Last Updated: August 10, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR ETHOSUXIMIDE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for ethosuximide

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00088452 ↗ Childhood Absence Epilepsy Rx PK-PD-Pharmacogenetics Study Completed National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) Phase 3 2004-07-01 The purpose of this study is to determine the best initial treatment for childhood absence epilepsy.
NCT00088452 ↗ Childhood Absence Epilepsy Rx PK-PD-Pharmacogenetics Study Completed Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati Phase 3 2004-07-01 The purpose of this study is to determine the best initial treatment for childhood absence epilepsy.
NCT00689585 ↗ Safety and Efficacy Study of Ethosuximide for the Treatment of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) Terminated McGill University Phase 2 2008-09-01 Pain remains the most debilitating symptom for adult patients suffering from complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS). Most CRPS patients gain little to no relief from current painkillers. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ethosuximide in search of much-needed adjunctive therapy to relieve the pain and suffering associated with CRPS.
NCT00689585 ↗ Safety and Efficacy Study of Ethosuximide for the Treatment of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) Terminated McGill University Health Center Phase 2 2008-09-01 Pain remains the most debilitating symptom for adult patients suffering from complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS). Most CRPS patients gain little to no relief from current painkillers. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ethosuximide in search of much-needed adjunctive therapy to relieve the pain and suffering associated with CRPS.
NCT00689585 ↗ Safety and Efficacy Study of Ethosuximide for the Treatment of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) Terminated McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre Phase 2 2008-09-01 Pain remains the most debilitating symptom for adult patients suffering from complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS). Most CRPS patients gain little to no relief from current painkillers. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ethosuximide in search of much-needed adjunctive therapy to relieve the pain and suffering associated with CRPS.
NCT01122381 ↗ Comparison of a Drug and Placebo in the Prevention of Migraine Headaches Terminated Thomas Jefferson University Phase 1/Phase 2 2011-12-01 The purpose of this study is to determine whether ethosuximide works better than placebo in the prevention of episodic migraine among veterans.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for ethosuximide

Condition Name

Condition Name for ethosuximide
Intervention Trials
Epilepsy 2
Peripheral Neuropathic Pain 2
Petit Mal Epilepsy 1
Epilepsy, Absence 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for ethosuximide
Intervention Trials
Epilepsy 4
Syndrome 3
Irritable Bowel Syndrome 2
Neuralgia 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for ethosuximide

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for ethosuximide
Location Trials
United States 24
France 4
United Kingdom 3
Egypt 2
China 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for ethosuximide
Location Trials
Pennsylvania 2
Maryland 1
Wisconsin 1
Washington 1
Virginia 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for ethosuximide

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for ethosuximide
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 2
Phase 3 3
Phase 2 5
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for ethosuximide
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Recruiting 4
Unknown status 3
Completed 3
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for ethosuximide

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for ethosuximide
Sponsor Trials
University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand 3
Matthew's Friends 1
McGill University 1
[disabled in preview] 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for ethosuximide
Sponsor Trials
Other 35
U.S. Fed 2
NIH 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Ethosuximide clinical trials update, market analysis, and projection (2024-2035)

Last updated: July 28, 2026

Ethosuximide (Zarontin and generic equivalents) is an established, off-patent antiepileptic used primarily for absence seizures. No active, late-stage (Phase 3) development programs with novel molecular entities were identified for a current update, leaving the near-term market driven by baseline demand, generic supply, and safety labeling and formulation improvements rather than pipeline-led growth.

What is the current clinical trials landscape for ethosuximide?

Are there any Phase 3 or late-stage trials for ethosuximide right now

No publicly indexed Phase 3 or registrational programs for ethosuximide were identified in the available dataset as of the current cut.

What Phase 1–2 activity exists for ethosuximide

Ethosuximide trials that remain observable in public registries tend to be small, non-pivotal studies. Typical themes:

  • Pharmacokinetics in special populations (pediatrics, renal/hepatic impairment, drug interaction evaluation).
  • Formulation performance (bioequivalence for generic products rather than new clinical endpoints).
  • Observational work and registry-style studies on seizure control and tolerability.

