Last Updated: August 9, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR FLUTICASONE PROPIONATE; SALMETEROL XINAFOATE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


505(b)(2) Clinical Trials for fluticasone propionate; salmeterol xinafoate

This table shows clinical trials for potential 505(b)(2) applications. See the next table for all clinical trials
Trial Type Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
New Combination NCT00497237 ↗ Clinical Trial of the Efficacy and Safety of Beclomethasone Dipropionate Plus Formoterol vs Fluticasone Propionate Plus Salmeterol in the 6 Months Step Down Treatment of Asthma Completed Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A. Phase 3 2007-04-01 Asthma is a serious global health problem. People of all ages in countries throughout the world are affected by this chronic airway disorder that can be severe and sometimes fatal. The prevalence of asthma is increasing everywhere, especially among children.According to international guidelines, once control of asthma is achieved and maintained for at least 3 months, a gradual reduction of the maintenance therapy should be tried in order to identify the minimum therapy required to maintain control. This will help reduce the risk of side effects and enhance patient adherence to the treatment plan. Reduction of therapy in patients on combination therapy should begin with a reduction in the dose of inhaled glucocorticosteroid.1 The present study is designed to evaluate if patients with controlled asthma treated with FP 1000 mcg + salmeterol 100 mcg daily can be stepped down. Stepping-down will be attempted with two medications: a new combination of extrafine beclomethasone dipropionate 400 mcg + formoterol 24 mcg daily (test medication, Foster™) and, alternatively, fluticasone propionate 500 mcg + salmeterol 100 mcg daily(reference medication) without losing asthma control.If this hypothesis will be confirmed, the present study will demonstrate that asthma control can be maintained with less than half the dose of inhaled corticosteroid and with less medical costs. Given the aims of this study, the population to be monitored includes adult patients with moderate persistent asthma, which can be defined controlled according to the current guidelines under standard stabilised treatment. The intended treatment duration is therefore designed to ensure that good control of asthma is firmly achieved before stepping down the treatment (8 weeks run-in period), but also that the condition of the patients are followed long enough (24 weeks comparative treatment period) to ensure that a new stable condition is also obtained and properly monitored.
>Trial Type >Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

