Last Updated: June 25, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR HYDROCORTISONE ACETATE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for hydrocortisone acetate

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00915343 ↗ Once-daily Oral Modified Release Hydrocortisone in Patients With Adrenal Insufficiency Completed Shire Phase 2/Phase 3 2007-08-21 This is a randomised, controlled, open, two-armed, two-period cross-over, multi-centre phase II/III study to assess the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of once-daily oral modified-release hydrocortisone in comparison to conventional thrice-daily oral hydrocortisone tablets in patients with adrenal insufficiency
NCT01014364 ↗ Low Doses Corticosteroids as Adjuvant Therapy for the Treatment of Severe H1N1 Flu Terminated Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris Phase 3 2010-03-01 The H1N1 flu pandemic is one of the major infectious threat of the past half century. it is rapidly progressing worldwide and a substantial number of patients get severe H1N1 related pneumonia that requires mechanical ventilation and admission to the intensive care unit. The acute respiratory distress syndrome is associated with a substantial mortality and morbidity partly as a consequence of uncontrolled lung and systemic inflammation. many physicians are trying to counteract this pro-inflammatory storm by the use of corticosteroids albeit these drugs may cause super infection or metabolic disorders. Thus, there is a need for a randomized double blind, placebo controlled trial to define the benefit to risk ratio of corticosteroids in this patient.
NCT01014364 ↗ Low Doses Corticosteroids as Adjuvant Therapy for the Treatment of Severe H1N1 Flu Terminated University of Versailles Phase 3 2010-03-01 The H1N1 flu pandemic is one of the major infectious threat of the past half century. it is rapidly progressing worldwide and a substantial number of patients get severe H1N1 related pneumonia that requires mechanical ventilation and admission to the intensive care unit. The acute respiratory distress syndrome is associated with a substantial mortality and morbidity partly as a consequence of uncontrolled lung and systemic inflammation. many physicians are trying to counteract this pro-inflammatory storm by the use of corticosteroids albeit these drugs may cause super infection or metabolic disorders. Thus, there is a need for a randomized double blind, placebo controlled trial to define the benefit to risk ratio of corticosteroids in this patient.
NCT01055249 ↗ UVB Model Validation Study Completed X-pert Med GmbH Phase 1 2010-01-01 Single centre, subject and observer blinded, placebo controlled, cross-over study of the effect of oral ibuprofen and topical hydrocortisone-21-acetate on ultraviolet radiation (UVR) induced pain and inflammation in healthy volunteers conducted in two segments and using an intra-individual comparison of application areas.
NCT01495910 ↗ A Study Examining Doses of Abiraterone Acetate in Adult Women With 21-Hydroxylase Deficiency Completed Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C. Phase 1 2011-12-01 The purpose of this study is to determine the minimum dose of abiraterone acetate needed to decrease serum androstenedione to age-appropriate levels in premenopausal women on steroid replacement for classic 21-hydroxylase deficiency.
NCT01702103 ↗ Demonstrate the Therapeutic Clinical Equivalence of Two Mometasone Nasal Sprays Unknown status PH&T S.p.A. Phase 3 2012-10-01 Demonstrate the therapeutic clinical equivalence of two mometasone nasal sprays in the relief of the signs and symptoms of perennial allergic rhinitis, in term of changes at week 8 from baseline of Total Nasal Symptom Scores (TNSS).
NCT01771328 ↗ Continuous Subcutaneous Hydrocortisone Infusion in Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia Unknown status Haukeland University Hospital Phase 2 2013-02-01 The conventional glucocorticoid replacement therapy in congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) renders the cortisol levels unphysiological, which may cause symptoms and long-term complications. Glucocorticoid replacement is technically feasible by continuous subcutaneous hydrocortisone infusion (CSHI), and can mimic the normal diurnal cortisol rhythm. This method was recently applied to treat a patient through a critical phase of puberty. This is a clinical trial aiming to evaluate CSHI treatment in patients with CAH. The main objective is to determine the effects of CSHI on metabolic parameters (androstenedione and 17-hydroxyprogesterone profiles, and testosterone,adrenocorticotropic hormone(ACTH), cortisol, and bone markers), and to determine the required glucocorticoid doses. Secondary objectives are to determine effects on clinical status, body weight, blood pressure and other metabolic parameters, as well as on subjective health status (AddiQoL, SF36).
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for hydrocortisone acetate

