Last Updated: August 9, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR ERGOCALCIFEROL


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for ergocalciferol

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00114556 ↗ The Effect of Zoledronic Acid on Bone Density in Liver Transplant Patients Completed Novartis Phase 4 2000-02-01 Following liver transplantation, rapid bone loss occurs, particularly within the first 6 months post-transplant. This may be associated with fractures, most notable vertebral. The ability to assess osteoporosis therapies in this system may provide useful information for osteoporosis management in general. Hypotheses: 1. That treatment with the bisphosphonate, zoledronate, at the time of liver transplantation and at 1 month post-transplantation will prevent the early transplant-related bone loss (measured by bone densitometry and biochemical bone markers at 3 months) seen in patients who are not treated with a bisphosphonate 2. That continuing treatment with zoledronate at 3 monthly intervals for a total duration of 12 months will result in further improvements in bone density beyond that seen at 3 months 3. That calcium and vitamin D (vit D) supplementation of liver transplant patients does not prevent marked bone loss following transplantation.
NCT00114556 ↗ The Effect of Zoledronic Acid on Bone Density in Liver Transplant Patients Completed Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia Phase 4 2000-02-01 Following liver transplantation, rapid bone loss occurs, particularly within the first 6 months post-transplant. This may be associated with fractures, most notable vertebral. The ability to assess osteoporosis therapies in this system may provide useful information for osteoporosis management in general. Hypotheses: 1. That treatment with the bisphosphonate, zoledronate, at the time of liver transplantation and at 1 month post-transplantation will prevent the early transplant-related bone loss (measured by bone densitometry and biochemical bone markers at 3 months) seen in patients who are not treated with a bisphosphonate 2. That continuing treatment with zoledronate at 3 monthly intervals for a total duration of 12 months will result in further improvements in bone density beyond that seen at 3 months 3. That calcium and vitamin D (vit D) supplementation of liver transplant patients does not prevent marked bone loss following transplantation.
NCT00157066 ↗ Effects of Vitamin D Supplementation on Antimycobacterial Immunity Completed Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Homerton Hospital, London E9 6SR, UK N/A 2002-12-01 The purpose of this study is to determine how vitamin D supplementation (ergocalciferol) affects the immune response to mycobacterial infection.
NCT00157066 ↗ Effects of Vitamin D Supplementation on Antimycobacterial Immunity Completed Environmental Health Department, London Borough of Newham, London E15 4SF, UK N/A 2002-12-01 The purpose of this study is to determine how vitamin D supplementation (ergocalciferol) affects the immune response to mycobacterial infection.
NCT00157066 ↗ Effects of Vitamin D Supplementation on Antimycobacterial Immunity Completed Imperial College London N/A 2002-12-01 The purpose of this study is to determine how vitamin D supplementation (ergocalciferol) affects the immune response to mycobacterial infection.
NCT00157066 ↗ Effects of Vitamin D Supplementation on Antimycobacterial Immunity Completed Newham Chest Clinic, London E7 8QP, UK N/A 2002-12-01 The purpose of this study is to determine how vitamin D supplementation (ergocalciferol) affects the immune response to mycobacterial infection.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for ergocalciferol

Condition Name

Condition Name for ergocalciferol
Intervention Trials
Vitamin D Deficiency 20
Osteoporosis 4
Chronic Kidney Disease 3
Inflammation 3
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for ergocalciferol
Intervention Trials
Vitamin D Deficiency 24
Renal Insufficiency, Chronic 8
Kidney Diseases 8
Osteoporosis 4
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for ergocalciferol

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for ergocalciferol
Location Trials
United States 36
Thailand 4
Saudi Arabia 4
United Kingdom 2
Israel 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for ergocalciferol
Location Trials
New York 7
Massachusetts 6
California 3
Wisconsin 3
North Carolina 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for ergocalciferol

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for ergocalciferol
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 17
Phase 3 4
Phase 2/Phase 3 2
[disabled in preview] 8
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for ergocalciferol
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 26
Unknown status 7
Terminated 6
[disabled in preview] 7
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for ergocalciferol

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for ergocalciferol
Sponsor Trials
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) 5
Massachusetts General Hospital 3
King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center 3
[disabled in preview] 7
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for ergocalciferol
Sponsor Trials
Other 73
NIH 7
U.S. Fed 5
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Ergocalciferol (Vitamin D2) Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Future Revenue Projections (2026–2035)

Last updated: July 28, 2026

What is ergocalciferol (vitamin D2) and what’s driving current clinical development?

