You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 27, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR IFOSFAMIDE; MESNA


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


505(b)(2) Clinical Trials for ifosfamide; mesna

This table shows clinical trials for potential 505(b)(2) applications. See the next table for all clinical trials
Trial Type Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
New Combination NCT01884428 ↗ Study of Combination of PIGEV Before Autologous Stem Cell Transplant in Patients With Hodgkin's Lymphoma Unknown status Armando Santoro, MD Phase 1 2011-07-01 study to assess maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety, tolerability and activity of IGEV (Ifosfamide, Gemcitabine,Vinorelbine, Prednisolone) + Panobinostat new combination in order to determine the recommended phase II dose
>Trial Type >Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

All Clinical Trials for ifosfamide; mesna

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00001209 ↗ A Pilot Study for the Treatment of Patients With Metastatic and High Risk Sarcomas and Primitive Neuroectodermal Tumors Completed National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 1 1986-10-01 This protocol is designed to test the feasibility of the administration of vincristine, adriamycin and cytoxan, alternating with the newly developed regimen ifosfamide VP-16 as well as the efficacy of this therapy in addition to radiotherapy in producing complete responses and disease-free survival in patients with Ewing's sarcoma, primitive sarcoma of bone, peripheral neuroepithelioma, and soft tissue sarcoma. This will not be a randomized study but will be comparable to the large data base of similar patients treated on successive Pediatric Branch studies.
NCT00001270 ↗ Feasibility Study of Interleukin 1-Alpha With Ifosfamide, CBDCA, and Etoposide With Autologous Bone Marrow Transplant in Metastatic Carcinoma and Lymphoma Completed National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 1 1991-06-01 This is a phase I/II study of interleukin-1, G-CSF and high dose ICE chemotherapy with autologous bone marrow transplant in patients with relapsed breast, testicular and lymphoid cancers. The initial goal of this study was to define the toxicity of interleukin-1 administered for 7 days prior to ICE chemotherapy. A total of 22 patients have been treated with IL-1 and ICE and results showed a more rapid engraftment (4.5 days) with IL-1. A second cohort of 18 patients also received G-CSF and engraftment was further shortened in some subgroups. Overall, the median time to engraftment was 16 days with both IL-1 and G-CSF. Accrual will continue to further define the toxicity and efficacy of this regimen.
NCT00001300 ↗ A Randomized Study of the Effect of Adjuvant Chemotherapy With Doxorubicin and Ifosfamide With Mesna in the Treatment of High-Grade Adult Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcoma Completed National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 3 1992-06-01 Randomized study. All patients must be randomized to treatment on Arms I and II within 3 months of definitive surgery on Regimen A. Regimen A: Surgery followed, as indicated, by Radiotherapy. Amputation; or limb-sparing resection followed by involved-field irradiation using megavoltage equipment with or without electron boost. Arm I: 2-Drug Combination Chemotherapy with Hematologic Toxicity Attenuation and Urothelial Protection. Doxorubicin, DOX, NSC-123127; Ifosfamide, IFF, NSC-109724; with Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor (Amgen), G-CSF, NSC-614629; and Mesna, NSC-113891. Arm II: Observation. No adjuvant chemotherapy.
NCT00001335 ↗ New Therapeutic Strategies for Patients With Ewing's Sarcoma Family of Tumors, High Risk Rhabdomyosarcoma, and Neuroblastoma Completed National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 2 1993-04-01 The prognosis for patients with metastatic Ewing's sarcoma family of tumors (ESF), rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS), and neuroblastoma (NBL) remains dismal, with less than 25% long-term disease-free survival. Though less grave, the prognosis for cure for other high-risk patients is approximately 50%. New treatment strategies, including the identification of highly active new agents, maximizing the dose intensity of the most active standard drugs, and the development of improved methods of consolidation to eradicate microscopic residual disease, are clearly needed to improve the outcome of these patients. This protocol will address these issues by commencing with a Phase II window, for the highest risk patients, to evaluate a series of promising drugs with novel mechanisms of action. All patients will then receive 5 cycles of dose-intensive "best standard therapy" with doxorubicin (adriamycin), vincristine, and cyclophosphamide (VAdriaC). Patients at high risk of relapse will continue onto a phase I consolidation regimen consisting of three cycles of dose-escalated Melphalan, Ifosfamide, Mesna, and Etoposide (MIME). Peripheral blood stem cell transfusions (PBSCT) and recombinant human G-CSF will be used as supportive care measures to allow maximal dose-escalation of this combination regimen.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for ifosfamide; mesna

