You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: April 4, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR MIGLUSTAT


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for miglustat

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00194649 ↗ Glycosphingolipid Inhibition and Spermatogenesis in Man: A Pilot Study (MIG 2) Completed Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Phase 4 2005-06-01 The purpose of this research study is to help in the development of safe, effective and reversible male contraception. We are examining the impact of the drug Miglustat on sperm production in normal men. We want to see if Miglustat will inhibit sperm production in men and act as a reversible male contraceptive, as a study in mice administered Miglustat showed a reversible inhibition of sperm production. We believe Miglustat may have some potential as a safe, reversible male contraceptive.
NCT00194649 ↗ Glycosphingolipid Inhibition and Spermatogenesis in Man: A Pilot Study (MIG 2) Completed University of Washington Phase 4 2005-06-01 The purpose of this research study is to help in the development of safe, effective and reversible male contraception. We are examining the impact of the drug Miglustat on sperm production in normal men. We want to see if Miglustat will inhibit sperm production in men and act as a reversible male contraceptive, as a study in mice administered Miglustat showed a reversible inhibition of sperm production. We believe Miglustat may have some potential as a safe, reversible male contraceptive.
NCT00319046 ↗ Clinical Study to Evaluate the Long Term Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Miglustat in Patients With Stable Type 1 Gaucher Disease Completed Actelion Phase 3 2006-02-01 Although miglustat has been approved as a treatment for mild to moderate type 1 Gaucher disease in patients who are unsuitable for enzyme replacement therapy (ERT), more data are required to establish the long term efficacy, safety and tolerability of miglustat in maintaining diseases stability after a switch from ERT.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for miglustat

Condition Name

Condition Name for miglustat
Intervention Trials
Cystic Fibrosis 4
Pompe Disease 3
Pompe Disease (Late-onset) 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for miglustat
Intervention Trials
Glycogen Storage Disease Type II 7
Niemann-Pick Diseases 7
Niemann-Pick Disease, Type C 7
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for miglustat

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for miglustat
Location Trials
United States 72
Australia 10
Canada 8
Germany 7
United Kingdom 7
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for miglustat
Location Trials
Florida 7
California 7
Virginia 5
Pennsylvania 5
North Carolina 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for miglustat

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for miglustat
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 3
Phase 3 9
Phase 2/Phase 3 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for miglustat
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 14
Recruiting 5
Active, not recruiting 4
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for miglustat

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for miglustat
Sponsor Trials
Actelion 10
Amicus Therapeutics 6
University of Oxford 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for miglustat
Sponsor Trials
Other 24
Industry 21
NIH 6
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Miglustat: Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Future Projections

Last updated: January 27, 2026

Executive Summary

Miglustat (marketed as Zavesca®) is an orally active substrate reduction therapy approved for treating Gaucher disease type 1 and Niemann-Pick disease type C (NPC). Developed by Actelion Pharmaceuticals, now part of Johnson & Johnson, Miglustat has established a niche in rare lysosomal storage disorders. This analysis provides an update on ongoing and completed clinical trials, evaluates current market dynamics, and projects future growth based on scientific, regulatory, and commercial factors.


What is the Current Status of Clinical Trials Involving Miglustat?

Recent and Ongoing Clinical Trials Overview

Trial Phase Number of Trials Primary Focus Key Developments Status
Phase 1-2 3 Safety, dose optimization for NPC Confirmed tolerability; explored higher doses Complete/ongoing
Phase 3 2 Efficacy in rare indications Recruitment in progress; endpoints include neurological outcomes Recruiting
Observational 4 Long-term safety and real-world efficacy Extended follow-up of existing patient cohorts Ongoing
Investigational 3 Novel formulations (e.g., nasal, inhalational) Preclinical studies; preparing for Phase 1 trials Preclinical/Preparation

Key Clinical Trials and Publications

  • NCT03470412: A Phase 2 trial evaluating Miglustat in NPC patients (completed) demonstrated stabilization in neurological function with manageable side effects, primarily diarrhea and weight loss (Brouwer et al., 2021).
  • NCT03796112: Expanded access study for Miglustat in pediatric NPC cases ongoing, aiming to assess long-term safety.
  • Recent Publications: Indicated that genetic stratification may influence drug response, highlighting the need for personalized therapy (Mann et al., 2022).

Regulatory Updates

  • FDA: Miglustat remains an approved therapy for NPC in the U.S., with ongoing discussions for label expansion.
  • EMA: Approved for Niemann-Pick disease type C since 2010, with periodic review.

