Last Updated: August 9, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR LACTULOSE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for lactulose

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00004796 ↗ Phase II Study of Lactulose and Circadian Rhythms in Patients With Cirrhosis Completed Northwestern University Phase 2 1994-11-01 OBJECTIVES: I. Assess the effect of lactulose on the circadian rhythm of plasma melatonin in patients with subclinical hepatic encephalopathy. II. Assess the intrasubject variability of circadian melatonin levels and neuropsychological tests. III. Assess which elements of the neuropsychological test battery show the response to lactulose.
NCT00004796 ↗ Phase II Study of Lactulose and Circadian Rhythms in Patients With Cirrhosis Completed National Center for Research Resources (NCRR) Phase 2 1994-11-01 OBJECTIVES: I. Assess the effect of lactulose on the circadian rhythm of plasma melatonin in patients with subclinical hepatic encephalopathy. II. Assess the intrasubject variability of circadian melatonin levels and neuropsychological tests. III. Assess which elements of the neuropsychological test battery show the response to lactulose.
NCT00133406 ↗ Long-term Impact and Intervention for Diarrhea in Brazil Unknown status National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Phase 3 2006-06-01 The primary objectives of this study are to determine the effect of 1 year supplementation of Vitamin A, Zinc, and Vitamin A plus Zinc compared to placebo on the Height for Age Z Score (HAZ) and the number of episodes of diarrhea and number of days of diarrhea at one year in children living in a Brazilian slum. Study participants will include 280 children ages 2 months to 8 years old, with a Height for Age Z score (HAZ) less than median for the Parque Universitario community, living in Brazilian favela. There is also a sub study to determine if ten days of glutamine delivered as an oral bolus improves the health of the digestive system.
NCT00133406 ↗ Long-term Impact and Intervention for Diarrhea in Brazil Unknown status University of Virginia Phase 3 2006-06-01 The primary objectives of this study are to determine the effect of 1 year supplementation of Vitamin A, Zinc, and Vitamin A plus Zinc compared to placebo on the Height for Age Z Score (HAZ) and the number of episodes of diarrhea and number of days of diarrhea at one year in children living in a Brazilian slum. Study participants will include 280 children ages 2 months to 8 years old, with a Height for Age Z score (HAZ) less than median for the Parque Universitario community, living in Brazilian favela. There is also a sub study to determine if ten days of glutamine delivered as an oral bolus improves the health of the digestive system.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for lactulose

Condition Name

Condition Name for lactulose
Intervention Trials
Hepatic Encephalopathy 42
Constipation 14
Liver Cirrhosis 13
Cirrhosis 10
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for lactulose
Intervention Trials
Hepatic Encephalopathy 55
Brain Diseases 50
Liver Cirrhosis 27
Fibrosis 23
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for lactulose

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for lactulose
Location Trials
United States 141
China 30
India 23
United Kingdom 8
Egypt 6
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for lactulose
Location Trials
New York 11
California 10
Virginia 8
Texas 7
Massachusetts 6
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for lactulose

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for lactulose
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 3
PHASE3 1
PHASE2 1
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for lactulose
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 74
Recruiting 31
Unknown status 24
[disabled in preview] 10
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for lactulose

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for lactulose
Sponsor Trials
Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, India 10
Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc. 9
Bausch Health Americas, Inc. 8
[disabled in preview] 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for lactulose
Sponsor Trials
Other 233
Industry 59
NIH 8
[disabled in preview] 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Lactulose Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Price-Driven Revenue Projections (2026)

Last updated: July 29, 2026

Lactulose is an established, small-molecule laxative used for constipation and hepatic encephalopathy (HE). Because it is off-patent globally, the competitive dynamic is largely generic-led and price/availability driven. In clinical-trial and pipeline terms, activity is concentrated in reformulations (e.g., taste/viscosity improvement, ready-to-drink and pediatric-friendly dosing), regional line extensions, and device-adjunct studies rather than brand-new molecular entities.

Is lactulose in active clinical trials in 2025 and 2026?

Yes. Clinical activity continues, but it is mostly incremental and concentrated in supportive care endpoints: bowel movement frequency, stool consistency, caregiver/patient tolerability, and HE surrogate endpoints (psychometric testing, ammonia trends, and time to improvement). Trial designs typically compare lactulose dosing regimens, formulations (syrup versus alternative delivery), and add-on strategies versus standard of care.

What endpoints are being used most often in lactulose trials?

Featured snippet style answer: Trials most often measure constipation symptom control and safety, with HE studies focused on clinical improvement and time-to-resolution.

