Last Updated: June 9, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR LEVAMISOLE HYDROCHLORIDE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for levamisole hydrochloride

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00002551 ↗ SWOG-9304 Chemotherapy Plus Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Rectal Cancer That Has Been Surgically Removed Completed Cancer and Leukemia Group B Phase 3 1994-03-01 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to damage tumor cells. It is not yet known which treatment regimen is more effective for rectal cancer. PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of different regimens of combination chemotherapy plus radiation therapy in treating patients who have rectal cancer that has been surgically removed.
NCT00002551 ↗ SWOG-9304 Chemotherapy Plus Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Rectal Cancer That Has Been Surgically Removed Completed Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Phase 3 1994-03-01 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to damage tumor cells. It is not yet known which treatment regimen is more effective for rectal cancer. PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of different regimens of combination chemotherapy plus radiation therapy in treating patients who have rectal cancer that has been surgically removed.
NCT00002551 ↗ SWOG-9304 Chemotherapy Plus Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Rectal Cancer That Has Been Surgically Removed Completed National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 3 1994-03-01 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to damage tumor cells. It is not yet known which treatment regimen is more effective for rectal cancer. PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of different regimens of combination chemotherapy plus radiation therapy in treating patients who have rectal cancer that has been surgically removed.
NCT00002551 ↗ SWOG-9304 Chemotherapy Plus Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Rectal Cancer That Has Been Surgically Removed Completed NCIC Clinical Trials Group Phase 3 1994-03-01 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to damage tumor cells. It is not yet known which treatment regimen is more effective for rectal cancer. PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of different regimens of combination chemotherapy plus radiation therapy in treating patients who have rectal cancer that has been surgically removed.
NCT00002551 ↗ SWOG-9304 Chemotherapy Plus Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Rectal Cancer That Has Been Surgically Removed Completed North Central Cancer Treatment Group Phase 3 1994-03-01 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to damage tumor cells. It is not yet known which treatment regimen is more effective for rectal cancer. PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of different regimens of combination chemotherapy plus radiation therapy in treating patients who have rectal cancer that has been surgically removed.
NCT00002551 ↗ SWOG-9304 Chemotherapy Plus Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Rectal Cancer That Has Been Surgically Removed Completed Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Phase 3 1994-03-01 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to damage tumor cells. It is not yet known which treatment regimen is more effective for rectal cancer. PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of different regimens of combination chemotherapy plus radiation therapy in treating patients who have rectal cancer that has been surgically removed.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for levamisole hydrochloride

Condition Name

Condition Name for levamisole hydrochloride
Intervention Trials
Colorectal Cancer 6
Anemia, Hemolytic 3
Loiasis 2
Aplastic Anemia 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for levamisole hydrochloride
Intervention Trials
Colorectal Neoplasms 6
Anemia 5
Anemia, Aplastic 4
Syndrome 4
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for levamisole hydrochloride

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for levamisole hydrochloride
Location Trials
United States 49
China 8
Iran, Islamic Republic of 3
Canada 2
Republic of the Congo 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for levamisole hydrochloride
Location Trials
Ohio 4
Wisconsin 3
Pennsylvania 3
Nebraska 3
Iowa 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for levamisole hydrochloride

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for levamisole hydrochloride
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE2 2
Phase 4 4
Phase 3 14
[disabled in preview] 12
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for levamisole hydrochloride
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 12
Unknown status 8
RECRUITING 7
[disabled in preview] 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for levamisole hydrochloride

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for levamisole hydrochloride
Sponsor Trials
National Cancer Institute (NCI) 4
Institute of Hematology & Blood Diseases Hospital 3
The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University 3
[disabled in preview] 6
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for levamisole hydrochloride
Sponsor Trials
Other 66
NIH 5
OTHER_GOV 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Levamisole Hydrochloride Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Launch-Impact Projection

Last updated: May 22, 2026

Levamisole hydrochloride is an older, off-patent anthelmintic and immunomodulator with limited modern sponsor-driven late-stage development in regulated settings, and a market that is dominated by legacy supply chains rather than new clinical-program monetization. Current risk for new entrants is not patent exclusivity loss timing, but regulatory status, supply constraints, quality-system expectations, and therapeutic positioning outside narrow indications where evidence is dated.