Ergocalciferol is vitamin D2 used to prevent and treat vitamin D deficiency and related disorders. Clinical development activity is dominated by:

  • New formulations (oral solutions, softgels, chewables, high-dose regimens)
  • Dose-regimen optimization (loading schedules, maintenance intervals, adherence-focused products)
  • Comparative studies against cholecalciferol (vitamin D3)
  • Use in specific populations (CKD, malabsorption states, oncology supportive care, bone health)

Key clinical-trial patterns seen across registries

  • Trials cluster around endpoints tied to serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) kinetics, safety, and adherence.
  • Sponsors often run comparative bioequivalence and dose-ranging studies rather than new “indication-changing” mechanism trials.
  • In multiple settings, outcomes are shaped by baseline vitamin D deficiency prevalence and background use of supplements.

What clinical trials are currently active for ergocalciferol in 2026?

No complete, verifiable “current active trials” set can be produced from the information in this request. A complete trials update requires registry-level pulling (ClinicalTrials.gov and other registries) and then mapping to ergocalciferol brand/NDC variants, dose forms, and sponsor names. Without that dataset in the prompt, producing a correct, litigation-grade update is not possible.

Which ergocalciferol indications are seeing the most trial activity?

In the absence of registry-backed evidence, the highest-probability therapeutic clusters are:

  • Vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency prevention/treatment (adult and pediatric populations)
  • Bone health and osteoporosis risk reduction support (adjunct to calcium where applicable)
  • CKD-related mineral and bone disorder support (often as part of broader vitamin D or active vitamin D strategies)
  • Malabsorption-related deficiency (e.g., bariatric surgery, GI disease cohorts)
  • Oncology supportive care and hypovitaminosis D correction (screening and correction studies)

These clusters reflect typical industry trial focus for vitamin D agents and vitamin-related supportive programs, but they are not a registry-verified 2026 “update” from your prompt.

How does ergocalciferol compare with cholecalciferol (vitamin D3) in clinical evidence?

Common decision factors in clinical and prescribing practice

  • Serum 25(OH)D raising efficacy and duration of effect
  • Relative performance in specific deficiency severities and adherence contexts
  • Safety profile when used within recommended dosing ranges
  • Drug product form factor and regimen convenience

Industry reality: many markets treat ergocalciferol and cholecalciferol as alternatives, so product differentiation often comes from dosing convenience, product stability, and patient adherence rather than a novel clinical claim.

What is the current market for ergocalciferol and how is demand distributed by region?

No region-specific market sizing or segment breakdown can be computed from this prompt. A market analysis with credible projections needs:

  • Global and regional sales baselines
  • Product form segmentation (oral drops, softgels, capsules, high-dose intermittent)
  • Distribution channel splits (pharmacy retail, mail order, hospital)
  • Reimbursement constraints by geography
  • Competitive pricing and substitution patterns vs vitamin D3

Without market data inputs or cited sources in the request, generating a defensible market forecast would require unsourced assumptions, which are not permissible under a high-stakes patent/strategy standard.

What competitive landscape matters most for ergocalciferol (brands, generics, and substitutes)?

Ergocalciferol markets typically face:

  • Generic competition driven by entrenched vitamin D inclusion in formularies and OTC overlap
  • Substitution with vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol), often stronger on uptake in many prescribing habits
  • Competition from calcifediol and active vitamin D analogs in CKD/mineral-bone disease pathways
  • Combination products (vitamin D plus calcium, multinutrient regimens)

For a “market analysis,” you need a product-level competitive list and pricing/reimbursement context, which the prompt does not provide.

When does ergocalciferol lose exclusivity and what patent barriers exist?

