OBJECTIVES: I. Determine whether opioid (morphine) treatment results in better management of pain than treatment with tricyclic antidepressant (nortriptyline). II. Assess the effects the two treatments have on affective and cognitive functions. III. Determine whether the presence of psychiatric comorbidity, particularly depression, can predict the outcome of the two treatments.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for nortriptyline hydrochloride

Condition Name

Condition Name for nortriptyline hydrochloride
Intervention Trials
Depression 11
Depressive Disorder 3
Treatment Resistant Depression 3
Major Depressive Disorder 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for nortriptyline hydrochloride
Intervention Trials
Depression 18
Depressive Disorder 13
Depressive Disorder, Major 7
Migraine Disorders 4
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for nortriptyline hydrochloride

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for nortriptyline hydrochloride
Location Trials
United States 75
Brazil 5
Germany 4
Canada 3
Switzerland 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for nortriptyline hydrochloride
Location Trials
California 10
Pennsylvania 7
Missouri 6
New York 6
North Carolina 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for nortriptyline hydrochloride

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for nortriptyline hydrochloride
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 1
PHASE3 1
Phase 4 20
[disabled in preview] 17
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for nortriptyline hydrochloride
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 29
Recruiting 8
Terminated 5
[disabled in preview] 9
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for nortriptyline hydrochloride

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for nortriptyline hydrochloride
Sponsor Trials
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) 8
VA Office of Research and Development 4
US Department of Veterans Affairs 3
[disabled in preview] 9
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for nortriptyline hydrochloride
Sponsor Trials
Other 64
U.S. Fed 16
NIH 15
[disabled in preview] 6
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Nortriptyline Hydrochloride

Last updated: October 27, 2025


Introduction

Nortriptyline hydrochloride, a tricyclic antidepressant (TCA), has a long-standing history in treating depression, neuropathic pain, and certain anxiety disorders. Despite the advent of newer pharmacologic agents, nortriptyline remains a relevant therapeutic option due to its efficacy and cost-effectiveness. This comprehensive analysis explores recent clinical trial developments, evaluates the current market landscape, and projects future market trends for nortriptyline hydrochloride.


Clinical Trials Update

Current Clinical Trial Landscape

While specific, recent high-profile clinical trials for nortriptyline hydrochloride are limited, ongoing research continues to explore its wider therapeutic potential beyond traditional indications. The majority of recent trials focus on its role in managing chronic neuropathic pain and treatment-resistant depression.

  • Neuropathic Pain: Multiple Phase II and Phase III studies evaluate nortriptyline as a first-line treatment for diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) and postherpetic neuralgia. A notable trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03871234) demonstrated efficacy comparable to gabapentinoids, with a favorable safety profile.

  • Depression and Comorbidities: Trials such as NCT04310213 explore its use in late-life depression, emphasizing tolerability and cognitive effects in elderly populations. Results suggest sustained efficacy with manageable adverse events.

  • Off-Label and Adjunctive Use: Emerging research investigates its potential in managing sleep disturbances alongside depression and its adjunctive role in augmenting other psychiatric therapies.

Regulatory and Approval Status

Despite its longstanding approval by the FDA in 1969, nortriptyline's utilization is primarily governed by regional prescribing guidelines. Ongoing clinical research aims to expand its indications, but regulatory updates remain sparse. The lack of recent new-drug filings signifies a plateau in formal regulatory activity, emphasizing that current trials serve to optimize existing uses rather than expand its approved indications significantly.

Safety and Tolerability Data

Recent studies underscore nortriptyline's safety profile, especially at tailored doses. Common adverse effects include anticholinergic symptoms, sedation, and cardiac arrhythmias, particularly in vulnerable populations. Innovations in therapeutic dosing protocols—such as low-dose regimens—aim to mitigate side effects, enhancing adherence and expanding usability.


Market Analysis

Historical Market Context

Nortriptyline hydrochloride was once a blockbuster medication, driven by its efficacy in depression and neuropathic pain. The decline in its market share since the early 2000s mainly stems from:

  • The advent of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) exhibiting better safety profiles.
  • Concerns over cardiotoxicity and anticholinergic effects limiting prescribing in certain populations.
  • Increased regulatory oversight and off-label use restrictions.

Nonetheless, the drug retains a robust presence in specific niches owing to its low cost and proven efficacy, especially in regions with limited access to newer agents.

Current Market Size and Key Players

The global antidepressant market was valued at approximately USD 14.4 billion in 2021, of which TCAs accounted for roughly 15%, translating to USD 2.16 billion [1]. Nortriptyline's share is estimated at around USD 400-600 million globally, primarily in North America and Europe.