What clinical trials are updating for levamisole hydrochloride in 2024-2026?

Levamisole hydrochloride’s recent “clinical trials update” is best characterized as low-volume, non-lead sponsor activity. In practice, most current activity tied to levamisole in searchable clinical trial registries concentrates on:

  • Reassessment in helminth infections using contemporary endpoints and safety monitoring
  • Immunology adjunct use cases that remain limited by evolving standards of care and study feasibility
  • Bioequivalence and formulation work, not large efficacy trials

Which trial types dominate the current activity?

  • Helminth infection studies that use updated parasitology endpoints and modern safety surveillance
  • Formulation or pharmacokinetic (PK) studies designed for generics and re-supply
  • Low-enrollment immunomodulation studies that face recruitment barriers and sponsor pullback

What is the practical implication for development timelines?

  • PK/bioequivalence work can move quickly, often months once sites and analytical batches are ready.
  • Efficacy studies in parasites are constrained by seasonal enrollment, diagnostic availability, and sponsor economics.
  • Program value is constrained by an aging evidence base and limited patent-tailoring opportunities.

What is levamisole hydrochloride’s current regulatory status and labeling footprint?

Levamisole hydrochloride has a long history of use, but modern regulatory landscapes are heterogeneous by geography:

  • In many markets it is generic/off-patent for antihelminth use.
  • In some settings it has restricted use or safety messaging tied to known adverse effects, especially agranulocytosis and hepatotoxicity.
  • Where it remains used as an immunomodulator, labeling and clinician adoption vary due to efficacy uncertainty versus newer immunotherapies.

FDA and US access reality

For US market access, modern differentiation is rarely clinical innovation and more often:

  • Controlled manufacturing and quality systems
  • Supply continuity for existing labeled forms
  • Compliance with current CGMP expectations and postmarket safety reporting

Europe and other regions

  • Generic supply and local approvals drive availability.
  • Parallel-channel demand exists in some geographies for deworming indications, but clinical-program sponsors are less incentivized because exclusivity is not a primary lever.

What patents protect levamisole hydrochloride and are they still in force?

Levamisole hydrochloride is a well-established active ingredient with an extensive historical literature base and legacy chemistry. For commercial planning, the key patent point is that:

  • The active ingredient and mainstream therapeutic uses are typically off-patent
  • Contemporary commercial differentiation is most often via process, formulation, or method-of-use patents, if any exist in a given jurisdiction for a specific product

How many patents cover levamisole hydrochloride today, by type?

For most markets, the practical answer is:

  • Ingredient composition patents: generally expired
  • Basic formulation salts/solid forms: often expired or not enforceable against standard generic salts
  • Process/manufacturing: may exist but rarely blocks entry unless tightly controlled
  • Specific dosage forms or restricted immunomodulation claims: could exist, but enforcement risk is usually low without active late-stage licensing or enforcement records

When does levamisole hydrochloride lose exclusivity and what is the generic entry risk?

Given the age of the compound, exclusivity risk is low in a patent sense:

  • The more relevant entry blockers are regulatory acceptability and quality/CMC execution, not unexpired patent estates.

What drives the “real” barrier to generic entry?

  • CMC validation: impurity profiles, residual solvents, polymorph control if applicable
  • Safety surveillance history: ensuring current labeling aligns with required safety warnings
  • Supply chain reliability: raw material sourcing and batch consistency

What formulations are protected and do product formats change IP barriers?

Levamisole hydrochloride is commonly marketed as oral tablets and other established dosage formats depending on country. For IP strategy and freedom-to-operate:

  • If a product is standard immediate-release solid oral dosage, formulation IP is typically weak or expired.
  • If a sponsor pursues a modified-release or stabilized solid system, there may be a narrow formulation patent opportunity, but it does not change the base off-patent status of the API.

What market size and demand drivers exist for levamisole hydrochloride?

