Last Updated: August 10, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR CLOMIPRAMINE HYDROCHLORIDE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for clomipramine hydrochloride

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00004310 ↗ Phase II Randomized Study of Intravenous Versus Oral Clomipramine in Patients With Obsessive Compulsive Disorder Unknown status Stanford University Phase 2 1999-10-01 OBJECTIVES: I. Evaluate the efficacy of intravenous versus oral pulse loading of clomipramine (CMI) followed by a 12-week course of maintenance therapy in patients with obsessive compulsive disorder.
NCT00004310 ↗ Phase II Randomized Study of Intravenous Versus Oral Clomipramine in Patients With Obsessive Compulsive Disorder Unknown status National Center for Research Resources (NCRR) Phase 2 1999-10-01 OBJECTIVES: I. Evaluate the efficacy of intravenous versus oral pulse loading of clomipramine (CMI) followed by a 12-week course of maintenance therapy in patients with obsessive compulsive disorder.
NCT00254735 ↗ Quetiapine Augmentation in Severe Obsessive Compulsive Disorder Completed AstraZeneca Phase 3 2002-04-01 The purpose of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of quetiapine or placebo added to baseline treatment of SSRI/clomipramine for the treatment of OCD in adult subjects.
NCT00466609 ↗ Using Drug Augmentation to Treat Obsessive Compulsive Disorder Patients Who Did Not Respond to Previous Treatment Completed Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico Phase 4 2007-05-01 This will be a controlled, randomized, double-blind and double-dummy study on the treatment augmentation strategy for obsessive compulsive disorder patients non-respondent to first line pharmacological treatment. The investigators will compare: fluoxetine maintenance at maximum dosage for additional 12 weeks; the association of fluoxetine with quetiapine; and the association of fluoxetine with clomipramine.
NCT00466609 ↗ Using Drug Augmentation to Treat Obsessive Compulsive Disorder Patients Who Did Not Respond to Previous Treatment Completed Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo Phase 4 2007-05-01 This will be a controlled, randomized, double-blind and double-dummy study on the treatment augmentation strategy for obsessive compulsive disorder patients non-respondent to first line pharmacological treatment. The investigators will compare: fluoxetine maintenance at maximum dosage for additional 12 weeks; the association of fluoxetine with quetiapine; and the association of fluoxetine with clomipramine.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for clomipramine hydrochloride

Condition Name

Condition Name for clomipramine hydrochloride
Intervention Trials
Premature Ejaculation 5
Depression 4
Obsessive Compulsive Disorder 4
Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder 3
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for clomipramine hydrochloride
Intervention Trials
Disease 8
Compulsive Personality Disorder 7
Depression 7
Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder 7
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for clomipramine hydrochloride

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for clomipramine hydrochloride
Location Trials
Korea, Republic of 5
Brazil 5
Germany 3
United States 3
Canada 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for clomipramine hydrochloride
Location Trials
Maryland 1
Ohio 1
California 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for clomipramine hydrochloride

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for clomipramine hydrochloride
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 6
Phase 3 5
Phase 2 4
[disabled in preview] 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for clomipramine hydrochloride
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 13
Unknown status 5
Recruiting 2
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for clomipramine hydrochloride

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for clomipramine hydrochloride
Sponsor Trials
Symyoo 4
Sandoz 2
CTC Bio, Inc. 2
[disabled in preview] 4
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for clomipramine hydrochloride
Sponsor Trials
Other 27
Industry 12
NIH 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial
Last updated: July 27, 2026

Clomipramine Hydrochloride Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Long‑Term Sales Projection

Clomipramine hydrochloride is an established, off-patent tricyclic antidepressant (TCA) used primarily for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and, in practice, some off-label neuropsychiatric indications. No current late-stage clinical development program is visible at scale comparable to modern specialty pipelines. Market dynamics are driven by generic penetration, formulary positioning, and antidepressant class competition rather than patent exclusivity.


What is the latest clinical trials update for clomipramine hydrochloride (OCD and off-label)?

Is clomipramine hydrochloride still being studied in new interventional trials?

Clinical-trials activity for clomipramine tends to be limited, with most activity shifting to:

  • Comparator or observational studies of older antidepressants in real-world settings
  • Pediatric or subtype analyses for OCD
  • Pharmacokinetic (PK) or bioequivalence work tied to generic product submissions
  • Trials focused on tolerability, dosing schedules, and switching strategies versus SSRIs/SNRIs rather than new chemical entities

For market forecasting, the key point is that clomipramine does not currently show the profile of an active, sponsor-led, multi-phase registration program that would materially change the growth curve of the core product over the next several years.

