You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 28, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR FLUOCINOLONE ACETONIDE; NEOMYCIN SULFATE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for fluocinolone acetonide; neomycin sulfate

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT02168478 ↗ Neo-Synalar Modified 48 Hour Patch Test Completed Noah Rosenberg, MD Phase 4 2014-06-01 A 48 hour patch test performed in healthy volunteers to determine the presensitization (pre-existing allergy) of Neo-Synalar (neomycin sulfate 0.5%(0.35% neomycin base), fluocinolone acetonide 0.025%) Cream . Subjects also receive a positive control (Sodium Lauryl Sulfate) and a negative control (Saline). The primary objective of this study is to determine if any subjects exhibit an allergic reaction which may be indicative of a pre-existing sensitization.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for fluocinolone acetonide; neomycin sulfate

Condition Name

Condition Name for fluocinolone acetonide; neomycin sulfate
Intervention Trials
Allergy 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for fluocinolone acetonide; neomycin sulfate
Intervention Trials
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for fluocinolone acetonide; neomycin sulfate

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for fluocinolone acetonide; neomycin sulfate
Location Trials
United States 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for fluocinolone acetonide; neomycin sulfate
Location Trials
New Jersey 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for fluocinolone acetonide; neomycin sulfate

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for fluocinolone acetonide; neomycin sulfate
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for fluocinolone acetonide; neomycin sulfate
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for fluocinolone acetonide; neomycin sulfate

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for fluocinolone acetonide; neomycin sulfate
Sponsor Trials
Noah Rosenberg, MD 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for fluocinolone acetonide; neomycin sulfate
Sponsor Trials
Industry 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Fluocinolone Acetonide; Neomycin Sulfate

Last updated: November 20, 2025

Introduction

Fluocinolone acetonide, a potent corticosteroid, combined with neomycin sulfate, an aminoglycoside antibiotic, forms a topical formulation primarily used to treat inflammatory and infectious skin conditions. This combination's therapeutic efficacy rests on anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial actions, making it suitable for psoriasis, dermatitis, and infected eczema. As the pharmaceutical landscape evolves, recent clinical trials and market dynamics are critical for stakeholders assessing growth prospects. This comprehensive analysis synthesizes updates in clinical trials, market data, and future projections for this drug combination.

Clinical Trials Update

Current Status and Key Highlights

Recent years have witnessed minimal publicly disclosed clinical trials specifically targeting the combination of fluocinolone acetonide and neomycin sulfate. The majority of research efforts focus on individual components or broader formulations. However, existing trials provide insights into the therapeutic potential and safety profile of this combination, often as part of larger dermatological studies.

Notable Clinical Trials

  • Safety and Efficacy in Psoriasis and Eczema: Multiple Phase II/III trials evaluate topical corticosteroids and antibiotics for inflammatory skin conditions. For example, a study published in The Journal of Dermatological Treatment (2020) assessed fluocinolone acetonide formulations, indicating significant symptom reduction. While neomycin's inclusion was not always isolated, combination therapies demonstrated favorable safety and efficacy [1].

  • Antimicrobial Resistance and Safety Concerns: Some trials address potential risks associated with repeated application of aminoglycosides like neomycin, notably ototoxicity and nephrotoxicity. Current data suggest that topical use minimizes systemic absorption, maintaining a favorable safety profile, but long-term studies are ongoing.

  • New Formulation Development: Innovative delivery systems, such as liposomal and nanoemulsion formulations, are under investigation to enhance drug penetration and reduce side effects. These studies are primarily early-stage, focusing on pharmacokinetics and tolerability.

Regulatory and Market Approvals

Most formulations containing fluocinolone acetonide and neomycin sulfate are approved in select geographies, such as the US, EU, and parts of Asia. Ongoing trials aimed at expanding indications or improving formulations are viewed favorably by regulatory agencies, which emphasize safety data—particularly regarding corticosteroid side effects and antibiotic stewardship.

Pending Clinical Trials

ClinicalTrials.gov currently lists few active or recruiting studies explicitly examining this combination. The scarcity may reflect market maturity, generic competition, and the presence of alternative therapies. Nonetheless, some ongoing trials investigate similar corticosteroid-antibiotic combinations, which may inform future use or label expansions.

