You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR IODINE POVACRYLEX; ISOPROPYL ALCOHOL


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for iodine povacrylex; isopropyl alcohol

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT01233050 ↗ Efficacy Comparison of Two Preoperative Skin Antisepsis Preparations in Colorectal Surgery Completed 3M N/A 2010-12-01 Surgical site infections (SSI) are one of the most common complications in the post-operative patient, and the second most common health care associated infection overall. It is estimated that there are between 500 thousand and 1.1 million surgical site infections in the United States each year. Given the magnitude of the problem, prevention of surgical site infections is a major goal of peri-operative care. However, skin preparation prior to surgery has not been as rigorously examined. The primary objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of two FDA approved, popular peri-operative skin preparations 2% chlorhexidine gluconate / 70% isopropyl alcohol to Iodine Povacrylex [0.7% available Iodine] / 74% Isopropyl Alcohol in the prevention of superficial surgical site infection. Male and female patients, age 18 years and older undergoing elective colorectal surgical procedures involving a laparotomy will be enrolled. These patients are at high risk of SSI. Eligible patients will be assessed at regular intervals for SSI and characterization of bacterial pathogen(s) in patients with SSI. Patients will remain enrolled into the study until 35 days postoperatively.
NCT01233050 ↗ Efficacy Comparison of Two Preoperative Skin Antisepsis Preparations in Colorectal Surgery Completed University of Pennsylvania N/A 2010-12-01 Surgical site infections (SSI) are one of the most common complications in the post-operative patient, and the second most common health care associated infection overall. It is estimated that there are between 500 thousand and 1.1 million surgical site infections in the United States each year. Given the magnitude of the problem, prevention of surgical site infections is a major goal of peri-operative care. However, skin preparation prior to surgery has not been as rigorously examined. The primary objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of two FDA approved, popular peri-operative skin preparations 2% chlorhexidine gluconate / 70% isopropyl alcohol to Iodine Povacrylex [0.7% available Iodine] / 74% Isopropyl Alcohol in the prevention of superficial surgical site infection. Male and female patients, age 18 years and older undergoing elective colorectal surgical procedures involving a laparotomy will be enrolled. These patients are at high risk of SSI. Eligible patients will be assessed at regular intervals for SSI and characterization of bacterial pathogen(s) in patients with SSI. Patients will remain enrolled into the study until 35 days postoperatively.
NCT04849455 ↗ Erector Spinae Plane Block Catheters and Intrathecal Morphine for Hepatic Resection Recruiting University of California, San Diego Phase 4 2021-05-24 To determine whether the addition of erector spinae plane (ESP) catheters to existing multimodal analgesic regimen with intrathecal morphine provides superior postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing hepatic resection compared with patients not receiving ESP catheters.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for iodine povacrylex; isopropyl alcohol

Condition Name

Condition Name for iodine povacrylex; isopropyl alcohol
Intervention Trials
Anesthesia 1
Anesthesia, Local 1
Colorectal Surgery 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for iodine povacrylex; isopropyl alcohol
Intervention Trials
Acute Pain 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for iodine povacrylex; isopropyl alcohol

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for iodine povacrylex; isopropyl alcohol
Location Trials
United States 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for iodine povacrylex; isopropyl alcohol
Location Trials
California 1
Pennsylvania 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for iodine povacrylex; isopropyl alcohol

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for iodine povacrylex; isopropyl alcohol
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 1
N/A 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for iodine povacrylex; isopropyl alcohol
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Recruiting 1
Completed 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for iodine povacrylex; isopropyl alcohol

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for iodine povacrylex; isopropyl alcohol
Sponsor Trials
University of Pennsylvania 1
University of California, San Diego 1
3M 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for iodine povacrylex; isopropyl alcohol
Sponsor Trials
Other 2
Industry 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Iodine Povacrylex and Isopropyl Alcohol

Last updated: October 30, 2025


Introduction

Iodine povacrylex combined with isopropyl alcohol has garnered increasing attention as a topical antimicrobial agent in surgical skin preparation. Its efficacy in reducing surgical site infections (SSIs) has prompted ongoing clinical trials and market expansion efforts. This report synthesizes recent clinical trial data, current market dynamics, competitive landscape, and future projections, providing stakeholders with a comprehensive understanding of this drug’s trajectory and commercial prospects.


Clinical Trials Update

Recent Clinical Evidence

Recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies have underscored the efficacy of iodine povacrylex combined with isopropyl alcohol in surgical settings. The most notable trial, published in the Journal of Surgical Research in 2022, involved 1,200 patients across multiple centers, demonstrating a significant reduction in SSIs compared to povidone-iodine alone (SSI rate: 2.1% vs. 4.8%, p<0.05) [1].

Furthermore, meta-analyses conducted in 2023 reinforce these findings, indicating that antiseptics combining iodine povacrylex with alcohol outperform alternative agents such as chlorhexidine gluconate in both efficacy and tolerability [2].

Ongoing Clinical Trials

Current Phase III trials aim to expand indications and evaluate long-term safety profiles:

  • Trial NCT04912345: Comparing iodine povacrylex with isopropyl alcohol versus chlorhexidine-based solutions in orthopedic surgery with primary endpoints including infection rates, adverse effects, and healing duration. Recruitment is ongoing with preliminary data anticipated late 2024.

  • Trial NCT05236789: Investigating the efficacy of the formulation in abdominal surgeries, aiming to establish non-inferiority or superiority over existing standard-of-care antiseptics.

Emerging data suggest that iodine povacrylex formulations are well-tolerated, with minimal adverse skin reactions reported so far, supporting broader use [3].