What outcomes do ethosuximide studies typically measure

Common endpoints include:

  • Absence seizure frequency and time to seizure control.
  • Ethosuximide plasma concentration and exposure metrics (Cmax, AUC).
  • Adverse events focused on known class risks: gastrointestinal intolerance, somnolence, and hematologic effects (notably neutropenia/agranulocytosis).

How does ethosuximide development differ from new antiepileptic pipeline drugs

Ethosuximide’s development footprint is dominated by:

  • Generic bioequivalence work.
  • Label refinements and safety monitoring rather than mechanism-of-action expansion.
  • Substitution into pediatric absence seizure pathways where standard-of-care remains unchanged.

Who manufactures ethosuximide and how does supply affect market pricing?

Brand vs generic supply

Ethosuximide is marketed in the US through legacy brand heritage (Zarontin) and broad generic competition. Market pricing and availability are primarily influenced by:

  • Generic manufacturer throughput and cost of raw materials.
  • Pediatric dosing demand volatility.
  • Occasional supply disruptions that shift utilization to specific manufacturers temporarily.

US distribution dynamics

Key market features for established, off-patent antiepileptics:

  • Wholesale acquisition cost compression after generic entries.
  • Substitution at the pharmacy level based on WAC and formulary position.
  • Concentration risk when a small set of generic SKUs dominate.

International commercialization pattern

Outside the US, ethosuximide follows a similar pattern:

  • Long-standing availability.
  • National formulary preferences affecting uptake between first-line absence seizure agents (ethosuximide, valproate, lamotrigine).

How big is the ethosuximide market today and what growth drives it?

Market size drivers

Demand is driven by:

  • Prevalence of absence seizures in pediatric populations.
  • Treatment guideline adherence and real-world switching behavior among absence seizure therapies.
  • Formulary access and payer restrictions that steer selection to specific pediatric tolerability profiles.

What limits growth

Ethosuximide faces structural growth constraints:

  • Off-patent status limits pricing power.
  • Competition from alternative absence seizure therapies with broader prescribing familiarity.
  • Pediatric adherence factors tied to taste/formulation and dosing frequency.

What increases demand

Demand can expand without “new” clinical development if:

  • Pediatric neurologist prescribing behavior increases.
  • Health systems tighten standard-of-care pathways for absence seizures.
  • Improved pediatric formulations reduce administration friction.

When does ethosuximide lose exclusivity, and what does that mean commercially?

Ethosuximide is historically off patent, so “exclusivity loss” is already realized in most major markets. Commercial implications:

  • Ongoing pricing pressure from multi-source generic manufacturing.
  • Market share is determined more by supply reliability and contracted payer economics than by patent protection.

What patents protect ethosuximide today, and which IP barriers affect generic entry?

What patent estate is likely relevant

For an established small molecule like ethosuximide, protection typically shifts from active ingredient patents to:

  • Formulation patents (specific dosage forms, release profiles, taste-masking approaches).
  • Manufacturing process claims (sterilization, crystallization, purification steps).
  • Method-of-use claims, where present, often face enforcement difficulty in practice because clinical use is well established.

How this affects litigation and Paragraph IV risk

Paragraph IV challenges are generally more relevant for brand-to-generic transitions. With ethosuximide already generic and multi-sourced, the practical risk shifts to:

  • Enforcement against specific formulation/process variants.
  • Coordinated market defenses through product line continuity, not active ingredient exclusivity.

What is the Orange Book status of ethosuximide?

Orange Book listing is expected for marketed strengths and manufacturers, with patents that may include:

  • Drug substance.
  • Drug product formulations.
  • Methods of use. Given the off-patent nature of ethosuximide, most filings reflect generic product patents and listed patent expiries rather than active ingredient protection.

Which companies are best positioned in ethosuximide’s market?

Selection criteria

The most commercially relevant attributes for ethosuximide generics:

  • Stable manufacturing capacity for pediatric liquid/solid forms.
  • Low-cost supply chains and high bioequivalence success rates.
  • Strong wholesaler relationships and payer contract coverage.
  • SKU breadth across strengths to reduce switching friction for prescribers.

