Last Updated: August 12, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR COBICISTAT; ELVITEGRAVIR; EMTRICITABINE; TENOFOVIR ALAFENAMIDE FUMARATE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for cobicistat; elvitegravir; emtricitabine; tenofovir alafenamide fumarate

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT01497899 ↗ Safety and Efficacy of E/C/F/TAF (Genvoya®) Versus E/C/F/TDF (Stribild®) in HIV-1 Infected, Antiretroviral Treatment-Naive Adults Completed Gilead Sciences Phase 2 2011-12-28 The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (Genvoya®; E/C/F/TAF) fixed-dose combination (FDC) versus elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (Stribild®; E/C/F/TDF) FDC in HIV-1 infected, antiretroviral treatment-naive adults.
NCT01780506 ↗ Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of E/C/F/TAF (Genvoya®) Versus E/C/F/TDF (Stribild®) in HIV-1 Positive, Antiretroviral Treatment-Naive Adults Completed Gilead Sciences Phase 3 2012-12-26 The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (E/C/F/TAF) fixed-dose combination (FDC) versus elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (E/C/F/TDF) FDC in HIV-1 positive, antiretroviral treatment-naive adults.
NCT01797445 ↗ Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of E/C/F/TAF Versus E/C/F/TDF in HIV-1 Positive, Antiretroviral Treatment-Naive Adults Completed Gilead Sciences Phase 3 2013-03-12 The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (E/C/F/TAF) fixed-dose combination (FDC) versus elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (E/C/F/TDF) in HIV-1 positive, antiretroviral treatment-naive adults.
NCT02251236 ↗ Elvitegravir (EVG) Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Pharmacokinetics in HIV-Infected Individuals Completed Gilead Sciences N/A 2016-01-01 The project will have two tracks, one for participants who are currently taking elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate or E/C/F/tenofovir alafenamide (E/C/F/TDF or E/C/F/TAF) single-tablet regimen* (STR) (Track A) and one for participants who will begin therapy with E/C/F/TDF or E/C/F/TAF STR during the study (Track B). Participants will take E/C/F/TDF and/or E/C/F/tenofovir alafenamide fumarate (E/C/F/TAF) STR** (if available) for 24 weeks. *Co-formulation of 150 mg of elvitegravir, 150 mg of cobicistat, 200 mg of emtricitabine, and 300 mg of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate. **Co-formulation of 150 mg of elvitegravir, 150 mg of cobicistat, 200 mg of emtricitabine, and 10 mg of tenofovir alafenamide fumarate.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for cobicistat; elvitegravir; emtricitabine; tenofovir alafenamide fumarate

Condition Name

Condition Name for cobicistat; elvitegravir; emtricitabine; tenofovir alafenamide fumarate
Intervention Trials
HIV-1 Infection 4
HIV 3
HIV Infections 3
HIV/AIDS 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for cobicistat; elvitegravir; emtricitabine; tenofovir alafenamide fumarate
Intervention Trials
HIV Infections 5
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome 3
Hepatitis B 1
Hepatitis 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for cobicistat; elvitegravir; emtricitabine; tenofovir alafenamide fumarate

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for cobicistat; elvitegravir; emtricitabine; tenofovir alafenamide fumarate
Location Trials
United States 89
Switzerland 7
Canada 7
Italy 5
Puerto Rico 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for cobicistat; elvitegravir; emtricitabine; tenofovir alafenamide fumarate
Location Trials
California 7
Missouri 5
Georgia 5
Florida 5
Washington 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for cobicistat; elvitegravir; emtricitabine; tenofovir alafenamide fumarate

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for cobicistat; elvitegravir; emtricitabine; tenofovir alafenamide fumarate
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 3 6
Phase 2 2
Phase 1/Phase 2 1
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for cobicistat; elvitegravir; emtricitabine; tenofovir alafenamide fumarate
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 9
Recruiting 1
Withdrawn 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for cobicistat; elvitegravir; emtricitabine; tenofovir alafenamide fumarate

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for cobicistat; elvitegravir; emtricitabine; tenofovir alafenamide fumarate
Sponsor Trials
Gilead Sciences 10
University at Buffalo 1
University of California, San Diego 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for cobicistat; elvitegravir; emtricitabine; tenofovir alafenamide fumarate
Sponsor Trials
Industry 11
Other 7
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Executive summary
Cobicistat + elvitegravir + emtricitabine + tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) fumarate combinations remain a high-volume HIV regimen in the US, but the addressable market is structurally pressured by long-acting and faster-shifting guideline preferences. Current commercialization is anchored in fixed-dose oral therapy, while new-cycle clinical development is concentrated on label expansion (renal/bone safety, co-morbidity subgroups), resistance/virologic suppression durability, and regimen simplification rather than de novo efficacy claims. Patent and exclusivity dynamics depend on the specific US product and its Orange Book and patent family structure; without that product-specific mapping, exact launch/expiration projections cannot be stated.

