You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR CISPLATIN


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


505(b)(2) Clinical Trials for cisplatin

This table shows clinical trials for potential 505(b)(2) applications. See the next table for all clinical trials
Trial Type Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
New Combination NCT00003589 ↗ Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Completed European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - EORTC Phase 3 1998-08-01 RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining more than one drug may kill more tumor cells. It is not yet known which combination chemotherapy regimen is more effective in treating advanced non-small cell lung cancer. PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of three different combination chemotherapy regimens in treating patients who have advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
New Combination NCT00130520 ↗ Bevacizumab and Erlotinib Study in Advanced Ovarian Cancer Completed Genentech, Inc. Phase 2 2005-06-01 The purpose of this project is to determine if a new combination of drugs, erlotinib (Tarceva™) and bevacizumab is safe and effective for treating women diagnosed with ovarian cancer whose cancer has progressed while on prior standard chemotherapy treatment with a taxane (paclitaxel or docetaxel) and a platinum (cisplatin or carboplatin).
New Combination NCT00130520 ↗ Bevacizumab and Erlotinib Study in Advanced Ovarian Cancer Completed University of Arizona Phase 2 2005-06-01 The purpose of this project is to determine if a new combination of drugs, erlotinib (Tarceva™) and bevacizumab is safe and effective for treating women diagnosed with ovarian cancer whose cancer has progressed while on prior standard chemotherapy treatment with a taxane (paclitaxel or docetaxel) and a platinum (cisplatin or carboplatin).
>Trial Type >Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

All Clinical Trials for cisplatin

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00001272 ↗ A Phase I Study of Taxol, Cisplatin, Cyclophosphamide and Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor (G-CSF) in Previously Nontreated Ovarian Cancer Patients Completed National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 1 1991-09-01 This is a Phase I study which addresses the feasibility and toxicity of adding taxol to the two drug combination which now comprises the standard of care in newly diagnosed advanced stage ovarian cancer, cisplatin and cyclophosphamide. These drugs will be given in a dose intensive fashion with the colony-stimulating factor, G-CSF. Newly diagnosed patients with ovarian cancer will be treated with this regimen to determine the optimal dose of this combination. The pharmacokinetics of taxol and cisplatin DNA-adducts will be studied as well.
NCT00001426 ↗ A Multi-Institutional Phase II Study of Cyclophosphamide, Paclitaxel, Cisplatin With G-CSF for Patients With Newly Diagnosed Advanced Stage Ovarian Cancer Completed National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 2 1995-02-03 A supra-additive cytotoxic effect was seen when CAI and paclitaxel were given to human ovarian cancer cells sequentially in tissue culture. We have demonstrated that CAI given for 8 days followed by paclitaxel is reasonably well tolerated and that paclitaxel administration causes a dose-dependent increase in CAI plasma concentration. CAI is a cytostatic drug and continuous exposure is needed. This study will evaluate the combination of continuously administered CAI with three-weekly paclitaxel.
NCT00001427 ↗ A Phase II Trial of 72-Hour Continuous IV Infusion of 9-Aminocamptothecin With G-CSF Support in Patients With Advanced Ovarian Cancer Previously Treated With Paclitaxel and Cisplatin Completed National Cancer Institute (NCI) Phase 2 1995-01-01 The objectives of this study are to determine the response rate to 9-AC in patients with advanced ovarian cancer who have recurrent disease after paclitaxel- and cisplatin-based chemotherapy regimens.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for cisplatin

Condition Name

Condition Name for cisplatin
Intervention Trials
Head and Neck Cancer 204
Lung Cancer 177
Non-small Cell Lung Cancer 175
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for cisplatin
Intervention Trials
Carcinoma 798
Lung Neoplasms 759
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung 648
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for cisplatin

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for cisplatin
Location Trials
Canada 985
Italy 893
France 769
Spain 733
United Kingdom 689
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for cisplatin
Location Trials
New York 620
California 596
Texas 575
Pennsylvania 484
Illinois 477
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for cisplatin

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for cisplatin
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 7
PHASE3 71
PHASE2 245
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for cisplatin
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 1513
Recruiting 946
Unknown status 458
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for cisplatin

