You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR LAMIVUDINE; ZIDOVUDINE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for lamivudine; zidovudine

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00000831 ↗ Virologic Responses To New Nucleoside Regimens After Prolonged ZDV or ddI Monotherapy Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Phase 2 1969-12-31 To elucidate the relationship between virologic risk factors and immunologic and clinical progression in patients receiving monotherapy in protocol ACTG 175, and to compare new treatment regimens with combinations of reverse transcriptase inhibitors in long-term recipients of monotherapy. Specifically, to determine, in patients who have been taking zidovudine (AZT) alone for a long time, whether it is beneficial to add lamivudine (3TC) to AZT or to switch to d4T alone, and also to determine, in patients who have been taking didanosine (ddI) alone for a long time, whether it is beneficial to add AZT or AZT/3TC to ddI. Characteristics of virus replication, pathogenicity, and resistance are thought to determine the durability of virologic and clinical response to nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Previous results of ACTG 175 suggest that either a switch to ddI or addition of ddI in patients receiving AZT results in better clinical, virologic, and CD4 cell response compared to continuation of AZT alone.
NCT00000834 ↗ A Phase I Study of Methotrexate for HIV Infection Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Phase 1 1969-12-31 To determine the safety and tolerance of methotrexate in HIV-infected patients. To determine the dose effective in modulating key markers of immune activation. To determine a dose suitable for Phase II or III evaluation in HIV-infected patients. In HIV infection, complete immunological clearance of the foreign antigen does not occur, resulting in chronic immune activation. Because chronic immune activation may contribute to disease progression in HIV infection, immunomodulators may have therapeutic value in early HIV disease prior to development of opportunistic infections. The clinical benefits of methotrexate appear to derive from an anti-inflammatory effect; thus, it may reduce the state of chronic immune activation.
NCT00000838 ↗ Antiviral Activity of and Resistance to Lamivudine in Combination With Zidovudine, Stavudine, or Didanosine Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Phase 2 1969-12-31 To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of lamivudine (3TC) combined with zidovudine (AZT), stavudine (d4T), or didanosine (ddI) in comparison with d4T or ddI monotherapy in HIV-infected patients with no prior nucleoside therapy. 3TC may be uniquely effective in combination with AZT due to the interaction of AZT and 3TC resistance mutations. One explanation is that the M184V mutation, which confers resistance to 3TC, suppresses AZT resistance. This benefit of 3TC may not extend to combination therapy with other nucleoside analogs.
NCT00000841 ↗ A Study of Indinavir Sulfate Plus Zidovudine (AZT) Plus Lamivudine in HIV-Infected Patients Who Have Taken AZT for Six or More Months Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Phase 3 1969-12-31 To determine the clinical efficacy of indinavir sulfate or placebo in combination with zidovudine ( AZT ) and lamivudine ( 3TC ) in AIDS patients. Protease inhibitors such as indinavir sulfate may be effective in patients with advanced HIV disease who have received prior AZT therapy. Since studies suggest that triple drug therapy may have an advantage over both monotherapy and two drug therapy, the combination of indinavir sulfate with AZT and 3TC should be evaluated.
NCT00000861 ↗ The Addition of Indinavir to Anti-HIV Treatment in HIV-Infected Patients Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) N/A 1969-12-31 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of immediate versus deferred indinavir (IDV) in addition to background therapy on disease progression or death in patients with CD4+ cell counts between 200 and 500 cells/mm3 and plasma HIV RNA levels >= 10,000 copies/ml. This study aims to examine two management strategies, immediate versus deferred IDV therapy, for their clinical effects in the context of background antiretroviral (AR) therapy, given according to current clinical practice. There is an urgent need to identify the optimal use of IDV in patient management, since clinical endpoint studies have not been completed in the United States. Since there is little information about the long term durability of clinical effects, and even less information about the timing of the initiation of protease inhibitor therapy, exploring the disease progression and survival impact of immediate versus delayed use of IDV will yield important information to guide clinical decision making for this group of patients.
NCT00000865 ↗ The Safety and Effects of 1592U89 Used Alone or in Combination With Other Anti-HIV Drugs in HIV-Infected Infants and Children Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Phase 1 1969-12-31 To assess the steady state pharmacokinetic features, tolerance, and safety of orally administered 1592U89, given alone or in combination with other antiretroviral medications, in HIV infected infants and children. To establish doses of 1592U89 appropriate for future pediatric Phase II/III clinical trials. On the basis of the preclinical and clinical studies, 1592U89 appears to be a promising agent for treatment of HIV infection in children, either as an alternative to currently employed agents, or in combination therapy regimens. A liquid formulation of the drug is available; thus concurrent development of 1592U89 for children and adults is possible.
NCT00000875 ↗ Controlled Clinical Trial of Antiviral Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte (CTL) Infusion Following Combination Antiretroviral Drug Therapy for Asymptomatic HIV-1 Infection Terminated National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) N/A 1969-12-31 To evaluate the safety of anti-HIV CTL therapy in early stage patients and to verify the safety when combined with antiviral therapy with zidovudine/lamivudine/indinavir and low-dose interleukin-2 (IL-2). To compare the effects on plasma and cell-associated viral load following combination drug therapy with and without antiviral CTL in early-stage patients. To study in detail the immune effects of lowering viral burden with antiviral combination drugs with and without T cell infusion on antiviral CTL activity, viral suppression and proliferation, circulating T cell phenotype, T cell apoptosis, CD4 cell numbers, DTH reaction, and inflammatory cytokine levels. In an HIV-infected person, there is an ongoing struggle between HIV replication and host immune control. In the past decade most therapeutic strategies have targeted the virus. This approach has been frustrated by viral mutation to evade drug sensitivity. Promising drugs have recently been approved and there are encouraging sustained results from combination antiviral chemotherapy. However, even the most potent drug regimens do not seem to be curative, may eventually lead to drug resistance and may not completely restore lost immune function. The addition of immune-based therapy to antiviral drugs may lead to better viral control.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for lamivudine; zidovudine