H1: Clinical trials update and market projection for cobicistat + elvitegravir + emtricitabine + tenofovir alafenamide fumarate

Last updated: July 26, 2026

What clinical trials are currently updating cobicistat + elvitegravir + emtricitabine + TAF (fumarate) evidence?

No complete, product-specific clinical-trials update can be produced from the information provided. A reliable update requires: (1) the exact US NDA/BLA identifier for the fixed-dose combination, (2) trial registry IDs or sponsor press releases tied to that exact combination, and (3) dates and endpoints (switch studies vs. initiation vs. preservation of suppression) for the same regimen.

What trial types typically refresh the cobicistat/elvitegravir/FTC/TAF evidence base?

Common update categories in HIV fixed-dose combinations include:

  • Resistance subgroup analyses (baseline resistance-associated substitutions; treatment-experienced cohorts)
  • Renal impairment and bone mineral density safety follow-through (eGFR categories, DEXA endpoints)
  • Drug-drug interaction expansions (especially cytochrome and transporters interacting with cobicistat-boosted regimens)
  • Simplification and switching studies (from prior INSTI-based therapy; from TDF-based regimens)

How large is the current market for cobicistat + elvitegravir + emtricitabine + TAF fumarate in the US and EU?

A quantified market analysis cannot be produced from the information provided. Market sizing requires anchoring to the specific branded fixed-dose product(s), formulation strengths, territory-specific pricing and dispensed volume (IQVIA or equivalent), and payer mix.

Market drivers that affect this regimen category

These factors generally shape demand and forecast direction for this INSTI-based boosted combination class:

  • Guideline preference shifts toward higher-barrier INSTIs and, increasingly, long-acting injectables
  • Safety advantage perceptions of TAF over TDF (renal and bone outcomes)
  • Coverage and formulary tiering by PBMs and national health services
  • Competitive adoption of next-generation INSTIs and long-acting maintenance

Supply and switching dynamics that typically drive volume

  • Patients on stable suppression often remain on a regimen if it maintains suppression and safety tolerability.
  • Switch volume increases when new payer policies or new long-acting options create a cost or adherence advantage.
  • Renal function and bone health profiles influence regimen choice between TDF and TAF backbones.

When does cobicistat + elvitegravir + emtricitabine + TAF lose exclusivity and what are the generic entry risks?

A definitive exclusivity and generic entry risk projection cannot be produced without the specific US Orange Book listing and the controlling patent expiry structure for the exact branded fixed-dose product.

What exclusivity mechanisms usually matter for HIV fixed-dose combinations?

For US products, timing outcomes usually depend on:

  • Patent expiry of active-ingredient composition, formulation, and method-of-use patents
  • Orange Book-listed expiration of listed patents (including any pediatric exclusivity if applicable)
  • Regulatory exclusivity tied to initial NDA approval or changes in regimen labeling

What patents protect cobicistat + elvitegravir + emtricitabine + TAF fumarate and how strong is the patent estate?

A patent-estate strength assessment cannot be produced from the information provided. A credible estimate requires:

  • Orange Book patent list extraction for the specific NDA
  • Patent family mapping (US and key international jurisdictions)
  • Litigation status and known injunction/settlement terms (if any)

Patent clusters typically present in boosted INSTI + NRTI/TAF fixed-dose products

  • Composition claims (combinations of cobicistat, elvitegravir, emtricitabine, TAF)
  • Formulation claims (tablet/capsule composition, excipients, solid-state properties)
  • Method-of-use claims (treatment of HIV-1 infection; dosing regimens)
  • Process/manufacturing method claims (TAF salt/form crystallization steps; impurity specifications)

What is the Orange Book status of cobicistat + elvitegravir + emtricitabine + TAF fumarate?

A complete Orange Book status cannot be produced from the information provided. Orange Book status requires:

  • Product identifier(s) and label application(s)
  • Listed patents with expiration dates and statutory basis
  • Any exclusivity blocks (data and regulatory exclusivity)

Has any generic or biosimilar competition emerged for cobicistat + elvitegravir + emtricitabine + TAF?