Market Analysis

Market Size and Growth Drivers

The topical corticosteroid-antibiotic segment was valued at approximately USD 2.5 billion in 2022, with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) projected at around 4% through 2028. Key drivers include:

  • Rising prevalence of skin disorders such as psoriasis, eczema, and contact dermatitis.
  • Increased awareness and diagnosis, especially in developing markets.
  • The drive for combination therapies offering enhanced efficacy and convenience.

Key Market Players

Leading pharmaceutical firms involved in this segment include Johnson & Johnson (Neosporin), Novartis, and GlaxoSmithKline. These companies offer various formulations, often over-the-counter (OTC), facilitating widespread accessibility.

Market Trends and Opportunities

  • Shift Toward Generic and OTC Products: Cost-effective generics dominate, reducing margins for branded formulations but expanding market penetration.
  • Development of Novel Delivery Systems: Liposomal and sustained-release formulations aim to improve compliance and reduce side effects, creating new market segments.
  • Emerging Markets: India, China, and Brazil exhibit expanding dermatology markets driven by urbanization and increasing healthcare spending.

Competitive Landscape

The market faces fierce competition from alternative therapies, including non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents, biologics (for severe psoriasis), and antibiotic alternatives. Manufacturers focus on differentiation via formulation innovation, safety profiles, and regulatory approvals.

Regulatory and Patent Considerations

Most patents covering specific formulations have expired, intensifying generic competition. Nonetheless, new delivery methods and combination ratios may hold patentability and provide exclusivity periods.

Market Projection

Short to Medium Term (2023-2028)

The market is expected to grow steadily, driven by rising dermatological disease prevalence and product innovation. The premium segment, featuring innovative delivery systems, could see higher growth rates (~6%) compared to the saturated OTC segment (~3%).

Long-Term Outlook (2028 and beyond)

  • Emergence of Biosynthetic and Biologic Alternatives: May impact corticosteroid prescriptions.
  • Regulatory Changes: Stricter controls on antibiotic use could influence market size, especially if resistance concerns dominate policy decisions.
  • Personalized Topical Therapies: Advances in pharmacogenomics may allow tailored formulations, expanding the category's scope.

Potential Market Challenges

  • Growing resistance to neomycin and other antibiotics might decrease reliance.
  • Safety concerns regarding corticosteroid side effects could limit application in certain populations.
  • Competition from newer therapies, such as biologic agents for inflammatory skin diseases.

Concluding Remarks

While clinical trial activity specific to fluocinolone acetonide and neomycin sulfate remains limited, ongoing research underscores their continued role in dermatology, primarily as adjuncts for inflammatory and infectious skin conditions. The market, shaped by generic proliferation and innovation, is poised for steady expansion, with opportunities rooted in formulation improvements and expanding indications. Strategic players focusing on safety, efficacy, and novel delivery systems are likely to shape the trajectory of this therapeutic class.


Key Takeaways

  • Clinical trials predominantly confirm the safety and efficacy of fluocinolone acetonide and neomycin sulfate for dermatitis and psoriasis, with ongoing innovations exploring enhanced delivery systems.
  • The global market for corticosteroid-antibiotic combinations remains sizable and growing, driven by increasing dermatological disease burden and OTC accessibility.
  • Patent expiries have led to a landscape dominated by generics, but innovation in formulations offers new growth avenues.
  • Resistance to topical antibiotics may influence future prescribing patterns, necessitating the development of alternative therapies.
  • Regulatory trends emphasizing safety and antimicrobial stewardship will shape the future product landscape.

FAQs

  1. Are there any recent approvals for new formulations of fluocinolone acetonide and neomycin sulfate?
    No recent major approvals have been announced, but ongoing trials exploring advanced delivery systems suggest future potential.

  2. What safety concerns are associated with long-term topical use of this combination?
    Risks include corticosteroid-related skin atrophy and systemic effects, as well as neomycin-associated allergic contact dermatitis; however, topical application generally minimizes systemic risks.

  3. How does antimicrobial resistance influence the use of this combination?
    Growing resistance, especially in Pseudomonas and Staphylococcus species, may limit effectiveness, encouraging the exploration of antibiotic-sparing formulations.

  4. What market segments are most promising for this drug combination?
    OTC segments targeting mild-to-moderate dermatitis and eczema, particularly in emerging markets, offer promising growth avenues.

  5. Are there any significant patent protections that could influence market exclusivity?
    Most patents covering specific formulations have expired, but new delivery mechanisms and combination ratios could receive patent protection, extending market exclusivity.


References

[1] Journal of Dermatological Treatment. Clinical trial data on corticosteroid formulations. 2020.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.