Levamisole is used primarily in:

  • Veterinary and some human antihelminth contexts (depending on jurisdiction)
  • Adjunct immunomodulation in selected settings where evidence supports use and clinicians adopt it

Demand is driven by

  • NDP and helminth control cycles: seasonal and public health program demand
  • Local formularies: clinician adoption and procurement contracts
  • Supply continuity: availability shocks can temporarily lift pricing

Competitive landscape

Competition is typically multi-generic and often based on:

  • Price
  • Supply reliability
  • Packaging and distribution coverage
  • Label positioning in local approvals

How does levamisole hydrochloride compare with alternative dewormers and immunomodulators?

In antihelminth use, clinicians and procurement programs usually weigh levamisole against:

  • Niclosamide, mebendazole, albendazole, pyrantel pamoate and other standard anthelmintics (region-dependent)
  • Newer public-health strategies that prioritize broader spectra and safety convenience

In immunomodulation:

  • Levamisole’s role is constrained by newer targeted immunotherapies and evolving standards.

Net effect: levamisole competes in a cost-sensitive segment where clinical differentiation is difficult without new data.

What clinical trial results would change market projections most for levamisole?

Because the compound is older and generally off-patent, the biggest market-shaping outcomes would be:

  • A demonstrable new, regulator-recognized clinical indication with modern endpoints and clear superiority or non-inferiority
  • A new delivery format that materially improves safety or usability, creating product differentiation beyond commodity generics

Absent those, market value remains tied to generic pricing and procurement cycles.

Market projection: baseline, downside, and upside scenarios for levamisole hydrochloride

Given off-patent dynamics, projections should be treated as supply-and-price outcomes more than innovation-driven revenue growth.

Baseline scenario (most likely)

  • Steady procurement demand with price pressure from generic competition
  • Occasional procurement spikes due to supply interruptions
  • Revenue growth tracks inflation and incremental volumes, not new uptake

Downside scenario

  • Quality or supply chain disruptions in major manufacturing hubs
  • Tightening regulatory scrutiny on imported products or impurity profiles
  • Substitution by other dewormers in procurement programs

Upside scenario

  • Public health re-emphasis on older low-cost therapies
  • Rapid market access for additional generics in underserved geographies
  • Controlled risk reduction on labeling and safety messaging drives renewed clinician adoption

What clinical development pathways are feasible for levamisole hydrochloride now?

For sponsors, feasible pathways are typically:

  • Bioequivalence/bridging studies to secure approval for generics in markets where levamisole remains labeled
  • Small comparative trials in helminth settings if gaps exist in updated regimens or local resistance patterns
  • Mechanistic immunology studies if a specific niche claim is defensible, though commercialization remains difficult

What biosimilar risk or biologics issues apply?

Levamisole hydrochloride is a small molecule. There is no biosimilar pathway or biologics-specific exclusivity framework.

What manufacturing and IP barriers matter most for new entrants?

  • GMP-compliant synthesis with impurity control and validated analytical methods
  • Solid form and salt consistency if the product form differs from legacy batches
  • Stability studies aligned to current packaging and shelf-life expectations
  • Evidence of pharmacovigilance readiness due to known safety signals in the historical record

Key takeaways

  • Levamisole hydrochloride development activity is likely low-volume and skewed toward formulation/PK or niche reassessment rather than large efficacy-led programs.
  • The market remains largely generic and procurement-driven, with financial outcomes tied to supply reliability and pricing, not patent exclusivity.
  • The highest-impact “projection variable” is regulatory and quality acceptance for specific product formats, not exclusivity timing.
  • Commercial differentiation requires either a defensible new indication or a product-level improvement that changes substitution behavior.

FAQs

  1. Is levamisole hydrochloride still used as an immunomodulator in humans?
  2. What safety issues drive labeling and pharmacovigilance for levamisole hydrochloride?
  3. Do levamisole hydrochloride generics require bioequivalence studies for approval?
  4. Which countries still have active procurement demand for levamisole hydrochloride deworming indications?
  5. How does levamisole compare in effectiveness and tolerability versus albendazole or mebendazole for common helminth infections?

References

  1. ClinicalTrials.gov. (n.d.). Levamisole hydrochloride (search results). https://clinicaltrials.gov/
  2. FDA. (n.d.). Orange Book: Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations (search results for levamisole hydrochloride). https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/daf/
  3. EMA. (n.d.). European public assessment reports for levamisole hydrochloride (search results). https://www.ema.europa.eu/

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.