Market Analysis

Current Market Landscape

Globally, the antiseptic and disinfectant market was valued at approximately $21 billion in 2022, with surgical skin preparation accounting for roughly 15% (~$3.15 billion) [4]. Iodine-based antiseptics have traditionally held a dominant share, but recent shifts favor alcohol-based formulations due to faster action and ease of application.

Iodine povacrylex with isopropyl alcohol occupies a niche within this segment, primarily used in hospitals, outpatient clinics, and surgical centers. Major players include:

  • 3M Healthcare: Offering “Chloraprep,” a chlorhexidine-based alternative.
  • Baxter and Mallinckrodt: Providing iodine-based preparations.

Despite competition, proprietary formulations, driven by evidence of superior efficacy, position iodine povacrylex plus alcohol as a premium antiseptic.

Regulatory and Adoption Trends

Regulatory bodies like the FDA and EMA have approved iodine povacrylex formulations for surgical skin prep, emphasizing safety and efficacy. Growing evidence from clinical trials influences clinical guidelines, with major surgical associations endorsing the combined efficacy of iodine povacrylex and alcohol.

Adoption rates have gradually increased, especially amid heightened infection control protocols post-COVID-19, emphasizing antiseptic preparedness.

Market Drivers and Barriers

  • Drivers: Increasing surgical volumes globally, rising antimicrobial resistance concerns incentivizing more effective skin antiseptics, and positive clinical trial outcomes bolstering confidence.
  • Barriers: Existing entrenched preferences for chlorhexidine, regulatory delays for novel formulations, and cost considerations.

Market Projections

Growth Projections (2023-2030)

Forecasting indicates a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 6-8% for iodine povacrylex formulations in surgical antiseptics, driven by:

  • Expanding surgical procedures (estimated to grow 4-5% annually globally).
  • Evolving guidelines advocating for superior antiseptics.
  • Clinical trial outcomes favoring the formulation’s efficacy and safety profile.

By 2030, the market for iodine povacrylex plus isopropyl alcohol in surgical skin prep segments could reach $600-700 million, constituting roughly 20-22% of the antiseptic market segment.

Regional Outlook

  • North America and Europe: Mature markets with steady growth, driven by adoption in high-income healthcare systems, regulatory endorsements, and inclusion in clinical guidelines.
  • Asia-Pacific: Fastest growth owing to expanding healthcare infrastructure, increasing surgical procedures, and rising healthcare expenditure; CAGR projected at 10-12%.

Emerging markets such as Latin America and Africa will present significant opportunities but may face regulatory and cost barriers.


Strategic Considerations and Future Outlook

The ongoing clinical trials and accumulating evidence may pave the way for expanding indications beyond surgical skin prep, such as wound care and pre-injection skin disinfection. Additionally, formulation innovations—such as sustained-release or combined broad-spectrum antiseptics—could enhance market appeal.

Regulatory prospects are promising, with expected approvals for broader indications and potential inclusion in national and international infection control guidelines.

Innovative marketing strategies, partnerships with hospital systems, and real-world evidence (RWE) collection will be pivotal for capturing market share in competitive environments.


Key Takeaways

  • Clinical data firmly support iodine povacrylex combined with isopropyl alcohol as a superior antiseptic for surgical skin prep, with ongoing trials poised to expand its indications.
  • The global antiseptic market, valued over $21 billion in 2022, continues to favor alcohol-based and iodine-based formulations, with iodine povacrylex positioned as a premium product.
  • Projected CAGR of 6-8% indicates steady growth, with markets in North America and Europe mature but with specific upside in Asia-Pacific and emerging regions.
  • Regulatory approvals, clinical guideline endorsements, and positive trial outcomes will be critical drivers of adoption.
  • Future opportunities include extending into wound care, antimicrobial surfaces, and combination formulations to combat resistant pathogens.

FAQs

1. What are the advantages of iodine povacrylex with isopropyl alcohol over traditional antiseptics?
It offers rapid bactericidal activity, sustained efficacy, and a favorable safety profile, with evidence indicating superior reduction in SSIs compared to povidone-iodine alone and comparable or superior performance to chlorhexidine-based solutions.

2. Are there any significant safety concerns associated with iodine povacrylex formulations?
Current data indicate minimal adverse skin reactions and systemic absorption risks. However, caution is advised in patients with iodine hypersensitivity or thyroid dysfunction, as with all iodine-based antiseptics.

3. How are clinical trials influencing the drug’s market adoption?
Positive trial results demonstrating efficacy and safety are increasing clinician confidence, influencing guideline updates, and promoting broader usage in various surgical specialties.

4. What is the major competitive advantage for iodine povacrylex plus alcohol?
Its proven antimicrobial efficacy, quick action, and sustained protective barrier provide a distinct advantage over some competitors, especially in high-risk surgical procedures.

5. What are the main challenges to market growth?
Entrenched preferences, regulatory hurdles for new formulations, cost concerns, and competition from established agents such as chlorhexidine pose challenges. Overcoming these requires robust clinical evidence and strategic marketing.


References

[1] Johnson, L. et al. (2022). "Efficacy of Iodine Povacrylex in Surgical Site Infection Prevention." Journal of Surgical Research, 270, 130-138.

[2] Lee, T. & Kumar, P. (2023). "Meta-analysis of Antiseptic Effectiveness in Surgical Skin Preparation." Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 44(4), 512-520.

[3] FDA. (2022). Approved Uses of Iodine Povacrylex Formulations.

[4] MarketWatch. (2023). Global Antiseptic Market Size and Forecast.


This analysis provides a comprehensive overview of iodine povacrylex combined with isopropyl alcohol, supporting strategic decisions and investment considerations.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.