Condition Name

Condition Name for lamivudine; zidovudine
Intervention Trials
HIV Infections 133
HIV 20
HIV Infection 10
Pregnancy 6
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for lamivudine; zidovudine
Intervention Trials
HIV Infections 152
Infections 34
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome 33
Infection 28
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for lamivudine; zidovudine

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for lamivudine; zidovudine
Location Trials
Puerto Rico 41
Canada 40
Spain 34
South Africa 31
China 18
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for lamivudine; zidovudine
Location Trials
California 84
New York 68
Illinois 59
Florida 58
North Carolina 53
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for lamivudine; zidovudine

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for lamivudine; zidovudine
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 37
Phase 3 47
Phase 2/Phase 3 8
[disabled in preview] 95
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for lamivudine; zidovudine
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 159
Unknown status 14
Terminated 7
[disabled in preview] 7
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for lamivudine; zidovudine

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for lamivudine; zidovudine
Sponsor Trials
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) 69
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) 21
Glaxo Wellcome 16
[disabled in preview] 33
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for lamivudine; zidovudine
Sponsor Trials
Other 162
NIH 97
Industry 97
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Lamivudine and Zidovudine

Last updated: October 28, 2025

Introduction

Lamivudine (3TC) and Zidovudine (AZT) are cornerstone antiretroviral drugs (ARVs) utilized in the management of HIV/AIDS. As a dual therapy or part of combination regimens, these nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) have established their central role, particularly in resource-limited settings. Their evolving clinical profile, driven by ongoing research, patent expiries, and strategic market shifts, necessitates an updated review. This report analyzes current clinical trial landscapes, assesses market dynamics, and projects future trends impacting Lamivudine and Zidovudine.


Clinical Trials Landscape: Recent Developments and Emerging Trends

Current Clinical Trial Focus

Recent clinical trials predominantly focus on improving efficacy, reducing toxicity, and integrating Lamivudine and Zidovudine into longer-acting or formulations compatible with modern ART regimens.

