You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: April 5, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR DORIPENEM


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for doripenem

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00210938 ↗ Doripenem in the Treatment of Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infections Completed Peninsula Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Phase 3 2004-03-01 The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical response rates of doripenem versus a comparator antibiotic in treatment of hospitalized patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections.
NCT00210938 ↗ Doripenem in the Treatment of Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infections Completed Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C. Phase 3 2004-03-01 The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical response rates of doripenem versus a comparator antibiotic in treatment of hospitalized patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections.
NCT00210990 ↗ Doripenem in the Treatment of Complicated Lower Urinary Tract Infection or Pyelonephritis Completed Peninsula Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Phase 3 2004-03-01 The purpose of this study is to assess the microbiological cure rate of doripenem in the treatment of patients with complicated urinary tract infection or pyelonephritis. The study will also characterize the safety and tolerability of treatment with doripenem in patients with complicated urinary tract infection or pyelonephritis.
NCT00210990 ↗ Doripenem in the Treatment of Complicated Lower Urinary Tract Infection or Pyelonephritis Completed Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C. Phase 3 2004-03-01 The purpose of this study is to assess the microbiological cure rate of doripenem in the treatment of patients with complicated urinary tract infection or pyelonephritis. The study will also characterize the safety and tolerability of treatment with doripenem in patients with complicated urinary tract infection or pyelonephritis.
NCT00211003 ↗ Doripenem in the Treatment of Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia Completed Peninsula Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Phase 3 2004-05-01 The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and effectiveness of doripenem in patients with hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP).
NCT00211003 ↗ Doripenem in the Treatment of Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia Completed Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C. Phase 3 2004-05-01 The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and effectiveness of doripenem in patients with hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP).
NCT00211016 ↗ Doripenem in the Treatment of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia Completed Peninsula Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Phase 3 2004-08-01 The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical response rate of doripenem versus comparator in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP).
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for doripenem

Condition Name

Condition Name for doripenem
Intervention Trials
Pneumonia 5
Urinary Tract Infections 5
Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia 5
Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated 4
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for doripenem
Intervention Trials
Infections 15
Infection 15
Communicable Diseases 13
Pneumonia 12
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for doripenem

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for doripenem
Location Trials
United States 67
Argentina 7
Ukraine 6
Russian Federation 5
Canada 5
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for doripenem
Location Trials
Ohio 7
Michigan 7
California 6
Arkansas 4
District of Columbia 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for doripenem

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for doripenem
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE1 1
Phase 4 7
Phase 3 13
[disabled in preview] 8
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for doripenem
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 22
Terminated 5
Unknown status 1
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for doripenem

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for doripenem
Sponsor Trials
Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C. 8
Peninsula Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 6
Janssen Research & Development, LLC 5
[disabled in preview] 9
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for doripenem
Sponsor Trials
Industry 32
Other 16
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Doripenem Clinical Trials, Market Analysis, and Projection

Last updated: February 19, 2026

This report details the current status of doripenem clinical trials, analyzes its market position, and projects future market performance. Doripenem, a carbapenem antibiotic, faces a competitive landscape dominated by generics and novel agents.

What is the current clinical trial status of Doripenem?

Doripenem's clinical trial activity primarily reflects its established use and the ongoing pursuit of expanded indications or improved formulations.

  • Approved Indications: Doripenem is FDA-approved for the treatment of hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) and complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAI), including those caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa [1].
  • Ongoing Registries and Observational Studies: Much of the current "clinical trial" activity involves post-marketing surveillance and observational studies. These aim to gather real-world effectiveness data, monitor resistance patterns, and assess safety in broader patient populations.
    • Examples include studies evaluating doripenem use in specific patient subgroups, such as those with renal impairment, or in combination therapies [2].
    • These studies are often observational and do not typically involve drug manipulation or new patient cohorts for efficacy assessment.
  • No Significant Novel Indication Trials: As of the latest available data, there are no major Phase III trials actively recruiting for new, distinct indications for doripenem. The focus is on consolidating its existing approved uses and understanding its performance within current treatment paradigms.
  • Limited Pediatric or Orphan Drug Development: Doripenem's development has historically focused on adult hospital settings. There is minimal evidence of significant ongoing trials in pediatric populations or for rare diseases, which represent areas for potential future exploration but are not currently active.
  • Formulation and Delivery Research: Some research may explore alternative formulations or delivery methods, though this is not prevalent in large-scale, late-stage clinical trials. The primary goal is typically to optimize existing pharmacokinetic profiles or administration routes.
  • Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs: While not direct clinical trials, doripenem is a subject of numerous studies within antimicrobial stewardship programs. These studies examine its appropriate use, impact on resistance, and cost-effectiveness compared to other carbapenems and broad-spectrum antibiotics [3]. This indirectly informs its clinical utility and market positioning.

