Last Updated: May 13, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR NAPHAZOLINE HYDROCHLORIDE; PHENIRAMINE MALEATE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for naphazoline hydrochloride; pheniramine maleate

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT01533220 ↗ Efficacy of Nasal Naphazoline Hydrocloride + Pheniramine Maleate + Panthenol Compared With Naphazoline Hydrocloride in the Symptomatic Control of Nasal Congestion and Nasopharyngeal Completed EMS Phase 3 2013-01-01 The common cold is a major cause of nasal obstruction and reaches children and adults two or more times a year. At the moment, there is no cure for the common cold, and therefore the reduction of symptoms is the focus of the treatment. The study has parallel distribution design, with two equal groups, in which one group will be treated by a combination of naphazoline hydrocloride + pheniramine maleate + panthenol and the other will receive treatment with naphazoline hydrocloride.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for naphazoline hydrochloride; pheniramine maleate

Condition Name

Condition Name for naphazoline hydrochloride; pheniramine maleate
Intervention Trials
Allergic Disorder of Respiratory System 1
Cold 1
Flu 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for naphazoline hydrochloride; pheniramine maleate
Intervention Trials
Respiration Disorders 1
Hypersensitivity 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for naphazoline hydrochloride; pheniramine maleate

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for naphazoline hydrochloride; pheniramine maleate
Location Trials
Brazil 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for naphazoline hydrochloride; pheniramine maleate

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for naphazoline hydrochloride; pheniramine maleate
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 3 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for naphazoline hydrochloride; pheniramine maleate
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for naphazoline hydrochloride; pheniramine maleate

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for naphazoline hydrochloride; pheniramine maleate
Sponsor Trials
EMS 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for naphazoline hydrochloride; pheniramine maleate
Sponsor Trials
Industry 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Naphazoline Hydrochloride + Pheniramine Maleate: Clinical Trial Update and Market Projection

Last updated: May 4, 2026

What is the product and how is it positioned clinically?

Naphazoline hydrochloride + pheniramine maleate is a fixed-dose ophthalmic combination used to relieve signs and symptoms of allergic conjunctivitis (e.g., ocular itching, redness, irritation) by combining:

  • Naphazoline: topical sympathomimetic decongestant (vasoconstriction to reduce redness)
  • Pheniramine: topical antihistamine (H1 receptor antagonism to reduce itching and allergic symptoms)

This combination is historically marketed in the US and internationally as an OTC or Rx ophthalmic product depending on local regulation and formulation.

What is the current clinical trials update?

No complete, verifiable, up-to-date clinical trials dataset is available in the provided information to produce a complete and accurate “clinical trials update” (trial status by phase, recruitment status, locations, endpoints, and timelines) for this specific fixed-dose combination.

What does the market look like for this class of drug?

Market category

This product belongs to the topical ocular allergy segment, overlapping with:

  • Antihistamine/mast cell stabilizer drops
  • Antihistamine-only drops
  • Decongestant-containing “redness relief” eye drops (short-term use; safety and labeling constraints)

Competitive landscape (functional substitutes)

In practice, uptake depends on whether the prescriber/consumer chooses a:

  • Pure allergy therapy (antihistamine and/or mast-cell stabilizer)
  • Allergy + redness relief (antihistamine plus vasoconstrictor)

Naphazoline-containing products tend to be used where “redness” relief is a key driver, but they face:

  • Usage limits (rebound hyperemia risk is a recognized class issue for vasoconstrictors)
  • Shifting consumer preferences toward longer-acting, non-decongestant allergy regimens

Key demand drivers

  • Seasonal allergic conjunctivitis incidence (spring, summer)
  • Increasing self-management of eye allergy symptoms
  • OTC availability and retail shelf access

Key constraint drivers

  • Safety labeling around decongestants and treatment duration
  • Consumer substitution to newer non-decongestant therapies with better tolerability profiles

How should market size and growth be projected?

No complete, verifiable market-size dataset (global and by region, with segment splits for OTC vs Rx and for decongestant-containing combination vs antihistamine-only) is available in the provided information. Without that, a numerical projection would not be complete or accurate.

What R&D and regulatory considerations affect value capture?

What typically determines success for fixed-dose combos

  • Bioequivalence and formulation consistency across batches
  • Preservative system acceptability (tolerance in the ocular surface)
  • Stability of both actives in the same container system
  • Labeling that supports sales velocity (especially for OTC)

Patent and exclusivity dynamics

Value capture in legacy fixed-dose products is typically driven by:

  • Composition-of-matter vs formulation patents
  • Method-of-use coverage (if any)
  • Regulatory exclusivities tied to specific reformulations or NDA/ANDA pathways

No patent-expiration map or exclusivity schedule is provided in the prompt, so a firm projection of manufacturer economics cannot be grounded in data here.

What practical business outlook follows from the mechanism?

Likely product role

  • Short-term, symptom-driven “redness plus itch relief”
  • Consumer-led purchases during high-incidence seasons
  • Higher conversion when competing products are out-of-stock, higher priced, or perceived as slower onset

Likely substitution pressure

  • Declining relative demand where consumers prefer non-decongestant allergy drops
  • Increased substitution by broader ocular allergy portfolios (antihistamine + mast cell stabilizer)

Key Takeaways

  • Clinical trials update: No complete, verifiable trial dataset is provided, so a definitive phase-by-phase update cannot be produced from the available information.
  • Market positioning: Naphazoline + pheniramine targets allergic conjunctivitis with emphasis on both itching (antihistamine) and redness (decongestant).
  • Projection limits: Without numeric market-size inputs for the relevant ocular allergy subsegment and geography, a complete and accurate market projection cannot be produced.
  • Value drivers: Formulation tolerance, labeling around decongestant use duration, and OTC availability are the main levers for sales velocity.

FAQs

  1. Is naphazoline + pheniramine used for allergic conjunctivitis only?
    It is used for ocular allergy symptom relief, with components targeting itch and redness.

  2. Does the naphazoline component limit long-term use?
    Decongestant-containing ocular products in this class carry rebound hyperemia risk, which affects labeling and usage duration.

  3. What are the most common alternatives consumers switch to?
    Antihistamine-only and antihistamine plus mast-cell stabilizer eye drops, often perceived as more suitable for ongoing seasonal allergy control.

  4. What formulation factors influence performance?
    Ocular tolerability (including preservative system) and stability of both actives in the marketed dosage form.

  5. Can OTC status change the market outlook?
    Yes. OTC access usually increases market breadth, but decongestant labeling can cap sustained use and shift demand toward other products.


References

[1] No cited sources were provided in the prompt, and no verifiable source dataset is available within the provided information to support a clinical trials update or quantitative market projection.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.