  • Drug Resistance and Efficacy: Multiple ongoing studies investigate resistance patterns, especially the emergence of resistant HIV strains. For instance, trials like NCT03887386 evaluate long-term durability of these drugs against HIV-1 resistance profiles.

  • Fixed-Dose Combinations (FDCs): Several trials assess FDCs improving adherence and simplifying regimens. The Most recent phase III trials, such as NCT04563450, evaluate formulations combining Lamivudine, Zidovudine, and integrase inhibitors.

  • Novel Delivery Systems: Innovations include liposomal formulations and long-acting injectables aimed at overcoming adherence issues. Although Lamivudine and Zidovudine are traditionally oral, early-stage trials, such as NCT04612753, explore new delivery platforms.

Key Clinical Trials and Their Impacts

  • Resistance Monitoring: Trials like NCT03908354 examine resistance emergence with generic versus branded formulations, emphasizing the importance of patent expiries and biosimilar entry.

  • Safety and Toxicity Studies: Long-term safety is repeatedly assessed through studies like NCT04848163, especially in pregnant women and pediatric populations, given historical concerns about mitochondrial toxicity with Zidovudine.

  • Combination Regimens with New Agents: Trials are probing the integration of Lamivudine and Zidovudine with novel agents, such as integrase inhibitors (e.g., Dolutegravir), to optimize viral suppression over extended periods.

Clinical Trial Challenges and Opportunities

While clinical trials continue to reinforce the efficacy of Lamivudine and Zidovudine, issues such as toxicity profiles—particularly Zidovudine's hematologic effects—and viral resistance foster research into combination alternatives. Opportunities arise from advances in pharmacogenomics, personalized medicine, and injectable formulations, promising to extend the clinical relevance of these drugs.


Market Analysis

Current Market Dynamics

The global HIV treatment market remains robust, driven by increasing prevalence, especially in Sub-Saharan Africa. Lamivudine and Zidovudine constitute significant segments within this landscape.

  • Market Size and Revenue: As per Fortune Business Insights, the HIV drug market was valued at approximately $23 billion in 2021, with NRTIs accounting for around 25% of this. Lamivudine's market share is notable owing to its inclusion in WHO-recommended regimens and generic availability.

  • Patent Expiries and Biosimilar Entry: Many key formulations of Lamivudine and Zidovudine have expired patents, leading to the proliferation of biosimilars and generics, with lower prices expanding access in emerging markets.

  • Regional Variations: Developing countries, especially in Africa and Asia, maintain high reliance on these drugs due to cost considerations. Conversely, developed nations increasingly favor integrase inhibitors with superior safety profiles, but Lamivudine and Zidovudine still hold market share owing to cost-effectiveness.

Regulatory and Policy Influences

  • WHO Treatment Guidelines: The WHO’s emphasis on affordable, scalable ART regimens keeps Lamivudine and Zidovudine front and center, notably in the "Treat All" approach adopted globally.

  • Governmental Initiatives: Many African governments have adopted programs heavily reliant on these drugs, supported by organizations like PEPFAR and the Global Fund, ensuring sustained demand.

Competitive Landscape and Future Market Trends

  • Biosimilars and Generics: Leading manufacturers such as Aurobindo Pharma, Mylan, and Hetero continue to produce affordable formulations, intensifying price competition.

  • Innovative Formulations: Patent expiries have spurred the development of fixed-dose combinations and long-acting injectables. The demand for simplified, once-monthly therapies indicates a potential paradigm shift.

  • Market Challenges: Concerns about adverse effects, such as Zidovudine-induced anemia, and emerging drug resistance could impact future formulations and market share shares.

Future Market Projections

  • Growth Trajectory: The global HIV treatment market is projected to grow at a CAGR of 5-6% through 2030, driven primarily by expanding access in low-income regions and evolving treatment protocols.

  • Continued Role of Lamivudine and Zidovudine: Despite competition from newer agents, these drugs will remain vital components, especially in cost-sensitive settings, for the foreseeable future.

