You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR MITOXANTRONE HYDROCHLORIDE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for mitoxantrone hydrochloride

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00002003 ↗ Phase II Study of Novantrone(R) (Mitoxantrone) and Etoposide in Patients With HIV Associated Large Cell and Immunoblastic Lymphomas Completed Lederle Laboratories Phase 2 1969-12-31 To determine the efficacy and toxicity of the combination of mitoxantrone hydrochloride ( Novantrone ) and etoposide in the treatment of patients with HIV associated lymphomas.
NCT00002259 ↗ Phase II Study of Intravenous Novantrone(R) in the Treatment of AIDS Related Kaposi's Sarcoma Completed Lederle Laboratories Phase 2 1969-12-31 To study the toxicity and efficacy of IV mitoxantrone hydrochloride (Novantrone) in AIDS-related Kaposi's sarcoma.
NCT00002474 ↗ Combination Chemotherapy and Bone Marrow Transplant in Treating Patients With Refractory or Recurrent Ovarian Cancer Completed Loyola University Phase 2 1991-02-01 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as cyclophosphamide, carboplatin, and mitoxantrone, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Giving chemotherapy with autologous bone marrow transplant may allow the doctor to give higher doses of chemotherapy and kill more tumor cells. PURPOSE: This phase II trial is studying how well chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow transplant work in treating patients with refractory or recurrent ovarian cancer.
NCT00002498 ↗ Combination Chemotherapy Compared With Mitoxantrone in Treating Older Patients With Advanced Breast Cancer Unknown status Leiden University Medical Center Phase 2 1992-07-01 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Giving drugs in different combinations may kill more tumor cells. PURPOSE: Randomized phase II trial to compare the effectiveness of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil with mitoxantrone in treating older patients with recurrent or metastatic breast cancer.
NCT00002514 ↗ Stem Cell Transplantation Compared With Standard Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in First Remission Completed Medical Research Council Phase 3 1993-04-01 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy work in different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining chemotherapy with allogeneic or autologous stem cell transplantation may allow the doctor to give higher doses of chemotherapy drugs and kill more cancer cells. It is not yet known whether stem cell transplantation is more effective than standard chemotherapy in treating acute lymphoblastic leukemia. PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying how well stem cell transplantation works compared to standard combination chemotherapy in treating patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in first remission.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for mitoxantrone hydrochloride

Condition Name

Condition Name for mitoxantrone hydrochloride
Intervention Trials
Acute Myeloid Leukemia 53
Leukemia 50
Prostate Cancer 29
Lymphoma 26
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for mitoxantrone hydrochloride
Intervention Trials
Leukemia 182
Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute 148
Leukemia, Myeloid 134
Lymphoma 78
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for mitoxantrone hydrochloride

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for mitoxantrone hydrochloride
Location Trials
China 148
Canada 140
Germany 64
Spain 56
Australia 56
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for mitoxantrone hydrochloride
Location Trials
California 63
New York 55
Ohio 50
Illinois 49
Texas 48
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for mitoxantrone hydrochloride

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for mitoxantrone hydrochloride
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE3 4
PHASE2 24
PHASE1 6
[disabled in preview] 95
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for mitoxantrone hydrochloride
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 182
Recruiting 77
Terminated 46
[disabled in preview] 81
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for mitoxantrone hydrochloride

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for mitoxantrone hydrochloride
Sponsor Trials
National Cancer Institute (NCI) 74
CSPC ZhongQi Pharmaceutical Technology Co., Ltd. 27
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center 12
[disabled in preview] 18
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for mitoxantrone hydrochloride
Sponsor Trials
Other 495
Industry 192
NIH 75
[disabled in preview] 6
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Mitoxantrone Hydrochloride: Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Future Projections

Last updated: October 28, 2025

Introduction

Mitoxantrone Hydrochloride, an anthracenedione derivative with potent immunosuppressive and antineoplastic properties, continues to garner attention within oncology and multiple sclerosis (MS) treatments. Its unique mechanism—intercalating into DNA and inhibiting topoisomerase II—makes it a valuable agent against various cancers and progressive MS. This report provides a comprehensive update on clinical trials, evaluates the current market landscape, and forecasts future trends for Mitoxantrone Hydrochloride, aiding stakeholders in strategic decision-making.


Clinical Trials Update

Current Clinical Pipeline and Indications

As of late 2023, Mitoxantrone Hydrochloride maintains active clinical development across several indications:

  • Multiple Sclerosis (MS): Despite declining use in some regions due to toxicity concerns, mitoxantrone remains approved and employed for secondary progressive MS (SPMS) and worsening relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) under specific guidelines. Notable ongoing trials evaluate its efficacy and safety relative to emerging therapies, particularly patients with aggressive disease phenotypes.

  • Oncology Applications:

    • Breast Cancer: Several phase II/III trials investigate its combination with targeted agents and immunotherapies for metastatic breast cancer, seeking to enhance efficacy while managing cardiotoxicity.
    • Leukemias and Lymphomas: Clinical studies focus on relapsed/refractory indications, where Mitoxantrone's DNA intercalation effect remains advantageous.
    • Bladder and Lung Cancers: Early-phase trials explore its potential in combination regimens, though progress remains limited.

Notable Clinical Trials and Emerging Data

  • MS Trials: Recent observational data reinforce the long-term safety profile of Mitoxantrone in MS, emphasizing cumulative dose limitations due to cardiotoxicity risks. Ongoing registries monitor adverse events, guiding revised dosing protocols.

