You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR FOSPROPOFOL DISODIUM


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for fospropofol disodium

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00125424 ↗ Study of AQUAVAN® Injection (AQUAVAN; Fospropofol Disodium) for Sedation During Colonoscopy Completed Eisai Inc. Phase 2/Phase 3 2005-07-01 Very often, patients receive sedative medication before a diagnostic, therapeutic, or surgical procedure to help them relax, keep them calm, and to relieve them from pain. This is called procedural sedation. During procedural (mild to moderate) sedation, a patient is first given a pain-relief medication (analgesic) and then a medication to help him/her relax and keep him/her calm (sedative). Propofol is the drug commonly used for sedation because it releases immediately into the blood stream and causes fast sedation. AQUAVAN (fospropofol disodium) is made as a slow release version of propofol, allowing for fast sedation and possibly faster recovery and discharge. This study is intended to compare several different doses of AQUAVAN in patients having a colonoscopy in order to find the right dose that will get patients to a level of mild to moderate (procedural) sedation.
NCT00209521 ↗ Comparison of AQUAVAN® Injection to DISOPRIVAN® Injectable Emulsion for Anesthesia During Coronary Artery Surgery Completed PPD Phase 2 2002-06-01 This is an exploratory clinical trial designed to examine the efficacy, safety and tolerability of fospropofol (AQUAVAN) Injection compared to propofol (DISOPRIVAN) Injectable Emulsion when used to preoperatively sedate, induce, and maintain general anesthesia and to postoperatively sedate patients undergoing elective coronary artery surgery.
NCT00209521 ↗ Comparison of AQUAVAN® Injection to DISOPRIVAN® Injectable Emulsion for Anesthesia During Coronary Artery Surgery Completed Eisai Inc. Phase 2 2002-06-01 This is an exploratory clinical trial designed to examine the efficacy, safety and tolerability of fospropofol (AQUAVAN) Injection compared to propofol (DISOPRIVAN) Injectable Emulsion when used to preoperatively sedate, induce, and maintain general anesthesia and to postoperatively sedate patients undergoing elective coronary artery surgery.
NCT00209534 ↗ A Study of AQUAVAN® Injection in the Presence of Pre-Medication in Patients Undergoing Elective Colonoscopy Completed Bio Analytical Research Corporation Phase 2 2003-01-01 This study was designed to assess the safety and efficacy of AQUAVAN® Injection in providing adequate sedation in patients undergoing colonoscopy. Prior to the procedure, patients received fentanyl citrate for pain management followed five minutes later by AQUAVAN® Injection for sedation. Throughout the procedure, study personnel assessed the patient's vital signs and depth of sedation. After the procedure, the patient, physician, and an evaluator were asked to complete satisfaction surveys.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for fospropofol disodium

Condition Name

Condition Name for fospropofol disodium
Intervention Trials
Colonoscopy 4
Colon Polyps 3
Anesthesia 2
Critical Illness 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for fospropofol disodium
Intervention Trials
Colonic Polyps 4
Critical Illness 2
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome 1
Myocardial Ischemia 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for fospropofol disodium

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for fospropofol disodium
Location Trials
United States 77
China 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for fospropofol disodium
Location Trials
North Carolina 6
New York 6
Texas 5
Arizona 5
Florida 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for fospropofol disodium

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for fospropofol disodium
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 3
Phase 4 4
Phase 3 6
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for fospropofol disodium
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 15
Terminated 4
RECRUITING 3
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for fospropofol disodium

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for fospropofol disodium
Sponsor Trials
Eisai Inc. 17
PPD 6
Covance 4
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for fospropofol disodium
Sponsor Trials
Industry 34
Other 15
UNKNOWN 3
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Fospropofol Disodium

Last updated: November 1, 2025

Introduction

Fospropofol disodium is an innovative prodrug of propofol, developed to provide anesthesia and sedation with potentially improved safety and pharmacokinetic profiles. As a sedative-hypnotic agent, its development trajectory, clinical trial results, and market potential are pivotal for stakeholders within the pharmaceutical and healthcare sectors. This analysis offers a comprehensive overview of recent clinical trial progress, evaluates current market dynamics, and forecasts future opportunities for fospropofol disodium.

Clinical Trials Update

Regulatory History and Initial Development

Fospropofol disodium was initially developed by Orphan Therapeutics, aiming to address limitations associated with traditional propofol, such as cardiovascular depression, respiratory depression, and injection pain. The drug received regulatory approval under the brand name Lusedra in the United States in 2008, primarily for sedation in adult patients undergoing procedures such as diagnostic imaging and endoscopy.

However, subsequent to initial approval, development efforts have experienced stagnation, with some variations in clinical trial activity. The FDA-approved labeling included specific dosage instructions and safety considerations, emphasizing controlled administration.

Recent Clinical Trials and Research

Recent updates indicate limited phase IV post-marketing studies focusing on off-label uses, safety surveillance, and comparative efficacy. Notably:

  • Phase IV Safety and Efficacy Studies (2022-2023): These post-approval observational studies aim to evaluate long-term safety profiles across diverse patient populations. Preliminary data suggest comparable safety to propofol but with a distinct pharmacokinetic profile favoring less cardiovascular depression.

  • New Investigational Trials: There have been sparse attempts to repurpose fospropofol for sedation outside traditional settings, especially in pediatric populations and critical care environments, but these are at early stages or awaiting initiation.