All Clinical Trials for fluticasone propionate; salmeterol xinafoate

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00102882 ↗ Study Of Asthma And Genetics In Patients To Be Treated With Fluticasone Propionate/Salmeterol Or Salmeterol Xinafoate Completed GlaxoSmithKline Phase 4 2004-10-01 This study may last up to 36-38 weeks. Patients will visit the clinic 11 times. A blood sample will be taken at Visit 1 to look at subjects' genes. Breathing tests will be done during the study. Study medicines and procedures will be provided at no cost. Patients will be treated with VENTOLIN (8 wks), ATROVENT (8 wks), then ADVAIR or SEREVENT (16 wks). ADVAIR and SEREVENT are FDA approved for the treatment of asthma in patients 4 years of age and older.
NCT00233051 ↗ Evaluating Genes in Sputum to Measure Drug Response in COPD Terminated GlaxoSmithKline N/A 2003-04-01 The purpose of this research study is to determine whether analysis of genes in sputum is a useful noninvasive technique for measuring response to drugs in patients with COPD. We propose to use polymerase chain reaction to evaluate gene expression in induced sputum from adult current smokers with moderate COPD, adult former smokers with moderate COPD. This study is designed to determine whether changes in expression of previously-identified inflammatory markers in induced sputum can be detected in response to drug therapy in COPD and to evaluate potential differences in the expression of these markers in adult smokers with and without COPD. Pre- and post-treatment serum will be obtained to facilitate proteomic analysis of therapeutic response as well. Changes in sputum gene expression in response to treatment will be the primary outcome variable in this study. Secondary outcomes will include changes in lung function, as well as changes in induced sputum inflammation. These endpoints will be evaluated before and directly after 6 weeks of randomly-assigned treatment with either salmeterol xinafoate or fluticasone propionate/50mcg salmeterol xinafoate combination DPI bid. Endpoints will be re-evaluated following a 4 week wash-out period.
NCT00233051 ↗ Evaluating Genes in Sputum to Measure Drug Response in COPD Terminated National Jewish Health N/A 2003-04-01 The purpose of this research study is to determine whether analysis of genes in sputum is a useful noninvasive technique for measuring response to drugs in patients with COPD. We propose to use polymerase chain reaction to evaluate gene expression in induced sputum from adult current smokers with moderate COPD, adult former smokers with moderate COPD. This study is designed to determine whether changes in expression of previously-identified inflammatory markers in induced sputum can be detected in response to drug therapy in COPD and to evaluate potential differences in the expression of these markers in adult smokers with and without COPD. Pre- and post-treatment serum will be obtained to facilitate proteomic analysis of therapeutic response as well. Changes in sputum gene expression in response to treatment will be the primary outcome variable in this study. Secondary outcomes will include changes in lung function, as well as changes in induced sputum inflammation. These endpoints will be evaluated before and directly after 6 weeks of randomly-assigned treatment with either salmeterol xinafoate or fluticasone propionate/50mcg salmeterol xinafoate combination DPI bid. Endpoints will be re-evaluated following a 4 week wash-out period.
NCT00403286 ↗ A Dose-Finding Study Evaluating Safety and Efficacy in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Completed Dey Phase 2 2006-11-01 The purpose of the study is to determine the appropriate dose of fluticasone propionate/formoterol fumarate that is closest to Advair Diskus (fluticasone propionate/salmeterol xinafoate using pulmonary function, safety, and levels of study drug in blood plasma in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
NCT00448435 ↗ Clinical Assessment Of GW815SF HFA MDI In Pediatric Patients With Bronchial Asthma Completed GlaxoSmithKline Phase 3 2007-04-01 To evaluate the efficacy and safety of GW815SF HFA MDI 25/50µg 1 inhalation bid in comparison with concomitant treatment with salmeterol xinafoate DPI 25µg 1 inhalation bid plus fluticasone propionate DPI 50µg 1 inhalation bid in paediatric patients with asthma. To evaluate the safety of long-term treatment of GW815SF HFA MDI 25/50µg 1 inhalation bid in paediatric patients with asthma.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for fluticasone propionate; salmeterol xinafoate

Condition Name

Condition Name for fluticasone propionate; salmeterol xinafoate
Intervention Trials
Asthma 18
Bioequivalence 12
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive 6
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for fluticasone propionate; salmeterol xinafoate
Intervention Trials
Asthma 18
Lung Diseases 10
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive 10
Respiratory Aspiration 9
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for fluticasone propionate; salmeterol xinafoate

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for fluticasone propionate; salmeterol xinafoate
Location Trials
United States 195
Greece 13
Germany 10
Canada 8
South Africa 8
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for fluticasone propionate; salmeterol xinafoate
Location Trials
Texas 9
North Carolina 8
Missouri 8
Florida 8
Colorado 8
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for fluticasone propionate; salmeterol xinafoate

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for fluticasone propionate; salmeterol xinafoate
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 6
Phase 3 7
Phase 2 6
[disabled in preview] 16
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for fluticasone propionate; salmeterol xinafoate
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 35
Not yet recruiting 4
Active, not recruiting 2
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for fluticasone propionate; salmeterol xinafoate

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for fluticasone propionate; salmeterol xinafoate
Sponsor Trials
GlaxoSmithKline 13
Becro Ltd. 12
Respirent Pharmaceuticals Co Ltd. 12
[disabled in preview] 6
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for fluticasone propionate; salmeterol xinafoate
Sponsor Trials
Industry 56
Other 7
NIH 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Fluticasone Propionate/Salmeterol Xinafoate (ICS/LABA) Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Patent-Driven Generic/Biosimilar Risk Projection (2026)

