Last Updated: August 9, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR LANSOPRAZOLE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for lansoprazole

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00149084 ↗ Tailored Treatment of H. Pylori Infection Based Polymorphisms of CYP2C19 and 23S rRNA of H. Pylori Unknown status Yokoyama Foundation for Clinical Pharmacology Phase 3 2003-04-01 The eradication rate of the standard H. pylori eradication therapy (such as the triple therapy with a proton pump inhibitor [PPI], amoxicillin and clarithromycin) depends on bacterial susceptibility to clarithromycin and genotypes of CYP2C19 in patients. The investigators intend to investigate whether the tailored therapy based on the two above-mentioned factors increases the cure rate of the initial eradication therapy.
NCT00149084 ↗ Tailored Treatment of H. Pylori Infection Based Polymorphisms of CYP2C19 and 23S rRNA of H. Pylori Unknown status Hamamatsu University Phase 3 2003-04-01 The eradication rate of the standard H. pylori eradication therapy (such as the triple therapy with a proton pump inhibitor [PPI], amoxicillin and clarithromycin) depends on bacterial susceptibility to clarithromycin and genotypes of CYP2C19 in patients. The investigators intend to investigate whether the tailored therapy based on the two above-mentioned factors increases the cure rate of the initial eradication therapy.
NCT00174928 ↗ A Study to Evaluate the Effect of Lansoprazole on Hospitalized Neonates With Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Completed Takeda Phase 1 2005-05-01 The purpose of this study is to understand how quickly lansoprazole, once daily (QD), improves feeding in premature babies or babies less than 28 days of age.
NCT00175032 ↗ A Comparison of Safety and Treatment in Subjects With Osteoarthritis Taking Low Dose Aspirin Completed Takeda Phase 3 2003-07-01 The purpose of this study is to compare the gastroduodenal ulceration rate, gastrointestinal complication rate and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-associated dyspepsia between lansoprazole, naproxen and celecoxib, taken once daily (QD) or twice daily (BID), in participants with osteoarthritis taking low dose aspirin.
NCT00175045 ↗ Intravenous vs Oral Lansoprazole on Gastric Acid Secretion in Subjects With Erosive Esophagitis Completed Takeda Phase 2 2003-06-01 The purpose of this study was to compare the pharmacodynamics of intravenous (IV) lansoprazole to oral lansoprazole capsules, once daily (QD), in participants with erosive esophagitis.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for lansoprazole

Condition Name

Condition Name for lansoprazole
Intervention Trials
Helicobacter Pylori Infection 17
Healthy 14
Erosive Esophagitis 12
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease 11
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for lansoprazole
Intervention Trials
Gastroesophageal Reflux 40
Esophagitis 23
Ulcer 23
Helicobacter Infections 19
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for lansoprazole

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for lansoprazole
Location Trials
United States 359
Japan 341
China 129
Korea, Republic of 34
Taiwan 20
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for lansoprazole
Location Trials
California 18
Texas 17
Florida 17
Missouri 16
North Carolina 14
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for lansoprazole

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for lansoprazole
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 3
PHASE3 6
PHASE2 4
[disabled in preview] 66
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for lansoprazole
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 121
Recruiting 18
Unknown status 18
[disabled in preview] 23
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for lansoprazole

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for lansoprazole
Sponsor Trials
Takeda 37
AstraZeneca 10
National Taiwan University Hospital 7
[disabled in preview] 11
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for lansoprazole
Sponsor Trials
Other 171
Industry 110
NIH 3
[disabled in preview] 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Lansoprazole clinical trials update, market analysis and forecast (2026-2035)

Last updated: July 25, 2026

Executive summary

  • Use and demand base: Lansoprazole remains a mature proton pump inhibitor (PPI) with broad availability in the US and most major markets. Demand tracks GERD and dyspepsia treatment patterns and payer/formulary decisions rather than clinical novelty.
  • Clinical trial direction (current cycle): Active portfolios skew to new formulations, combinations, pediatric studies, and comparative bioequivalence rather than new MOA phase 3 efficacy trials.
  • Market outlook: Growth is expected to be low-to-moderate, driven mainly by population growth, treatment persistence, and replacement of older brands with authorized generics. Price compression limits value growth; volume and switch dynamics drive revenue more than unit price.
  • Competitive risk profile: Generic saturation is the baseline. Incremental launches face tight price competition, limited differentiation, and regulatory time-to-market constraints tied to ANDA economics and pediatric labeling extensions.

What is lansoprazole used for, and what trials are still ongoing?

Answer (featured snippet): Lansoprazole is used to treat GERD, erosive esophagitis, and H. pylori-related conditions (in combination regimens). Current trials focus largely on formulation updates, pediatric/labeling expansions, and bioequivalence/comparative pharmacokinetics rather than late-stage new mechanism studies.

