Last Updated: August 8, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR DIGOXIN


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for digoxin

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00000476 ↗ Digitalis Investigation Group (DIG) Completed National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Phase 3 1990-06-01 To determine if digitalis had a beneficial, harmful, or no effect on total mortality in patients with clinical heart failure and sinus rhythm.
NCT00000547 ↗ Enalapril After Anthracycline Cardiotoxicity Completed National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Phase 3 1994-04-01 To determine if the chronic administration of enalapril, an inhibitor of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE), reduces progression of cardiac dysfunction in pediatric oncology patients who have received anthracyclines, and who are not currently on digoxin, diuretics, or vasodilators for heart failure.
NCT00000556 ↗ Atrial Fibrillation Follow-up Investigation of Rhythm Management (AFFIRM) Completed National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Phase 3 1995-03-01 To compare two standard treatment strategies for atrial fibrillation: ventricular rate control and anticoagulation vs. rhythm control and anticoagulation.
NCT00006330 ↗ Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Interaction Study of Digoxin and Hawthorn Completed National Center for Research Resources (NCRR) N/A 1969-12-31 Hawthorn (Crataegus oxyacantha) is a natural product that is popular in European and American herbal medicine practice. Some of its cardiac uses include the treatment of high and low blood pressure, rapid heart beat, chest pain, and blocked arteries. In many cases, it is used as an adjuvant agent with other cardiac drugs such as digoxin, amiodarone, and warfarin. To date, little information is known about the effect of hawthorn when taken with other drugs and if toxicities occur when hawthorn is used with other drugs. The purpose of this study is to examine the interaction between digoxin and hawthorn in eight healthy subjects. Subjects will be recruited by advertisement. The design of the study will include a 10-day and a three-week treatment phase of digoxin 0.125 mg - 0.25 mg/day and hawthorn (Crataegus special extract WS1442, Schwabe Co.) 450 mg twice daily or placebo, with a randomized crossover. There will be a three-week washout period in between treatment phases. On day 10 (phase I) and day 21 (phase II), subjects will have 12 blood samples drawn for pharmacokinetic analysis. The plasma samples will be measured for digoxin concentration. Additionally, the subjects will be assessed for any clinical toxicities or adverse events. The significance of this study is to provide the clinician with information regarding the safe use of digoxin in combination with the herbal supplement, hawthorn.
NCT00007605 ↗ Comparing the Effects of Amiodarone, Sotalol, and Placebo in Maintaining Sinus Rhythm in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Converted to Sinus Rhythm Completed US Department of Veterans Affairs Phase 3 1998-04-01 Atrial fibrillation is the most frequently occurring cardiac arrhythmia, with 1.0-1.5 million cases annually. It is a risk factor for congestive heart failure, and stroke, 75,000 cases of the latter occurring annually in patients with atrial fibrillation. The safety of the most widely used antiarrhythmic agent for this group of patients, quinidine, has been called into question. This study seeks to determine whether two other agents, amiodarone and sotalol, are safe and effective treatments for patients with atrial fibrillation.
NCT00007605 ↗ Comparing the Effects of Amiodarone, Sotalol, and Placebo in Maintaining Sinus Rhythm in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Converted to Sinus Rhythm Completed VA Office of Research and Development Phase 3 1998-04-01 Atrial fibrillation is the most frequently occurring cardiac arrhythmia, with 1.0-1.5 million cases annually. It is a risk factor for congestive heart failure, and stroke, 75,000 cases of the latter occurring annually in patients with atrial fibrillation. The safety of the most widely used antiarrhythmic agent for this group of patients, quinidine, has been called into question. This study seeks to determine whether two other agents, amiodarone and sotalol, are safe and effective treatments for patients with atrial fibrillation.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for digoxin

Condition Name

Condition Name for digoxin
Intervention Trials
Healthy 43
Healthy Volunteers 17
Atrial Fibrillation 17
Heart Failure 13
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for digoxin
Intervention Trials
Atrial Fibrillation 27
Heart Failure 23
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 8
Overweight 6
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for digoxin

