You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR ETHCHLORVYNOL


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for ethchlorvynol

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT02017197 ↗ Therapeutic Equivalence Between Branded and Generic WARFArin Tablets in Brazil Completed Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo Phase 4 2014-08-01 The purpose of this study is to assess whether the switch from branded to generic warfarin or between different generic warfarin tablets may cause fluctuation in the results of coagulation tests (International Normalized Rate, acronym INR) in patients, thus predisposing them to unnecessary risks.
NCT02017197 ↗ Therapeutic Equivalence Between Branded and Generic WARFArin Tablets in Brazil Completed Federal University of São Paulo Phase 4 2014-08-01 The purpose of this study is to assess whether the switch from branded to generic warfarin or between different generic warfarin tablets may cause fluctuation in the results of coagulation tests (International Normalized Rate, acronym INR) in patients, thus predisposing them to unnecessary risks.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for ethchlorvynol

Condition Name

Condition Name for ethchlorvynol
Intervention Trials
Atrial Fibrillation 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for ethchlorvynol
Intervention Trials
Atrial Fibrillation 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for ethchlorvynol

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for ethchlorvynol
Location Trials
Brazil 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for ethchlorvynol

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for ethchlorvynol
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for ethchlorvynol
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for ethchlorvynol

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for ethchlorvynol
Sponsor Trials
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 1
Federal University of São Paulo 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for ethchlorvynol
Sponsor Trials
Other 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Ethchlorvynol: Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Future Projections

Last updated: October 30, 2025


Introduction

Ethchlorvynol, marketed under brand names such as Placidyl, is a sedative-hypnotic agent historically utilized to manage insomnia. Despite its efficacy, the drug’s use has waned due to safety concerns, the emergence of newer therapies, and regulatory restrictions. This report provides a comprehensive analysis of the current clinical trial landscape, market dynamics, and future projections for ethchlorvynol, offering critical insights for stakeholders navigating this niche pharmaceutical domain.


Clinical Trials Update on Ethchlorvynol

Regulatory and Research Status

Currently, ethchlorvynol is not the subject of active Phase I or II clinical trials visible in prominent registries such as ClinicalTrials.gov or the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP). Historically, research efforts on ethchlorvynol have been limited to its initial development in the 1950s and 1960s, primarily centered on safety and pharmacokinetic studies. The last significant regulatory submissions date back several decades, with no recent data indicating ongoing clinical evaluation.

The regulatory landscape has shifted significantly since its peak use. Agencies such as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) have classified ethchlorvynol as a controlled or scheduled substance owing to its potential for abuse and dependence. Consequently, further clinical development has largely ceased, and the drug is predominantly available as a legacy product or generic through limited channels.

Safety and Efficacy Data

Historical clinical data underscored concerns regarding abuse potential, respiratory depression, and dependence, culminating in restrictions or withdrawal in several markets. The initial trials revealed advantages in rapid onset and short-term efficacy but were overshadowed by adverse effects, especially with prolonged use.

Given the absence of recent clinical investigations, current pharmacovigilance reports focus more on post-marketing surveillance rather than novel trials. The lack of new data constrains the potential for therapeutic re-evaluation, relegating ethchlorvynol to a legacy status within the sedative-hypnotic market.


Market Analysis

Historical Market Landscape

During the mid-20th century, ethchlorvynol was widely prescribed for insomnia, especially among patients who responded poorly to barbiturates or benzodiazepines. Its market share peaked in the 1960s and 1970s, benefitting from its efficacy and marketing strategies.

However, rising awareness of dependency risks, the development of safer alternatives, and stricter regulatory controls led to a decline in its prescription and manufacturing. The drug was phased out progressively in several jurisdictions, notably in the United States, where the DEA classified it as a Schedule IV controlled substance in 1974 [1].

Current Market Dynamics

Today, ethchlorvynol exists predominantly as a legacy product, with minimal production and regulatory approval in new markets. It is largely obsolete in developed countries, replaced by non-pharmacological interventions and newer pharmacotherapies like zolpidem, eszopiclone, and melatonin receptor agonists.

In markets where it remains available, typically in countries with less stringent regulations, it commands negligible market share owing to safety concerns, limited physician familiarity, and regulatory restrictions.

Off-Label and Grey Market Considerations

Instances of illicit use or off-label prescriptions are sporadic and not well-documented, aligning with its controlled status. The drug's abuse potential has historically limited its recreational use, confining its role largely to a historical context rather than contemporary therapeutic use.


Future Projections

Obstacles to Development and Market Re-entry

Given the current safety profile, regulatory restrictions, and market preferences, the prospects for ethchlorvynol’s re-establishment as a therapeutic agent appear minimal. No active clinical development programs or investment efforts are underway, reflecting diminished commercial interest.

The regulatory environment, emphasizing patient safety, discourages revival unless a compelling new formulation or indication emerges. Moreover, the availability of safer, more effective sleep aids diminishes the incentive for companies to pursue new clinical trials or marketing efforts.

Potential Niche Opportunities

Although mainstream prospects are limited, niche or academic research might revive interest if, for example, ethchlorvynol demonstrates unique efficacy in specific populations or in combination therapies. However, such prospects are speculative and would require substantial safety validation.

Legal and Regulatory Trajectory

Future regulation is likely to further restrict or prohibit ethchlorvynol’s manufacture and distribution, especially given an increasing global focus on controlled substances with abuse potential. In jurisdictions like the U.S. and EU, it is classified under strict control measures, emphasizing reduction in abuse and diversion.


Key Takeaways

  • Clinical Development: No active clinical trials or recent research efforts focus on ethchlorvynol, reflecting its obsolescence and safety concerns.
  • Market Status: Once a widely prescribed hypnotic, ethchlorvynol's market has largely disappeared, replaced by safer alternatives due to its abuse potential.
  • Regulatory Landscape: Strict control measures have limited access and viability, with ongoing regulatory tightening globally.
  • Future Outlook: The likelihood of ethchlorvynol regaining market relevance remains low; any future development would require significant safety re-evaluation and regulatory approval hurdles.
  • Niche Applications: Limited potential exists for niche academic or biomedical exploration, though commercial prospects remain bleak.

FAQs

1. Why did the use of ethchlorvynol decline?
Its decline resulted from safety concerns—particularly risks of dependency, overdose, and abuse—coupled with the advent of safer, more effective sleep medications.

2. Is ethchlorvynol still available legally?
In some countries, it remains available as a legacy product; however, global regulatory agencies classify it as a controlled substance, significantly restricting its distribution and use.

3. Are there ongoing clinical trials exploring ethchlorvynol?
No, current public trial registries show no active or recruiting studies involving ethchlorvynol.

4. Could ethchlorvynol be reformulated for safety?
While theoretically possible, reformulation is unlikely unless compelling clinical evidence emerges, given its historical safety issues and regulatory restrictions.

5. What are the alternatives to ethchlorvynol for insomnia?
Modern options include non-benzodiazepine hypnotics like zolpidem, eszopiclone, and newer agents such as suvorexant, which often offer safer profiles with fewer dependency risks.


References

[1] Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA). "Control of Ethchlorvynol; Scheduled as a Controlled Substance." 1974.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.