Last Updated: August 9, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR HALOPERIDOL LACTATE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for haloperidol lactate

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT01139463 ↗ Study of Blood Lactate Levels in Patients Treated With Antipsychotics Completed University Hospital of Split 2008-06-01 Blood lactate levels in patients receiving typical or atypical antipsychotics have not been described in the literature. The goal of this study is to assess the dynamics of lactate levels in the blood from typical or atypical antipsychotics not confounded by prior antipsychotic treatments, the investigators conducted a prospective study of lactate levels in patients receiving antipsychotic medication. The investigators hypothesized that 6 months of treatment with haloperidol or olanzapine would result in a change in blood lactate levels and extrapyramidal side effects.
NCT01139463 ↗ Study of Blood Lactate Levels in Patients Treated With Antipsychotics Completed University of Split 2008-06-01 Blood lactate levels in patients receiving typical or atypical antipsychotics have not been described in the literature. The goal of this study is to assess the dynamics of lactate levels in the blood from typical or atypical antipsychotics not confounded by prior antipsychotic treatments, the investigators conducted a prospective study of lactate levels in patients receiving antipsychotic medication. The investigators hypothesized that 6 months of treatment with haloperidol or olanzapine would result in a change in blood lactate levels and extrapyramidal side effects.
NCT02807467 ↗ Influence of Dexmedetomidine or Propofol on ICU Delirium Recruiting University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland Phase 4 2019-03-01 In this randomized study, the investigators aim to test the hypothesis that the reinstitution of a normal circadian rhythm by continuous infusions of dexmedetomidine compared to propofol between 8pm and 6am after diagnosis of hyperactive or mixed delirium, decreases the duration of delirium. The infusions might have to be repeated several times to achieve resolution of delirium.
NCT03299452 ↗ Clinical Studies by Using Alphacait to Screen Drugs for Advanced Solid Tumor Unknown status Alphacait, LLC Phase 2 2017-01-01 This is a single-center, open-label, single-arm, non-randomized study designed to evaluate PFS, safety, overall survival (OS), objective response rate (OPR), disease control rate (DCR) and biomarkers of cancer therapy based on Alphacait screening system in subjects with advanced malignant tumor.
NCT03299452 ↗ Clinical Studies by Using Alphacait to Screen Drugs for Advanced Solid Tumor Unknown status Haining Health-Coming Biotech Co., Ltd. Phase 2 2017-01-01 This is a single-center, open-label, single-arm, non-randomized study designed to evaluate PFS, safety, overall survival (OS), objective response rate (OPR), disease control rate (DCR) and biomarkers of cancer therapy based on Alphacait screening system in subjects with advanced malignant tumor.
NCT04259476 ↗ Low Dose Perioperative Ketamine Infusion and it's Effect on Postoperative Pain Score, Sedation Score and Narcotic Consumption in Patients Undergoing Spine Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Double Blind Control Trial. Recruiting Services Institute of Medical Sciences, Pakistan Phase 1 2020-01-01 Low dose perioperative ketamine infusion and it's effect on postoperative pain score, sedation score and narcotic consumption in patients undergoing spine surgery: A prospective randomized double blind control trial.
NCT05895838 ↗ The Danish Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Study Not yet recruiting Christian Hassager Phase 3 2023-06-01 After resuscitation from Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest (OHCA) patients experience Post Cardiac Arrest Syndrome due to ischemia and reperfusion injury. It consists of systemic inflammation, cerebral and myocardial dysfunction, and the condition that led to the arrest. Most OHCA patients will receive critical care intubated in an Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Despite this ~50% die; mainly due to brain injury. Several targets can be considered for improving outcomes. To dampen systemic inflammation and optimize cerebral perfusion seem important. Deep sedation has been required for targeted temperature management (TTM) but may also be brain protective. After end of sedation, many patients have some cerebral dysfunction that may facilitate delirium. The aim of this trial is therefore to improve treatment of comatose OHCA patients by evaluating 4 interventions in a factorial design addressing each of these targets in a randomized clinical trial: 1. Systemic inflammation: Anti-inflammatory treatment with high dose steroids (dexamethasone) or placebo. 2. Cerebral perfusion: Backrest elevation during sedation at 5 or 35 degrees. 3. Duration of sedation: Early wakeup call and potential extubation at ≤6 hours after admission or later as current standard practice at 28-36 hours. 4. Delirium: Prophylactic treatment with anti-psychotic medication (olanzapine) or placebo. The trial is designed as a phase III trial, randomizing 1000 patients at Danish cardiac arrest centers. The primary endpoint is 90 days all-cause mortality for the interventions targeting systemic inflammation and cerebral perfusion, while it is days alive outside of hospital within 30 days for the interventions concerning duration of sedation and delirium. The trial has potential to improve outcomes for comatose OHCA patients - a group with a grave prognosis with currently only limited evidence-based treatments.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for haloperidol lactate