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for digoxin
Location Trials
United States 206
China 29
Germany 23
Canada 19
Japan 12
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for digoxin
Location Trials
Texas 28
Florida 17
California 13
New York 12
Ohio 11
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for digoxin

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for digoxin
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 3
PHASE2 5
PHASE1 31
[disabled in preview] 46
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for digoxin
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 157
Recruiting 33
Not yet recruiting 27
[disabled in preview] 41
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for digoxin

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for digoxin
Sponsor Trials
Boehringer Ingelheim 15
Bristol-Myers Squibb 12
AstraZeneca 9
[disabled in preview] 16
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for digoxin
Sponsor Trials
Other 201
Industry 186
NIH 15
[disabled in preview] 9
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial
Last updated: July 29, 2026

DIGOXIN clinical trials update, market analysis and exclusivity outlook (2026)

Executive summary: Digoxin is an established, off-patent cardiovascular drug used for atrial fibrillation (AF) rate control and heart failure (HF) management. The commercial landscape is dominated by generic oral tablets and oral solutions, with limited differentiation and minimal near-term R&D-driven revenue expansion. Clinical activity is largely pre-approval bioequivalence, formulation, and device-adjunct studies; there is no broad, late-stage “new digoxin” development program that would materially change market projections. Near-term market growth is forecast to be modest, driven by AF/HF prevalence, aging demographics, and hospital prescribing rather than new molecular entity breakthroughs. Patent and exclusivity risk is structurally low because the active ingredient is mature and widely generic.

What clinical trials are currently updating for digoxin?

Featured snippet answer: Current digoxin clinical research is mostly centered on bioequivalence, formulation changes (oral liquid concentration, stability, excipient systems), adherence or dosing support tools, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) workflows, and AF rate control outcomes versus comparator strategies. Late-stage pivotal trials for a new digoxin product are not a consistent, visible driver in public registries compared with newer CV pipelines.

Which trial types show up most often in digoxin updates?

  1. Bioequivalence and pharmacokinetic (PK) studies

    • Typical endpoints: Cmax, Tmax, AUC, and steady-state exposure.
    • Context: generics and authorized generics seeking regulatory acceptance for tablets or solutions.
  2. Therapeutic drug monitoring and safety optimization

    • Digoxin has a narrow therapeutic index and clinically meaningful toxicity risk at elevated exposure, especially with renal impairment and interacting drugs (for example, amiodarone, verapamil, macrolides, and certain diuretics).
    • Common research questions: how to improve timing/frequency of serum digoxin measurements and dose adjustment algorithms.
  3. Population-based “real world” observational studies

    • AF rate control targets, hospitalization outcomes, and dosing practices.
    • These studies often update evidence for guideline-consistent use rather than create new regulatory endpoints.
  4. Device-adjunct and workflow studies

    • Examples: electronic dosing support, lab-ordering triggers, and pharmacist-managed TDM pathways.

What are the practical clinical readouts that matter for market positioning?

For digoxin product differentiation, the market cares about:

  • PK consistency and stability for oral solutions (particularly where excipient stability and dosing accuracy influence exposure).
  • Safety signals tied to dosing in elderly and renally impaired patients.
  • Operational outcomes: time to therapeutic range, fewer toxicity events, and reduced lab rework.

How big is the digoxin market today and what drives demand?

Featured snippet answer: Digoxin demand is anchored in atrial fibrillation rate control and heart failure management. Growth is mostly epidemiology and practice inertia rather than innovation.

Market demand drivers

  • AF prevalence and burden: AF increases with age; digoxin remains a common option for ventricular rate control, particularly when comorbidities limit beta-blocker or calcium-channel blocker use.
  • HF population turnover: Digoxin is still used as an adjunct in selected HFrEF patients to reduce hospitalization risk in guideline-consistent settings.
  • Healthcare access and low drug cost: Generic availability keeps digoxin accessible in chronic management settings.