Condition Name

Condition Name for hydrocortisone acetate
Intervention Trials
Adrenal Insufficiency 3
Internal Hemorrhoids 2
Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia 2
Depression 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for hydrocortisone acetate
Intervention Trials
Adrenogenital Syndrome 4
Adrenal Hyperplasia, Congenital 4
Adrenocortical Hyperfunction 3
Adrenal Insufficiency 3
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for hydrocortisone acetate

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for hydrocortisone acetate
Location Trials
United States 18
China 4
Norway 2
Egypt 1
Germany 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for hydrocortisone acetate
Location Trials
Michigan 4
California 3
Texas 3
New York 2
Maryland 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for hydrocortisone acetate

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for hydrocortisone acetate
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE3 1
Phase 4 1
Phase 3 3
[disabled in preview] 14
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for hydrocortisone acetate
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 11
Unknown status 5
Recruiting 2
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for hydrocortisone acetate

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for hydrocortisone acetate
Sponsor Trials
Haukeland University Hospital 2
Children's Hospital Los Angeles 2
Feinstein Institute for Medical Research 2
[disabled in preview] 6
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for hydrocortisone acetate
Sponsor Trials
Other 21
Industry 11
NIH 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial
Last updated: May 20, 2026

Hydrocortisone Acetate Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Market-Projections: What to Know for Exclusivity, Competitors, and FDA Risk

Hydrocortisone acetate is an established corticosteroid available in multiple dosage forms (notably injectable hydrocortisone acetate and topical formulations). The market is characterized by generic availability and limited remaining patent-driven exclusivity in most geographies. Public clinical-trial activity is present but generally not concentrated in large late-stage programs that would materially shift near-term market structure.

Is hydrocortisone acetate still in clinical trials in 2025? What are the latest trial results and phases?

Featured-snippet answer: Hydrocortisone acetate continues to appear in clinical research, typically in supportive or niche contexts (formulation studies, dosing comparisons, anti-inflammatory use cases). Publicly disclosed late-stage registrational programs with clear 2025 readouts are not a consistent feature of hydrocortisone acetate’s development landscape.

Where are trials focused: injection vs topical vs alternative delivery systems?

Hydrocortisone acetate trials most often align with one of these intents:

  • Formulation or bioavailability work (including comparisons across salt forms, vehicle systems, or routes)
  • Short-cycle inflammatory indications (post-procedure inflammation, musculoskeletal inflammation, ocular-adjacent regimens where applicable by local labeling)
  • Non-inferiority or endpoint equivalence studies where a new sponsor seeks differentiation without needing a wholly new mechanism

What trial endpoints dominate?

Common endpoints in hydrocortisone acetate studies include:

  • Change in symptom or inflammation scores
  • Reduction in edema and pain
  • Time-to-improvement and rescue-medication use
  • Safety signals focused on infection, hyperglycemia, hypertension, and adrenal suppression monitoring where relevant

What does the public development cadence indicate?

The development pattern is consistent with a product where:

  • The core pharmacology is mature
  • New entrants usually pursue route-of-administration, formulation differentiation, or competitive positioning rather than mechanism innovation
  • Late-stage “single winner” trials are less frequent than for novel biologics or new small molecules

How big is the hydrocortisone acetate market today and what drives demand?

Featured-snippet answer: Demand is driven by the breadth of use in inflammatory conditions, cost-sensitive procurement, and institutional adoption of corticosteroid injectables and topical steroids. Market size is more dependent on formulation access and procurement economics than on brand-level innovation.

Key demand drivers

  • Broad anti-inflammatory use across outpatient and inpatient settings
  • Steroid procurement in hospital formularies for short-term flares and procedural inflammation
  • Cost advantages of generic corticosteroids, including hydrocortisone acetate where suppliers compete on price and supply reliability
  • Role in combination products and treatment pathways that rely on corticosteroid coverage

Key demand headwinds

  • Side-effect profile limiting use duration and requiring monitoring
  • Substitution by other corticosteroid esters, different potency classes, or alternative anti-inflammatory agents depending on payer and guideline placement
  • Ongoing competitive pressure from other generic steroid injectables and topical corticosteroids

Commercial structure

The market tends to be:

  • Multi-supplier and price-driven (generic-rich)
  • Contract-driven for hospital accounts
  • Product-line driven by formulation availability rather than disease-modifying innovation

What is the forecast for hydrocortisone acetate market growth through 2030?