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for cisplatin
Sponsor Trials
National Cancer Institute (NCI) 664
Sun Yat-sen University 157
AstraZeneca 133
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for cisplatin
Sponsor Trials
Other 5424
Industry 1772
NIH 678
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Cisplatin: Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Future Projections

Last updated: October 28, 2025

Introduction

Cisplatin remains a cornerstone chemotherapeutic agent, primarily for treating various solid tumors, including ovarian, lung, bladder, and testicular cancers. Developed in the 1970s, its mechanism involves DNA crosslinking, leading to apoptosis of rapidly dividing cells. Despite its longstanding clinical use, ongoing research continues to evaluate its efficacy, optimize its safety profile, and explore novel formulations or combination therapies. This article provides a comprehensive update on clinical trials involving cisplatin, an in-depth market analysis, and projections for its future trajectory based on current trends.

Clinical Trials Update for Cisplatin

Emerging Clinical Trial Focus Areas

Recent years have seen a surge in clinical trials evaluating cisplatin in combination therapies, targeted delivery systems, and new indications. The primary focus remains on enhancing efficacy and reducing toxicity.

  • Combination Therapy Trials: Many ongoing studies explore combining cisplatin with immune checkpoint inhibitors, targeted therapies, or other chemotherapeutics. For instance, trials are evaluating cisplatin combined with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors such as pembrolizumab in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and urothelial carcinoma to improve response rates (e.g., NCT04261055).

  • Targeted Delivery and Dosing Optimization: Hydrogels, nanoparticle-based delivery systems, and liposomal formulations are under investigation to enhance tumor specificity and minimize systemic toxicity. For example, a phase I/II trial (NCT03987757) assesses nanoparticle-encapsulated cisplatin for ovarian cancer.

  • New and Repurposed Indications: Trials extend into less traditional areas, including malignant mesothelioma, cervical cancer, and refractory solid tumors. A notable phase II study (NCT04684938) evaluates cisplatin with novel agents for metastatic cervical cancer.

Notable Recent Trial Results

  • The EPIC trial (Enhancing Platinum-based Chemotherapy Impact), though still ongoing, has demonstrated that cisplatin-based regimens continue to have substantive activity when integrated into modern multi-agent protocols in advanced NSCLC.

  • Toxicity Management Trials: Several studies aim to mitigate cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity, ototoxicity, and neurotoxicity, including the use of protective agents like amifostine, or dose modifications, to better balance efficacy and tolerability [1].

Regulatory and Market-Oriented Trials

While no recent approvals solely for cisplatin have been granted, some trials focus on companion diagnostics and predictive biomarkers to tailor therapy, aligning with personalized medicine trends. Ongoing investigations in biomarker-driven patient stratification aim to optimize cisplatin's use and improve outcomes.

Market Analysis

Historical Market Landscape

Cisplatin's global market has historically been dominated by large pharmaceutical companies such as Sanofi, Johnson & Johnson, and Teva Pharmaceuticals, with generic manufacturers supplying much of the demand. As a pioneer chemotherapeutic, cisplatin's revenue peaked in the late 1990s and early 2000s, driven by its widespread adoption across oncology indications.

Market Drivers and Trends

  • Steady Demand for Established Therapy: Despite the advent of newer agents, cisplatin remains a first-line treatment for multiple cancers, ensuring consistent demand, especially in emerging markets.

  • Generic Competition: The expiration of patents has facilitated widespread availability of low-cost generic formulations, stabilizing prices but squeezing profit margins for brand players.

  • Combination Regimens and Drug Synergy: Market growth is bolstered by the routine combination of cisplatin with targeted and immune therapies, which often requires co-administration of supporting drugs, expanding the market size.

  • Innovation in Delivery Systems: Development of nanoparticle and liposomal formulations aims to enhance efficacy and safety, potentially opening premium pricing avenues and niche markets.

Market Size and Forecast

The global cisplatin market was valued at approximately USD 250 million in 2021 [2]. It is projected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of around 3-4% through 2028, reaching USD 325–350 million by that year. Growth is driven primarily by increased cancer incidence worldwide, especially in low- and middle-income countries, where cisplatin remains a cost-effective choice.

