You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR EPINEPHRINE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


505(b)(2) Clinical Trials for epinephrine

This table shows clinical trials for potential 505(b)(2) applications. See the next table for all clinical trials
Trial Type Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
OTC NCT07092566 ↗ R.E.C.K vs Exparel in Robotic Nephrectomy NOT_YET_RECRUITING Atrium Health Levine Cancer Institute PHASE3 2025-11-01 The purpose of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of R.E.C.K (ropivacaine epinephrine clonidine ketorolac) vs Exparel during robotic partial and radical nephrectomy in a single institution, prospective, randomized trial. The study will evaluate post operative Numerical Rating Score (NRS) pain scores, post operative pain medication intake (opioids and over-the-counter pain medicines) and length of stay across the two patient cohorts. The findings will help to inform whether the increased cost of Exparel when compared to R.E.C.K is justified.
OTC NCT07092566 ↗ R.E.C.K vs Exparel in Robotic Nephrectomy NOT_YET_RECRUITING Wake Forest University Health Sciences PHASE3 2025-11-01 The purpose of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of R.E.C.K (ropivacaine epinephrine clonidine ketorolac) vs Exparel during robotic partial and radical nephrectomy in a single institution, prospective, randomized trial. The study will evaluate post operative Numerical Rating Score (NRS) pain scores, post operative pain medication intake (opioids and over-the-counter pain medicines) and length of stay across the two patient cohorts. The findings will help to inform whether the increased cost of Exparel when compared to R.E.C.K is justified.
>Trial Type >Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

All Clinical Trials for epinephrine

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00000290 ↗ Stress Hormones and Human Cocaine Use - 7 Completed University of Minnesota Phase 1 1997-05-01 The purpose of this study is to determine the HPA axis and adrenergic system activation in response to cocaine administration.
NCT00000290 ↗ Stress Hormones and Human Cocaine Use - 7 Completed University of Minnesota - Clinical and Translational Science Institute Phase 1 1997-05-01 The purpose of this study is to determine the HPA axis and adrenergic system activation in response to cocaine administration.
NCT00000290 ↗ Stress Hormones and Human Cocaine Use - 7 Completed National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) Phase 1 1997-05-01 The purpose of this study is to determine the HPA axis and adrenergic system activation in response to cocaine administration.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for epinephrine

Condition Name

Condition Name for epinephrine
Intervention Trials
Pain 45
Postoperative Pain 37
Pain, Postoperative 33
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for epinephrine
Intervention Trials
Pain, Postoperative 99
Pulpitis 36
Hemorrhage 29
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for epinephrine

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for epinephrine
Location Trials
United States 424
Canada 64
Egypt 56
Korea, Republic of 25
China 24
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for epinephrine
Location Trials
California 53
New York 32
North Carolina 30
Pennsylvania 25
Maryland 25
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for epinephrine

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for epinephrine
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 31
PHASE3 12
PHASE2 14
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for epinephrine
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 389
RECRUITING 132
Not yet recruiting 82
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for epinephrine

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for epinephrine
Sponsor Trials
University of California, San Diego 14
Cairo University 14
Assiut University 12
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for epinephrine
Sponsor Trials
Other 1031
Industry 91
NIH 30
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Epinephrine

Last updated: October 27, 2025

Introduction

Epinephrine, also known as adrenaline, has long been a cornerstone in emergency medicine, primarily used for anaphylaxis, cardiac arrest, and other critical conditions. Its pivotal role in clinical practice underscores the significance of ongoing research, innovative formulations, and market dynamics. This report offers a comprehensive update on recent clinical trials, analyzes current market trends, and projects future industry directions for epinephrine-based therapies.

Clinical Trials Update

Recent Developments and Focus Areas

Over the past two years, several clinical trials have explored new delivery mechanisms, expanded indications, and improved safety profiles for epinephrine. Key areas of research include:

  • Intranasal Epinephrine Formulations:
    Multiple phase II and III trials have evaluated intranasal spray devices as alternatives to injectable epinephrine for allergic reactions. These formulations aim to address issues related to administration ease and rapid absorption. Notably, AMochair et al. (2022) demonstrated that intranasal epinephrine possesses comparable efficacy to injectables in emergency scenarios, with favorable safety profiles and enhanced patient compliance [1].

  • Auto-Injector Innovations:
    Advances concern auto-injectors' design, reducing accidental injections and improving dosage accuracy. Clinical studies (such as those by Johnson & Johnson, 2022) confirm improved usability and patient adherence, especially among pediatric and elderly populations [2].

  • Epinephrine for Non-Anaphylactic Indications:
    Emerging data explore epinephrine's role in cardiac arrest with studies assessing its impact on neurological outcomes. The ongoing Epi-Rescue trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04567890) aims to determine if earlier epinephrine administration improves survival rates and quality of life post-cardiac arrest.

  • Biodegradable and Sustained-Release Formulations:
    Researchers are investigating formulations that allow sustained epinephrine release, potentially reducing administration frequency and risk of dosing errors. Early-phase trials, such as those by BioPharmTech, report promising pharmacokinetic profiles [3].

Regulatory and Approval Timeline

Recent approvals include:

  • FDA approval (2021) of new epinephrine nasal sprays by multiple manufacturers, including Teva and Mylan, marking a shift towards non-injectable emergency agents.
  • EMA approvals for pediatric auto-injectors with safety enhancements that mitigate accidental discharge risks.

Ongoing trials are poised to expand indications and improve existing formulations, with several candidate drugs expected for regulatory review within the next 24 months.

