Last Updated: August 9, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR CIPROFLOXACIN; DEXAMETHASONE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for ciprofloxacin; dexamethasone

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00945802 ↗ FST-201 In The Treatment of Acute Otitis Externa Terminated Shire Phase 3 2009-07-31 The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of FST-201 compared to Ciprodex in the treatment of acute otitis externa. This trial is designed to enable filing of a New Drug Application in support of FST-201 for the indication of acute otitis externa.
NCT00956748 ↗ N-Acetylcysteine as an Adjunct for Refractory Chronic Suppurative Otitis Media Withdrawn St. Paul's Hospital, Canada Phase 4 2019-11-29 Chronic suppurative otitis media (CSOM) can be particularly difficult to treat as a number of patients do not respond to routine antibiotic or surgical treatments. The current treatment involves administering combination antibiotic anti-inflammatory ear drops such as Ciprodex (ciprofloxacin 0.3% / dexamethasone 0.1%). Although most patients experience a relief of symptoms, a fraction of patients remain refractory to treatment. Recent findings suggest that the addition of N-acetylcysteine (0.5-2%) to Ciprodex is a superior treatment for otitis media with effusion compared to the use of Ciprodex alone.
NCT00961675 ↗ FST-201 in the Treatment of Acute Otitis Externa Completed Shire Phase 3 2009-08-31 The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of FST-201 compared to Ciprodex in the treatment of acute otitis externa. This study will be conducted at one site, the Lyndon B. Johnson (LBJ) Tropical Medical Center, Department of Otolaryngology, in Pago Pago, American Samoa.
NCT01277016 ↗ A Trial for Systemic Light-chain (AL) Amyloidosis Completed European Myeloma Network Phase 3 2011-01-01 In this multi-center phase III trial, untreated patients diagnosed with AL who are not candidates for stem cell transplant with melphalan 200 mg/m2 are the target population. Stage I and II patients will be eligible. Stage III patients will be enrolled in an ancillary phase II study. Eligible patients will be stratified as cardiac stage I or stage II and then randomized to receive MDex or BMDex. Primary objective is to compare hematologic(clonal) response i.e. the rate of complete response (CR) + partial response (PR) defined according to the criteria of the International Society for Amyloidosis consensus.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for ciprofloxacin; dexamethasone

Condition Name

Condition Name for ciprofloxacin; dexamethasone
Intervention Trials
Acute Otitis Externa 3
Otitis Externa 2
Lymphoma 1
Post-Traumatic Endophthalmitis 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for ciprofloxacin; dexamethasone
Intervention Trials
Otitis 7
Otitis Externa 5
Lymphoma 2
Endophthalmitis 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for ciprofloxacin; dexamethasone

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for ciprofloxacin; dexamethasone
Location Trials
United States 49
Brazil 2
Puerto Rico 2
American Samoa 1
Malaysia 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for ciprofloxacin; dexamethasone
Location Trials
Florida 4
Virginia 3
Oregon 3
Ohio 3
North Carolina 3
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for ciprofloxacin; dexamethasone

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for ciprofloxacin; dexamethasone
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 2
Phase 3 6
Phase 2 4
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for ciprofloxacin; dexamethasone
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 6
Terminated 3
Withdrawn 2
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for ciprofloxacin; dexamethasone

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for ciprofloxacin; dexamethasone
Sponsor Trials
Novum Pharmaceutical Research Services 2
Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. 2
Shire 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for ciprofloxacin; dexamethasone
Sponsor Trials
Other 12
Industry 11
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Ciprofloxacin Dexamethasone Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Sales Projection (2026–2035)

Last updated: July 27, 2026

What clinical trials exist for ciprofloxacin with dexamethasone in ophthalmology and otology?

Answer: Ciprofloxacin/dexamethasone is in active and planned development primarily around ophthalmic and otic delivery, often using reformulated suspensions, improved suspension viscosity, mucus-penetrating/excipient systems, and preservative-free formats to support compliance and switch from older generic supply.

Where are the trials concentrated by indication?

  • Ophthalmic
    • Post-surgical inflammation and infection prophylaxis (cataract and related anterior segment procedures)
    • Acute bacterial conjunctivitis with steroid-responsive inflammation
    • Keratitis and corneal injury-associated inflammation where steroid is used under strict clinical protocols
    • Blepharitis and eyelid inflammation syndromes when bacterial coverage plus anti-inflammatory steroid is indicated
  • Otic
    • Otitis externa where antibacterial coverage plus anti-inflammatory steroid is used
    • Post-procedural inflammation with bacterial risk

What trial designs are most common?

  • Randomized controlled trials comparing ciprofloxacin/dexamethasone:
    • Against ciprofloxacin alone plus a separate steroid
    • Against generic steroid combinations (where bioequivalence and excipient differences matter)
    • Against older fixed-combination products using different preservative systems
  • Endpoints commonly include:
    • Microbiologic eradication and clinical cure rates (for bacterial endpoints)
    • Time to pain/itch improvement, conjunctival hyperemia reduction, and anterior chamber inflammation scoring (for steroid endpoints)
    • Safety, intraocular pressure changes (ophthalmic), and local tolerance

What “type” of trials are being run?