Featured-snippet answer: Growth is likely to track inflation and volume stability or low-to-moderate expansion, with upside tied to uptake of accessible generic products and downside tied to guideline shifts and substitution. Material “step-change” growth would generally require a meaningful regulatory or formulation breakthrough, which is not the dominant pattern in hydrocortisone acetate’s recent development profile.

Base-case projection mechanics (high level)

A practical forecast typically reflects:

  • Stable underlying demand for anti-inflammatory steroid use
  • Continued generic competition compressing pricing
  • Limited brand premium and limited durable exclusivity
  • Revenue lift from volume rather than price, unless supply constraints occur

Scenario framing

  • Base case: modest CAGR dominated by volume and replacement demand; pricing remains pressured
  • Bull case: episodic supply tightness or higher utilization in institutional settings; some share capture from competitor stock-outs or formulary changes
  • Bear case: faster substitution toward other steroid profiles, procurement cost pressure accelerating switching, or increased restrictions on steroid use in certain settings

What patents protect hydrocortisone acetate? How strong is the patent estate?

Featured-snippet answer: Hydrocortisone acetate is an old active ingredient. Patent protection, where it exists, is typically concentrated in specific formulations, dosage forms, manufacturing methods, or fixed combinations, not in the core compound.

Patent estate characteristics

For legacy corticosteroids like hydrocortisone acetate:

  • Compound patents are long expired
  • Remaining IP is usually limited to secondary patents such as:
    • Specific topical vehicles and concentrations
    • Injectable presentation innovations
    • Process patents for manufacturing or purification
    • Stability and shelf-life improvements for particular presentations
    • Combination products or device-integrated delivery

How strong is it for blocking generics?

In most markets, the practical blocker is rarely “generic hydrocortisone acetate” as a concept. Instead, barriers arise when:

  • A competitor must use a specific route/dosage form that is still protected
  • A company holds patents on a particular formulation or manufacturing approach
  • Country-specific patent coverage and enforcement support ongoing protection

What is the Orange Book status of hydrocortisone acetate in the US? Which products have listed patents?

Featured-snippet answer: Hydrocortisone acetate products appear in the FDA Orange Book with a patchwork of listed patents that typically do not provide broad compound-level exclusivity. The actionable reality is presentation-level patent listings for specific NDCs, often tied to formulation, manufacturing, or approved methods.

How Orange Book listings usually map to exclusivity

  • Drug substance exclusivity is generally not a factor for a legacy compound
  • Patent listings influence the timing of AB-rated generic substitution at the presentation level
  • Exclusivity, if any, typically ties to specific applications, not to hydrocortisone acetate broadly

Are there Paragraph IV challenges for hydrocortisone acetate? Who is filing and what has settled?

Featured-snippet answer: Paragraph IV litigation is more common for products with current brand or partially protected presentations. For hydrocortisone acetate, broad Paragraph IV activity is less likely because most presentations are already generic or have limited remaining exclusivity at the presentation level.

What to look for in litigation patterns

When litigation occurs, it tends to be:

  • NDC-specific (injectable or topical presentations)
  • Centered on listed formulation or process patents
  • Resolved through settlements that preserve a period of generic launch for the specific disputed claims

How does hydrocortisone acetate compare with hydrocortisone base, hydrocortisone sodium phosphate, and other steroid esters?

Featured-snippet answer: Hydrocortisone acetate differs mainly by ester form and formulation properties, affecting solubility, dosing form, and clinical handling. Substitution depends on route and intended duration of anti-inflammatory effect.

Decision factors that drive switching

  • Solubility and formulation feasibility (injectable readiness vs depot-like behavior)
  • Onset and duration as used in clinical protocols
  • Formulary preferences and procurement economics
  • Side-effect management and monitoring requirements

Competitive implications

If hydrocortisone acetate’s local presentation is not protected, competitive pressure comes from:

  • Alternative hydrocortisone ester products
  • Other corticosteroids with superior practical handling
  • Combination therapies that alter the payer and guideline path

Which companies compete in hydrocortisone acetate, and how is the competitive landscape structured?

Featured-snippet answer: The competitive landscape is generic-dominated with multiple manufacturers across injectable and topical presentations. Brand incumbency is limited in practical terms unless protected NDCs remain.

How competitors typically differentiate

  • Price and supply reliability
  • Formulation and manufacturing quality systems
  • Variants by concentration, packaging, and presentation (single-dose vs multi-dose where applicable)
  • Contract distribution and hospital group purchasing strategies

What generic entry risks exist for hydrocortisone acetate? When could generics launch?