Condition Name

Condition Name for ifosfamide; mesna
Intervention Trials
Sarcoma 61
Lymphoma 56
Soft Tissue Sarcoma 21
Leukemia 21
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for ifosfamide; mesna
Intervention Trials
Lymphoma 147
Sarcoma 128
Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin 52
Lymphoma, B-Cell 46
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for ifosfamide; mesna

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for ifosfamide; mesna
Location Trials
Canada 222
Australia 101
Italy 98
United Kingdom 73
France 69
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for ifosfamide; mesna
Location Trials
New York 94
California 85
Texas 83
Illinois 61
Pennsylvania 61
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for ifosfamide; mesna

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for ifosfamide; mesna
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE3 3
PHASE2 17
PHASE1 5
[disabled in preview] 11
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for ifosfamide; mesna
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 217
Recruiting 82
Unknown status 56
[disabled in preview] 49
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for ifosfamide; mesna

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for ifosfamide; mesna
Sponsor Trials
National Cancer Institute (NCI) 134
Children's Oncology Group 28
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 26
[disabled in preview] 22
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for ifosfamide; mesna
Sponsor Trials
Other 612
NIH 137
Industry 128
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Ifosfamide and Mesna: Clinical Trial Update, Market Analysis, and Projection

Last updated: February 19, 2026

Current Clinical Trial Landscape for Ifosfamide and Mesna

The clinical trial landscape for ifosfamide and mesna is characterized by a focus on optimizing existing treatments, exploring novel combinations, and addressing resistance mechanisms across various oncological indications. Trials are primarily concentrated in solid tumors, including osteosarcoma, soft tissue sarcoma, and germ cell tumors, where ifosfamide remains a cornerstone of chemotherapy. Mesna, as a uroprotective agent, is consistently evaluated alongside ifosfamide to mitigate its dose-limiting toxicity, hemorrhagic cystitis.

Key Therapeutic Areas Under Investigation

  • Osteosarcoma: Several Phase II and III trials are investigating ifosfamide-based regimens, often in combination with other cytotoxic agents like doxorubicin and cisplatin, for both neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings. Efforts are directed at improving event-free survival and overall survival rates in high-risk or relapsed/refractory disease. For instance, a retrospective analysis published in Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research in 2022 evaluated the efficacy of ifosfamide in pediatric and young adult osteosarcoma patients, highlighting its continued role [1].

  • Soft Tissue Sarcoma: Ifosfamide is being assessed in combination regimens for advanced and metastatic soft tissue sarcomas. Trials explore its synergy with novel targeted therapies and immunotherapies to overcome resistance. A Phase II study published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology in 2023 examined the combination of ifosfamide with pazopanib in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma, reporting preliminary efficacy signals [2].

  • Germ Cell Tumors: While platinum-based chemotherapy is standard, ifosfamide-containing regimens are employed in salvage settings for refractory or relapsed germ cell tumors. Ongoing research aims to define optimal dosing and combination strategies.

  • Other Solid Tumors: Exploratory studies are evaluating ifosfamide in bladder cancer, lung cancer, and gynecological malignancies, often in the context of recurrent or refractory disease.

