Last Updated: May 4, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR FENOFIBRIC ACID


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for fenofibric acid

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00300430 ↗ Study to Evaluate the Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of ABT-335, in Combination With Three Different Statins in Subjects With Mixed Dyslipidemia. Completed Abbott Phase 3 2006-09-01 The primary purpose of this study is to test the safety and the effects of using an investigational drug regimen; once daily ABT-335 (Investigational drug) administered in combination with once daily atorvastatin calcium, rosuvastatin calcium or simvastatin in patients with abnormal lipid levels in the blood.
NCT00300456 ↗ Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of ABT-335 in Combination With Simvastatin in Subjects With Multiple Abnormal Lipid Levels in the Blood Completed Abbott Phase 3 2006-03-01 The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of fenofibric acid (ABT-335) + simvastatin combination therapy with ABT-335 and simvastatin monotherapy in subjects with multiple abnormal lipid levels in the blood.
NCT00300469 ↗ Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of ABT-335 in Combination With Atorvastatin in Subjects With Multiple Abnormal Lipid Levels in the Blood Completed Abbott Phase 3 2006-03-01 The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of fenofibric acid (ABT-335) + atorvastatin combination therapy with ABT-335 and atorvastatin monotherapy in subjects with multiple abnormal lipid levels in the blood.
NCT00300482 ↗ Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of ABT-335 in Combination With Rosuvastatin Calcium in Subjects With Multiple Abnormal Lipid Levels in the Blood Completed Abbott Phase 3 2006-03-01 The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of fenofibric acid (ABT-335) + rosuvastatin calcium combination therapy with ABT-335 and rosuvastatin calcium monotherapy in subjects with multiple abnormal lipid levels in the blood.
NCT00808678 ↗ Comparison of the Bioavailability of Fenofibric Acid and Rosuvastatin From ABT-143 Relative to That From the Coadministration of ABT-335 (Fenofibric Acid) and Rosuvastatin Calcium Completed AstraZeneca Phase 1 2008-12-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and compare the pharmacokinetic parameters from the fixed dose combination ABT-143 relative to that from the co-administration of the two monotherapies.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for fenofibric acid

Condition Name

Condition Name for fenofibric acid
Intervention Trials
Healthy 12
Dyslipidemia 5
Mixed Dyslipidemia 4
Coronary Heart Disease 4
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for fenofibric acid
Intervention Trials
Coronary Artery Disease 5
Myocardial Ischemia 5
Dyslipidemias 5
Coronary Disease 4
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for fenofibric acid

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for fenofibric acid
Location Trials
United States 13
Korea, Republic of 4
Brazil 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for fenofibric acid
Location Trials
Illinois 5
North Dakota 2
Florida 2
Maryland 1
Georgia 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for fenofibric acid

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for fenofibric acid
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 2
Phase 3 5
Phase 1 13
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for fenofibric acid
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 18
Terminated 2
Unknown status 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for fenofibric acid

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for fenofibric acid
Sponsor Trials
Abbott 6
Mutual Pharmaceutical Company, Inc. 6
AstraZeneca 2
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for fenofibric acid
Sponsor Trials
Industry 17
Other 5
NIH 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Fenofibric Acid: Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Forward Projections

Last updated: April 25, 2026

What is the current clinical development status for fenofibric acid?

Fenofibric acid is a marketed metabolite of fenofibrate (therapeutic class: lipid-modifying agent, fibrate). Public clinical-trial activity in the fenofibric-acid-specific label is limited relative to the broader fenofibrate development footprint. Market-relevant trial signals tend to be driven by (i) label lifecycle work (bioequivalence, formulation, or guidance-driven studies) and (ii) comparative or combination strategies that use fenofibrate/fenofibric acid as the active comparator or investigational arm.

Clinical-trial activity signals (public registry view):

  • Interventional trials: Most fenofibric-acid mentions occur as marketed-product comparators rather than as new, pivotal programs.
  • Bioequivalence / formulation studies: Common in post-approval life-cycle work.
  • Outcomes trials: Less common for fenofibric acid specifically; major outcomes evidence historically comes from fenofibrate programs, with mechanistic relevance carried forward to the fenofibric-acid active moiety.

Practical interpretation for R&D and investing:
Fenofibric acid is not showing the pattern of a late-stage, high-enrollment, label-expansion global program. The “action” is more likely to be substitution-level (generic entry, dosage-form optimization, and payer-driven utilization) than innovation-level (new mechanism, new indication pivots).

What is the approved commercial role of fenofibric acid?

Fenofibric acid is approved for lipid disorders where fibrates are used:

  • Hypertriglyceridemia and mixed dyslipidemia (as a class, fibrates target triglycerides and help improve lipid profiles).

From a commercial standpoint, fenofibric acid behaves like a maintenance chronic therapy rather than an intermittent specialist drug. That drives demand characteristics tied to:

  • guideline adherence in triglyceride elevations,
  • formulary positioning,
  • generic penetration and pricing compression.

How big is the market for fenofibric-acid–linked therapy, and what drives it?

Because fenofibric acid sits inside the broader “fibrate” and “lipid modifier” ecosystem, the market is best analyzed through demand drivers rather than a standalone “fenofibric acid-only” net sales series (most published commercial reporting groups fibrates, fenofibrate/fenofibric acid, and related assets).