What is the current market landscape for Doripenem?

The market for doripenem is characterized by significant generic competition and a dynamic landscape of carbapenem resistance and the introduction of novel antibacterial agents.

  • Generic Erosion: Doripenem's patent exclusivity has long expired, leading to widespread generic availability. This has drastically reduced pricing and market share for the originator product (Doribax®).
    • The average selling price (ASP) for generic doripenem in hospital settings is significantly lower than its original branded price.
    • Multiple manufacturers globally produce generic doripenem APIs and finished dosage forms.
  • Intense Competition within Carbapenems: Doripenem competes directly with other carbapenems, including imipenem/cilastatin, meropenem, and ertapenem.
    • Meropenem: Remains a dominant force due to its broad spectrum, favorable safety profile, and extensive clinical experience. Generic meropenem is widely available and cost-effective.
    • Ertapenem: Offers a broader spectrum against Gram-positive and anaerobic organisms but lacks activity against P. aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Enterococcus faecalis. Its once-daily dosing can be an advantage in outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) settings, a niche doripenem does not typically fill.
    • Imipenem/Cilastatin: While effective, its broader use has been tempered by concerns regarding nephrotoxicity and higher rates of resistance development in some pathogens.
  • Emergence of Novel Antibacterial Agents: The development and approval of new antibiotics targeting resistant pathogens pose a long-term threat to the market share of older broad-spectrum agents like doripenem.
    • Beta-lactam/Beta-lactamase Inhibitor (BLBLI) Combinations: Agents like ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, and imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam are approved for specific carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections, directly challenging carbapenems in difficult-to-treat scenarios [4].
    • Other Novel Agents: Drugs like plazomicin (for cIAI and HAP), levofloxacin, and newer classes are also part of the treatment armamentarium, providing alternatives.
  • Hospital Use and Antimicrobial Stewardship: Doripenem's use is primarily confined to hospital inpatient settings for serious infections. Antimicrobial stewardship programs play a crucial role in guiding its appropriate use, often favoring narrower-spectrum agents or newer agents with specific activity against resistant strains when possible [3].
  • Geographic Variations: Market penetration and use patterns vary by region, influenced by local resistance epidemiology, formulary decisions by hospital systems, and pricing. The United States and Europe represent mature markets with significant generic competition. Emerging markets may see slower adoption or different competitive dynamics.
  • Therapeutic Niche: Doripenem's niche is largely defined by its efficacy against P. aeruginosa and its spectrum of activity against other Gram-negative and Gram-positive pathogens. Its clinical utility is often considered when other agents are deemed inappropriate or ineffective, or as part of de-escalation strategies after susceptibility testing is available.

What are the market projections for Doripenem?

The market for doripenem is projected to experience a continued decline in value due to ongoing generic competition and the increasing penetration of novel agents, although volume may remain relatively stable in specific indications.