What could limit demand?

  • Therapeutic substitution toward other agents: Beta-blockers, diltiazem/verapamil (rate control), and modern HF disease management pathways reduce reliance on digoxin in certain patient segments.
  • Safety and monitoring complexity: Narrow therapeutic index pushes prescribers toward monitoring-intensive dosing or avoids use in higher-risk patients.
  • Prescriber preference shifts: Hospitals may standardize on alternative rate control pathways where digoxin monitoring infrastructure is limited.

How strong is the patent and exclusivity position for digoxin?

Featured snippet answer: The digoxin active ingredient is mature and broadly off-patent in most major jurisdictions. Current market constraints are primarily formulation, regulatory, and manufacturing quality controls, not active-ingredient exclusivity.

What patents typically protect digoxin now?

In practice, patent coverage for digoxin marketed products is usually limited to:

  • Formulation-specific patents (for example, specific oral solution concentrations, stability claims, or excipient systems).
  • Process claims (manufacturing steps or impurity controls).
  • Method-of-use variations are less commonly central for enforcement versus the strength of existing standard-of-care evidence.

When does exclusivity likely end for digoxin products?

For the active ingredient, exclusivity is effectively expired, so commercial entry barriers are generally:

  • Regulatory listing status (e.g., who holds the relevant FDA approvals).
  • Branding and product lifecycle management (the supplier count matters more than exclusivity dates).

What is the Orange Book status of digoxin?

Featured snippet answer: Orange Book listings for digoxin products generally show that the active ingredient is widely generic. Most products are listed as approved generics without meaningful remaining exclusivity tied to the active ingredient.

What product categories appear on the Orange Book

  • Oral tablets (multiple strengths).
  • Oral solutions (concentration variations).
  • Generics and authorized generics with bioequivalence-based approvals.

Which companies dominate digoxin supply, and how competitive is pricing?

Featured snippet answer: Competition is intense, with multiple generic manufacturers supplying tablets and solutions. Pricing is constrained by standard generic commoditization dynamics rather than brand differentiation.

How the competitive set typically clusters

  • Large generic firms supply common strengths in tablets and solution formats.
  • Specialty generics may focus on liquid stability, package size, and distribution reliability.

Pricing and margin expectations

  • Low unit economics are typical due to commoditization.
  • Margin variation comes from:
    • supply reliability,
    • relative share in hospital formularies,
    • handling of shortages or quality events,
    • contract purchasing.

What clinical trial risks affect digoxin manufacturing or regulatory posture?

Featured snippet answer: The main risk is not efficacy. It is safety exposure variance tied to formulation, bioavailability, and adherence to narrow therapeutic index practices.

Common development “pressure points” for new digoxin products

  • Bioequivalence robustness across formulations and patient-like conditions.
  • Impurity and stability controls for oral solutions.
  • Consistent dosing device and measurement accuracy (where solutions are dispensed).

What generic entry risks exist for digoxin?

Featured snippet answer: The generic entry risk is low because digoxin is already generic across major strengths and forms. The practical risks center on manufacturing and regulatory compliance, not exclusivity fights.

What would block entry in practice?

  • Facility inspections or quality issues that delay approvals or limit launches.
  • Shortage-driven demand spikes that attract multiple suppliers but also create regulatory scrutiny on manufacturing scale-ups.
  • Product-specific formulation/regulatory nuances that require additional bridge studies.

How does digoxin compare with alternative AF rate control strategies on evidence and market impact?

Featured snippet answer: Digoxin is often used for rate control when clinicians want limited blood pressure effects, but the market impact is tempered by safety monitoring and substitution by beta-blockers and non-dihydropyridine calcium-channel blockers.

AF rate control: what clinicians weigh

  • Hemodynamic profile: beta-blockers and diltiazem can affect blood pressure; digoxin is often considered when hypotension is a concern.
  • Comorbidity patterns: renal impairment influences digoxin dosing.
  • Monitoring capacity: availability of TDM supports safe use.

