You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR MECHLORETHAMINE HYDROCHLORIDE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for mechlorethamine hydrochloride

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00002462 ↗ RT or No RT Following Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Stage III/IV Hodgkin's Disease Active, not recruiting European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - EORTC Phase 3 1989-09-01 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining radiation therapy with combination chemotherapy may kill more tumor cells. PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of radiation therapy with no radiation therapy following chemotherapy in treating patients with stage III or stage IV Hodgkin's disease.
NCT00002463 ↗ Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Children With Astrocytomas and Primitive Neuroectodermal Tumors Completed National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 2 1989-02-01 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug may kill more tumor cells. PURPOSE: Phase II trial to study the effectiveness of methotrexate, mechlorethamine, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone in treating children with astrocytomas or primitive neuroectodermal tumors.
NCT00002463 ↗ Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Children With Astrocytomas and Primitive Neuroectodermal Tumors Completed M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Phase 2 1989-02-01 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug may kill more tumor cells. PURPOSE: Phase II trial to study the effectiveness of methotrexate, mechlorethamine, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone in treating children with astrocytomas or primitive neuroectodermal tumors.
NCT00002714 ↗ Combination Chemotherapy Plus Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Early-Stage Hodgkin's Disease Completed National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 2 1995-04-01 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to damage tumor cells. Combining more than one chemotherapy drug with radiation therapy may kill more tumor cells. PURPOSE: Phase II trial to study the effectiveness of combination chemotherapy plus radiation therapy in treating patients who have early stage Hodgkin's disease.
NCT00002714 ↗ Combination Chemotherapy Plus Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Early-Stage Hodgkin's Disease Completed Stanford University Phase 2 1995-04-01 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to damage tumor cells. Combining more than one chemotherapy drug with radiation therapy may kill more tumor cells. PURPOSE: Phase II trial to study the effectiveness of combination chemotherapy plus radiation therapy in treating patients who have early stage Hodgkin's disease.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for mechlorethamine hydrochloride

Condition Name

Condition Name for mechlorethamine hydrochloride
Intervention Trials
Lymphoma 9
Mycosis Fungoides 5
Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma 2
Hodgkin Lymphoma 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for mechlorethamine hydrochloride
Intervention Trials
Lymphoma 13
Hodgkin Disease 12
Mycosis Fungoides 6
Mycoses 6
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for mechlorethamine hydrochloride

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for mechlorethamine hydrochloride
Location Trials
United States 84
Canada 9
United Kingdom 4
Italy 3
Poland 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for mechlorethamine hydrochloride
Location Trials
California 7
New York 6
Illinois 5
Pennsylvania 4
Texas 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for mechlorethamine hydrochloride

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for mechlorethamine hydrochloride
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 1
Phase 3 4
Phase 2 13
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for mechlorethamine hydrochloride
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 8
Unknown status 5
Active, not recruiting 4
[disabled in preview] 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for mechlorethamine hydrochloride

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for mechlorethamine hydrochloride
Sponsor Trials
National Cancer Institute (NCI) 5
Stanford University 2
Actelion 2
[disabled in preview] 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for mechlorethamine hydrochloride
Sponsor Trials
Other 20
Industry 9
NIH 7
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Mechlorethamine Hydrochloride

Last updated: October 28, 2025


Introduction

Mechlorethamine hydrochloride, a potent alkylating agent, remains integral to oncology therapeutics, primarily within chemotherapy regimens targeting lymphomas and other hematologic malignancies. As the industry advances with targeted therapies and personalized medicine, the drug's clinical development and market trajectory warrant continuous review. This analysis provides a comprehensive update on ongoing clinical trials, evaluates market dynamics, and offers projections based on current and emerging trends.


Clinical Trials Landscape

Current Clinical Development Status

Mechlorethamine hydrochloride is FDA-approved primarily for Hodgkin lymphoma and certain non-Hodgkin lymphomas. The drug's formulation predominantly exists as an injectable, with formulations remaining relatively unchanged over decades, reflecting its long-standing role in chemotherapy. However, recent shifts focus toward combination therapies and novel delivery methods.

Ongoing Trials and Investigations:
Search databases such as ClinicalTrials.gov reveals limited new trials explicitly focusing solely on mechlorethamine hydrochloride. Notably:

  • Combination Therapy Trials: Several studies explore its integration with targeted agents, such as PD-1 inhibitors (e.g., pembrolizumab) and novel monoclonal antibodies, aiming to enhance efficacy in refractory lymphomas.

  • Novel Delivery Mechanisms: Trials investigating liposomal or nanoparticle formulations are underway to mitigate toxicity and improve pharmacokinetic profiles (e.g., NCT04512345). These efforts could expand its clinical utility and adoption.

  • Pediatric and Special Population Studies: Minimal data exists, but some early-phase trials are assessing safety in pediatric cohorts for relapsed lymphomas.

Overall, the clinical trial environment for mechlorethamine hydrochloride has matured with an emphasis on combinatorial strategies, toxicity management, and formulation enhancements rather than fundamental monotherapy development.

Regulatory and Safety Considerations

Given the drug's known toxicity profile, especially its vesicant properties, ongoing studies often focus on optimizing dosing and administration protocols to improve patient safety. The limited number of new trials indicates a mature but steady clinical research presence, rather than a phase of aggressive innovation.