Indications driving clinical activity

  • GERD: symptom control and healing of erosive esophagitis
  • Maintenance strategies in select label contexts
  • H. pylori eradication: combination regimens (with antibiotics and acid suppression)
  • Dyspepsia and other acid-related disorders depending on jurisdiction labeling

Typical “trial types” still appearing for mature PPIs

  • Pediatric PK/PD, dosing confirmation, and safety (age-stratified studies)
  • Formulation trials: delayed-release optimization, granulation differences, new excipients
  • Device-adjacent delivery: dispersible or capsule-free dosing formats in some markets
  • Comparative PK/bioequivalence for authorized generics and new entrants
  • Real-world evidence studies are common but do not typically support regulatory exclusivity

What does the latest lansoprazole clinical trials landscape look like in 2025-2026?

Answer: Trial activity is dominated by bioequivalence and formulation studies plus smaller clinical investigations around dosing, tolerability, and pediatric use. Phase 3 efficacy trials are less common because the MOA is established and generic competition is mature.

Phase distribution by practical expectation for a generic-heavy PPI

  • Early pharmacology: PK comparisons, absorption modeling, food-effect studies
  • Safety/labeling: pediatric and post-market safety updates
  • No clear signal for breakthrough MOA development in the standard lansoprazole class unless tied to new combinations or specialized delivery

Where ongoing studies usually concentrate

  • Regions where dosing formulations are being optimized for local prescribing practices
  • Pediatric-adaptation markets seeking harmonized dosing and palatability
  • Companies positioning differentiated tablets/capsules or fixed-dose combinations

Which new lansoprazole formulations are in development, and what patent strategy typically applies?

Answer: Differentiation is usually product-line rather than molecule-level, using formulation and manufacturing method IP, plus regulatory strategy around bioequivalence.

Common formulation development themes in mature PPIs

  • Improved granulation to control dissolution timing
  • Stabilizer/excipient changes to improve consistency and shelf life
  • New dosage forms (for example, dispersible variants)
  • Fixed-dose combinations aimed at adherence improvements (jurisdiction-dependent)

Patent estate reality for lansoprazole

  • The active ingredient is long off-patent in most markets; remaining leverage is usually limited to:
    • Method-of-manufacture
    • Specific formulation compositions
    • Specific combinations and dosing regimens
    • Orphan/pediatric exclusivity only where applicable through new regulatory pathways (not typical for lansoprazole)

What is the market size for lansoprazole, and how does it trend?

Answer: Lansoprazole’s value growth is constrained by generic competition, while volume remains supported by ongoing GERD and dyspepsia treatment needs.

Market drivers

  • GERD prevalence and chronicity
  • Payer formularies favoring lowest-cost PPIs within classes
  • Switching between PPIs based on price and coverage
  • Continued OTC/insurer access in relevant markets (where applicable to local regulation)

Market friction factors

  • Strong headwinds from:
    • Class competition with other PPIs (esomeprazole, omeprazole, pantoprazole, rabeprazole)
    • Interchangeability policies
    • Erosion of brand premiums after generic substitution

How does lansoprazole compare with other PPIs like omeprazole and pantoprazole on revenue and share?

Answer: Competitive advantage for lansoprazole is typically cost and supply chain efficiency, not clinical superiority. Share dynamics usually track pricing and formulary inclusion rather than differentiation.

Competitive set

  • Omeprazole (including enteric-coated generics and branded remnants by region)
  • Pantoprazole
  • Esomeprazole
  • Rabeprazole
  • Class-level alternatives (H2 blockers in some segments)

What usually moves share

  • Tender cycles and hospital pharmacy procurement
  • Pharmacy benefit manager (PBM) switching programs
  • OTC-to-Rx conversions based on plan rules and patient cost-sharing

When does lansoprazole lose exclusivity, and what does that mean for generics?

Answer: Lansoprazole is already in a post-exclusivity environment in major markets. The practical “exclusivity” left is mostly regulatory exclusivity around specific formulations or pediatric/label expansions if any are present in a given jurisdiction.

Generic entry mechanics that matter for lansoprazole

  • ANDA pathways in the US for oral dosage forms
  • Bioequivalence testing requirements for each strength/dosage form
  • Patent certifications against Orange Book-listed patents where relevant (generally limited for established actives)

Litigation pattern for mature PPIs

  • More activity early in generic transitions; for lansoprazole specifically, the current cycle typically shows:
    • fewer high-stakes challenges
    • more localized disputes around formulation/manufacturing IP where still listed

What is the Orange Book status of lansoprazole products in the US?

Answer: Lansoprazole is widely available, so the current Orange Book landscape typically contains many ANDAs and listed patents with limited remaining term. The practical read-through is that most generic entries are already established, and new litigation risk is concentrated in remaining formulation or method patents (if listed) rather than the API itself.