What trial endpoints matter commercially for clomipramine?

Across existing and smaller ongoing studies, commercially relevant endpoints typically include:

  • OCD symptom score change (Y-BOCS and related scales)
  • Treatment response and remission rates
  • Discontinuation rates due to adverse events
  • Cardiac safety signals relevant to TCAs (QTc, conduction)
  • Anticholinergic burden and weight gain metrics
  • Adherence and switching patterns between TCAs and SSRIs

How much of “clinical development” is actually regulatory/bioequivalence?

For older products, a large share of “trial-like” activity is tied to:

  • Bioequivalence studies for new generic strengths or dosage forms
  • Manufacturing process changes requiring bridging
  • Small PK studies in special populations (age, hepatic/renal impairment)

That activity can increase supply and reduce unit pricing, which pressures revenue more than it supports expansion.


What approvals and regulatory status does clomipramine hydrochloride have in the US (FDA) and EU?

US status: NDA legacy with generic-led distribution

Clomipramine hydrochloride is an older FDA-approved drug. Current market access is primarily through:

  • Generic clomipramine hydrochloride tablets/capsules in typical oral strengths
  • Potentially multiple abbreviated product listings covering different strengths and manufacturers

Because it is not a modern orphan or biologics program, regulatory milestones do not typically create fresh commercial inflection points beyond generic entry and labeling updates.

EU status: national market availability with multiple generics

In Europe, clomipramine is marketed as a generic in most major markets, with commercial variation driven by national reimbursement, pricing policies, and prescriber habits in OCD pathways.


What is the Orange Book status of clomipramine hydrochloride (exclusivity and patent coverage)?

Clomipramine hydrochloride is an off-patent product for which:

  • Brand exclusivity has expired
  • Remaining “patent estate” coverage is generally not a meaningful barrier for generic competition

As a result, Orange Book-driven litigation risk is typically low relative to newer branded drugs. The material economic factor is not patent timing but generic pricing and supply stability.


When does clomipramine hydrochloride lose exclusivity and what does that mean for generic entry?

Exclusivity timeline impact

For an off-patent TCA:

  • There is no near-term exclusivity countdown that would prevent generic access
  • Market share is determined by the depth of generic competition and contracting behavior (PBMs, wholesalers)

Practical outcome

Any incremental “risk” to generics is usually tied to:

  • Short-term supply constraints
  • Quality or manufacturing issues
  • Labeling and bioequivalence package acceptance rather than patent barriers

How many patents cover clomipramine hydrochloride and its formulations (and do they matter commercially)?

For clomipramine itself, the historically relevant IP landscape is largely diluted by time:

  • Core active ingredient protection is long expired
  • Formulation or process patents, if any, are typically inactive or narrow and do not materially constrain market access

Commercially, this means clomipramine’s revenue pool is exposed to:

  • Continued unit price erosion
  • Distributor and payer preference shifts toward lowest-cost generics
  • Substitution among antidepressants for OCD (often SSRI-based strategies)

Which companies manufacture and distribute clomipramine hydrochloride generics?

Because clomipramine is an established generic, the competitive set typically includes:

  • Large generic manufacturers with portfolio breadth across oral CNS products
  • Regional distributors holding multiple ANDA approvals
  • Multiple interchangeable NDCs for the same strength

Market share depends on contracting and procurement, not brand differentiation.


How does clomipramine hydrochloride compare with SSRIs and other OCD treatments (commercial substitutability)?

Core commercial substitution: SSRI and SSRI-alternative pathway

OCD care commonly starts with SSRIs and then escalates. Clomipramine competes on:

  • Effectiveness for certain OCD symptom profiles
  • Risks and tolerability trade-offs inherent to TCAs

In practice, commercial demand is capped by:

  • Prescriber reluctance due to TCA side effects and monitoring requirements
  • Step-therapy or guideline-aligned sequencing favoring SSRIs

Key commercial implication

Even without patent risk, clomipramine faces structural market pressure from:

  • Broad SSRI availability (low cost, fewer acute tolerability barriers)
  • Modern augmentation strategies (specialist care and off-label add-ons)

What market analysis exists for clomipramine hydrochloride (US and major EU markets)?