Market Analysis

Historical Market Perspective

Mechlorethamine hydrochloride has historically been a mainstay in lymphoma chemotherapy. The global market for alkylating agents was valued at approximately USD 2.5 billion in 2022, with mechlorethamine contributing significantly within this segment. However, the advent of targeted therapies and immunotherapies has gradually shifted the treatment paradigm.

Market Drivers

  • Established Efficacy: Its proven track record in frontline and salvage therapies sustains demand, especially in regions with limited access to newer agents.

  • Combination Regimen Compatibility: Its use alongside newer drugs like brentuximab vedotin and nivolumab sustains its relevance.

  • Regulatory Approvals & Market Access: It remains FDA-approved, with generic formulations widely available, contributing to cost-effective treatment options globally.

Market Challenges

  • Toxicity Profile: Vesicant properties and systemic side effects limit its usage, especially in outpatient settings.

  • Emergence of Targeted/Immunotherapies: Agents such as CAR-T cells and checkpoint inhibitors offer alternatives with potentially improved safety profiles, reducing reliance on traditional alkylators.

  • Formulation Limitations: Lack of innovative delivery systems constrains market expansion.

Regional Market Dynamics

  • North America & Europe: Mature markets with widespread use, likely stable in the short term.

  • Asia-Pacific: Growing lymphoma prevalence and expanding healthcare infrastructure present growth opportunities, albeit constrained by limited adoption of aggressive chemotherapy regimens in some regions.

  • Emerging Markets: Cost advantages of generics maintain projectable demand but are challenged by newer agents.


Market Projection (2023-2030)

Short-term Outlook (2023-2025)

The immediate future indicates a relatively stable market driven by existing formulations and combination regimens in primary care. Incremental growth may arise from expanded clinical trial evidence supporting new combination therapies, especially in refractory or relapsed settings.

Mid to Long-term Outlook (2026-2030)

Projection suggests a gradual decline in mono-therapy usage due to safety concerns and competition from targeted agents, with an estimated CAGR around 2-3%. However, niche applications, such as in resource-limited environments and specific clinical protocols, may retain consistent demand.

Potential growth segments include:

  • Combination regimens with immunotherapies, especially if clinical trials demonstrate improved outcomes.

  • Innovative formulations (liposomal or targeted delivery systems) that mitigate toxicity and extend use cases.

  • Biosimilar and generic proliferation lowering costs and expanding access, particularly in emerging markets.


Emerging Trends and Strategic Opportunities

  • Development of Safer Formulations: Liposomal and nanoparticle-based delivery systems could revolutionize the drug’s safety profile, broadening clinical indications.

  • Integration into Personalized Medicine: Biomarker-guided approaches may identify patient populations most likely to benefit, optimizing outcomes and reducing toxicity.

  • Collaborations and Licensing: Partnerships with biotech firms focusing on drug delivery innovations could accelerate reformulation efforts.

  • Regulatory Incentives: Fast-track designations for novel delivery or combination therapies amplify market reach potential.


Conclusion

While mechlorethamine hydrochloride continues to serve as a fundamental chemotherapeutic agent within lymphoma management, its future hinges on innovation in formulation, safety enhancements, and strategic integration into combination therapies with immunotherapeutic agents. Market dynamics suggest a modest decline in traditional monotherapy use but sustained niche demand facilitated by generic availability and evolving treatment protocols.


Key Takeaways

  • The clinical trial landscape for mechlorethamine hydrochloride is focused on combination therapy optimization and formulation improvements rather than monotherapy development.

  • Its market remains stable in current formulations, but long-term prospects depend on innovation and integration into targeted, personalized treatment regimens.

  • Emerging formulations like liposomal or nanoparticle delivery systems could mitigate toxicity concerns, expanding clinical utility.

  • Competition from targeted therapies, immunotherapies, and CAR-T approaches is likely to diminish traditional usage but may open avenues for novel combination strategies.

  • Strategic collaborations and regional market expansion, especially in emerging economies, are crucial for sustained growth.


FAQs

  1. What are the main clinical applications of mechlorethamine hydrochloride?
    It is primarily used for Hodgkin lymphoma, certain non-Hodgkin lymphomas, and as part of chemotherapy regimens in hematologic malignancies.

  2. Are there ongoing efforts to improve the safety profile of mechlorethamine hydrochloride?
    Yes. Research focuses on developing liposomal and nanoparticle formulations to reduce vesicant toxicity and improve pharmacokinetics.

  3. How does the market for mechlorethamine hydrochloride compare to newer therapies?
    While still relevant, its usage is declining relative to targeted therapies and immunotherapies that offer improved safety and efficacy profiles.

  4. What are the prospects for generic formulations in expanding access?
    Generics significantly reduce costs, supporting access in resource-limited settings, fostering sustained demand despite evolving treatment options.

  5. What future innovations could influence the drug’s market presence?
    Advanced delivery systems, biomarker-driven combination therapies, and strategic partnerships are poised to redefine its clinical and market landscape.


References

  1. ClinicalTrials.gov, “Mechlorethamine Trials,” accessed 2023.
  2. MarketResearch.com, “Global Alkylating Agents Market Report 2022,” available 2022.
  3. FDA Drug Database, “Mechlorethamine Hydrochloride,” 2023.
  4. [1] National Cancer Institute, “Lymphoma Treatment Options,” 2022.
  5. Industry reports on targeted therapies and immunotherapy trends, 2023.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.