Last updated: July 27, 2026

Executive summary

  • Fluticasone propionate/salmeterol xinafoate is an established inhaled corticosteroid plus long-acting beta2-agonist (ICS/LABA) used for COPD and asthma maintenance. The core commercial risk is not a single “breakthrough” patent cliff but a layered expiration profile across strengths, device types (HFA pressurized metered dose inhaler, DPI), and formulation/packaging/manufacturing patents listed in the US Orange Book for approved NDA/ANDA products.
  • Near-term market growth is driven by guideline adherence and switching within ICS/LABA classes, while higher-uptake scenarios increasingly depend on device convenience, dosing adherence, payer coverage, and competitive pressure from triple-therapy (ICS/LABA/LAMA) inhalers and ICS/LABA fixed combinations with alternative molecules.
  • Generic exposure risk is structurally moderate: once key regulatory and method/formulation patents expire for each listed brand product and its device-specific equivalents, multiple FDA-approved ANDAs can enter. Litigation-driven delays can still occur through Orange Book patent challenges and settlement-triggered “carve-outs.”
  • Clinical development in this specific fixed-dose pair is typically incremental (device, dose regimen, combination extensions, and new patient subgroups), so the principal “update” to monitor is label change pace, FDA device approvals, and any new patent listings rather than new phase 3 efficacy readouts.

What is the clinical trial pipeline for fluticasone propionate/salmeterol xinafoate (asthma and COPD) in 2024–2026?

Are there new phase 3 efficacy trials for the fixed-dose combination?

Answer: No evidence supports a widely recognized, brand-defining phase 3 pivotal trial involving the fluticasone/salmeterol fixed-dose combination as a new active therapeutic product during 2024–2026. The prevailing pattern for this drug class is life-cycle activity: comparative studies, device performance trials, and post-approval label expansion rather than new mechanism-defining Phase 3 programs.

What types of studies are typically active in this category?

Key trial categories that commonly appear for established ICS/LABA fixed combinations:

  • Device comparability and aerosol performance studies (device engineering, plume geometry, lung deposition surrogates, dose uniformity).
  • Real-world effectiveness or adherence studies tied to inhaler switching programs.
  • Pediatric asthma pharmacokinetic and regimen confirmation studies aligned to labeling maintenance dosing.
  • COPD exacerbation reduction studies in subpopulations or as adjunct endpoints in device or dosing regimen trials.

What does the FDA regulatory status look like for fluticasone propionate/salmeterol xinafoate in the US (NDA, ANDA, and Orange Book listing behavior)?

What FDA approvals govern fluticasone propionate/salmeterol fixed combinations?

Answer: US marketing is generally anchored by an approved NDA for the fixed-dose product(s) and multiple ANDAs once patents expire and exclusivity permits. Orange Book listing status is the operational map for generic launch timing.

What Orange Book entries matter for exclusivity and generic timing?

Answer: For combination inhalers, the gating factors usually include:

  • Composition/formulation patents (particle engineering, surfactant/excipient system, spray pattern targets).
  • Method patents (manufacturing steps, mixing/dosing control).
  • Device-specific patents (metering chamber geometry, actuator design, DPI resistance features).
  • Any secondary patents claiming specific patient-use regimens or dosing schedules, if listed for the NDA.

How strong is the patent estate for fluticasone propionate/salmeterol xinafoate, and which patent types drive the latest expirations?

What patents typically dominate for ICS/LABA inhalers?

Answer: The latest-dated patent barriers in this drug class usually cluster around:

  • Formulation and manufacturing process improvements (not therapeutic mechanism per se).
  • Device and delivery system patents.
  • Packaging and stability-linked patents that tie to shelf-life and aerosol performance.

How many patents can cover a single marketed strength?

Answer: In practice, an ICS/LABA fixed-dose NDA can have dozens to low-hundreds of listed patents spanning multiple claim sets. The number that truly delays generic entry for a specific ANDA depends on which listed patents the challenger contests and whether those patents are found invalid or non-infringed, or whether a settlement grants “authorized generic” timing.

When does fluticasone propionate/salmeterol lose exclusivity in the US (patent expiration vs FDA exclusivity)?

What are the practical exclusivity concepts that affect launch?

Answer: Two layers control entry:

  1. Patent expiration for each Orange Book-listed patent (often the binding constraint because it can require a court or settlement).
  2. Regulatory exclusivity (e.g., pediatric exclusivity, other exclusivity grants). Regulatory exclusivity can extend market protection even after earlier patents expire, but it is less common as the sole driver for established fixed combinations than patent scope.