This cannot be stated accurately without Orange Book AND ANDA history for the exact fixed-dose product in each territory.

What generic entry would look like for this category

If generic entry occurs, it typically follows:

  • ANDA submission after patent/period triggers
  • Paragraph IV certifications tied to specific Orange Book patents
  • Potential settlement agreements leading to delayed launch schedules

What patent litigation affects cobicistat + elvitegravir + emtricitabine + TAF fumarate?

A litigation-impact summary cannot be generated without:

  • The patent numbers asserted (and jurisdictions)
  • Court docket outcomes and settlement dates
  • Any forfeiture or trigger events in settlement agreements

Typical litigation outcomes that change market forecasts

  • Entry-date carveouts in settlements
  • Design-around impacts (formulation/process changes that may not avoid method-of-use claims)
  • Consent decrees that cap product launch timing in exchange for payments

How do cobicistat + elvitegravir + emtricitabine + TAF compare with alternative HIV regimens on efficacy, safety, and adherence?

A structured comparison cannot be completed without tying to specific labeled claims and the exact marketed product regimen.

Comparative axes that usually decide switching

  • Virologic suppression rate maintenance (HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL)
  • Renal safety (eGFR changes) and bone outcomes (DEXA)
  • Drug-drug interaction burden due to cobicistat boosting
  • Pill burden and dosing flexibility
  • Resistance development profiles after discontinuation

How does a market forecast for this regimen change if long-acting injectables gain share?

A forecast cannot be quantified without a base-year sales anchor and competitor share assumptions.

Mechanisms of share shift that matter for oral INSTI combinations

  • Adherence advantage for patients eligible for long-acting therapy
  • Payer preference for injectable maintenance if cost-effective
  • Provider guidance and patient readiness affecting adoption curve

What formulations are protected for cobicistat + elvitegravir + emtricitabine + TAF fumarate (tablet/excipients) and what does that mean for manufacturing barriers?

A formulation/IP barrier assessment cannot be completed without the formulation patent list and manufacturing-related claims in the controlling families.

Manufacturing/IP issues that can block generic readiness

  • Salt/form properties for TAF fumarate consistency and impurity thresholds
  • Solid-state form control and stability profiles
  • Bioequivalence strategy under cobicistat boosting and pharmacokinetic constraints

Which companies are challenging this regimen with Paragraph IV ANDAs?

This cannot be stated without ANDA filing history tied to the exact US product and Orange Book patent entries.

Regulatory status: what FDA updates apply to cobicistat + elvitegravir + emtricitabine + TAF fumarate?

A regulatory-status update cannot be produced without the specific NDA label history: supplements, safety communications, and indication expansions for the exact fixed-dose product.

What FDA label changes typically move commercial forecasts for this class

  • Expanded indication language for treatment-experienced or comorbidity subgroups
  • Changes tied to renal monitoring or bone safety
  • Drug interaction labeling updates affecting co-prescribed medications

Commercial projection scenarios for cobicistat + elvitegravir + emtricitabine + TAF fumarate: base, bear, bull

A quantified projection cannot be produced without:

  • Current sales baseline for the exact branded fixed-dose product
  • Controlling exclusivity timeline
  • Competitor uptake assumptions (including long-acting transitions)
  • Territory differentiation for pricing and coverage

Key Takeaways

  • A clinical-trials update, exclusivity timeline, patent-litigation mapping, Orange Book status, and quantified market projections for cobicistat + elvitegravir + emtricitabine + tenofovir alafenamide fumarate require product- and jurisdiction-specific records that are not provided here.
  • Decision-grade forecast modeling is not supportable without the exact branded fixed-dose product identifiers and the Orange Book patent/expiration structure that governs generic entry timing.

FAQs

  1. What endpoints do HIV fixed-dose combination trials use to update labeling for INSTI-based regimens?
  2. How do boosted regimens with cobicistat change drug-drug interaction labeling requirements?
  3. What does TAF fumarate improve versus TDF in renal and bone sub-studies for HIV therapy?
  4. How do Orange Book patent lists and Paragraph IV certifications typically determine US generic launch timing?
  5. What factors drive switching from oral INSTI regimens to long-acting injectables in the HIV market?

References (APA)

No sources cited because no product-specific clinical, regulatory, Orange Book, or litigation data was provided in the prompt.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.