  • Chronic constipation:
    • Stool frequency (number per day/week)
    • Stool consistency (e.g., Bristol Stool Scale)
    • Stool urgency, straining, and caregiver-reported burden
    • Time to first bowel movement
  • Hepatic encephalopathy:
    • Clinical improvement scores (commonly using validated psychometric/clinical instruments)
    • Time to reversal or improvement
    • Adverse events (diarrhea, dehydration, electrolyte changes)

What study types dominate?

  • Randomized comparative studies of lactulose dosing schedules (e.g., once- vs multiple-daily regimens)
  • Bioavailability and formulation-performance studies for alternative products
  • Pediatric-focused trials that test palatability and dosing accuracy
  • Real-world studies tied to prescribing changes or guideline adherence

Where is trial activity concentrated geographically?

Activity is spread across Europe, Asia-Pacific, and parts of Latin America, with most studies conducted where lactulose is already standard-of-care and where pediatric and HE patient volumes support recruitment.

What is the current market size for lactulose in constipation and hepatic encephalopathy?

Lactulose market value is driven by:

  1. global prevalence of constipation and liver disease burden,
  2. long-term generic adoption,
  3. dosing intensity and treatment switching behavior in HE,
  4. price erosion in generic segments.

How big is the lactulose market by use case?

Featured snippet style answer: Constipation is the largest steady consumer segment; HE is smaller by prescription volume but significant for institutional use patterns and guideline adherence.

  • Constipation:
    • High recurrence and chronic use patterns
    • Broad OTC or semi-OTC presence depending on jurisdiction
  • HE:
    • Hospital and specialty-driven, with ongoing use as adjunct therapy
    • Competitive pressure from alternative non-absorbed disaccharides and gut-directed regimens

What are the main product forms sold commercially?

  • Oral syrup solutions (most common)
  • Powder/sachet products in some regions
  • Hospital pack sizes supporting HE protocols
  • Pediatric-leaning presentations with modified excipients or flavor profiles

How do generic manufacturers compete for lactulose share, and what pricing pressures matter?

Featured snippet style answer: Lactulose pricing is constrained by generic interchangeability; differentiation is mostly supply chain reliability, pack economics, and formulation tolerability.

What drives wholesale and retail pricing for lactulose?

  • Competitive procurement contracts for hospital formularies (HE)
  • OTC and pharmacy channel dynamics (constipation)
  • Currency and commodity costs affecting syrup logistics
  • Size and frequency of dispensing and shelf-life constraints
  • Tender wins for national distributors

What is the competitive advantage for leading brands in an off-patent market?

  • Execution speed in supply and consistent quality
  • Contracting leverage with national health systems
  • Small formulation improvements that reduce discontinuation (taste, viscosity, dosing accuracy)
  • Distribution breadth, including pediatric and hospital SKUs

When does lactulose lose exclusivity in key jurisdictions?

Featured snippet style answer: Lactulose is generally off-patent in major markets. Exclusivity is not the principal driver of competitive entry now.

How does “exclusivity” show up anyway if patents are expired?

  • New formulation or process patents (where present) can delay specific product copycats, but they do not block broad therapeutic use of lactulose.
  • Regulatory exclusivity can exist only for specific product presentations, not the molecule itself, and typically has limited impact versus generic approvals.

What patent estate protects lactulose products today?

Featured snippet style answer: Most foundational patents on lactulose manufacture and use are expired; remaining protection is limited to incremental formulation/process patents in specific geographies and for specific marketed presentations.

What kinds of patents still appear in filings?

  • Formulation-specific claims (excipients, viscosity targets, pediatric-friendly preparations)
  • Manufacturing process claims (refining/purification steps, crystallization controls)
  • Method-of-use claims that are narrow to specific patient subsets or dosing protocols, where still pursued

How does that affect freedom to operate (FTO)?

Because lactulose is widely used and widely approved, FTO risk is more about product-specific process/formulation claims than about the underlying drug. Litigation-driven barriers are uncommon relative to brand-new chemistry.

What Orange Book status does lactulose have in the US?

Featured snippet style answer: Lactulose is not under active brand-name exclusivity in the Orange Book for the molecule itself; approved products are predominantly generic.

How to interpret Orange Book listings for off-patent molecules

  • The presence of listed patents tends to be tied to specific product approvals and may be outdated or fully expired.
  • New entrants typically seek generic parity with minor formulation differences.

What FDA regulatory pathway issues affect lactulose generics and reformulations?

Featured snippet style answer: Most entries are ANDA-based and rely on bioequivalence and pharmaceutical equivalence; reformulations may introduce additional requirements depending on changes in formulation and dosing form.

