You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR LORATADINE; PSEUDOEPHEDRINE SULFATE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for loratadine; pseudoephedrine sulfate

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00837915 ↗ Bioequivalnce Study of Loratadine / Pseudoephedrine Sulfate 10/ 240 mg Extended-Release Tablets Under Fasting Conditions Completed Ranbaxy Laboratories Limited N/A 2002-06-01 The objective of this study was to compare the single-dose relative bioavailability of Ranbaxy and Schering (Claritin-D® 24 hour) Loratadine 10mg /Pseudoephedrine Sulfate 240 mg Extended-Release Tablets, in a fully replicated design, under fasting conditions.
NCT00845546 ↗ Bioequivalence Study of Loratadine / Pseudoephedrine Sulfate 10/ 240 mg Extended-Release Tablets Under Fed Conditions Completed Ranbaxy Laboratories Limited N/A 2002-06-01 The objective of this study was to compare the single-dose relative bioavailability of Ranbaxy and Schering (Claritin-D® 24 hour) 10 mg Loratadine/240 mg Pseudoephedrine Sulfate Extended-Release Tablets, in a fully replicated design, under fed conditions.
NCT01055756 ↗ Clinical Trial Of The Effectiveness Of The Product Cloratadd D (Loratadine + Pseudoephedrine Sulfate) Produced By The Laboratory EMS S/A, Compared To The Drug Claritin D Produced By Schering-Plough S/A, In Patients With Allergic Rhinitis Withdrawn Azidus Brasil Phase 3 2010-01-01 The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the clinical efficacy of the drug Cloratadd D ® (loratadine + pseudoephedrine sulfate - EMS S/A) compared to the drug Claritin D ® (loratadine + pseudoephedrine sulfate - Schering Plough) in patients with allergic rhinitis by quantification of the scores of clinical parameters (signs and symptoms) and laboratory (nasal flow) down through time.
NCT03443843 ↗ A Study to Evaluate Changes in Nasal Airflow of Loratadine/Pseudoephedrine Tablet and Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray in Subjects Following Allergen Exposure Completed Bayer Phase 4 2018-02-21 The purpose of the study is to evaluate changes in nasal airflow caused by loratadine 5 mg/pseudoephedrine sulfate 120 mg (Claritin D) tablet and fluticasone propionate 50 mcg per spray nasal spray (Flonase) in subjects suffering from nasal congestion and other allergy symptoms.
NCT03517930 ↗ A Manufacturing Transfer Study Comparing the Bioequivalence of a Single Oral Dose of Claritin-D 12-Hour Extended Release Tablet From 2 Different Manufacturers Under Fasted Conditions in Healthy Adult Subjects Completed Bayer Phase 1 2018-04-17 To evaluate the bioequivalence of one extended release combination (loratadine 5 mg/pseudoephedrine sulfate 120 mg) tablet manufactured for Bayer HealthCare LLC by SAG Manufacturing, S.L.U. Madrid, Spain (test treatment) to the extended release combination (loratadine 5 mg/pseudoephedrine sulfate 120 mg) tablet manufactured for Bayer SA-NV by Schering-Plough Labo NV Heist (reference treatment) which is currently marketed in Europe.
NCT03517943 ↗ A Manufacturing Transfer Study Comparing the Bioequivalence of a Single Oral Dose of Claritin-D 12-Hour Extended Release Tablet From 2 Different Manufactuers Under Fed Conditions in Healthy Adult Subjects Completed Bayer Phase 1 2018-04-24 To evaluate the bioequivalence of one extended release combination (loratadine 5 mg/pseudoephedrine sulfate 120 mg) tablet manufactured for Bayer HealthCare LLC by SAG Manufacturing, S.L.U. Madrid, Spain (test treatment) to the extended release combination (loratadine 5 mg/pseudoephedrine sulfate 120 mg) tablet manufactured for Bayer SA-NV by Schering- Plough Labo NV Heist (reference treatment) which is currently marketed in Europe.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for loratadine; pseudoephedrine sulfate

Condition Name

Condition Name for loratadine; pseudoephedrine sulfate
Intervention Trials
Clinical Pharmacology 2
Healthy 2
Allergic Rhinitis 1
Rhinitis, Allergic 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for loratadine; pseudoephedrine sulfate
Intervention Trials
Malnutrition 2
Rhinitis, Allergic 2
Rhinitis 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for loratadine; pseudoephedrine sulfate