Featured-snippet answer: Generic entry risk is usually tied to NDC-level patent or exclusivity end dates rather than to active-ingredient-level protection. For most hydrocortisone acetate presentations, the risk is moderate to high because patent coverage is limited and fragmented.

Most common generic entry constraints

  • NDC-specific patent claims that prevent launch of an “at-risk” generic
  • Formulation equivalence constraints if a protected formulation approach is required
  • Administrative delays, labeling disputes, or patent list navigation under Hatch-Waxman

What determines the launch timeline

  • Expiration of listed patents tied to the specific dosage form and strength
  • Resolution of any relevant litigation affecting that NDC
  • Country-specific regulatory approvals for each presentation

What formulations are protected for hydrocortisone acetate? What dosage forms face the most IP barriers?

Featured-snippet answer: Protected elements are more likely to involve topical vehicles, injectable formulation specifics (including concentration, buffering system, or stability profile), or manufacturing methods for specific strengths.

Dosage forms where IP can matter

  • Topical creams/ointments: vehicle systems and stability
  • Injectable: excipient system, particle/precipitation stability, and sterilization-compatible formulation
  • Fixed combinations: if a product is a combination, protection may extend to combination ratios or methods

What manufacturing IP barriers affect hydrocortisone acetate supply?

Featured-snippet answer: Manufacturing-related patents, when present, typically relate to process optimization or stability-enhancing methods for a particular presentation. In a generic-dominated market, these barriers are generally narrower than in novel-drug pipelines.

Where delays can come from

  • Process replication of a protected method for a specific presentation
  • Scale-up validation and stability testing requirements
  • Quality systems and regulatory inspection outcomes that can constrain supply

Clinical and market outlook: what changes could materially shift demand for hydrocortisone acetate?

Featured-snippet answer: Demand shifts are more likely from clinical practice pattern changes and procurement dynamics than from new mechanistic breakthroughs. Material upside would require either a resurgence of corticosteroid use in certain protocols or a supply-side disruption that improves price realization.

Potential market inflection points

  • Guideline changes expanding steroid use for certain inflammatory presentations
  • Increased institutional utilization for short-course inflammation
  • Supply disruptions that tighten availability and raise net prices temporarily
  • Introduction of protected NDCs via reformulation or device-linked delivery systems

Key Takeaways

  • Hydrocortisone acetate is a mature corticosteroid with ongoing but typically incremental clinical trial activity.
  • Market dynamics are generic-dominated and primarily shaped by procurement economics, presentation availability, and substitution among steroid esters.
  • Forecast growth through 2030 is likely modest and driven mainly by volume and inflation rather than brand-level premium.
  • IP protection is generally fragmented and presentation-specific; actionable exclusivity or launch barriers, where they exist, are NDC-level rather than compound-level.
  • Competitive and generic entry risk depends on which specific strengths and dosage forms still carry listed patents or are affected by litigation.

FAQs

1) What are the most common clinical uses of hydrocortisone acetate injection versus topical hydrocortisone acetate?
Injection is typically used for acute anti-inflammatory needs where systemic steroid effect is required, while topical forms target localized inflammatory skin conditions.

2) Does hydrocortisone acetate have any remaining exclusivity that blocks generics broadly?
Exclusivity, when present, is generally tied to specific approvals or NDCs rather than broad hydrocortisone acetate exclusivity.

3) Are there newer hydrocortisone acetate formulations that could expand the market?
Market expansion is more likely from stability, convenience, or formulation refinements within existing routes than from new mechanism development.

4) Which therapeutic competitors most often substitute for hydrocortisone acetate?
Competitors include other hydrocortisone ester formulations and alternative corticosteroids depending on potency, route, and protocol.

5) How do patent listings on specific NDCs translate into real launch timing for generics?
Launch timing depends on the expiration of listed patents and any litigation outcomes for the specific dosage form and strength, not on the active ingredient alone.


References

  1. FDA. Orange Book: Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations (Hydrocortisone Acetate entries). U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
  2. ClinicalTrials.gov. Search results for hydrocortisone acetate (filters by status, condition, and intervention). U.S. National Library of Medicine.
  3. U.S. FDA. Hatch-Waxman (Drug Patent and Exclusivity) framework and Paragraph IV certification basics. U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.