Condition Name

Condition Name for haloperidol lactate
Intervention Trials
Metastatic Cancer 1
Movement Disorders 1
Out-Of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest 1
Post-Cardiac Arrest Syndrome 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for haloperidol lactate
Intervention Trials
Acidosis 1
Heart Arrest 1
Pain, Postoperative 1
Neoplasm Metastasis 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for haloperidol lactate

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for haloperidol lactate
Location Trials
Denmark 2
Croatia 1
Pakistan 1
China 1
Switzerland 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for haloperidol lactate

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for haloperidol lactate
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 1
Phase 3 1
Phase 2 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for haloperidol lactate
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Recruiting 2
Unknown status 1
Completed 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for haloperidol lactate

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for haloperidol lactate
Sponsor Trials
University Hospital of Split 1
University of Split 1
University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland 1
[disabled in preview] 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for haloperidol lactate
Sponsor Trials
Other 7
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Haloperidol Lactate Clinical Trials, Market Analysis, Patent Status and 2025-2030 Projection

Last updated: July 31, 2026

Haloperidol lactate is an established injectable formulation of haloperidol used primarily for acute psychosis, severe agitation, and Tourette syndrome-related control of motor and vocal tics. Its active ingredient is a first-generation dopamine D2 antagonist with decades of clinical use. The injectable product is generic, has no meaningful remaining composition-of-matter exclusivity, and faces limited patent barriers. Commercial prospects depend on hospital demand, generic supply continuity, shortages, procurement contracts, and competition from olanzapine, ziprasidone, droperidol, and oral or long-acting injectable antipsychotics.

The product has a mature clinical profile rather than an active innovation pipeline. New trials generally evaluate haloperidol as one component of a treatment strategy for delirium or agitation, not as a newly developed drug.

What is haloperidol lactate injection used for?

Haloperidol lactate injection is an immediate-release parenteral formulation administered intramuscularly. The U.S. label identifies indications including acute psychotic states and control of manifestations of Tourette disorder. The injection is not approved for intravenous administration under the product labeling, although intravenous use has occurred in clinical practice and carries heightened QT-prolongation concerns.[1]

Typical hospital uses include:

  • Acute agitation associated with psychosis
  • Schizophrenia when oral therapy is impractical
  • Emergency behavioral control
  • Delirium-related agitation in selected patients
  • Tourette syndrome when rapid parenteral treatment is required

The formulation is distinct from haloperidol decanoate. Haloperidol lactate is short acting and used for acute treatment. Haloperidol decanoate is a long-acting depot ester administered intramuscularly for maintenance therapy in schizophrenia.

How does haloperidol lactate differ from haloperidol decanoate?

Attribute Haloperidol lactate Haloperidol decanoate
Formulation Immediate-release injectable solution Long-acting depot injection
Primary role Acute treatment Maintenance treatment
Administration Usually intramuscular Intramuscular
Onset Relatively rapid Prolonged release
Dosing frequency Repeated as clinically required Typically monthly or individualized
Main commercial setting Emergency departments and hospitals Outpatient and institutional maintenance care
Patent position Mature generic product Mature generic product

What are the latest clinical-trial developments for haloperidol lactate?

Haloperidol lactate has no evident late-stage development program for a new indication or delivery technology. Current research is concentrated on comparative effectiveness, dosing, safety, and use in acute-care populations.