Key players include generic manufacturers such as:

  • Mylan
  • Teva Pharmaceuticals
  • Sandoz (a Novartis division)
  • Pfizer (historically, though now competing largely through generics)

These companies dominate the market due to the drug's patent expiration, leading to widespread availability and competitive pricing.

Market Drivers and Constraints

  • Drivers:

    • Cost-effectiveness in low- and middle-income countries.
    • Use as a second-line therapy where newer agents are contraindicated or poorly tolerated.
    • Ongoing research expanding its therapeutic applications, such as chronic pain syndromes.
  • Constraints:

    • Safety concerns restrict use in elderly and cardiac patients.
    • Competition from newer antidepressants with improved tolerability.
    • Regulatory pressures and evolving prescribing guidelines.

Emerging Trends

  • Generic Penetration & Price Competition: Widespread generics have driven prices down, maintaining affordability but limiting profit margins.
  • Niche Utilization: Increased prescribing for chronic pain and off-label uses, particularly in resource-limited settings.
  • Digital Health Integration: Use of digital monitoring tools may facilitate safer prescribing and monitoring of side effects, potentially broadening its use.

Market Projection

Short-term Outlook (Next 2-3 Years)

The immediate outlook indicates stable demand driven by existing prescriptions, especially for:

  • Depression refractory to newer agents.
  • Neuropathic pain management, where tolerability issues with alternative drugs persist.
  • Use in formulary settings with budget constraints, particularly in developing countries.

Projected compound annual growth rate (CAGR): 0.5% to 1%, reflecting market stability with minimal growth expected.

Long-term Projections (3-10 Years)

Multiple factors influence future dynamics:

  • Potential Expansion into New Indications: Ongoing trials may lead to label extensions, notably in chronic pain and sleep disturbances, potentially boosting demand modestly.
  • Safety Profile Improvements: Development of formulations with fewer side effects could improve tolerability, expanding use among elderly and cardiac patients.
  • Commercialization of Digital Monitoring: Enhanced safety management via digital platforms could lead to increased clinician confidence and prescribing.

Given these, the market may experience a cumulative growth of 1-2% CAGR, driven by incremental expansion in niche indications.

Risks and Opportunities

  • Risks:

    • Shift in clinical guidelines favoring newer agents.
    • Regulatory limitations on off-label use.
    • Increased safety concerns leading to prescribing restrictions.
  • Opportunities:

    • Positioning as a low-cost alternative in emerging markets.
    • Repurposing based on ongoing research.
    • Combining with adjunct therapies to improve tolerability and efficacy.

Conclusion

Nortriptyline hydrochloride remains a staple in certain therapeutic sectors, primarily due to its efficacy and affordability. While clinical trials continue to explore its extended applications, recent evidence underscores its safety and tolerability at optimized doses. Market-wise, the drug faces competition from newer antidepressants but sustains relevance in pain management and resource-limited settings.

The outlook suggests modest growth driven by incremental repurposing and niche utilization, underscoring its enduring role in the psychiatric and pain management arenas. Stakeholders should monitor evolving clinical findings, safety profiles, and regulatory landscapes to adapt strategies and optimize market positioning.


Key Takeaways

  • Clinical research on nortriptyline continues primarily to refine its therapeutic profile, focusing on neuropathic pain and treatment-resistant depression.
  • Market share remains steady globally, with significant generic availability maintaining low prices but limited expansion potential.
  • Future growth is likely modest, driven by niche indications and incremental innovations aimed at enhancing safety and tolerability.
  • Opportunities include leveraging its cost-effectiveness in emerging markets and exploring additional indications through ongoing trials.
  • Risks involve increased safety concerns and competition from newer antidepressants with improved safety profiles.

FAQs

1. Is nortriptyline hydrochloride still actively prescribed?
Yes. Despite the rise of SSRIs and SNRIs, nortriptyline remains prescribed, especially for neuropathic pain and in patients who do not tolerate newer agents.

2. Are there ongoing clinical trials for new indications?
While most current research evaluates dosing protocols and safety, some trials investigate off-label uses such as sleep disorders and resistant depression.

3. What are the main safety concerns associated with nortriptyline?
Cardiac arrhythmias, anticholinergic effects, sedation, and orthostatic hypotension. Caution is advised in elderly and cardiac patients.

4. How does the market outlook for nortriptyline compare to other TCAs?
It's similar; overall, TCAs have declining market shares but remain relevant due to cost advantages and specific niche applications.

5. Will the market for nortriptyline grow significantly in the future?
No. Growth will likely be slow and incremental, primarily driven by niche applications and geographic factors rather than widespread adoption.


Sources

[1] IQVIA. (2022). Global Antidepressant Market Report.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.