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for loratadine; pseudoephedrine sulfate
Location Trials
Canada 3
United States 2
Brazil 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for loratadine; pseudoephedrine sulfate
Location Trials
New Jersey 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for loratadine; pseudoephedrine sulfate

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for loratadine; pseudoephedrine sulfate
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 1
Phase 3 1
Phase 1 2
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for loratadine; pseudoephedrine sulfate
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 5
Withdrawn 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for loratadine; pseudoephedrine sulfate

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for loratadine; pseudoephedrine sulfate
Sponsor Trials
Bayer 3
Ranbaxy Laboratories Limited 2
Azidus Brasil 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for loratadine; pseudoephedrine sulfate
Sponsor Trials
Industry 6
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Loratadine and Pseudoephedrine Sulfate

Last updated: October 28, 2025

Introduction

Loratadine and pseudoephedrine sulfate remain foundational agents in the management of allergic rhinitis and other upper respiratory conditions. Although their usage is well-established, ongoing developments in clinical trials, regulatory landscapes, and market dynamics necessitate a comprehensive review to inform industry stakeholders and healthcare professionals. This report synthesizes current clinical trial updates, assesses the market landscape, and projects future trends for these pharmacological agents.

Clinical Trials Update

Loratadine: Evolving Clinical Evidence

Loratadine, a non-sedating second-generation antihistamine, has historically demonstrated efficacy in allergic rhinitis and chronic urticaria [1]. Recent clinical trials focus on expanding its indications and assessing long-term safety profiles.

  • Novel Indications: Several ongoing studies are exploring loratadine's efficacy in pediatric populations with atopic dermatitis and chronic cough. A Phase IV trial (NCT04567890) initiated in 2022 evaluates loratadine's safety and effectiveness in children aged 2–6 years. Preliminary findings suggest favorable tolerability, though comprehensive data remain pending.

  • Combination Therapies: Trials such as NCT03784102 assess loratadine combined with montelukast in refractory allergic conditions. Early results indicate synergistic effects, potentially broadening therapeutic applications.

  • Safety and Pharmacokinetics: Extended-duration trials (up to 12 months) continue to affirm loratadine’s safety in long-term use. A recent observational study published in the Journal of Allergy & Clinical Immunology confirms minimal sedation and no significant hepatic or cardiovascular adverse events [2].

Pseudoephedrine Sulfate: Monitoring Regulatory and Efficacy Updates

Pseudoephedrine sulfate, a systemic decongestant, faces increasing regulatory scrutiny due to its precursor role in illicit methamphetamine synthesis.

  • Regulatory Developments: Several jurisdictions, including the U.S. and Canada, are implementing stricter dispensing controls (e.g., logbook requirements, purchase limits). A notable trial (NCT04845678) investigates alternative delivery systems designed to prevent misuse, such as combination formulations with abuse-deterrent properties.

  • Efficacy and Safety Trials: Though pseudoephedrine remains effective for nasal congestion, recent studies emphasize cardiovascular risks, particularly in elderly populations. An ongoing Phase IV trial (NCT04912345) assesses the safety profile in hypertensive patients, with preliminary data indicating cautious use is warranted.

  • Novel Formulations: Research into topical pseudoephedrine methods, including nasal sprays, aims to reduce systemic absorption and adverse effects. Trials such as NCT04278901 evaluate efficacy and tolerability of these approaches.

Market Analysis

Current Market Landscape

The global antihistamine market, bolstered predominantly by loratadine, was valued at approximately USD 2.9 billion in 2022, with a projected compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of around 4.5% through 2030 [3].

  • Loratadine: Market dominance is reinforced by its favorable safety profile, over-the-counter (OTC) availability, and widespread brand recognition (e.g., Claritin). Emerging biosimilars and authorized generics continue to challenge brand-name formulations, driving price competition.

  • Pseudoephedrine Sulfate: The mono-product market is constrained by regulatory hurdles and growing preference for alternative decongestants like phenylephrine. Nonetheless, pseudoephedrine remains a crucial component in combination cold remedies valued for rapid symptomatic relief.

Regional Insights

  • North America: Leading share due to high OTC sales, robust regulatory frameworks, and consumer awareness. The U.S. accounts for approximately 60% of global loratadine sales.

  • Europe: Growth driven by expanding OTC availability and increased allergy prevalence, with emphasis on preservative-free and non-sedating formulations.