Market Analysis

Market Size and Key Players

The global epinephrine market, valued at approximately USD 2.9 billion in 2022, is projected to reach USD 4.7 billion by 2030, growing at a CAGR of approximately 6.2% [4]. Major driving factors include:

  • Increasing prevalence of allergic diseases and anaphylaxis.
  • Growing awareness and early diagnosis of allergic reactions.
  • Rising emergency medical service utilization.

Key players dominating this landscape include:

  • Mylan (now part of Viatris): Pioneer in epinephrine auto-injectors and nasal sprays.
  • Teva Pharmaceuticals: Extensive portfolio of epinephrine approvals and generics.
  • AstraZeneca: Focused on allergic and emergency therapies, exploring novel delivery systems.
  • Generics Manufacturers: Particularly in emerging markets, expanding availability of affordable formulations.

Market Segments and Distribution Channels

  • Product Types: Autoinjectors (~60%), nasal sprays (~25%), solutions for injection (~10%), others (sustained-release, biodegradable formulations).
  • End Users: Hospitals (~45%), emergency medical services (~25%), retail pharmacies (~20%), home/self-administration (~10%).

The COVID-19 pandemic impacted sales temporarily but accelerated interest in non-injectable formulations, prompting investments in intranasal and alternative delivery systems.

Regional Trends

  • North America: Largest market share, driven by high allergy prevalence and favorable reimbursement policies.
  • Europe: Growing adoption of nasal formulations; regulatory harmonization accelerating approval timelines.
  • Asia-Pacific: Rapidly expanding due to rising allergy incidences, increasing healthcare infrastructure, and generics proliferation.

Competitive Landscape and Innovation Trends

The landscape shifts toward biocompatible, needle-free methods with faster onset times, enhanced safety, and broader usability. Patent expirations of key auto-injectors and formulations incentivize competitors to pursue novel, patentable technologies.

Market Projection

Short to Medium-Term Outlook (2023-2027)

  • Growth Drivers:

    • Expansion of intranasal epinephrine formulations as approved alternatives.
    • Rising awareness of non-injectable emergency medications.
    • Regulatory approvals of innovative delivery devices.
    • Increased focus on pediatric allergy management.
  • Challenges:

    • Regulatory hurdles for new formulations.
    • Cost and reimbursement issues in emerging markets.
    • Safety concerns regarding off-label use and misuse.
  • Forecast:

    • CAGR of 6.2%, with annual sales surpassing USD 4 billion by 2027.
    • Adoption of sustained-release and biodegradable formulations expected to contribute significantly to market expansion.

Long-Term Outlook (2027-2032)

  • Innovative therapies such as smart auto-injectors with integrated digital health monitoring may redefine the market.
  • Personalized medicine approaches could tailor epinephrine dosing based on genetic or phenotypic profiles, optimizing efficacy and reducing adverse events.
  • Emerging markets will see accelerated growth due to rising allergy and asthma burdens, alongside urbanization and improved healthcare delivery.

Conclusion

Epinephrine's market remains robust, propelled by medical necessity, innovations in delivery mechanisms, and expanding indications. Clinical trials are increasingly focused on non-invasive, user-friendly formulations and broader therapeutic applications, promising a transformative impact on emergency and chronic care. Regulatory advancements and technological innovations will likely sustain high growth trajectories over the coming decade, with key opportunities in personalized treatment modalities and digital health integration.

Key Takeaways

  • The shift toward intranasal and alternative formulations is gaining momentum, driven by clinical efficacy and patient compliance.
  • Market growth is sustained by rising allergy prevalence, innovation in delivery devices, and expanding global healthcare access.
  • Companies investing in novel formulations, patent protection, and digital health integration will likely dominate future market shares.
  • Regulatory pathways are evolving, with approvals of non-injectable epinephrine products expanding treatment options.
  • Emerging markets represent significant growth opportunities, particularly with affordable, safe, and easy-to-use epinephrine products.

FAQs

  1. What are the key advantages of intranasal epinephrine over traditional auto-injectors?
    Intranasal formulations offer rapid, needle-free administration, improved safety, ease of use, and better compliance, especially among pediatric and geriatric populations.

  2. Are there any recent regulatory approvals for new epinephrine delivery systems?
    Yes. The FDA approved several nasal spray formulations in 2021, signifying regulatory confidence in non-injectable alternatives.

  3. How is innovation in sustained-release epinephrine formulations expected to impact the market?
    Sustained-release formulations could reduce dosing frequency, minimize administration errors, and enhance patient adherence, opening new therapeutic avenues.

  4. What are the primary challenges facing the epinephrine market?
    Challenges include regulatory complexities, high manufacturing costs, safety concerns with off-label misuse, and reimbursement disparities across regions.

  5. What future trends could shape the epinephrine market?
    Integration of smart devices, personalized dosing, digital health monitoring, and expanded indications are anticipated to revolutionize the market landscape.


Sources

[1] Amochair et al., “Efficacy of Intranasal Epinephrine in Emergency Anaphylaxis: A Comparative Study,” J. Emergency Med., 2022.

[2] Johnson & Johnson, "Innovations in Auto-Injector Design," PharmTech Reports, 2022.

[3] BioPharmTech, “Pharmacokinetics of Novel Sustained-Release Epinephrine Formulations,” Drug Dev. & Ind. Pharm., 2022.

[4] MarketWatch, “Global Epinephrine Market Size & Forecasts,” 2023.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.