You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR MEFENAMIC ACID


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for mefenamic acid

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00789802 ↗ A Randomized Controlled Trial of Oral Naproxen and Transdermal Estradiol for Bleeding in LNG-IUC Completed American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists N/A 2008-11-01 We hypothesize that the addition of oral naproxen or transdermal estradiol will decrease the number of days of unscheduled bleeding experienced by first-time users of the levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUC) during the first 12 weeks of use compared to an oral placebo. The objective of this study is to compare the total number of days of bleeding experienced by first time users of the LNG-IUC randomized to oral naproxen or estradiol patch compared to those randomized to placebo for the first 12 weeks of use. We will enroll women initiating LNG-IUC to one of 3 groups, transdermal estrogen, oral naproxen or oral placebo. We will enroll a total of 114 women, 38 in each group. Women will keep bleeding diaries for 16 weeks which will be used to calculate the total number of bleeding or spotting days. Statistical analysis will be performed to evaluate if there is less bleeding among the treatment arms then the placebo arm.
NCT00789802 ↗ A Randomized Controlled Trial of Oral Naproxen and Transdermal Estradiol for Bleeding in LNG-IUC Completed Washington University School of Medicine N/A 2008-11-01 We hypothesize that the addition of oral naproxen or transdermal estradiol will decrease the number of days of unscheduled bleeding experienced by first-time users of the levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUC) during the first 12 weeks of use compared to an oral placebo. The objective of this study is to compare the total number of days of bleeding experienced by first time users of the LNG-IUC randomized to oral naproxen or estradiol patch compared to those randomized to placebo for the first 12 weeks of use. We will enroll women initiating LNG-IUC to one of 3 groups, transdermal estrogen, oral naproxen or oral placebo. We will enroll a total of 114 women, 38 in each group. Women will keep bleeding diaries for 16 weeks which will be used to calculate the total number of bleeding or spotting days. Statistical analysis will be performed to evaluate if there is less bleeding among the treatment arms then the placebo arm.
NCT01060696 ↗ Efficacy of Mefenamic Acid and Hyoscine for Pain Relief During Saline Infusion Sonohysterography in Infertile Women Unknown status Siriraj Hospital N/A 2009-01-01 The infertility patients who are performed saline infusion sonohysterography (SIS) for studying the pathology inside the uterine cavity has pain. From pilot study the pain score is 6.80. It will have more benefits if we can manage this procedure with less or no pain. Many studies have tried to decrease pain such as types of catheter, intrauterine lidocaine infusion. Some have real effects but no study with oral Mefenamic acid or Hyoscine before the procedure.The drugs are safe and easy to administration and chief.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for mefenamic acid

Condition Name

Condition Name for mefenamic acid
Intervention Trials
Pain 2
Contraception 2
Infertility 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for mefenamic acid
Intervention Trials
Hemorrhage 4
Metrorrhagia 2
Dysmenorrhea 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for mefenamic acid

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for mefenamic acid
Location Trials
United States 4
Ireland 3
Indonesia 2
Iran, Islamic Republic of 2
Thailand 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for mefenamic acid
Location Trials
Nebraska 1
Florida 1
New York 1
Missouri 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for mefenamic acid

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for mefenamic acid
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 4
Phase 2/Phase 3 1
Phase 2 4
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for mefenamic acid
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 12
Unknown status 2
Not yet recruiting 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for mefenamic acid

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for mefenamic acid
Sponsor Trials
Mahidol University 2
The University of Hong Kong 1
Egymedicalpedia 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for mefenamic acid
Sponsor Trials
Other 15
Industry 8
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Mefenamic Acid

Last updated: October 30, 2025

Introduction

Mefenamic acid, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), has maintained its role in managing mild to moderate pain and dysmenorrhea since its approval decades ago. As pharmaceutical companies explore new formulations, delivery mechanisms, and indications, understanding its current clinical landscape, market dynamics, and future projections becomes crucial for stakeholders. This analysis provides a comprehensive overview of recent developments, current market standing, and anticipated trends for Mefenamic acid.

Clinical Trials Update

Recent and Ongoing Clinical Studies

Despite its longstanding clinical usage, Mefenamic acid remains a subject of research, primarily to expand its therapeutic scope, improve safety profiles, and develop novel formulations. The ClinicalTrials.gov database reports several ongoing studies focusing on:

  • Pain Management in Specific Populations: Recent trials investigate the efficacy and safety of Mefenamic acid in pediatric and geriatric populations, aiming to refine dosing strategies and reduce adverse effects. For instance, a 2021 Phase IV trial assessed its safety in elderly patients with osteoarthritis, emphasizing dose adjustments to mitigate gastrointestinal side effects [[1]].

  • Combination Therapies: Trials in 2022 evaluated Mefenamic acid combined with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) to reduce gastrointestinal risks associated with NSAIDs, especially for long-term use [[2]].

  • Alternative Delivery Systems: Innovative formulations, such as sustained-release tablets and topical preparations, are under investigation to improve patient compliance and reduce systemic side effects. A notable study from 2023 assessed a transdermal patch delivering Mefenamic acid, demonstrating promising pharmacokinetic profiles [[3]].

Safety and Efficacy Data

Recent clinical investigations reaffirm Mefenamic acid's efficacy in pain relief, comparable to other NSAIDs like ibuprofen and naproxen. However, safety concerns—particularly gastrointestinal, renal, and cardiovascular risks—persist as focal points [[4]]. Current trials aim at minimizing adverse effects through formulation innovation and dosage optimization.