  • Formulation/compliance trials: preservative-free, once-daily dosing, or improved suspensions to reduce variability.
  • Bioequivalence and bridging: for generics or authorized brand extensions, where the “clinical” signal is replaced by PK/ophthalmic performance metrics.
  • Real-world evidence: post-launch outcomes for switching from separate antibiotic + steroid regimens.

What is the current FDA and regulatory status of ciprofloxacin/dexamethasone products?

Answer: Most US supply is dominated by ANDA generics and authorized equivalents of earlier fixed combinations. Regulatory status for a given product is determined by its Orange Book listing and labeling (ophthalmic vs otic, dosage form, preservative system, and indication language).

Orange Book status: what to check

For each strength/dosage form (ophthalmic suspension, ophthalmic ointment if applicable, otic drops), the relevant Orange Book entries typically capture:

  • Active ingredient(s): ciprofloxacin hydrochloride with dexamethasone
  • Applicant/manufacturer
  • Patent numbers listed for:
    • Drug product (composition)
    • Method-of-use
    • Method of manufacture
    • Packaging and/or formulation-specific patents (less common but appears with some systems)
  • Approval pathway (NDA vs ANDA)
  • Exclusivity type (if any new reference-listed drug or pediatric/other exclusivity is relevant)

What regulatory pathways drive market entries?

  • ANDAs for fixed-combination generics are the dominant mechanism for market supply.
  • 505(b)(2) is used when a company reformulates delivery system, preservative system, dosing frequency, or changes to the reference labeling require bridging.
  • Labeling optimization can be used to expand usage to adjacent indications while staying within steroid/antibiotic combination frameworks.

When do ciprofloxacin/dexamethasone products lose exclusivity and patents in key markets?

Answer: Exclusivity timing is product-specific and typically clustered around the reference product’s composition and method-of-use patent estate plus any pediatric exclusivity. For most fixed combinations in mature ophthalmic/otic antibiotics with steroid, the US is generally in a low-exclusivity regime with ongoing ANDA activity.

What drives the loss of exclusivity?

  • Patent expirations for:
    • Fixed combination composition (ciprofloxacin + dexamethasone in specified ratios/stability conditions)
    • Suspension/vehicle composition
    • Specific method-of-use language (steroid-responsive inflammatory states with bacterial coverage)
  • Exclusivity periods if a reference listed drug still holds:
    • 3-year NCE exclusivity is rarely relevant for ciprofloxacin-based and dexamethasone-based combination products.
    • Pediatric exclusivity can extend certain NDA-based exclusivity.
  • OTC vs prescription constraints: these products are prescription, so regulatory exclusivity dominates rather than switch-over exclusivity.

What patents protect ciprofloxacin with dexamethasone, and how many are typically in force?

Answer: Patent estates for these fixed combinations usually include composition/formulation and method-of-use listings rather than broad claims that stop all generic entry. Patent defensibility is often concentrated in formulation-specific stability and delivery system details.

Typical patent categories appearing in Orange Book listings

  • Composition of the fixed combination
    • Ratio ranges of ciprofloxacin and dexamethasone
    • Stabilizers and buffering systems
    • pH and viscosity targets for suspension stability
  • Formulation and manufacturing
    • Methods for producing stable suspensions
    • Particle size control targets
    • Suspension uniformity specifications
  • Method-of-use
    • Specific clinical scenarios that include both antibacterial coverage and steroid anti-inflammatory control
    • Post-operative inflammation or infection prophylaxis protocols

How patent coverage affects generic risk

  • Generics often clear by:
    • Licensing or design-around on formulation/manufacturing details
    • Carving out specific method-of-use claims through Paragraph IV positions
    • Settling into label carve-outs where courts or settlement agreements require modifications

Which companies sell ciprofloxacin/dexamethasone products in the US, and who is most exposed to pricing pressure?

**Answer: The US market for ciprofloxacin/dexamethasone is highly competitive with multiple ANDA suppliers. Pricing pressure is highest for products with:

  • Short dosing regimens that align with interchangeable formulary use
  • Limited payer differentiation
  • Preservative system or dosing frequency that is not strongly clinically differentiated Exposure also increases where payer policies push toward lowest acquisition cost equivalents.**

Commercial winners tend to have:

  • Supply chain reliability
  • Consistent suspension performance and patient tolerability
  • Contracting leverage with group purchasing organizations

Competitive pressure tends to concentrate on:

  • Ophthalmic suspension generics
  • Otic drops where antibiotic-steroid combinations are commoditized

What is the market size for ciprofloxacin/dexamethasone, and what does the 2026–2035 sales outlook look like?

Answer: The market is mature, with growth driven by population aging, sustained ophthalmic/otic disease burden, periodic brand-to-generic switching, and incremental uptake of preservative-free and simplified dosing formats. In a pricing-compression environment, volume gains do not always translate to revenue growth at historic rates.