Key regulatory levers

  • Bioequivalence for modified excipient or dosage presentation changes
  • Stability and shelf-life validation for syrup/powder formats
  • Pediatric labeling and dosing instructions
  • Label revisions tied to constipation and HE usage statements

What are the current clinical risks and discontinuation drivers in lactulose therapy?

Across constipation and HE, the dominant safety/quality risks are tolerability and downstream complications.

  • Diarrhea and abdominal cramping (dose-related)
  • Electrolyte imbalance risk in vulnerable patients, especially with overuse or comorbidities
  • Dehydration risk if diarrhea persists
  • Adherence issues if taste/viscosity reduces acceptance

How does lactulose compare with rifaximin and other HE therapies?

Featured snippet style answer: For HE, lactulose is a standard first-line non-absorbed disaccharide in many treatment algorithms; rifaximin is commonly used as an add-on or alternative strategy, especially for recurrent HE, which shifts HE bundle economics.

Competitive dynamics in HE

  • Lactulose often carries lower unit drug cost
  • Rifaximin adds higher drug cost but can improve recurrence management in certain pathways
  • Patient selection and guideline-aligned switching affect lactulose volumes

What is the lactulose clinical development outlook for constipation in pediatrics?

Featured snippet style answer: Development focuses on dosing usability and palatability to improve adherence and reduce caregiver burden, not on new mechanisms.

Why pediatric studies matter for commercialization

  • Pediatric dosing accuracy and tolerability drive uptake for chronic constipation use
  • Packaging and flavor/excipient profiles can be differentiators even when the API is generic

Market projections: what is the revenue runway for lactulose through 2031?

Featured snippet style answer: Revenue growth is expected to be modest in value terms globally because competition keeps net prices under pressure; growth is mostly volume-led and regionally dependent.

Projection logic for an off-patent generic

Revenue = (Volume) × (Net price)

  • Volume:
    • Demographic aging supports chronic constipation prevalence
    • Liver disease burden supports sustained HE adjunct use
  • Net price:
    • Competitive generics drive downward price trajectories
    • Hospital and national tender dynamics compress margins
  • Net effect:
    • Value growth lags volume growth
    • Market share shifts favor manufacturers with stable supply and low-cost manufacturing

What regions are likely to show stronger volume-led growth?

  • Asia-Pacific and parts of Latin America where access expansion and growing healthcare utilization can increase prescription volumes
  • Countries with high pediatric constipation burden and improving pharmacy access

What regions are likely to show more pricing compression?

  • Mature EU and US channels where multiple ANDA and tendered products converge quickly

What generic entry risks exist for lactulose reformulations?

Featured snippet style answer: Patent-blocking risks are limited because the molecule is off-patent; reformulation-specific risks are the main issue.

Common barriers to new reformulation entrants

  • Narrow formulation/process patents still active in some markets
  • Regulatory and labeling complexity for pediatric and HE indications
  • Manufacturing scale-up and stability performance for syrup/powder SKUs

Key Takeaways

  • Lactulose clinical trial activity persists, but it is incremental and focused on tolerability, dosing regimens, and formulation usability rather than new molecular breakthroughs.
  • Market demand is driven by constipation prevalence and HE guideline-based use, with constipation typically dominating prescription volume.
  • Net price erosion from generic competition is the primary headwind; revenue growth is likely volume-led with modest value expansion through 2031.
  • Patent leverage is mostly limited to formulation/process refinements and rarely blocks broad generic use of lactulose itself.

FAQs

  1. What are the most common lactulose clinical endpoints in constipation trials?
    Stool frequency, time to first bowel movement, stool consistency, and safety/tolerability.

  2. Does lactulose have a distinct role in recurrent hepatic encephalopathy?
    It is used as a core non-absorbed disaccharide; recurrent HE treatment often involves additional agents such as rifaximin depending on regimen and guideline.

  3. Are there pediatric formulations of lactulose with different excipients or dosing devices?
    Many markets carry pediatric-oriented presentations aimed at improving palatability and dosing accuracy, though the API remains lactulose.

  4. What drives hospital formulary decisions for lactulose in HE?
    Tender pricing, pack availability, protocol fit, and consistent tolerability and safety outcomes for diarrhea risk.

  5. Will new clinical trials materially change lactulose’s standard of care?
    Trials typically refine dosing and presentation rather than replacing lactulose as a standard adjunct for constipation and HE.

References

  1. FDA. Orange Book: Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations. (Accessed 2026).
  2. WHO. Model List of Essential Medicines. (Most recent edition).
  3. ClinicalTrials.gov. Lactulose search results and study records. (Accessed 2026).

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.