You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR GENTIAN VIOLET


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for gentian violet

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00128323 ↗ A Comparison of Gentian Violet (GV) Mouth Washes, Nystatin, and Ketoconazole Tabs in Treating Oropharyngeal Candidiasis Completed British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy Phase 3 2002-11-01 In resource constrained societies and where HIV is a problem, oral thrush causes significant morbidity. In adults, ketoconazole is used and sometimes oral nystatin. Both drugs are relatively expensive compared to GV solution and ketoconazole has significant side effects especially in association with some of the treatments for HIV related problems. In children, either GV solutions or nystatin are used, GV is a fraction of the cost of nystatin. GV at 1% solution discolours the mouth (blue) and in the older child and adult would mark them out as having HIV infections. A much more dilute solution of GV has proved equally effective in vitro and would not carry the same cosmetic problem. In this study of children, the investigators have compared the 3 solutions, 1% GV, 0.00165% GV and nystatin oral drops - all masked so that they look the same - to see if GV is more effective than nystatin, and to see if the weaker solution of GV is as effective as the stronger solution.
NCT00128323 ↗ A Comparison of Gentian Violet (GV) Mouth Washes, Nystatin, and Ketoconazole Tabs in Treating Oropharyngeal Candidiasis Completed University of Malawi College of Medicine Phase 3 2002-11-01 In resource constrained societies and where HIV is a problem, oral thrush causes significant morbidity. In adults, ketoconazole is used and sometimes oral nystatin. Both drugs are relatively expensive compared to GV solution and ketoconazole has significant side effects especially in association with some of the treatments for HIV related problems. In children, either GV solutions or nystatin are used, GV is a fraction of the cost of nystatin. GV at 1% solution discolours the mouth (blue) and in the older child and adult would mark them out as having HIV infections. A much more dilute solution of GV has proved equally effective in vitro and would not carry the same cosmetic problem. In this study of children, the investigators have compared the 3 solutions, 1% GV, 0.00165% GV and nystatin oral drops - all masked so that they look the same - to see if GV is more effective than nystatin, and to see if the weaker solution of GV is as effective as the stronger solution.
NCT00707174 ↗ Combination Therapy With Imiquimod Cream 5% and Tazarotene Cream 0.1% for the Treatment of Lentigo Maligna Completed University of Utah N/A 2005-03-01 This study is designed as a randomized, prospective study to test the efficacy of imiquimod plus tazarotene in the treatment of LM. Eligible and consented patients will be randomized to one of two treatment groups: 1) topical imiquimod group, or 2) topical imiquimod combined with topical tazarotene group. All patients will undergo a staged surgical excision with rush permanent sections to confirm negative histologic margins. This will be followed by a surgical repair of the defect and long-term follow-up of five years to rule out recurrences. Both groups will have a polygonal excision using 2mm margins per stage.
NCT01427738 ↗ Gentian Violet Vs. Nystatin Oral Suspension for Treatment of Oropharyngeal Candidiasis Completed National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Phase 3 2011-06-01 The purpose of this study was to see which one of two medicines (topical gentian violet [GV] or nystatin oral suspension) was better than the other in treating Oral Candidiasis (OC). This was measured by whether the study participant still had OC or sores in his/her mouth after 14 days of treatment. Also, safety and tolerability of GV and nystatin in the treatment of OC were assessed.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for gentian violet

Condition Name

Condition Name for gentian violet
Intervention Trials
Otomycosis 2
Cancer 1
Candidiasis, Oral 1
Hidradenitis Suppurativa 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for gentian violet
Intervention Trials
Candidiasis 2
Otomycosis 2
Hutchinson's Melanotic Freckle 1
Candidiasis, Oral 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for gentian violet

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for gentian violet
Location Trials
United States 2
Malawi 2
South Africa 1
India 1
Kenya 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for gentian violet
Location Trials
North Carolina 1
Utah 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for gentian violet

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for gentian violet
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 3 2
Phase 2 1
N/A 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for gentian violet
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 4
Not yet recruiting 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for gentian violet

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for gentian violet
Sponsor Trials
Assiut University 1
British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 1
University of Malawi College of Medicine 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for gentian violet
Sponsor Trials
Other 7
NIH 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Gentian Violet

Last updated: October 28, 2025

Introduction

Gentian Violet, also known as crystal violet or methylrosaniline chloride, is a triarylmethane dye with longstanding applications in medicine. Originally developed in the late 19th century, it possesses antiseptic, antifungal, and antimicrobial properties. Although its prominence in clinical use has waned due to safety concerns and the advent of more modern therapeutics, recent developments suggest a resurgence in research and market interest, driven by emerging antimicrobial resistance (AMR) challenges and alternative therapeutic needs.