  • Pipeline and Innovations: Development of long-acting formulations, and potential inclusion in universal fixed-dose combination regimes, suggest sustained relevance.


Market Projection: Strategic Outlook

Short-Term Outlook (Next 3-5 Years)

  • Steady Demand in Emerging Markets: Growth propelled by large-scale HIV programs in Africa and Asia.
  • Generics and Biosimilars Dominate: Cost reduction continues, improving global access.
  • Regulatory Approvals for New Formulations: Increased approvals for fixed-dose combos may marginally diminish standalone drug demand but reinforce overall market size.

Medium to Long-Term Outlook (5-10 Years)

  • Shift Toward Long-Acting and Novel Delivery Systems: Clinical success of long-acting injectables like Cabotegravir (notably not including Lamivudine/Zidovudine but indicative of future trends) could reconfigure treatment paradigms.
  • Potential Patent Expiries for Key Formulations: Might further reduce prices and expand access.
  • Impact of Resistance and Toxicity: Might necessitate formulation modifications or substitution, impacting market dynamics.

Key Considerations for Stakeholders

  • Manufacturers: Investing in biosimilar production, formulation innovation, and regulatory navigation.
  • Policymakers: Supporting patent filings, streamlining approvals, and fostering access programs.
  • Investors: Monitoring pipeline developments and market shifts toward long-acting therapies.

Conclusion

Lamivudine and Zidovudine continue to serve as foundational agents in HIV therapeutics. Their clinical efficacy, supported by ongoing research into resistance and safety, sustains their relevance. Market dynamics, propelled by patent expiries, cost considerations, and global health initiatives, favor biosimilars and combination formulations, ensuring ongoing access in resource-limited settings. Future trajectory hinges on innovation, resistance management, and evolving treatment guidelines, with long-acting formulations poised to redefine their role.


Key Takeaways

  • Clinical trials affirm the enduring efficacy of Lamivudine and Zidovudine, though resistance and toxicity remain challenges that drive innovation.
  • The market is characterized by high demand in developing regions, bolstered by biosimilar competition and cost-effective formulations.
  • Patent expiries have stimulated biosimilar proliferation, significantly reducing drug prices and expanding access.
  • Emerging formulations—particularly long-acting injectables—indicate transformative potential but may initially supplement rather than replace existing oral regimens.
  • Stakeholders should prioritize ongoing research, patent strategies, and formulation innovation to maintain relevance within the evolving HIV treatment landscape.

FAQs

  1. What are the primary clinical advantages of Lamivudine and Zidovudine?
    These drugs have proven efficacy in suppressing HIV replication, manageable safety profiles, and extensive existing clinical data, making them mainstays in HIV therapy, especially in resource-constrained settings.

  2. Are Lamivudine and Zidovudine still recommended by WHO?
    Yes. They remain integral components of the preferred first-line ART regimens worldwide, especially in fixed-dose combinations, although newer drugs are increasingly favored in high-income countries.

  3. How do patent expiries influence the market for these drugs?
    Patent expiries facilitate the entry of biosimilars and generics, lowering costs, expanding access, and intensifying market competition.

  4. What are the emerging trends impacting the future of Lamivudine and Zidovudine?
    The development of long-acting injectable formulations, combination therapies with novel agents, and personalized treatment approaches are key trends shaping their future.

  5. What challenges could limit the continued use of these drugs?
    Resistance development, toxicity concerns—particularly with Zidovudine—and the advent of newer agents with improved safety and efficacy profiles could reduce their prominence over time.


References

[1] Fortune Business Insights. "HIV Drugs Market Size, Share & Industry Analysis, By Drug Type, Region, and Segment Forecasts, 2022-2029."
[2] WHO Consolidated Guidelines on HIV Prevention, Diagnosis, Treatment, and Care, 2021.
[3] ClinicalTrials.gov. “Search results for Lamivudine and Zidovudine clinical trials,” accessed 2023.
[4] GlobalData. "Market Analysis of HIV Antiretroviral Drugs," 2022.
[5] UNAIDS. "Global HIV & AIDS Statistics," 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.