How does ethosuximide compare with valproate and lamotrigine for absence seizures?

Relative positioning in absence seizure therapy

In typical treatment algorithms for absence seizures:

  • Ethosuximide is often positioned as first-line for absence seizures due to seizure control focus and tolerability considerations.
  • Valproate and lamotrigine are used based on comorbid seizure types, patient-specific tolerability, and seizure disorder overlap.

Commercial impact of comparative practice

If clinicians choose ethosuximide as first-line in absence-only seizure phenotypes, it supports baseline demand stability. If patient selection shifts toward broader antiepileptic regimens, ethosuximide volume can be pressured even without new competitors.

What formulation opportunities could drive the next product cycle?

Likely areas of product differentiation

For ethosuximide, innovation usually clusters around:

  • Pediatric-friendly dosing forms (liquid concentrations, dosing accuracy tools, palatability).
  • Extended stability and shelf-life improvements.
  • Reduced adverse-event burden through formulation engineering rather than new active ingredients.

Regulatory path for differentiated generics

Differentiated products usually pursue:

  • Bioequivalence-based approvals for existing active ingredient.
  • Label expansions where data supports improved administration or tolerability.

Ethosuximide market projection 2024-2035: scenario model

Base-case outlook (most likely)

  • Volume: stable-to-slight growth driven by pediatric epilepsy prevalence and incremental prescribing penetration.
  • Price: continued pressure toward lower WAC, with periodic stabilization when supply constraints occur.
  • Revenue: modest growth in dollar terms is more dependent on formulary share and supply stability than on unit price expansion.

Downside scenario

  • Supply normalization across competitors increases price compression.
  • Shifts toward alternative absence therapies reduce ethosuximide proportion of prescriptions.
  • Higher adverse-event scrutiny affects switching patterns or monitoring burden for prescribers.

Upside scenario

  • Improved pediatric formulations gain uptake and reduce administration barriers.
  • Increased guideline adherence in absence-only populations increases first-line prescribing.
  • Limited supply disruptions raise short-term market share for particular manufacturers.

What matters most in execution

  • Pediatric liquid availability and stability.
  • Contract placement with large pharmacy benefit managers and Medicaid formularies.
  • Sustained production capacity for common strengths.

Key risks and what they do to revenue timing

Clinical risk

Ethosuximide has established safety risks (GI symptoms and hematologic effects). In practice, risks show up as:

  • More monitoring and slower titration.
  • Occasional discontinuations in real-world cohorts.

Regulatory risk

Generic markets can be exposed to:

  • Product recalls or manufacturing quality actions.
  • Label revisions for safety monitoring requirements.

Commercial risk

  • Multi-source commoditization reduces ability to sustain premium pricing.
  • Share swings occur when specific generic SKUs face temporary shortages.

Key Takeaways

  • Ethosuximide remains an established, off-patent antiepileptic used for absence seizures; market dynamics are driven by generic supply, payer coverage, and pediatric access rather than by a near-term late-stage pipeline.
  • Public clinical development for ethosuximide shows no clear evidence of new Phase 3 registrational momentum, with activity more consistent with smaller PK/formulation and observational studies.
  • Market projection through 2035 is best treated as a stable base demand with continued price compression; growth is most sensitive to formulation uptake and formulary share rather than innovation-led expansion.

FAQs

  1. Is ethosuximide still a first-line treatment for absence seizures in 2025?
  2. Do new generic entrants for ethosuximide face formulation or process patent enforcement risk?
  3. What adverse events drive discontinuation rates in real-world ethosuximide use?
  4. How does ethosuximide dosing differ between pediatric tablets and oral solution in practice?
  5. What supply disruptions have historically mattered most for ethosuximide availability?

References (APA)

  1. ClinicalTrials.gov. (n.d.). Ethosuximide (search results). https://clinicaltrials.gov/
  2. FDA. (n.d.). Drugs@FDA: ethosuximide label and approval history. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/daf/
  3. FDA. (n.d.). Orange Book: ethosuximide (Drug Product and Patent information). https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/ob/

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.