Mesna's Role in Mitigating Ifosfamide Toxicity

Mesna's integration into ifosfamide treatment is standard practice to prevent hemorrhagic cystitis. Clinical trials continue to refine mesna dosing schedules and administration routes to maximize uroprotection while minimizing patient burden. While the efficacy of mesna is well-established, research is ongoing to understand variations in response and to identify potential predictive biomarkers for urotoxicity.

Emerging Research Directions

  • Combination Therapies: The most active area of research involves combining ifosfamide with novel agents. This includes:

    • Targeted Therapies: Investigating combinations with agents that target specific oncogenic pathways, aiming for synergistic cytotoxic effects.
    • Immunotherapies: Early-phase trials are exploring the potential of combining ifosfamide with immune checkpoint inhibitors to enhance anti-tumor immune responses.
    • Other Chemotherapeutic Agents: Evaluating modified schedules or combinations with newer cytotoxic drugs to improve response rates and overcome resistance.
  • Addressing Resistance: Mechanisms of ifosfamide resistance, including altered drug metabolism and DNA repair pathways, are subjects of preclinical and early clinical investigation. Strategies to circumvent resistance, such as using efflux pump inhibitors or DNA repair modulators, are under development.

  • Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Studies: Optimization of ifosfamide dosing based on individual patient pharmacokinetics is a recurring theme in research, aiming to maximize therapeutic index.

Market Analysis and Projection for Ifosfamide and Mesna

The market for ifosfamide and mesna is mature, characterized by established generics and a stable demand driven by their continued role in treating specific oncological conditions. Market growth is moderate, influenced by factors such as cancer incidence rates, healthcare access, and the emergence of newer therapeutic modalities.

Market Size and Segmentation

The global market for ifosfamide and mesna is primarily segmented by:

  • Therapeutic Application: Osteosarcoma, soft tissue sarcoma, germ cell tumors, and other cancers.
  • Distribution Channel: Hospitals, clinics, and retail pharmacies.
  • Geography: North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, Latin America, and the Middle East & Africa.
Metric (USD Billion) 2022 2023 (Est.) 2024 (Proj.) CAGR (2023-2028)
Ifosfamide Market 0.35 0.36 0.38 2.5%
Mesna Market 0.20 0.21 0.22 3.0%
Combined Market 0.55 0.57 0.60 2.7%

Source: Proprietary Market Research and Industry Reports (2023-2024)

Key Market Drivers

  • Prevalence of Target Cancers: The incidence of osteosarcoma and soft tissue sarcomas, while relatively rare compared to other cancers, drives consistent demand for ifosfamide.
  • Established Efficacy: Ifosfamide's proven efficacy in specific cancer types, particularly in pediatric and young adult osteosarcoma and certain sarcomas, ensures its continued use.
  • Uroprotection Role of Mesna: Mesna's critical role in mitigating ifosfamide's dose-limiting toxicity makes it an indispensable companion drug.
  • Generic Availability: The availability of cost-effective generic versions of both drugs contributes to their market accessibility and sustained demand, especially in price-sensitive markets.
  • Clinical Trial Activity: Ongoing research exploring novel combinations and optimizing treatment protocols can indirectly support market stability by reinforcing the value of these drugs.

Market Restraints

  • Development of Novel Therapies: The advent of targeted therapies and immunotherapies for various cancers poses a competitive threat, potentially reducing reliance on traditional chemotherapy like ifosfamide.
  • Toxicity Profile: Ifosfamide's inherent toxicity, despite mesna's protection, can limit its use in certain patient populations or lead to treatment discontinuation.
  • Stringent Regulatory Scrutiny: Like all pharmaceuticals, ifosfamide and mesna are subject to rigorous regulatory oversight, which can impact development and market access.
  • Competition from Alternative Chemotherapies: In some indications, other chemotherapy agents may offer comparable efficacy with potentially better toxicity profiles.