Generic entry timing projection logic (operational)

  • Generic launch is typically earliest after the latest relevant patent expires or after a Paragraph IV pathway produces an adjudicated outcome or a settlement that permits commercial entry.
  • For device products, even if active ingredient composition patents are expired, device-specific patents and manufacturing method patents can still delay “true equivalent” market availability or trigger carve-out arrangements.

Which companies are most likely to challenge fluticasone propionate/salmeterol xinafoate patents via Paragraph IV in the US?

Answer: Generic challengers in this category are generally large inhalation-and-biosimilars-adjacent manufacturers and established ANDA filers with inhaler portfolios. The most relevant question for business planning is not who filed first, but which ANDAs are listed as “pending” with Paragraph IV certifications against specific Orange Book patents for the target NDA and whether litigation is active in district courts.

What patent litigation affects fluticasone propionate/salmeterol xinafoate generic entry (case timeline, courts, and settlements)?

How litigation typically impacts launch dates in inhaler combinations

Answer: For inhaler combinations, litigation affects launch through:

  • 30-month stay triggers after Paragraph IV notice.
  • Court outcomes (invalidity/non-infringement) that allow earlier entry.
  • Settlements that either:
    • provide an agreed entry date (sometimes with an authorized generic),
    • limit generic claims to certain strengths,
    • or include “no-early-launch” commitments.

What should investors and licensing teams track

  • Which specific patents are asserted (formulation vs method vs device).
  • Whether settlements tie to patent-by-patent expiration or to an earlier composite entry date.
  • Whether a settlement permits “authorized generic” production by the brand or a licensing partner.

What formulations of fluticasone/salmeterol are protected (HFA MDI vs DPI, strengths, and device-specific barriers)?

Does device type change the IP and generic risk?

Answer: Yes. Even when the active ingredients match, device-specific patents can create separate infringement analyses and different settlement outcomes for each marketed dosage form.

Strength and regimen considerations that drive market segmentation

Operational segmentation commonly includes:

  • Dosage strengths used for asthma maintenance and COPD symptom control.
  • Inhaler actuation and dose delivery characteristics that affect real-world adherence and payer switching dynamics.

How does fluticasone propionate/salmeterol compare with competing ICS/LABA and triple-therapy inhalers on market share and uptake?

Competitive set

Core competitors typically include:

  • Other ICS/LABA fixed combinations using alternative molecules (different corticosteroids and LABAs).
  • Triple therapy combinations (ICS/LABA/LAMA), which displace some dual therapy users by offering broader exacerbation prevention.

Market shift drivers

  • Treatment guidelines increasingly favor escalation to triple therapy in patients with persistent symptoms or exacerbations on dual therapy.
  • Payers and formularies push toward preferred inhaler platforms or higher-efficacy claims where supported by clinical outcomes.

Net impact on fluticasone/salmeterol projections

  • Base case: mature, stable demand with gradual share pressure from triple therapy where formularies favor escalation.
  • Upside case: adherence and switchbacks if payers maintain favorable pricing or if patient populations respond well to dual therapy with fewer device changes.

Market analysis: what is the demand outlook for fluticasone/salmeterol through 2030?

Market dynamics that determine growth rate

Key drivers:

  • COPD and asthma prevalence trends and diagnosis rates.
  • Inhaler adherence and switching behavior.
  • Payer formulary strategies and copay assistance.
  • Competitive pricing and generic penetration after patent milestones.

Projection framework (business use)

Use a scenario model built on:

  1. Current protected revenue retention until the latest relevant patent expiry in each dosage form.
  2. Post-launch erosion curve based on how quickly ANDAs launch across strengths and devices.
  3. Competitive offset from triple therapy and newer ICS/LABA options.

Base case directional outlook (qualitative)

Answer: Demand is projected to remain substantial but face continuing share pressure from triple-therapy inhalers. Generic erosion risk is concentrated around the latest-dated patents and any device-specific barriers that delay full ANDA rollout.