Market sizing framework (inputs that control projections)

Revenue for ciprofloxacin/dexamethasone is typically modeled as:

  • US and ex-US prescription volume (ophthalmic and otic)
  • Net price realization after rebates and payer contracting
  • Share shifts between:
    • Fixed combination vs antibiotic + steroid administered separately
    • Preserved vs preservative-free
    • Once-daily vs multiple-daily regimens (where available)

Sales projection: conservative base, 2026–2035

Base-case logic for forecasting:

  • Volume: modest growth from demographic and chronic/infectious disease incidence
  • Price: continued erosion from generic competition and biosimilar-adjacent style pricing dynamics (though these are small-molecule drugs)
  • Net revenue: low single-digit CAGR in value unless a meaningful branded switch or distinct formulation launches with payer differentiation

Projection band (value growth):

  • 2026–2030: low-to-mid single-digit CAGR in net sales globally depending on geography and prescribing patterns
  • 2031–2035: closer to mid single-digit or lower as competition consolidates and penetrations for differentiated formulations plateau

What could shift the forecast upward?

  • A differentiated preservative-free product gaining formulary share
  • Higher adherence formulations (reduced frequency, improved tolerability)
  • Label expansions that increase eligible clinical scenarios

What could shift the forecast downward?

  • Aggressive contracting pushing further price compression
  • Increased preference for antibiotic-only regimens combined with separate steroid where practice guidelines or safety concerns shift
  • Supply disruptions leading to substitution to other antibiotic-steroid combinations

How do ciprofloxacin/dexamethasone products compare with other antibiotic-steroid fixed combinations?

Answer: Clinical use patterns depend on spectrum, steroid potency, and local tolerability. Ciprofloxacin offers broad Gram-negative activity; dexamethasone provides potent anti-inflammatory control. Competitors with different fluoroquinolones or corticosteroids often compete via pricing and formulary placement.

Competitive comparison dimensions that affect switching

  • Spectrum (Gram-positive vs Gram-negative emphasis)
  • Steroid potency and duration of inflammation suppression
  • Preservative sensitivity and patient tolerability
  • Dosing frequency and ease of use
  • Availability and manufacturing stability

What generic entry risks exist for ciprofloxacin/dexamethasone?

Answer: Generic entry risk is structurally high because fixed antibiotic-steroid combinations have multiple ANDA competitors and typically show patent landscapes focused on narrower formulation and method-of-use listings. Paragraph IV challenges remain feasible where listed patents are not broad enough to block approval.

What typically limits generic substitution?

  • Label carve-outs from settlements
  • Specific method-of-use claim dates that restrict “indicated for” language
  • Formulation-specific stability or particle size constraints that affect bioequivalence acceptability

What patent litigation affects ciprofloxacin/dexamethasone, and what settlements typically do?

**Answer: Litigation for small-molecule fixed combinations usually centers on:

  • Orange Book listed patents for formulation/composition or method-of-use
  • Paragraph IV certifications Settlements typically result in:
  • Launch-date workarounds via revised labeling
  • Design-around of formulation details
  • Payment-for-delay structures in some cases, though typical outcomes depend on case specifics and jurisdiction.**

What is the clinical differentiation potential: antibiotic-only vs antibiotic-steroid fixed combinations?

**Answer: The clinical rationale for fixed combinations is compliance and a single instillation that pairs antibacterial coverage with anti-inflammatory steroid. Differentiation is highest where:

  • Inflammation is a significant contributor to symptom burden
  • Practitioners prefer avoiding steroid-only or antibiotic-only regimens for the same episode type
  • Patients are sensitive to preservative systems or multiple daily instillation schedules**

Key Takeaways

  • Ciprofloxacin/dexamethasone is a mature fixed-combination class with development activity mostly in formulation refinement, preservative-free systems, and bridging/Bioequivalence packages tied to incremental differentiation.
  • Regulatory status is product-specific and should be assessed per dosage form and strength via Orange Book listings, including patent lists and any exclusivity tied to the reference listed drug.
  • Market growth is constrained by ongoing generic competition and price compression, with value CAGR typically driven by volume expansion and selective uptake of differentiated formats rather than brand-like pricing power.
  • Generic entry risk is structurally high across US supply, with patent estates often narrower in practical blocking scope, leading to label carve-outs and launch-timing agreements rather than full injunction outcomes.

FAQs

  1. Which ciprofloxacin/dexamethasone dosage forms (ophthalmic vs otic) have the most generic substitution in the US?
  2. Do preservative-free ciprofloxacin/dexamethasone products materially change market share versus preserved suspensions?
  3. How does method-of-use labeling for post-surgical inflammation affect generic “at-risk” launch timing?
  4. What endpoints are most used in bridging studies for ciprofloxacin/dexamethasone reformulations?
  5. Which competitor fixed combinations (other fluoroquinolone-steroid pairs) most commonly replace ciprofloxacin/dexamethasone at formulary level?

References

  1. FDA. Orange Book: Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations. U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
  2. FDA. Drugs@FDA. U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
  3. FDA. Guidance for Industry: ANDA Submissions. U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.