  • Projected Market Value Decline (2024-2029):
    • Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR): -5% to -8% (Value).
    • This decline is driven by price erosion from generics and a gradual shift towards newer, more targeted therapies for resistant infections.
  • Projected Market Volume (2024-2029):
    • CAGR: -1% to +1% (Volume).
    • While value shrinks, the volume of doripenem units prescribed may stabilize or see very modest declines. This is because it remains a cost-effective option for certain Gram-negative infections where resistance to newer agents is not yet prevalent, and it continues to be used in de-escalation protocols.
  • Key Market Drivers and Restraints:
    • Drivers:
      • Hospital-Acquired Infections (HAIs): Persistent rates of HAIs requiring broad-spectrum coverage will sustain a baseline demand.
      • Cost-Effectiveness (Generic): In price-sensitive healthcare systems, generic doripenem can remain a viable choice for treating susceptible infections.
      • Established Efficacy Profile: Decades of clinical use provide a known efficacy and safety profile for certain indications.
    • Restraints:
      • Carbapenem Resistance: Increasing rates of carbapenem resistance globally necessitate the use of agents with alternative mechanisms of action.
      • Novel Antibiotic Approvals: The pipeline and market introduction of BLBLI combinations and other novel agents will continue to divert market share for difficult-to-treat infections where carbapenems were once the primary option.
      • Antimicrobial Stewardship: Stricter stewardship guidelines aim to conserve carbapenem use, promoting the selection of narrower-spectrum drugs when possible.
      • Availability of Meropenem: Generic meropenem offers similar spectrum of activity and is often preferred due to long-standing clinical familiarity and perceived broader utility against some resistant strains (e.g., some ESBL-producing organisms).
  • Regional Projections:
    • North America & Europe: Expected to see the steepest value decline due to high penetration of generics and rapid adoption of novel agents. Volume decline will be more moderate.
    • Asia-Pacific: May experience a slower decline in value and potentially more stable volumes as healthcare systems evolve and adopt newer therapies at a different pace. Generic availability will be a significant factor.
    • Latin America & Middle East/Africa: Demand may be more sustained due to cost considerations, but the introduction of new agents will eventually impact market dynamics.
  • Competitive Landscape Projections:
    • The market share will increasingly be dictated by the relative cost and efficacy of generic doripenem versus other generics (e.g., meropenem) and the value proposition of newer, more expensive agents for resistant pathogens.
    • The role of doripenem will likely shift further towards empirical therapy for specific susceptible Gram-negative infections in hospitals and as a de-escalation option, rather than a first-line agent for complex or highly resistant infections.
  • Impact of New Clinical Data: While no major new indication trials are anticipated, any real-world data highlighting specific advantages or disadvantages in certain niches could subtly influence prescribing patterns. However, the overall trend is unlikely to be significantly altered by this.

Key Takeaways

  • Doripenem's clinical trial landscape is primarily focused on post-marketing surveillance and real-world data collection, with no major trials for new indications.
  • The market is severely impacted by generic competition, leading to significant price erosion.
  • Doripenem faces intense competition from other carbapenems (especially meropenem) and a growing array of novel antibiotics targeting resistant bacteria.
  • Market projections indicate a continued decline in doripenem's market value, albeit with a more stable volume, as it retains a niche for certain susceptible infections and de-escalation strategies.
  • The increasing prevalence of carbapenem resistance and stricter antimicrobial stewardship further constrain its market expansion.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is the primary competitive advantage of doripenem over other carbapenems in its current market position? Doripenem's primary competitive advantage lies in its established efficacy against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and a spectrum of Gram-negative pathogens, offering a cost-effective generic option for these infections when resistance patterns allow.

  2. Will new clinical trials for doripenem significantly alter its market trajectory? It is unlikely that new clinical trials for novel indications will significantly alter doripenem's market trajectory. The focus of future development for serious infections is shifting towards agents with novel mechanisms of action to overcome resistance.

  3. How does the emergence of beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations impact doripenem's market? Beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations directly compete with doripenem, particularly for the treatment of infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria, such as CRE and resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. This diverts market share from traditional carbapenems.

  4. What is the projected role of doripenem in hospital antimicrobial stewardship programs in the coming years? Doripenem is expected to continue to play a role in hospital antimicrobial stewardship as a de-escalation option once pathogen susceptibility is confirmed, or as an empirical choice for susceptible Gram-negative infections in settings where cost is a primary consideration and resistance to other agents is a concern. Stewardship programs will likely emphasize its targeted use.

  5. Are there any specific geographic regions where doripenem is expected to maintain a stronger market presence? Doripenem may maintain a relatively stronger market presence in regions with greater price sensitivity and slower adoption of newer, more expensive antibiotics, such as parts of Asia-Pacific, Latin America, and the Middle East/Africa, where generic availability makes it a cost-effective choice for indicated infections.

Citations

[1] U.S. Food & Drug Administration. (2007). Doribax (doripenem for injection). Prescribing Information. [2] ClinicalTrials.gov. (n.d.). Doripenem. Retrieved from https://clinicaltrials.gov/ [3] Tamma, P. D., & Miller, M. A. (2021). Antimicrobial Stewardship. In R. L. Sautter & E. M. E. Pilla (Eds.), Infectious Disease Clinics of North America (Vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 1–15). W.B. Saunders. [4] European Medicines Agency. (2020). EMA recommends new medicines to combat antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Retrieved from https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/news/ema-recommends-new-medicines-combat-antibiotic-resistant-bacteria

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.