Key demand drivers

  • Triglyceride management prevalence: fibrates remain a core option for high triglycerides, especially where statin optimization does not fully address triglycerides.
  • Cardiometabolic risk management: patients on lipid regimens often cycle among triglyceride-targeted add-ons.
  • Payer preference and step edits: formulary lists and prior authorization rules favor lower WAC net pricing, accelerating generic use.
  • Safety and tolerability considerations: class monitoring (renal function, muscle-related risk) influences adherence and persistence.

Key supply and pricing drivers

  • Generic availability: fenofibrate/fenofibric acid has a strong generic trajectory in many markets, pushing pricing down while keeping volume steady.
  • Switching dynamics: prescribers often continue established triglyceride regimens even when branded assets exit.

What is the projected market trajectory for fenofibric acid?

Fenofibric acid should follow a typical branded-to-generic and then volume-maintenance trajectory, with downside tied to:

  • formulary substitution to the lowest-cost fibrate equivalents,
  • substitution to non-fibrate triglyceride therapies in specific subpopulations,
  • guideline evolution that shifts emphasis toward statin-based strategies with targeted add-ons.

Projection framework (directional, investment-relevant):

  • Near-term (0 to 24 months): volume stability with continued margin compression as inventory cycles and generic pricing anchors.
  • Mid-term (2 to 5 years): gradual erosion of branded share (if any remaining) and continued pressure on price per unit, with total class volumes stabilizing around clinical need.
  • Long-term (5+ years): a stable-to-slowly declining revenue profile in markets where multiple low-cost fibrate options coexist and payers maintain step therapy.

Because fenofibric acid competes primarily on cost and dosing convenience within the fibrate class, the “shape” is usually flat volume with declining revenue intensity.

Base-case commercialization outlook (revenue direction)

Time window Expected revenue direction Primary driver
0-24 months Down or flat (net price compression) Generic price anchors, formulary substitution
2-5 years Flat to modest decline Ongoing cost pressure and step edits
5+ years Modest decline to flat Persistent patient need, but incremental share lost to alternatives

Where do clinical and regulatory changes most likely affect the business?

Even without new pivotal programs, clinical and regulatory work can influence commercial outcomes through:

  • formulation and dosing changes that improve adherence and persistence,
  • bioequivalence packages that enable rapid generic launches,
  • label maintenance that impacts payer coverage decisions.

In practical market terms, the most material events for fenofibric-acid revenue tend to be:

  • introduction and expansion of low-cost supply,
  • discontinuations or market withdrawals of higher-cost products,
  • changes in reimbursement criteria.

How should investors and competitors map competitive risk?

For players holding adjacent lipid assets or new triglyceride programs, fenofibric acid’s commercial risk is mainly “competitive substitution” rather than “mechanism disruption.”

Competitive risk map

  • Within fibrates: strongest risk comes from the lowest-cost generic substitutes and switchability at the pharmacy counter.
  • Outside fibrates (triglycerides): competition shifts based on payer coverage and clinical positioning (patients with severe triglyceride elevation may stay on fibrates longer).
  • Statin-centric regimens: when guidelines or formulary policies reduce add-on fibrate use, volume can soften.

What are the actionable implications for R&D strategy?

A fenofibric-acid-centric innovation strategy is typically viable only if it addresses one of these commercial bottlenecks:

  • differentiating dosing convenience (titration, adherence),
  • improving tolerability or monitoring workflow,
  • creating distinct reimbursement pull through evidence packaging.

If a program does not improve payer economics or patient persistence, the market tends to reward cost and supply rather than incremental clinical nuance.

Key Takeaways

  • Fenofibric acid’s clinical pipeline activity is limited for new pivotal indications; public signals skew toward life-cycle and comparative work rather than major outcome-stage expansion.
  • The market behaves like a chronic lipid therapy with volume stability but pricing compression driven by generic supply and formulary substitution.
  • Forward revenue outlook is flat-to-declining in most markets: net price pressure in the near term, followed by stabilization at lower net revenue intensity.

FAQs

1) Is fenofibric acid still seeing meaningful late-stage trials for new indications?

Publicly visible fenofibric-acid-specific late-stage programs are limited; most activity is life-cycle or comparative within lipid management contexts.

2) What most strongly impacts fenofibric-acid commercial performance?

Generic entry, formulary placement, and step-edit policies that determine net pricing and switching at the pharmacy level.

3) How does fenofibric acid compete in triglyceride management?

Primarily versus other fibrates on cost and convenience, and versus non-fibrate triglyceride therapies based on payer coverage and clinical subpopulation fit.

4) What is the most likely market trajectory over the next 2 to 5 years?

Flat to modest decline in revenue due to ongoing net price compression, with volume supported by persistent clinical need.

5) What kind of R&D work is most likely to produce commercial lift for fenofibric acid assets?

Studies that improve adherence/persistence, simplify monitoring, or improve reimbursement pull through evidence and practical dosing advantages.


References

[1] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Drugs@FDA: Fenofibric acid (accessed 2026-04-26).
[2] ClinicalTrials.gov. Search results for fenofibric acid (accessed 2026-04-26).
[3] National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov database (accessed 2026-04-26).
[4] European Medicines Agency. EPAR resources for fenofibrate/fenofibric-acid–related products (accessed 2026-04-26).

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.