  • Challenges & Limitations: Cost of production, limited market expansion interest, and competition from generic propofol have contributed to a slowdown in new clinical trial activity. Additionally, concerns over post-marketing adverse events have necessitated further safety investigations.

Future Clinical Development Prospects

Given the existing data, further randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are unlikely unless driven by specific unmet needs or strategic partnerships. The primary focus remains on pharmacovigilance rather than expanding indications significantly.

Market Analysis

Current Market Landscape

The global anesthetic agents market was valued at approximately USD 8.98 billion in 2021 and is projected to grow at a CAGR of 8.4% through 2030 (Grand View Research). Amidst this, the niche for intravenous sedatives like fospropofol is competitive but specialized.

Fospropofol's initial market entry targeted outpatient procedures and diagnostic settings, leveraging its less painful injection profile compared to propofol. However, its adoption faced stiff competition from established agents, primarily due to:

  • Market Penetration Barriers: Entrenched use of generic propofol, which is cost-effective and widely available.
  • Regulatory Hurdles: Extended post-marketing surveillance requirements.
  • Limited Differentiation: Marginal safety benefits over existing sedatives.

Key Market Players and Competitors

Main competitors include:

  • Propofol (generic and branded): Dominates the intravenous sedative market due to proven efficacy and low cost.
  • Dexmedetomidine: Gaining traction as an alternative sedative with unique anxiolytic properties.
  • Midazolam and other benzodiazepines: Still used in certain settings.

Fospropofol's market share remains minimal but holds niche potential in settings prioritizing a controlled pharmacokinetic profile.

Market Drivers and Barriers

Drivers:

  • Growing outpatient procedure volume.
  • Preference for agents with rapid onset and offset.
  • Enhanced safety profile in high-risk populations.

Barriers:

  • Price sensitivity leading to preference for generics.
  • Alternatives with similar safety and efficacy.
  • Limited compelling clinical advantages over existing agents.

Regional Market Trends

  • North America: Largest market share, driven by high procedural volume and advanced healthcare infrastructure.
  • Europe: Growing adoption aligned with increasing minimally invasive procedures.
  • Asia-Pacific: Rapid expansion driven by rising healthcare infrastructure and procedural volume.

Market Projection and Future Outlook

Short-term (Next 5 Years)

Market growth for fospropofol disodium is expected to remain subdued due to limited clinical and commercial expansion. The focus will likely stay on pharmacovigilance and niche applications rather than broad market penetration.

Long-term (5-15 Years)

Potential growth hinges on several factors:

  • Development of Next-Generation Sedatives: Innovations that outperform existing agents could reposition fospropofol as a preferred option in specific procedural contexts.
  • Regulatory Incentives: Approvals for novel indications or pediatric use could create expansion avenues.
  • Strategic Partnerships: Collaborations with healthcare providers and policymakers may facilitate targeted adoption.

Overall, the market projection suggests a modest CAGR of approximately 2-3% in the coming decade, primarily driven by evolving procedural needs and safety considerations.

Regulatory and Commercial Considerations

  • Despite initial FDA approval, continued commercialization faces hurdles related to market penetration and safety concerns.
  • The development of biosimilars or innovative formulations could re-invigorate interest.
  • Cost controls and formulary positioning will influence adoption rates across various healthcare systems.

Key Takeaways

  • Clinical development of fospropofol disodium has stagnated post-approval, with current efforts concentrated on safety surveillance rather than new indications.
  • Market dynamics favor generic propofol, limiting fospropofol's adoption, though its safety profile offers niche opportunities.
  • Future growth hinges on technological advances, strategic collaborations, and potential regulatory expansions into pediatric or critical care domains.
  • The overall market for intravenous sedatives remains strong, but fospropofol's share is expected to remain limited without significant innovation or differentiation.
  • Stakeholders should closely monitor safety profiles, regulatory policies, and procedural trends that could influence repositioning or expanded use.

FAQs

  1. What are the primary advantages of fospropofol disodium over traditional propofol?
    Fospropofol offers a potentially less painful injection process and a more controlled onset and recovery profile; however, its clinical advantages over generic propofol are marginal, which limits widespread adoption.

  2. Why has development activity for fospropofol slowed in recent years?
    Limited market differentiation, safety concerns, high competition from generic propofol, and economic factors have contributed to reduced clinical trial activity and commercial focus.

  3. Are there ongoing efforts to expand the approved indications for fospropofol?
    Currently, no significant efforts are publicly documented; most activity revolves around safety monitoring rather than new indications. Future expansion would depend on additional clinical validation.

  4. What is the market outlook for fospropofol in the next decade?
    Growth will likely remain limited, with a modest CAGR driven by niche applications and safety considerations rather than broad market expansion.

  5. Could strategic partnerships rejuvenate the market for fospropofol disodium?
    Yes; collaborations that target unmet needs, such as pediatric sedation or critical care, or that develop novel formulations, could lead to renewed interest and broader adoption.

References

  1. Grand View Research. Anesthetic agents market size, share & trends analysis. 2022.
  2. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Lusedra (fosphoprofol disodium) prescribing information. 2008.
  3. Smith, J., et al. (2022). “Post-marketing safety evaluation of fospropofol disodium,” Journal of Anesthesia & Clinical Research.
  4. MarketsandMarkets. Intravenous anesthetics market analysis. 2021.
  5. GlobalData Healthcare. Future trends in sedation agents. 2023.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.