What generic entry risks exist for fluticasone propionate/salmeterol xinafoate (ANDAs, authorized generics, and launch triggers)?

What are the highest-risk launch triggers?

Answer: The highest risk points for margin compression are:

  • Expiration or invalidation of the latest Orange Book formulation/process patents for the specific NDA.
  • Court or settlement events that lift a 30-month stay.
  • Settlement agreements that permit early commercial entry for certain strengths or devices.

What “authorized generic” behavior changes

Answer: If the brand licenses an authorized generic to a generic partner near the entry date, the erosion can start earlier than expected and reduce the brand’s post-expiry revenue tail.

Where are the geographic coverage and regulatory differences relevant (US vs EU/UK)?

Regulatory path differences by region

Answer: US risk is driven by Orange Book patents and Paragraph IV/30-month stays. EU/UK risk is typically driven by SPC/EP timelines and national patent litigation, plus marketing authorization requirements under EMA and national transfer processes.

Market implication

Answer: Even if the US has a defined patent expiry timeline, parallel EU/UK patent estates can create staggered market normalization and impact global revenue exposure.

Key patent-and-timing checklist for business teams (how to operationalize the projection)

Use this checklist to map the next 18–36 months of risk:

  • Identify the NDA/ANDA product you are targeting (brand name and device type).
  • Pull the full Orange Book listing set and isolate:
    • latest expiration dates,
    • listed patents that are commonly asserted in inhaler cases (formulation, method, device).
  • Monitor Paragraph IV notices tied to those exact patents.
  • Track litigation dockets and settlement terms:
    • entry date,
    • authorized generic language,
    • strength/device carve-outs.
  • Align FDA label change announcements with potential new patent listings:
    • new strengths,
    • different delivery systems,
    • pediatric label updates.

Key Takeaways

  • Fluticasone propionate/salmeterol xinafoate is a mature ICS/LABA product where market evolution is shaped more by device- and patent-defined barriers than by new Phase 3 clinical breakthroughs.
  • Generic and margin compression risk is driven by Orange Book patent sets that span formulation, method, and device delivery elements, with entry often gated by litigation or settlement-driven timing.
  • Competitive pressure is structurally moderate-to-high from triple-therapy inhalers, which can divert patients who might otherwise remain on dual therapy.
  • The most actionable forward-looking signals for 2026–2030 are: Orange Book listing changes, Paragraph IV challenges against the latest patents, litigation outcomes tied to those patents, and whether authorized generic arrangements accelerate erosion.

FAQs

1) What patents protect fluticasone propionate/salmeterol xinafoate inhalers in the US?
Patent protection is typically split across formulation/composition, manufacturing methods, and delivery device components, with the most delaying patents usually being the latest-listed Orange Book entries tied to specific dosage forms and devices.

2) How do Paragraph IV challenges change the timing of generic fluticasone/salmeterol entry?
They can trigger a 30-month stay and shift entry timing based on court outcomes or settlements that define an allowed launch date by patent and sometimes by strength/device.

3) What matters more for generic fluticasone/salmeterol: API expiration or device patents?
Device and method/formulation patents often control infringement analysis and settlement scope even after API-related protections are gone, especially for inhaler systems where performance and delivery are claim-specific.

4) Are pediatric or COPD subpopulation label expansions a driver of new patent listings?
Label extensions can prompt additional patent filings and Orange Book additions linked to specific use or regimen claims, which can extend effective exclusivity for targeted subsets.

5) Will triple-therapy inhalers reduce the market for fluticasone/salmeterol?
They can reduce share among patients eligible for step-up therapy, especially where formularies prefer ICS/LABA/LAMA for exacerbation prevention; dual therapy demand generally persists but grows more slowly than triple therapy in many settings.

References

  1. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Orange Book: Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations. FDA.
  2. FDA. Drug Trials Snapshots for relevant fluticasone propionate/salmeterol products and associated trials databases. FDA.
  3. EMA. European public assessment reports and product information for fluticasone propionate/salmeterol-containing inhalers. European Medicines Agency.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.