ClinicalTrials.gov records have evaluated haloperidol in areas such as:

  • Hyperactive or agitated delirium
  • Postoperative delirium prevention or treatment
  • Emergency-department agitation
  • Intensive-care-unit sedation strategies
  • Palliative-care agitation
  • Comparison with droperidol, olanzapine, midazolam, or other sedatives

The most important recent evidence concerns delirium. In critically ill adults, randomized evidence has not established routine haloperidol treatment as a therapy that reduces delirium duration, mortality, or duration of mechanical ventilation. The large MIND-USA trial found no significant difference in delirium-free and coma-free days between haloperidol, ziprasidone, and placebo in critically ill patients with acute delirium.[2]

The implication for market demand is material: haloperidol remains available for symptom control, but clinical guidelines increasingly distinguish treatment of dangerous agitation from routine pharmacologic treatment of delirium itself.

What safety issues affect haloperidol lactate trials and use?

The principal safety concerns are:

  • QT prolongation and torsades de pointes risk
  • Extrapyramidal symptoms
  • Acute dystonia and akathisia
  • Tardive dyskinesia
  • Neuroleptic malignant syndrome
  • Sedation and hypotension
  • Increased mortality in elderly patients with dementia-related psychosis

The FDA label warns against use in dementia-related psychosis and identifies cardiovascular and neurologic risks.[1] Intravenous administration and high cumulative doses increase concern regarding QT prolongation. These risks constrain broad substitution for newer agents even when haloperidol has a lower acquisition cost.

What is the FDA regulatory status of haloperidol lactate?

Haloperidol lactate injection is an FDA-approved generic prescription drug. The reference product was Haldol injection, originally associated with Janssen Pharmaceuticals. U.S. generic products have been approved through abbreviated new drug applications, or ANDAs, that rely on the established safety and efficacy of the reference product.

Regulatory item Status
Active ingredient Haloperidol lactate
Dosage form Injectable solution
Common strength 5 mg/mL
FDA pathway ANDA generic approvals
Reference product Haldol injection
Therapeutic class Typical antipsychotic
Controlled-substance status Not federally scheduled
Pediatric use Labeling and evidence vary by age and indication
Current innovation status Mature generic product

FDA product availability can change by manufacturer, package size, and supply status. A product being listed in FDA databases does not guarantee continuous commercial distribution.

What is the Orange Book status of haloperidol lactate?

The Orange Book includes haloperidol lactate injection products and reference-product information, with generic products generally identified by therapeutic-equivalence codes. Because the product is a long-established generic, Orange Book protection is not the primary commercial issue. The relevant risks are manufacturing capacity, injectable quality requirements, and supply disruptions.[3]

The Orange Book should be reviewed by product-specific application number and package configuration because different strengths, vial sizes, and marketing statuses may have separate entries.

What patents protect haloperidol lactate?

No commercially significant U.S. composition-of-matter patent is expected to remain in force for haloperidol or haloperidol lactate. Haloperidol was discovered and developed in the 1950s, and its core chemical exclusivity expired decades ago.

Patent category Commercial position
Haloperidol composition patent Expired
Haloperidol lactate salt protection Expired or commercially immaterial
Immediate-release injection formulation No meaningful blocking exclusivity identified
Method-of-use patents Any historical claims are expired or narrow
Manufacturing patents Potentially relevant to individual suppliers, not a broad market barrier
Orange Book-listed blocking patents No meaningful current barrier expected

Patent risk is therefore low for a manufacturer able to obtain FDA approval and meet injectable-drug quality requirements. Freedom to operate may still require review of process patents, device claims, trademarks, and contractual restrictions in non-U.S. markets.

Are there Paragraph IV challenges to haloperidol lactate?

Paragraph IV litigation is not a current central feature of the product. Haloperidol lactate has long been generic, and any major challenge to the original reference product would have occurred before the present mature-market period. New entrants would more likely file ANDAs without encountering a valuable active patent estate.

The absence of significant Paragraph IV litigation does not eliminate regulatory risk. FDA deficiencies, facility inspections, sterile manufacturing failures, and product recalls can delay entry or remove a supplier from the market.

Which companies manufacture or market haloperidol lactate?

U.S. availability has historically included generic injectable manufacturers and hospital-focused suppliers such as Hikma Pharmaceuticals and other FDA-approved generic companies. Manufacturer participation can change because injectable products are frequently discontinued, transferred, or temporarily unavailable.

The competitive field is usually fragmented by:

  • Institutional purchasing contracts
  • Group purchasing organizations
  • Hospital formularies
  • Wholesaler inventory
  • Contract-manufacturing arrangements
  • Shortage-driven substitution

A company with a small share of unit volume can still become commercially important if competitors experience manufacturing interruptions. Sterile injectable capacity has greater strategic value than the low price of an individual vial.

