You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: November 9, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR GADODIAMIDE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for gadodiamide

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00209391 ↗ A Safety & Efficacy Clinical Study to Evaluate the Narrowing of the Renal Arteries While Using Gadodiamide Completed GE Healthcare Phase 3 2003-09-01 Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA) is an examination similar to Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) which uses a magnetic field and a contrast medium when needed to visualize blood flow in the arterial vessels throughout the body. Gadodiamide, a contrast medium, is already approved and is used to image blood vessels by directly injecting it into the vein, but this procedure has not been formally tested to image the renal artery vessels using MR. The study is designed to determine the presence or absence of a relevant stenosis (ie greater than/equal to 50%) or occlusion in renal arteries. Intra-arterial Digital Subtraction Angiography will be used as the standard of truth.
NCT00209443 ↗ A Safety and Efficacy Clinical Study to Evaluate the Narrowing of the Aorto-iliac Arteries While Using Gadodiamide Completed GE Healthcare Phase 3 2004-09-01 Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA) is an examination similar to Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) which uses a magnetic field and a contrast medium when needed to visualize blood flow in the arterial vessels throughout the body. Gadodiamide, a contrast medium, is already approved and is used to image blood vessels by directly injecting it into the vein, but this procedure has not been formally tested to image the aorto-iliac vessels using MR. The study is designed to determine the presence or absence of a relevant stenosis (ie greater than/equal to 50%) or occlusion in aorto-iliac arteries. Intra-arterial Digital Subtraction Angiography (IADSA) will be used as the standard of truth.
NCT00908310 ↗ Post-marketing Safety Study in Patients With Moderate Renal Insufficiency Who Receive Omniscan for Contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Completed i3 Statprobe Phase 4 2009-05-01 This will be an international, multi-center, post-marketing surveillance study in patients with moderate renal insufficiency who are administered gadodiamide, Omniscan, during a MRI. Omniscan will be administered intravenously at the medical discretion of the prescribing physician.
NCT00908310 ↗ Post-marketing Safety Study in Patients With Moderate Renal Insufficiency Who Receive Omniscan for Contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Completed GE Healthcare Phase 4 2009-05-01 This will be an international, multi-center, post-marketing surveillance study in patients with moderate renal insufficiency who are administered gadodiamide, Omniscan, during a MRI. Omniscan will be administered intravenously at the medical discretion of the prescribing physician.
NCT02458118 ↗ Pancreatic Perfusion Using Secretin and MRI Unknown status University of Nottingham Phase 1/Phase 2 2012-06-01 The purpose of this study is to assess pancreatic perfusion in patients with chronic pancreatitis at rest and after secretin stimulation and compare this to published data on pancreatic perfusion in normal subjects.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for gadodiamide

Condition Name

Condition Name for gadodiamide
Intervention Trials
Nephrogenic Fibrosing Dermopathy 1
Alzheimer's Disease 1
Renal Artery Stenosis 1
Aorto-iliac Stenosis 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for gadodiamide
Intervention Trials
Renal Insufficiency 2
Cardiomyopathies 1
Renal Artery Obstruction 1
Pancreatitis, Chronic 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for gadodiamide

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for gadodiamide
Location Trials
United States 5
Germany 2
China 2
United Kingdom 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for gadodiamide
Location Trials
Massachusetts 1
Illinois 1
Arizona 1
New Jersey 1
North Carolina 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for gadodiamide

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for gadodiamide
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE3 1
Phase 4 3
Phase 3 2
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for gadodiamide
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 3
Recruiting 3
Unknown status 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for gadodiamide

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for gadodiamide
Sponsor Trials
GE Healthcare 3
Guerbet 2
The Central Hospital of Lishui City 1
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for gadodiamide
Sponsor Trials
Other 8
Industry 7
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Gadodiamide

Last updated: October 28, 2025

Introduction

Gadodiamide, a gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA), has served as a critical imaging reagent for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), primarily used to enhance diagnostic accuracy in various neurological, cardiovascular, and oncological applications. Its pharmacological profile, coupled with evolving regulatory landscapes and technological advancements, continues to influence its clinical utility and market trajectory. This report synthesizes the latest clinical trial developments, conducts a comprehensive market analysis, and projects the future landscape for Gadodiamide.

Clinical Trials Update

Recent Clinical Trials and Their Outcomes

While Gadodiamide was initially developed with an extensive safety and efficacy profile, recent clinical investigations have predominantly focused on safety concerns associated with gadolinium retention, especially in patients with compromised renal function or those undergoing multiple MRI scans.

Key Trials and Studies (2021–2023):

  • Gadolinium Retention Studies: Multiple observational and pharmacokinetic studies have documented gadolinium deposition in brain tissues after repeated administrations of linear GBCAs such as Gadodiamide [1]. These studies underscore potential neurotoxic risks, prompting regulatory agencies to reevaluate the safety profile.
  • Contrast Efficacy Evaluations: Comparative trials comparing Gadodiamide to macrocyclic agents like Gadoterate meglumine demonstrate comparable imaging efficacy but highlight differences in safety and retention profiles [2].
  • Renal Safety Trials: Post-marketing surveillance continues to monitor adverse events in patients with renal impairment. Recent data suggest a low incidence of NSF (nephrogenic systemic fibrosis) with Gadodiamide when appropriate screening protocols are applied [3].

Regulatory and Safety Developments

Health authorities such as the FDA have issued warnings emphasizing cautious use of linear GBCAs, including Gadodiamide, due to gadolinium retention concerns. The EMA has similarly restricted its use, advocating for alternative macrocyclic agents when feasible [4]. Notably, some jurisdictions have reclassified Gadodiamide as limited to specific indications or contraindicated for vulnerable populations.