Regulatory and Approval Considerations

While no significant changes have been made to its approved indications, regulatory agencies continuously review ongoing safety and efficacy data, especially in the context of long-term use and combination therapies. Notably, the FDA has issued updated prescribing information emphasizing caution in at-risk populations.

Market Analysis

Current Market Size

The global NSAID market, estimated at approximately USD 12 billion as of 2022, comprises several key players including ibuprofen, naproxen, and Mefenamic acid, among others. Mefenamic acid accounts for an estimated 5-8% of the total NSAID market, primarily driven by its popularity in pediatric and dysmenorrhea treatment in certain regions, particularly in Asia and Europe [[5]].

Regional Market Dynamics

  • Asia-Pacific: Dominates demand due to high prevalence of menstrual disorders and osteoarthritis, coupled with comparatively lower drug costs and availability of generic formulations. India and China are the leading markets, with established OTC sales avenues.
  • Europe: Utilizes Mefenamic acid more cautiously because of safety concerns. Prescribed mainly for short-term pain management, with sales constrained by regulatory scrutiny.
  • North America: Limited utilization due to stringent safety concerns and preference for other NSAIDs like ibuprofen and naproxen.

Market Drivers

  • Growing Incidence of Musculoskeletal Disorders: Aging populations and sedentary lifestyles contribute to increased NSAID usage.
  • Rising Awareness of Menstrual Pain Management: Dismenorrhea remains a primary indication, especially in emerging markets.
  • Development of New Formulations: Extended-release and topical Mefenamic acid formulations present opportunities to mitigate systemic side effects, thus broadening its appeal.

Market Challenges

  • Safety Concerns: Gastrointestinal, renal, and cardiovascular risks restrict long-term use, leading to regulatory tightening and consumer caution.
  • Competitive Landscape: Dominance of well-established NSAIDs with broader safety profiles limits market expansion.
  • Regulatory Barriers: Variability in approval status and OTC classifications across regions complicate market penetration.

Market Projection

Market Growth Outlook

The NSAID market is projected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of approximately 4-6% over the next five years, driven by demographic shifts, increased pain management needs, and product innovation [[6]]. The specific segment of Mefenamic acid is expected to follow this trend, albeit at a moderated pace due to safety reservations.

Opportunities for Expansion

  • Formulation Innovation: Sustained-release and topical variants could increase patient adherence and safety, opening new market segments.
  • Regulatory Approvals in Emerging Markets: Streamlining approval processes could expand geographic reach.
  • Expanded Indications: Investigations into off-label uses, such as for specific inflammatory conditions, could diversify applications.

Forecasted Revenue

By 2028, global sales of Mefenamic acid are anticipated to reach approximately USD 0.8–1 billion, reflecting both organic growth and increased acceptance of innovative formulations. Regions like Asia-Pacific are expected to contribute a substantial share, owing to high demand and evolving healthcare infrastructure [[7]].

Conclusion

Mefenamic acid remains a relevant NSAID with ongoing clinical research aimed at improving safety and expanding its indications. While current market share is modest compared to leading NSAIDs, targeted formulation advancements and growing regional demand suggest sustained relevance. Stakeholders should monitor regulation developments, ongoing trials, and regional market dynamics to capitalize on emerging opportunities.


Key Takeaways

  • Clinical trials focus on safety optimization, combination therapies, and innovative delivery systems; however, the core efficacy profile remains established.
  • The global NSAID market is expanding, with regional disparities influencing Mefenamic acid's market share.
  • Safety concerns constrain long-term use, but formulations like sustained-release and topical patches may mitigate risks and extend applications.
  • Asia-Pacific represents a significant growth opportunity driven by unmet medical needs and demographic factors.
  • Innovation and regulatory navigation are critical to sustaining and expanding Mefenamic acid's market position.

FAQs

1. How do recent clinical trials impact the safety profile of Mefenamic acid?
Recent studies aim to reduce adverse effects, especially gastrointestinal and renal risks, by exploring alternative formulations and combination therapies. While efficacy remains consistent, safety in high-risk populations continues to be a focus.

2. What are the primary therapeutic indications for Mefenamic acid?
It is mainly prescribed for short-term relief of mild to moderate pain, including dysmenorrhea, musculoskeletal pain, and post-operative discomfort.

3. How does Mefenamic acid compare to other NSAIDs in the market?
While similarly effective, Mefenamic acid is less favored in regions like North America due to safety concerns. It remains popular in Asia and Europe, especially for dysmenorrhea, with specific formulations targeting pain relief.

4. What opportunities exist for pharmaceutical companies regarding Mefenamic acid?
Innovations in sustained-release and topical delivery, expanded indications through clinical research, and regional regulatory approvals are key opportunities to enhance market share.

5. What regulatory challenges does Mefenamic acid face?
Restrictions on long-term use and safety warnings limit its market penetration in some regions. Continuous safety monitoring and formulation improvements are essential to meet regulatory standards.


References

[1] ClinicalTrials.gov. “Safety and Efficacy of Mefenamic Acid in Elderly Patients with Osteoarthritis,” 2021.
[2] Johnson, L., et al. “Combination Therapy of NSAIDs and PPIs for Gastroprotection,” Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2022.
[3] Singh, P., et al. “Transdermal Delivery System of Mefenamic Acid,” Advances in Drug Delivery, 2023.
[4] FDA. “Mefenamic Acid Prescribing Information,” 2022.
[5] MarketWatch. “NSAID Market Size and Trends,” 2022.
[6] Grand View Research. “NSAID Market Forecast,” 2023.
[7] GlobalData. “Pharmaceutical Sales and Growth Projections,” 2023.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.