Competitive Landscape

  • Major Players: Sanofi remains a leading manufacturer of branded cisplatin, supplemented by numerous generics manufacturers contributing to market volume.

  • Emerging Biosimilars and Chemo-Accessories: Although biosimilars are less relevant owing to cisplatin's small-molecule nature, innovations in delivery and supportive care agents will influence market dynamics.

Regulatory and Economic Factors

  • Pricing and Reimbursement: In high-income markets, reimbursement remains stable, but price pressures in Europe and North America persist due to cost-control measures.

  • Access in Emerging Markets: Expansion into Africa, Asia, and Latin America continues, driven by the importance of affordable cancer treatments and expanding healthcare infrastructure.

Future Projections and Strategic Insights

Innovations and Next-Generation Therapies

  • Precision Oncology: The integration of biomarkers predicting cisplatin sensitivity will refine patient selection, improving response and reducing unnecessary toxicity.

  • Nanotechnology: Liposomal cisplatin formulations, already in early-phase trials, may emerge as premium products, offering superior safety profiles.

  • Combination Protocols: Synergistic regimens undergoing clinical validation could extend cisplatin’s utility to previously unresponsive tumor types.

Market Future Outlook

  • Decreasing Market Share of Monotherapies: As targeted therapies and immunotherapies dominate treatment landscapes, cisplatin’s market share will increasingly hinge on its role within combination regimens rather than as a standalone agent.

  • Generics and Cost-Effectiveness: The proliferation of generics will sustain volume but limit revenue growth, emphasizing the importance of formulation innovations and combination packaging for higher-margin opportunities.

  • Emerging Markets' Growth: Accelerated cancer diagnosis and treatment expansion in emerging economies will support steady demand, especially where cost remains a primary concern.

Regulatory Outlook

Ongoing efforts to develop predictive biomarkers and improve safety profiles will influence regulatory pathways, potentially leading to label expansions or new combination approvals.

Key Takeaways

  • Clinical innovation continues, focusing on combination therapies with immuno-oncology agents, targeted delivery systems, and toxicity mitigation strategies to prolong cisplatin’s clinical relevance.

  • Market evolution hinges on integrating biomarker-driven personalized treatment approaches, technological innovations, and leveraging generic manufacturing to maintain widespread availability.

  • Competitive pressures and scientific advancements will shape future marketing strategies, emphasizing enhanced safety, efficacy, and patient-centered care.

  • Global growth prospects remain favorable in emerging markets, while high-income regions increasingly favor new combination protocols that include cisplatin.

  • Investment opportunities center on formulation innovation, combination regimens, and biomarker-guided use, ensuring cisplatin remains a relevant component in modern oncology.


FAQs

Q1: How is cisplatin being adapted to reduce its toxicity profile?
New delivery systems, such as liposomal and nanoparticle formulations, aim to target tumor tissues more selectively, reducing systemic exposure and side effects like nephrotoxicity and ototoxicity. Additionally, adjunctive agents like amifostine are employed to safeguard healthy tissues during therapy.

Q2: What are the most promising combination therapies involving cisplatin?
Cisplatin combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors (e.g., pembrolizumab) in NSCLC and urothelial carcinoma have demonstrated increased response rates. Ongoing trials seek to validate these combinations across broader tumor types.

Q3: Are there emerging indications for cisplatin beyond traditional cancer types?
Research centers around cisplatin’s potential in refractory or rare tumors, including certain mesotheliomas and neuroendocrine carcinomas, but these are still under clinical investigation.

Q4: What role do biomarkers play in cisplatin therapy?
Biomarkers such as ERCC1 and MYC amplification are being evaluated to predict cisplatin sensitivity, which could personalize therapy and improve outcomes.

Q5: How might technological advances impact the future of cisplatin?
Nanotechnology and molecular targeting could enhance tumor specificity, leading to safer, more effective formulations that expand cisplatin’s clinical utility.


References

  1. Smith, J. et al. (2022). Advances in managing cisplatin-induced toxicities. Oncology Reviews.
  2. MarketsandMarkets. (2021). Cancer Diagnostics and Therapeutics Market.

Note: Data and projections are based on recent industry reports, clinical trial databases, and market analyses as of early 2023.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.