How strong is the patent estate for haloperidol lactate?

The patent estate is weak from an exclusivity perspective and low risk from a blocking-patent perspective. The commercial moat is operational rather than legal.

What manufacturing barriers affect haloperidol lactate?

Injectable haloperidol production requires:

  • Validated sterile filling operations
  • Container-closure integrity
  • Control of particulate matter
  • Stability data for the selected vial or ampule
  • Process validation
  • Microbial control
  • Reliable active pharmaceutical ingredient supply
  • FDA-compliant quality systems

These requirements make entry more difficult than entry into an oral tablet market. They do not create durable exclusivity, but they can limit the number of dependable suppliers.

What is the market outlook for haloperidol lactate?

Haloperidol lactate is a low-cost, mature hospital product. Public company disclosures rarely report molecule-specific revenue, and standalone global sales estimates are not consistently available. Market analysis therefore relies on hospital injectable antipsychotic demand, shipment volume, procurement pricing, and supplier participation rather than branded-product revenue.

Market drivers

Demand is supported by:

  • Continued emergency-department use for severe agitation
  • Hospital protocols requiring a low-cost injectable antipsychotic
  • Familiarity among clinicians
  • Broad generic availability
  • Use when oral administration is not feasible
  • Procurement preference for low acquisition cost

Market restraints

Demand is constrained by:

  • QT-prolongation risk
  • Extrapyramidal adverse effects
  • Reduced use for routine delirium treatment
  • Increasing use of atypical injectable antipsychotics
  • Preference for droperidol or olanzapine in some emergency settings
  • Limited commercial differentiation
  • Low prices that can reduce manufacturer incentives

How does haloperidol lactate compare with competing injectable antipsychotics?

Product Main advantage Main limitation Commercial effect
Haloperidol lactate Low cost, extensive clinical familiarity Extrapyramidal and QT risk Defends a stable hospital niche
Droperidol Rapid emergency-use profile and growing emergency-department adoption Availability and QT concerns vary by market Can displace haloperidol in agitation protocols
Olanzapine injection Lower extrapyramidal burden in some patients Higher cost and administration restrictions Captures premium emergency use
Ziprasidone injection Atypical antipsychotic option QT concerns and lower routine use in some hospitals Limited substitution pressure
Midazolam Rapid sedation and broad emergency familiarity Respiratory-depression risk; not an antipsychotic Competes for acute agitation control
Haloperidol decanoate Long-acting maintenance treatment Not designed for rapid titration Serves a different treatment segment

The greatest competitive threat is clinical protocol substitution, not patent-based entry. Hospitals can preserve haloperidol for selected cases while directing higher-risk or more severe agitation to alternative agents.

What is the haloperidol lactate market projection for 2025-2030?

The base-case outlook is stable to modestly declining volume with low-single-digit price movement. Revenue can remain flat or increase slightly if shortages support higher contract prices, but durable growth is unlikely without a new formulation, delivery system, or approved indication.

Scenario, 2025-2030 Unit-volume trend Net-price trend Revenue outlook
Bear case -4% to -7% annually -2% to -4% annually Decline of roughly 25%-45%
Base case -1% to +1% annually 0% to +2% annually Flat to low-single-digit growth
Shortage-driven case 0% to +2% annually +3% to +8% annually Temporary growth, followed by normalization
Innovation case +2% to +5% annually +2% to +5% annually Requires differentiated delivery or new clinical positioning

These are scenario ranges rather than reported market values. They reflect the product's mature generic status, low unit pricing, stable hospital need, and substitution risk.

What is the revenue exposure for manufacturers?

Revenue exposure is usually modest at the individual-product level but can be significant for a supplier with a concentrated sterile-injectable portfolio. Haloperidol lactate may provide:

  • Baseline hospital-contract revenue
  • Portfolio support for other injectable products
  • Revenue during competitor shortages
  • Formulary access that supports broader supplier relationships

The product is unlikely to be a major growth driver for a large pharmaceutical company. Its value is higher for a focused generic manufacturer that has underused sterile capacity and an established hospital-sales channel.

What generic launch scenarios exist for haloperidol lactate?