How to interpret Orange Book listings operationally

  • Focus on whether any remaining patents are:
    • listed for the specific dosage form/strength of interest
    • still within the enforceable window
  • For forecasting generic entry, the key is whether any new “blocking” patents exist for that exact presentation.

What Paragraph IV challenges affect lansoprazole, and where are the bottlenecks?

Answer: Paragraph IV challenges are generally not a primary forecasting lever for lansoprazole value now because many presentations are already generic. Remaining bottlenecks are usually:

  • patents tied to specific formulations
  • method-of-manufacture limitations
  • regulatory strategy for new dosage forms or combinations

What bottlenecks delay launches

  • Inactive litigation if patents expire or are narrowed
  • Narrow remaining claims tied to process
  • Bioequivalence and CMC readiness timelines

What biosimilar risk exists for lansoprazole?

Answer: None. Lansoprazole is a small-molecule drug and is not biologic-based, so biosimilar frameworks do not apply.


What is the commercial forecast for lansoprazole through 2035?

Answer: Revenue growth is expected to be limited versus historical peaks due to pricing pressure and substitution. Volume is likely to be steadier, so forecast performance hinges on:

  • maintenance of formulary inclusion
  • procurement wins
  • conversion of OTC and acute users to chronic or recurrent therapy
  • retention of market share versus other PPIs

Forecast structure used for mature PPIs

  • Units forecast: population growth + prevalence + adherence/persistence
  • Mix: shifts among strengths, dosage forms, and formulation variants
  • Price: ASP/wholesale compression driven by generic competition
  • Share: class-level switching among PPIs based on PBM and tender rules

Projection logic (what to expect)

  • Near-term (1-3 years): modest revenue movement, likely dominated by pricing changes and mix rather than new demand
  • Mid-term (4-7 years): incremental share churn inside the PPI class; continued price compression
  • Long-term (8-10 years): stability in volume but limited value upside; differentiation remains mainly supply chain and product format

How many brands and generic competitors share the lansoprazole market?

Answer: Lansoprazole is widely manufactured by multiple generic companies and may have many authorized generic and branded remnants depending on country. The competitive field is dense, which drives:

  • aggressive tender pricing
  • rapid substitution after loss of brand exclusivity
  • frequent NDC-level portfolio consolidation

Practical implication for entry or expansion

  • Market access tends to be won through contracting and cost position.
  • Clinical differentiation is not the primary lever.

Which regions offer the best opportunity for lansoprazole demand and revenue?

Answer: Opportunities concentrate where:

  • GERD management continues to grow with healthcare access
  • pricing regulation supports stable reimbursement
  • patent/formulation-specific differentiation exists locally
  • pediatric labeling and dosing format preferences increase uptake

Regional opportunity pattern for mature PPIs

  • Higher growth markets: emerging economies with rising diagnosed GERD
  • Mature markets: stable volume but heavy price compression

What clinical endpoints and safety considerations still matter for lansoprazole?

Answer: Safety and tolerability remain key, with attention to class effects and adherence-related outcomes.

Common endpoints in ongoing studies

  • PK metrics: Cmax, AUC, time to absorption
  • Food-effect and fasting comparisons
  • Safety: adverse events, lab monitoring where required
  • Symptom scores and healing outcomes only in narrower labeling-update studies

Safety themes seen across PPIs

  • Short-term tolerability and discontinuation rates
  • Drug-drug interaction considerations (acid suppression impacts absorption of some therapies)
  • Electrolyte and mineral-related considerations (class-wide attention in post-market settings)

Key Takeaways

  • Lansoprazole is in a mature, generic-saturated market where clinical trial activity is mostly formulation, PK, and labeling-support rather than MOA breakthroughs.
  • Forecasts should treat revenue as mainly a function of price compression and mix, with unit demand supported by GERD/dyspepsia prevalence and persistence.
  • Commercial winners are typically determined by supply chain cost, contracting strategy, and product format execution, not therapeutic differentiation.
  • Litigation and exclusivity are not usually the main value levers for lansoprazole now; they matter only when specific formulation or method patents remain relevant to the exact dosage form.

FAQs

  1. How do lansoprazole generics maintain differentiation when the API is off-patent?
  2. What FDA regulatory pathway applies to lansoprazole ANDAs, and what slows approvals?
  3. Does lansoprazole have pediatric-specific studies that affect labeling in the US?
  4. How do procurement tenders and PBM switches influence lansoprazole market share?
  5. What drug-drug interaction considerations are most relevant for lansoprazole in real-world use?

References

  1. FDA. Drugs@FDA: FDA approved drug products (lansoprazole entries and labeling). U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
  2. FDA. Orange Book: Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations. U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
  3. ClinicalTrials.gov. Search results for lansoprazole. U.S. National Library of Medicine.
  4. EMA. European Medicines Agency: product information and assessment documents for lansoprazole-containing medicines. European Medicines Agency.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.