Ongoing Research and Future Trials

Current research focuses on:

  • Developing safer gadolinium chelate formulations with minimized retention.
  • Exploring chelation therapies for gadolinium removal post-exposure.
  • Assessing long-term neurocognitive impacts through longitudinal studies.

No significant new Phase III trials specifically for Gadodiamide are active, as the regulatory environment favors macrocyclic agents with lower retention profiles. However, retrospective safety analyses and pharmacovigilance studies remain ongoing.

Market Analysis

Market Overview

Gadodiamide historically dominated the linear GBCA segment, particularly in North America, Europe, and parts of Asia. Despite its widespread adoption, recent safety warnings have significantly impacted its market share.

Market Size (2022):

  • Estimated global GBCA market: USD 1.3 billion.
  • Gadodiamide's contribution: Approximately USD 150–200 million, accounting for roughly 15% of the GBCA segment [5].

Key Market Drivers

  • Demand for Advanced MRI Imaging: The increasing importance of MRI in diagnostics sustains demand for contrast agents.
  • Clinical Efficacy of Gadodiamide: Its proven efficacy in stroke and neurological imaging supported widespread use historically.
  • Favorable Pricing: Gadodiamide typically offered lower cost compared to macrocyclic counterparts, appealing in price-sensitive markets.

Market Constraints

  • Safety Concerns & Regulatory Restrictions: Heightened awareness of gadolinium retention has led to restrictions and shifts toward macrocyclic agents, diminishing Gadodiamide’s market share.
  • Innovation and Alternative Technologies: Emerging imaging agents and techniques threaten traditional contrast agents' dominance.
  • Patient Safety Advocacy: Increasing emphasis on safety favors agents with better retention profiles.

Competitive Landscape

Major competitors include macrocyclic GBCAs such as Gadoterate meglumine and Gadobutrol. These agents have benefited from safety perceptions and regulatory endorsements, further displacing Gadodiamide in clinical practice.

Regional Insights

  • North America: Regulatory caution has led to reduced utilization.
  • Europe: EMA restrictions have limited Gadodiamide's indications.
  • Asia-Pacific: Price sensitivity sustains some demand, but regulatory shifts are gradually influencing prescribing habits.

Market Outlook (2023–2030)

The global GBCA market is projected to grow at a CAGR of 3–4% driven by expanding MRI use, especially in oncology and cardiology. However, Gadodiamide’s market share is expected to decline further, owing to safety concerns. It may persist in niche markets where cost considerations outweigh safety issues, notably in emerging economies lacking strict regulations.

Future Market Projections

Therapeutic and Diagnostic Innovation Impact

The future of Gadodiamide hinges on regulatory acceptance. Innovative approaches, such as gadolinium chelation therapies and the development of safer agents, are expected to further limit its use. Nevertheless, its legacy status and cost-effectiveness in specific regions may sustain residual demand.

Regulatory Evolution

  • Global Divergence: While the US and Europe lean toward restricting Gadodiamide, some Asian markets might continue its use due to cost and accessibility.
  • Potential Resurgence: Long-term safety data and the development of low-retention formulations could lead to reformulation and market re-entry, contingent upon regulatory approval.

Market Shares

It is anticipated that Gadodiamide’s market share will decline from the current 15% to less than 5% over the next decade, replaced largely by macrocyclic GBCAs and emerging targeted imaging agents.

Key Factors Influencing Future Market Dynamics

  • Regulatory policies prioritizing patient safety.
  • Advances in MRI technology reducing dependence on contrast agents.
  • Development of next-generation, low-retention GBCAs.
  • Economic considerations impacting healthcare spending in developing regions.

Key Takeaways

  • Safety and retention profiles predominantly shape Gadodiamide's clinical use.
  • Regulatory restrictions are curbing its global market share.
  • Market growth prospects are modest, with declines expected as macrocyclic agents and alternatives gain prominence.
  • Innovation and safety improvements could revitalize some formulations, but regulatory hurdles remain significant.
  • Regional disparities will persist, with emerging markets cautiously favoring cost-effective options.

FAQs

Q1: Will Gadodiamide regain its position in the MRI contrast agent market?
Unlikely in the near term, given safety concerns and regulatory restrictions favoring macrocyclic agents with lower gadolinium retention.

Q2: Are there ongoing efforts to develop safer versions of Gadodiamide?
Yes, research focuses on reformulating gadolinium chelates with improved stability and lower retention profiles, but regulatory approval processes are lengthy.

Q3: How significant is gadolinium retention safety in current clinical decision-making?
It is a critical factor, particularly for patients requiring multiple scans, influencing clinicians to prefer macrocyclic GBCAs.

Q4: What regions are most impacted by Gadodiamide's market decline?
North America and Europe are experiencing substantial reductions; Asia-Pacific remains more dependent on cost-effective linear agents.

Q5: Could gadolinium-based contrast agents be replaced entirely by new imaging techniques?
While emerging advanced imaging modalities are on the rise, GBCAs currently remain the standard in many diagnostic scenarios; complete replacement is not imminent.


References

[1] Appelbaum, J., et al. (2022). Gadolinium Retention in Brain Tissues after Linear and Macrocyclic Contrast Agents. Radiology.
[2] Kanda, T., et al. (2021). Comparative Efficacy of Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents in MRI. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
[3] Health Canada. (2022). Post-Market Safety Review of Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents.
[4] European Medicines Agency (EMA). (2022). Safety Re-evaluation of Linear GBCAs.
[5] MarketsandMarkets. (2023). Gadolinium Contrast Agents Market Report.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.