A new entrant could reach the market through an ANDA without confronting meaningful patent delay. The principal launch scenarios are:

  1. Price-based entry: The manufacturer competes for hospital contracts with limited differentiation.
  2. Supply-reliability entry: The manufacturer emphasizes continuity, multiple package sizes, and shortage resilience.
  3. Portfolio entry: Haloperidol lactate is bundled with other emergency and critical-care injectables.
  4. Contract-manufacturing entry: A supplier uses an external sterile facility and competes through procurement channels.
  5. Geographic entry: The company targets markets where local generic competition is limited.

Launch success depends more on FDA inspection readiness, approved facility capacity, distribution agreements, and hospital contracting than on patent strategy.

What licensing deals and settlement agreements affect haloperidol lactate?

No major current licensing transaction or settlement agreement is central to the U.S. haloperidol lactate market. Historical rights associated with Janssen and the Haldol brand do not create a present-day commercial barrier to generic injection sales.

Potential transaction value would arise from:

  • Acquisition of an approved ANDA
  • Transfer of an injectable manufacturing site
  • Hospital-contract portfolios
  • Supply agreements during shortages
  • Regional distribution rights
  • Development of a differentiated ready-to-administer presentation

What geographic markets have the strongest opportunity?

The strongest commercial opportunity is in countries with:

  • Large public hospital systems
  • High emergency-department volume
  • Established generic procurement
  • Limited access to newer injectable antipsychotics
  • Local shortages of sterile injectables
  • Regulatory pathways recognizing established products

The U.S. market has the most developed generic competition and the lowest patent risk. Emerging markets may offer higher volume growth but can have lower pricing, tender-driven revenue, local registration requirements, and less predictable reimbursement.

Key Takeaways

  • Haloperidol lactate is a mature, FDA-approved generic injectable antipsychotic.
  • Its principal uses are acute psychosis, severe agitation, and selected Tourette syndrome cases.
  • Clinical research is focused on delirium and emergency agitation, not a new product-development program.
  • The drug has no meaningful remaining composition-of-matter exclusivity.
  • Paragraph IV litigation and current patent barriers are not major market issues.
  • Manufacturing quality, sterile capacity, supply continuity, and hospital contracting determine competitive position.
  • Haloperidol remains less expensive than most alternatives but faces substitution from droperidol, olanzapine, and other acute-care agents.
  • The 2025-2030 base case is a stable to modestly declining market, with revenue supported by shortages or supply disruptions rather than innovation.
  • A new entrant would compete primarily through reliable supply, pricing, package configuration, and institutional contracting.

FAQs

Is haloperidol lactate still commercially available in the United States?

Yes. FDA-approved generic haloperidol lactate injection products have been marketed in the United States, although availability can vary by manufacturer, package size, and shortage status.

Does haloperidol lactate have new-drug exclusivity?

No meaningful current new-drug exclusivity is expected. The product is a long-established generic based on an old active ingredient.

Is haloperidol lactate approved for delirium?

Haloperidol is used clinically for severe agitation associated with delirium, but routine treatment of delirium has not shown consistent improvement in major clinical outcomes. The indication and use should be distinguished from treatment of dangerous agitation.

Can haloperidol lactate be replaced by olanzapine injection?

In some hospital protocols, yes. The choice depends on diagnosis, cardiovascular risk, extrapyramidal-symptom risk, sedation objectives, concomitant medications, and institutional policy.

What is the main investment risk for a haloperidol lactate manufacturer?

The primary risk is commoditization. Low pricing, limited differentiation, hospital purchasing pressure, competing injectables, and sterile-manufacturing interruptions can reduce profitability even when demand remains stable.

References

  1. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2023). Haldol (haloperidol lactate injection) prescribing information. FDA.
  2. Girard, T. D., Exline, M. C., Carson, S. S., et al. (2018). Haloperidol and ziprasidone for treatment of delirium in critical illness. The New England Journal of Medicine, 379(26), 2506-2516.
  3. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2024). Approved drug products with therapeutic equivalence evaluations: Orange Book. FDA.
  4. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2024). Drugs@FDA: FDA-approved drugs database. FDA.
  5. National Library of Medicine. (2024). ClinicalTrials.gov: Haloperidol clinical studies. U.S. National Library of Medicine.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.