Geographic Market Insights

  • North America and Europe: These regions represent significant markets due to advanced healthcare infrastructure, higher cancer diagnosis rates, and established treatment protocols. Demand is driven by both established treatment regimens and ongoing clinical research.
  • Asia-Pacific: This region is projected to experience the fastest growth, fueled by increasing cancer incidence, expanding healthcare access, and rising adoption of generic pharmaceuticals. Government initiatives to improve cancer care also contribute.
  • Latin America and MEA: These markets are expected to show steady growth, primarily driven by increasing healthcare expenditure and the demand for affordable generic cancer treatments.

Competitive Landscape

The market for ifosfamide and mesna is highly competitive, dominated by generic manufacturers. Major players include:

  • Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.
  • Novartis AG (through its Sandoz division for generics)
  • Hikma Pharmaceuticals PLC
  • Fresenius SE & Co. KGaA
  • Accord Healthcare

These companies focus on manufacturing and supplying cost-effective generic formulations. The competitive advantage lies in supply chain efficiency, quality control, and regional distribution networks. The development of novel formulations or delivery systems for ifosfamide or mesna, while less common in this mature market, could offer a competitive edge.

Future Market Projections

The combined market for ifosfamide and mesna is projected to grow at a modest Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of approximately 2.7% from 2023 to 2028. This growth will be sustained by:

  • Continued Use in Orphan Indications: Ifosfamide will remain a critical treatment option for specific rare cancers like osteosarcoma and certain subtypes of sarcoma where alternative therapies are limited or less effective.
  • Combination Therapy Exploration: Although new drug development for ifosfamide itself is limited, its inclusion in combination regimens with novel agents could maintain or slightly increase its utilization in clinical practice.
  • Expansion in Emerging Markets: The increasing accessibility and affordability of generic ifosfamide and mesna in developing economies will contribute to market expansion.

However, the market may face headwinds from the increasing adoption of precision medicine and newer immunotherapies that offer alternative treatment paradigms for a broader range of cancers. The focus for these drugs will increasingly be on specific niches and salvage therapies.

Key Takeaways

Ifosfamide and mesna remain integral to the treatment of specific sarcomas and osteosarcoma, with ongoing clinical trials focusing on combination therapies and resistance mechanisms. The generic market is stable, driven by established efficacy and cost-effectiveness, particularly in niche indications. Market growth is projected at a moderate CAGR, supported by emerging markets and continued use in orphan diseases, while facing potential competition from novel therapeutic modalities.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What are the primary indications for ifosfamide in current clinical practice? Ifosfamide is primarily used for the treatment of osteosarcoma, soft tissue sarcomas, and germ cell tumors, often in advanced, metastatic, or relapsed/refractory settings.

  2. What is the main role of mesna in ifosfamide treatment? Mesna acts as a uroprotective agent, binding to acrolein, a toxic metabolite of ifosfamide, thereby preventing or reducing the incidence of hemorrhagic cystitis.

  3. What is the projected market growth rate for ifosfamide and mesna over the next five years? The combined market for ifosfamide and mesna is projected to grow at a CAGR of approximately 2.7% from 2023 to 2028.

  4. What are the key competitive factors in the ifosfamide and mesna market? Key competitive factors include cost-effectiveness due to generic availability, supply chain efficiency, quality control, and regional distribution networks.

  5. Are there significant ongoing research efforts to develop new indications for ifosfamide beyond its current uses? While there is ongoing research into combination therapies and optimizing existing use, the development of entirely new indications for ifosfamide is limited, with current efforts focused on refining its role in established or challenging oncological niches.

Citations

[1] Garcia-Gomez, C., et al. (2022). Ifosfamide in the Treatment of Pediatric and Young Adult Osteosarcoma: A Retrospective Analysis. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 480(7), 1378-1387. [2] Smith, J., et al. (2023). A Phase II Study of Ifosfamide in Combination with Pazopanib for Patients with Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 41(16), Abstract 11000.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.