What could change the next 12 to 36 months for digoxin clinical development?

Featured snippet answer: Near-term changes are more likely in delivery and workflow (monitoring systems, dosing tools, solution stability improvements) than in new randomized late-stage efficacy trials.

Market-moving possibilities (practical, not speculative)

  • Supply chain normalization after episodic shortages (when they occur).
  • Lab and monitoring workflow standardization leading to stable digoxin use rates.
  • New generic entrants for specific solution concentrations or pack sizes.

DIGOXIN market projection: base case, drivers, and downside/upside ranges

Featured snippet answer: Market growth is expected to remain modest and largely tied to AF/HF epidemiology. Upside comes from improved prescribing persistence and supply availability; downside comes from continued substitution and safety-driven prescribing restrictions.

Base case (directional)

  • Growth: low-single-digit CAGR in value terms in many markets, with volume tied to prevalence and substitution dynamics.
  • Determinants: population aging and hospital formularies.

Upside levers

  • Hospital formulary wins where digoxin is standardized as second-line or adjunct rate control.
  • Improved monitoring pathways that reduce clinician reluctance and toxicity avoidance.
  • Product availability continuity reducing missed doses during supply disruptions.

Downside levers

  • Therapeutic substitution: broader adoption of alternatives in outpatient and inpatient pathways.
  • Monitoring burden: reduced TDM capacity leads to lower utilization in high-risk cohorts.
  • Safety incidents: localized adverse event trends can trigger guideline or institutional restrictions.

What data sources are used to update digoxin clinical and market views?

Featured snippet answer: Clinical visibility is driven by trial registries and protocol postings, while market views rely on prescription utilization, wholesaler movement, and formulary coverage.

Core sources

  • ClinicalTrials.gov for study status and designs.
  • FDA product labeling and approval history.
  • Orange Book for listings and exclusivity notes.
  • Epidemiology and guideline updates for demand drivers in AF and HF.

Key takeaways

  • Digoxin is a mature, widely generic cardiovascular drug with clinical activity dominated by bioequivalence, formulation, and safety workflow optimization rather than new efficacy breakthroughs.
  • Demand is driven by AF prevalence and chronic HF management, with modest market growth and pricing constrained by generic competition.
  • Exclusivity risk is structurally low because active-ingredient patent protection is largely expired; differentiability is mainly formulation and manufacturing quality.
  • The near-term business impact is more about supply reliability, product lifecycle management, and monitoring-oriented real-world practice than late-stage clinical innovation.

FAQs

1) Are there new digoxin clinical trials focused on therapeutic drug monitoring?
TDM-oriented studies and workflow trials appear periodically, usually assessing timing, dose adjustment protocols, and safety outcomes in real-world or pragmatic settings.

2) Do digoxin formulation changes affect bioequivalence requirements for generics?
Yes. Oral solution excipient systems, concentration, stability, and dosing device accuracy are typical focus areas for bridging and bioequivalence submissions.

3) What patient groups are most likely to reduce or discontinue digoxin use?
Patients with significant renal impairment, electrolyte abnormalities, and multiple interacting drugs are most likely to be dose-restricted or monitored more intensively, which can reduce persistence if monitoring is not feasible.

4) How does digoxin use differ between atrial fibrillation and heart failure populations?
In AF, it is primarily used for ventricular rate control; in HF, it is used as an adjunct therapy in selected patients, with a different emphasis on hospitalization and symptom management.

5) What is the main regulatory barrier for new digoxin products in the US?
For new entrants, the barrier is typically regulatory compliance for approval (bioequivalence, CMC readiness, and labeling) rather than exclusivity litigation.

References

  1. US Food and Drug Administration. Orange Book: Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations. FDA.
  2. ClinicalTrials.gov. Studies for “digoxin” (search results and trial records). National Library of Medicine.
  3. FDA. Drug labeling and approval histories for digoxin-containing products (access via Drugs@FDA).

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.