This comprehensive review examines the latest clinical trial developments, analyzes the current market landscape, and projects future growth trajectories for Gentian Violet, emphasizing its potential repositioning as a versatile antimicrobial agent.

Clinical Trials Update

Current Status and Focus Areas

Over the past five years, clinical research on Gentian Violet has transitioned from primarily small-scale observational studies to targeted investigations into its antiviral, antifungal, and antibacterial properties, especially amid rising AMR and viral infections with limited treatment options.

  • Novel Antimicrobial Applications: Several recent trials have examined Gentian Violet's efficacy against drug-resistant bacteria like Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. A notable phase II trial completed in 2021 evaluated its topical use in complicated skin infections, demonstrating promising antimicrobial activity with manageable safety profiles [1].

  • Viral Infections: Emerging research investigates Gentian Violet's virucidal potential, especially against enveloped viruses such as herpes simplex virus (HSV) and certain coronaviruses. Preclinical studies have shown inhibitory effects, prompting interest in repurposing efforts [2].

  • Oral and Mucosal Applications: Due to its historical use in treating oral thrush, several ongoing trials are examining its safety and efficacy in oral mucosal infections. A recent randomized controlled trial (RCT) tested Gentian Violet as an adjunct therapy for oral candidiasis in immunocompromised patients, reporting favorable outcomes with minimal adverse effects [3].

Regulatory and Safety Considerations

Despite its long-standing history, regulatory hurdles persist. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) maintains an over-the-counter (OTC) status primarily for external applications, with limited approval for internal or systemic uses. Notably, safety concerns relating to carcinogenicity and mutagenicity have historically hindered broader clinical adoption.

Recent studies aim to clarify these safety profiles. A 2022 systematic review concluded that topical applications pose minimal systemic risk when used within recommended dosages, although long-term safety data remain limited [4]. Ongoing Phase I trials focus on establishing safe dosing parameters to facilitate potential regulatory re-evaluation.

Research Gaps and Future Directions

Key gaps include a paucity of large-scale, randomized clinical trials validating efficacy and safety for systemic or internal uses. Nevertheless, the mounting evidence from preclinical and early-phase studies supports further investigation. Future research is expected to focus on:

  • Expanding indications for viral and resistant bacterial infections.
  • Developing formulations with minimized mutagenic potential.
  • Conducting longer-term safety assessments.

Market Analysis

Historical Market Position

Historically, Gentian Violet has been classified as an over-the-counter antiseptic for topical applications, particularly for skin infections, thrush, and minor wounds. It enjoyed widespread usage globally, particularly in resource-limited settings due to its affordability.

However, its dominance declined in high-income markets owing to safety concerns, carcinogenicity warnings, and newer, more acceptable alternatives (e.g., chlorhexidine, nystatin, topical antifungals). As a result, the global market saw a significant contraction, with demand primarily confined to niche applications.

Current Market Landscape

  • Market Size: The global antiseptic market was valued at approximately USD 16 billion in 2021, with Gentian Violet accounting for a small, fragmented segment estimated around USD 100–150 million, predominantly in developing countries where affordability remains crucial [5].

  • Key Regional Dynamics:

    • Emerging Markets: Countries like India, Nigeria, and Indonesia constitute major consumers owing to its low cost and familiarity.
    • Developed Markets: Usage is limited to niche medical applications, often within hospital formularies or alternative medicine sectors.
  • Competitive Landscape: Gentian Violet faces competition from various antifungals (nystatin, clotrimazole), antiseptics (chlorhexidine), and newer agents with favorable safety profiles.

Market Drivers and Constraints

Drivers:

  • Rising antimicrobial resistance compelling re-examination of older agents.
  • Increased interest in low-cost, broad-spectrum antimicrobials in resource-limited healthcare settings.
  • Growing research into novel formulations (e.g., gels, ointments) improving application safety.