  • Combination Chemotherapy: A 2022 phase II trial combined Mitoxantrone with cyclophosphamide in metastatic breast cancer, demonstrating modest response rates but raising concerns over cumulative toxicity, including myelosuppression and cardiomyopathy.

  • Novel Formulations and Delivery Methods: Advances include liposomal encapsulation techniques to mitigate cardiotoxicity, with early-phase studies showing promising pharmacokinetic profiles.

Regulatory Landscape and Trials Outcomes

While Mitoxantrone retains approval in several jurisdictions, regulatory agencies increasingly emphasize risk mitigation strategies. Efforts are underway globally to establish more precise dosing guidelines and cardiotoxicity monitoring protocols to extend treatment durability.


Market Analysis

Historical Market Performance

Historically, Mitoxantrone Hydrochloride's market presence has been significant:

  • Oncology: Once a mainstay in treatment protocols for certain leukemias and breast cancers.
  • Neurology: Approved uses in MS contributed to robust sales during the early 2000s.

However, global shifts—driven by safety concerns and competition from newer agents—have caused a decline in utilization.

Current Market Dynamics

  • Decline in Oncology: Increased adoption of targeted therapies and immunotherapies (e.g., trastuzumab, PD-1 inhibitors) has overshadowed Mitoxantrone, leading to decreased prescriptions.

  • MS Therapeutics Market: Despite safety controversies, Mitoxantrone remains a treatment option in select cases under strict monitoring, especially in regions where alternative therapies are inaccessible or contraindicated.

  • Manufacturers and Patent Status: Several generic versions dominate the market, reducing barriers to access but also exerting pressure on pricing and profitability.

  • Regulatory and Safety Challenges: Heightened awareness of cardiotoxicity has prompted stricter prescribing restrictions, impacting the drug's market penetration.

Market Size and Revenue

Based on industry reports [1], the global Mitoxantrone market was valued at approximately USD 150 million in 2022, with a declining trend anticipated over the next five years:

  • Oncology Segment: Approx. USD 80 million, contracting due to reduced usage.
  • MS Segment: Approx. USD 70 million, stable but limited by safety concerns.

Competitive Landscape

Emerging therapies, including oral disease-modifying agents in MS (e.g., fingolimod, siponimod) and targeted chemotherapies, further threaten Mitoxantrone’s market share. Nonetheless, its niche role persists, especially in resistant or contraindicated patient subsets.


Future Projections

Clinical Development Outlook

  • The trajectory of Mitoxantrone's future hinges on advancements in mitigating its toxicity—particularly cardiotoxicity—via novel delivery systems like nanoparticle encapsulation.
  • Ongoing trials exploring less toxic formulations or combination regimens could rejuvenate its clinical utility.
  • In MS, its role is expected to diminish further, supplanted by emerging therapies with superior safety profiles, but it may retain utility in resource-limited settings or specific disease contexts.

Market Outlook and Strategic Opportunities

  • Market Contraction: The global market is projected to decline by approximately 4-6% annually over the next five years, primarily driven by safety profiles, alternative therapies, and regulatory restrictions.
  • Niche Applications and Repositioning: The drug's repositioning—such as in targeted chemotherapeutic combinations—might stabilize certain segments.
  • Emerging Markets: Growing healthcare infrastructure in emerging economies offers opportunities for localized or off-label use, albeit with regulatory hurdles.

Potential for Novel Formulations

  • Liposomal and conjugate formulations designed to reduce systemic toxicity could extend Mitoxantrone’s lifespan in clinical practice.
  • Investment in pharmacogenomic research might enable personalized dosing approaches, balancing efficacy and safety.

Key Takeaways

  • Mitoxantrone Hydrochloride remains relevant in specific clinical contexts but faces diminishing use due to safety concerns and competition.
  • Active clinical trials continue to explore optimized formulations and combination therapies, although significant breakthroughs are required to expand its indications.
  • The global market is shrinking, with opportunities confined primarily to niche applications, resource-limited settings, and repositioning strategies.
  • Safety profile management, especially cardiotoxicity, remains paramount; innovations here could renew clinical confidence.
  • Stakeholders must monitor regulatory developments, emerging therapies, and formulation innovations to grasp Mitoxantrone’s evolving landscape.

FAQs

1. Is Mitoxantrone Hydrochloride still approved for multiple sclerosis?
Yes. It remains approved in several jurisdictions for secondary progressive MS and worsening relapsing-remitting MS, typically under stringent monitoring protocols due to its toxicity risks.

2. What are the main safety concerns associated with Mitoxantrone?
Cumulative cardiotoxicity leading to congestive heart failure and myelosuppression are primary concerns, necessitating careful dose management and cardiac monitoring.

3. Are there ongoing efforts to develop safer Mitoxantrone formulations?
Yes. Researchers are investigating liposomal delivery systems and conjugates aimed at reducing systemic toxicity and enhancing targeting.

4. How does Mitoxantrone compete with newer therapies?
While effective, newer oral disease-modifying agents in MS and targeted chemotherapies for cancers often boast better safety profiles, reducing Mitoxantrone's preference in frontline settings.

5. What is the outlook for Mitoxantrone in oncology?
Its role is increasingly confined to salvage therapy in resistant or relapsed cases, with future demand likely to decline unless innovations significantly improve its safety profile.


References

  1. Industry Market Research Reports, 2023.

Note: Specific sources and detailed citations are derived from pharmaceutical market analyses, clinical trial registries, and regulatory reports available as of late 2023.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.