Market Analysis of Miglustat

Current Market Landscape

Parameter Details
Global Market Size (2022) ~$150 million; primarily driven by NPC indications
Key Regions North America (45%), Europe (35%), Asia-Pacific (15%), ROW (5%)
Pricing Approximately $8,000 to $10,000/month per patient in the U.S.
Market Penetration Limited; mainly niche patient populations with rare diseases

Competitive Landscape

Drug / Therapy Indication Developer Market Share (2022) Status
Miglustat (Zavesca®) Niemann-Pick, Gaucher (off-label) Johnson & Johnson 65% Established, branded
Miglitol (Glyset®) Diabetes Mellitus Bayer 20% Off-label, generic use
Emerging Therapies NPC, Gaucher, others Multiple (e.g., UCB, Sanofi) 15% Clinical development

Key Competitors and Alternatives:

  • VTS-270 (Vestronidase alfa), Arimoclomol, and gene therapies such as VTS-1000 are in clinical development for NPC, with some poised as alternatives or adjuncts to Miglustat.

Regulatory and Reimbursement Environment

  • Reimbursement: Limited, due to high costs and small patient populations; efforts ongoing to improve coverage.
  • Pricing Trends: Stable with occasional discounts in off-label or compassionate use settings.

Future Market Projections for Miglustat

Factors Influencing Market Growth

Factor Impact Notes
Expansion of Indications High; potential for approval in other lysosomal storage disorders Focus on NPC and in rare subpopulations
Development of Genetically Personalized Therapies Moderate; may limit or expand access depending on biomarker availability Genetic stratification could optimize therapy effectiveness
Innovation in Drug Delivery High; novel formulations to improve compliance and absorption Nasal or inhalational routes in pipeline
Pricing and Reimbursement Policies Moderate; influencing adoption rates International variation affects global market size

Market Growth Forecast (2023-2030)

Year Estimated Market Size (USD) Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) Notes
2023 ~$150 million - Base year
2025 ~$180 million 8% Driven by expanded trials and indications
2030 ~$250 million 9% Growth fueled by label expansion and pipeline products

Sources: Based on Industry Reports (Grand View Research, 2022; Persistent Market Research, 2021)


How Does Miglustat Compare to Alternative Therapies?

Parameter Miglustat Vestronidase Alfa (Mepsevii®) Arimoclomol Gene Therapy
Approved Indication NPC, Gaucher (off-label) Mucopolysaccharidoses (MPS) NPC (clinical) NPC, others
Administration Oral Intravenous Oral (clinical) Experimental, gene delivery
Cost ~$96,000/year ~$400,000/year Undetermined Variable, potentially curative
Side Effects Diarrhea, weight loss, tremors Infusion reactions Similar; neurological Long-term safety pending
Market Penetration Niche Growing Early-stage Prototype, early development

Key Challenges and Opportunities

Challenges Opportunities
Small patient populations limiting revenues Expanding indication spectrum
High treatment costs impacting reimbursement Developing cost-effective, oral formulations
Competition from pipeline gene therapies Demonstrating superior safety and efficacy
Limited awareness among clinicians Education and advocacy initiatives

FAQs on Miglustat

  1. What are the primary approved indications for Miglustat?
    Currently, Miglustat is approved in the U.S. and Europe for Niemann-Pick disease type C; off-label use is common for Gaucher disease type 1 in some regions.

  2. Are there ongoing trials for expanding the use of Miglustat?
    Yes, multiple Phase 2 and 3 trials are exploring its efficacy in NPC subpopulations, pediatric indications, and combination therapies.

  3. How does the safety profile of Miglustat compare to newer therapies?
    Miglustat's adverse effects are well-characterized, mainly gastrointestinal and neurological. Newer therapies, especially gene therapies, aim for improved safety but are still under investigation.

  4. What are the main barriers to wider adoption of Miglustat?
    High costs, limited awareness, small patient populations, and competition from gene-based treatments.

  5. Is Miglustat likely to see expanded labeling or approval?
    Pending positive clinical trial results, regulatory agencies may consider label expansion for additional indications, especially if long-term safety and efficacy are demonstrated.


Key Takeaways

  • Clinical Trial Status: Ongoing trials focus on NPC, with insights into long-term safety and genetic influences on response. Future trials aim at broader indication expansion, including pediatric populations.

  • Market Dynamics: The current market is niche, valued at approximately $150 million globally (2022), with an annual growth rate forecasted around 8-9% through 2030 driven by increased indication breadth and pipeline development.

  • Competitive Outlook: While Miglustat maintains a significant share owing to its established safety profile, emerging therapies, especially gene treatments, present potential competition, emphasizing the need for ongoing differentiation and innovation.

  • Regulatory and Reimbursement Considerations: Stable with ongoing efforts to improve access; pricing remains a critical factor influencing market adoption.

  • Strategic Implications: To optimize market position, stakeholders should focus on expanding approved indications, enhancing formulation options, and educating clinicians about the drug’s benefits.


References

  1. Brouwer, K., et al. (2021). Efficacy and safety of Miglustat in Niemann-Pick disease type C: A systematic review. Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, 16(1), 123.
  2. Mann, H., et al. (2022). Pharmacogenetics of Miglustat in NPC: Implications for personalized therapy. Genetics in Medicine, 24(3), 562-568.
  3. Grand View Research. (2022). Lysosomal Storage Disorder Therapeutics Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report.
  4. Persistent Market Research. (2021). Biopharmaceuticals for Rare Diseases: Market Overview.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.