Market drivers

Clomipramine sales are primarily influenced by:

  • Generic volume and contracting intensity
  • OCD prevalence and diagnosis rates (long-run demand driver, slow-moving)
  • Switching dynamics driven by tolerability, patient history, and clinician familiarity
  • Safety monitoring perception (cardiac and anticholinergic profile)
  • Pediatric OCD and dosing comfort by prescribers

Market risks

  • Ongoing antidepressant class substitution toward SSRIs and combination approaches
  • Ongoing price pressure typical of older off-patent molecules
  • Supply chain concentration risk if fewer manufacturers dominate certain strengths

What is the near-term sales outlook for clomipramine hydrochloride (2026–2031)?

Projection framework (unit economics, not exclusivity)

For an off-patent oral drug, projection typically decomposes into:

  • Total addressable demand (OCD and related off-label use)
  • Market penetration versus substitutable antidepressant options
  • Generic pricing trajectory (annual declines in average selling price)
  • Volume changes from formulary access

Base-case long-term view

  • Volume: modest growth or flat trend, driven by OCD diagnosis and chronic-use persistence, offset by substitution to SSRIs
  • Price: continued downtrend due to generic competition and payer preference for lowest-cost products
  • Revenue: generally stable to modestly declining in nominal terms; stable in units in many scenarios

Because clomipramine lacks late-stage registration catalysts, the most likely pattern is revenue compression rather than growth.


What competitive landscape risks exist for clomipramine hydrochloride (generic launches, pricing, and supply)?

Generic entry risk

Entry risk is usually low because generics are already widely available. The practical competitive events are:

  • New generic approvals that increase the NDC count
  • Manufacturing shifts that expand supply for specific strengths
  • Occasional supply disruptions that temporarily lift prices

Formulary and payer pressure

Ongoing pressure from:

  • PBM preferred formulary lists
  • Antidepressant step edits
  • Substitution protocols

These factors reduce upside even when absolute prevalence increases.


What generic entry risks exist for clomipramine hydrochloride (Paragraph IV, settlement, litigation)?

Paragraph IV litigation is generally not a primary driver for older widely genericized products because:

  • Most ANDAs have already entered
  • Remaining entry is typically not prevented by meaningful active patents

Settlement agreements may exist historically, but they are not typically a near-term driver for market timing on this molecule.


What manufacturing and IP barriers affect new supply of clomipramine hydrochloride?

For older, small-molecule oral drugs, barriers tend to be operational:

  • Scaling consistent manufacturing and impurity control
  • Bioequivalence data packages across strengths and dosage forms
  • Stability and formulation consistency across vendors

These impact timing and cost of supply but not long-run exclusivity.


Clinical and safety considerations that affect market demand

TCA safety profile impacts prescribing

Commercial demand is sensitive to:

  • Clinician comfort with cardiac risk and baseline ECG practices
  • Anticholinergic side effects influencing tolerability
  • Weight gain and sedation affecting adherence
  • Drug interaction burden (CYP and additive anticholinergic or serotonergic risk)

These variables shape real-world persistence and contribute to substitution away from TCAs when tolerability is less favorable.


Key Takeaways

  • Clomipramine hydrochloride is an established off-patent TCA; market outcomes are driven by generic pricing and formulary preference, not exclusivity timelines.
  • Clinical trials activity is generally limited and often shifts toward smaller studies, PK/BE work, and comparative effectiveness in OCD care pathways.
  • Competitive pressure from SSRIs and modern OCD treatment sequencing constrains growth; the most likely market pattern is stable-to-declining nominal revenue with flat-to-modest unit movement.
  • IP-driven entry barriers are not a major near-term determinant; operational supply and contracting are the main commercial levers.

FAQs

  1. Is clomipramine hydrochloride used for pediatric OCD, and does that change prescribing patterns?
  2. How do clomipramine hydrochloride tablets compare with other generics in tolerability and adherence in real-world use?
  3. What are the main safety monitoring steps clinicians use when starting clomipramine hydrochloride?
  4. Does switching from SSRI therapy to clomipramine hydrochloride improve OCD response rates in treatment-resistant patients?
  5. How does average selling price for off-patent TCAs like clomipramine typically evolve after additional generic launches?

References (APA)

No sources were cited.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.