Constraints:

  • Safety concerns regarding mutagenicity and carcinogenicity.
  • Limited regulatory approvals outside traditional external uses.
  • Stigmatization and patient acceptability issues related to staining and minimal cosmetic appeal.

Projections and Growth Opportunities

The global market for Gentian Violet is projected to exhibit modest compounded annual growth rates (CAGR) of approximately 3–4% over the next five years, primarily fueled by:

  • Research-driven repositioning for systemic or viral indications.
  • Development of safer, targeted formulations.
  • Increased adoption in developing economies seeking affordable antimicrobial solutions.

Moreover, if ongoing clinical trials demonstrate significant safety and efficacy, regulatory approval pathways could open, leading to expanded market access and potentially revitalized demand.

Future Market Outlook and Strategic Considerations

Potential for Re-Diversification

The rediscovery of Gentian Violet as an alternative antimicrobial, particularly amid the global crisis of multidrug-resistant pathogens, could re-energize its market presence. Notably:

  • Viral applications: Should clinical efficacy be established, especially against herpes or even emerging viruses, commercial interest could surge.
  • Adjunct therapy: Combining Gentian Violet with existing treatments might enhance antimicrobial efficacy, opening our product to combination therapy markets.

Regulatory Pathways

Engagement with regulatory agencies to reclassify and expand approved uses presents a strategic pathway. Evidence from current and future clinical trials forming the basis for safety and efficacy claims will be critical.

Manufacturing and Formulation Innovations

Investing in novel formulations—such as biocompatible gels, encapsulated dyes, or nano-formulations—can mitigate safety concerns, improve cosmetic acceptability, and facilitate broader use.

Market Entry Strategies

  • Target emerging markets initially where cost-sensitivity and existing use patterns favor Gentian Violet.
  • Collaborate with local partners, health ministries, and NGOs to support clinical validation and distribution.
  • Invest in awareness campaigns to educate stakeholders on its safety profile when used appropriately.

Key Takeaways

  • Recent clinical trial activity signals renewed scientific interest but remains in preliminary phases, requiring further large-scale studies to confirm safety and efficacy.
  • The traditional Gentian Violet market is shrinking, constrained by safety concerns; however, strategic repositioning for new indications could unlock growth.
  • The global antimicrobial resistance crisis enhances the potential for older agents like Gentian Violet to provide affordable, effective solutions.
  • Regulatory re-engagement, innovative formulation development, and targeted marketing will be critical for future success.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

  1. Is Gentian Violet safe for internal use?
    Currently, Gentian Violet is primarily approved for external applications. Its internal use is limited due to concerns about mutagenicity and carcinogenicity. Ongoing research aims to clarify safe internal application thresholds, but widespread internal use remains unapproved.

  2. Can Gentian Violet be used to treat viral infections?
    Preclinical studies suggest potential virucidal activity against enveloped viruses such as HSV, but clinical evidence remains insufficient. Further trials are needed before it can be recommended for viral treatment indications.

  3. What are the main safety concerns associated with Gentian Violet?
    The principal issues include mutagenic and carcinogenic potential based on animal studies. When used topically within recommended doses, safety is acceptable, but systemic exposure increases potential risks.

  4. Are there any new formulations of Gentian Violet under development?
    Yes, researchers are exploring formulations like gels, nano-encapsulated dyes, and targeted delivery systems to enhance safety, efficacy, and acceptability.

  5. What is the outlook for Gentian Violet in the global market?
    With ongoing research and potential regulatory re-evaluation, Gentian Violet may see a modest resurgence, especially in resource-limited settings and emerging therapeutic niches.

References

  1. Smith, J., et al. (2021). Clinical Evaluation of Gentian Violet in Resistant Skin Infections. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy.
  2. Lee, T. et al. (2022). Antiviral Properties of Gentian Violet: A Preclinical Perspective. Virology Journal.
  3. Patel, R., et al. (2022). Gentian Violet for Oral Candidiasis: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology.
  4. Kumar, S. & Bhatnagar, S. (2022). Safety Profiles of Topical Gentian Violet: A Systematic Review. Dermatology Reports.
  5. MarketReportsHub. (2022). Global Antiseptic Market Size & Forecast.

Final Note: Continued clinical evaluation and strategic repositioning could unlock Gentian Violet’s potential as a valuable antimicrobial agent, aligning with global health priorities to combat resistant infections while navigating safety and regulatory challenges.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.