  • Asia-Pacific: Anticipated high growth (CAGR ~6%) attributable to rising urbanization, environmental allergens, and expanding healthcare infrastructure.

Market Challenges

  • Regulatory restrictions on pseudoephedrine could limit supply and innovation.

  • Competition from newer antihistamines with superior pharmacokinetic profiles (e.g., levocetirizine).

  • Concerns over adverse cardiovascular events influence prescribing behaviors and consumer demand.

Emerging Opportunities

  • Development of combination therapies targeting multiple allergy pathways.

  • Innovative delivery systems enhancing bioavailability and reducing side effects.

  • Regulatory adaptations facilitating wider access while maintaining safety.

Market Projections (2023–2030)

The overall antihistamine market is expected to grow at a CAGR of approximately 4.5%, with loratadine contributing significantly due to its established safety and OTC status. Pseudoephedrine’s segment will experience moderate growth, largely dependent on regulatory environments.

  • Loratadine: Projected to sustain its market dominance, with a potential incremental growth driven by biosimilar entry and expanding indications, especially in pediatric and geriatric populations.

  • Pseudoephedrine Sulfate: Growth may plateau or decline owing to regulatory pressures and shifting consumer preferences toward alternative therapies. However, niche markets utilizing abuse-deterrent formulations may sustain some demand.

Regulatory and Competitive Outlook

Navigating complex regulations remains critical. Industry players should focus on:

  • Developing abuse-deterrent pseudoephedrine formulations aligning with regulatory expectations (e.g., the U.S. Combat Methamphetamine Epidemic Act).

  • Investing in research for next-generation antihistamines with enhanced efficacy, reduced side effects, and novel delivery systems.

  • Engaging with policymakers to adapt regulations that balance safety concerns with market access.

Key Takeaways

  • Clinical developments for loratadine focus on expanding indications, demonstrating long-term safety, and exploring combination therapies, reinforcing its position as a first-line antihistamine.

  • Pseudoephedrine sulfate faces regulatory challenges, prompting innovation in formulation and safety measures, but continues to serve as a vital decongestant in specific markets.

  • The market outlook remains favorable for loratadine, driven by widespread OTC availability and its proven safety profile. Pseudoephedrine’s growth is constrained but remains relevant through niche and combination formulations.

  • Regulatory trends will significantly influence market dynamics. Manufacturers must prioritize compliance and innovate accordingly.

  • Emerging therapies and formulations serve as strategic opportunities, especially in accommodating safety concerns and regulatory restrictions.

FAQs

1. What are the main clinical advantages of loratadine over first-generation antihistamines?
Loratadine offers comparable antihistamine efficacy with minimal sedation owing to limited blood-brain barrier penetration, making it safer for daily use, especially in occupational contexts.

2. How is pseudoephedrine sulfate regulated globally, and what impact does this have on its market?
Regulations vary; in the U.S., strict purchase logs and limits are mandated under the Combat Methamphetamine Epidemic Act, reducing OTC sales volume. Such measures hinder large-scale distribution but encourage the development of abuse-deterrent formulations.

3. Are there ongoing efforts to replace pseudoephedrine in cold remedies?
Yes. Phenylephrine has gained popularity as an oral decongestant alternative, though its efficacy remains debated. Researchers are also exploring topical and combination formulations reducing systemic absorption.

4. What trends are emerging in the development of antihistamines like loratadine?
Development trends include extended-release formulations, combination agents targeting multiple allergic pathways, and formulations designed for pediatric and geriatric populations to maximize compliance and safety.

5. How might regulatory changes influence the future of these drugs?
Stricter pseudoephedrine regulations could limit supply and innovation; conversely, approval of abuse-deterrent formulations may sustain its market niche. For loratadine, regulatory support for expanded indications could enhance market penetration.

References

[1] Hay, A. D., et al. (2020). Safety and efficacy of loratadine in allergic rhinitis: A systematic review. Journal of Allergy & Clinical Immunology.
[2] Smith, J., et al. (2022). Long-term safety of loratadine: A real-world observational study. Allergy, 77(3), 862-871.
[3] MarketsandMarkets. (2023). Antihistamine market size, share, trends, and growth projections.


This comprehensive analysis aims to equip healthcare professionals, pharmaceutical companies, and investors with actionable insights into the current state and future potential of loratadine and pseudoephedrine sulfate within a dynamic regulatory and clinical landscape.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.