Ergocalciferol is widely available and largely commodity-like. In practice, the IP landscape for vitamin D2 products tends to be less about broad “molecule exclusivity” and more about:

  • Formulation/process patents on specific dosage forms or manufacturing methods
  • Pediatric formulation claims or specific dosing regimens
  • Brand-specific patents where applicable

A correct exclusivity and patent barrier analysis requires patent-by-patent mapping to specific ergsocalciferol product filings, assignees, and Orange Book entries. The request does not include a target brand, NDA/ANDA/BLA number, or any cited IP dataset.

What is the Orange Book status of ergocalciferol products and which patents are listed?

A product-specific Orange Book status cannot be provided without identifying the exact FDA-listed ergocalciferol NDA/ANDA entries and then enumerating listed patents and exclusivities. Ergocalciferol can appear under multiple product codes, dosing forms, and label variants, so an unscoped answer risks being inaccurate.

What generic entry risks exist for ergocalciferol and how do Paragraph IV challenges apply?

Paragraph IV challenges apply only to ANDA dossiers with listed patents in the Orange Book for specific reference listed drug(s). Without the relevant Orange Book listings and the product(s) in question, the request cannot support a correct Paragraph IV landscape summary.

How do clinical outcomes translate into commercial adoption for ergocalciferol?

For vitamin D2, commercial adoption drivers are usually:

  • Dosing convenience (loading regimens vs maintenance schedules)
  • Patient adherence and tolerability (less frequent dosing can shift net uptake)
  • Product stability and dispensing format
  • Formulary placement and reimbursement behavior
  • Availability in high-volume channels (retail, mail order)

This is standard market behavior, but a rigorous projection still requires a baseline sales curve, competitive price bands, and formulary penetration rates.

What revenue projections are realistic for ergocalciferol from 2026 to 2035?

No numerical revenue forecast can be produced from the information in this request. A defensible projection requires at minimum:

  • Market size baseline (global and/or targeted geography)
  • Historical growth rates, volume trends, and pricing dynamics
  • Competitive substitution assumptions (ergocalciferol vs cholecalciferol; vitamin D combinations)
  • Regulatory and reimbursement changes

Without cited or supplied datasets, any numeric projection would be synthetic and not suitable for decision-grade R&D, licensing, or litigation work.

What would change the outlook for ergocalciferol clinical and market growth?

The highest-impact variables are:

  • New formulation patents that extend product differentiation beyond generic commodity status
  • Label expansions into higher-value subsets (where payer behavior changes)
  • Shifts in guideline preferences between vitamin D2 and vitamin D3
  • Evidence that specific dosing regimens deliver improved adherence or sustained 25(OH)D responses
  • Patent or regulatory actions affecting supply, discontinuations, or access in major markets

These remain drivers, not forecasts, without registry and market inputs.

Key Takeaways

  • Ergocalciferol development is typically centered on formulation, regimen optimization, and comparative performance in maintaining serum 25(OH)D.
  • A current clinical trials update for 2026 requires registry-level extraction by drug form, dose, sponsor, and endpoint mapping. The prompt does not include that dataset.
  • A market analysis and 2026–2035 revenue projection require sales baselines, regional splits, pricing trends, and competitive substitution rates. The prompt does not include those inputs.
  • IP and exclusivity in ergocalciferol markets are usually more about formulation/process and product-specific listings than broad “molecule” exclusivity, but a correct exclusivity and Orange Book assessment is impossible without product identification.

FAQs

  1. Is ergocalciferol (vitamin D2) still prescribed in 2026 versus cholecalciferol (vitamin D3)?
  2. What serum 25(OH)D endpoints do ergocalciferol trials typically use to demonstrate efficacy?
  3. Do ergocalciferol products have Orange Book listed patents, and how do they affect generic substitution?
  4. Which dosage forms (drops, softgels, capsules) tend to achieve higher adherence in vitamin D2 studies?
  5. How do CKD and malabsorption patient populations change ergocalciferol dosing and trial design?

References

No sources were provided in the request, and no registry or market datasets were included.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.