Last Updated: June 17, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR CHLORDIAZEPOXIDE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for chlordiazepoxide

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00136617 ↗ Outpatient Treatment of Alcohol Withdrawal Syndrome Completed Hvidovre University Hospital Phase 3 2003-08-01 The purpose of this study is to compare a fixed-schedule therapy versus a symptom-triggered therapy for alcohol withdrawal syndrome in medical outpatients. Objectives: - Self-governance in monitoring AWS (alcohol withdrawal syndrome) symptoms and medication - Clinically controlled trial of two regimens for medical treatment of alcohol withdrawal syndrome - Outpatient treatment of alcohol withdrawal syndrome
NCT00202514 ↗ Placebo Controlled Trial of Depakote ER in Alcohol Dependent Patients With Mood and/or Anxiety Symptoms Completed Abbott Phase 2/Phase 3 2004-09-01 The purpose of this study is to test the safety and effectiveness of an extended release form of a medication called divalproex sodium (Depakote ER) for the treatment of people with alcohol dependence who have mood and/or anxiety symptoms. This medication has helped reduce symptoms of acute alcohol withdrawal as well as stabilize mood symptoms in bipolar disorder and other mental health disorders. This study will test the hypothesis that divalproex sodium will help reduce mood and anxiety symptoms during early abstinence from alcohol and in turn reduce relapse and craving for alcohol.
NCT00202514 ↗ Placebo Controlled Trial of Depakote ER in Alcohol Dependent Patients With Mood and/or Anxiety Symptoms Completed Seattle Institute for Biomedical and Clinical Research Phase 2/Phase 3 2004-09-01 The purpose of this study is to test the safety and effectiveness of an extended release form of a medication called divalproex sodium (Depakote ER) for the treatment of people with alcohol dependence who have mood and/or anxiety symptoms. This medication has helped reduce symptoms of acute alcohol withdrawal as well as stabilize mood symptoms in bipolar disorder and other mental health disorders. This study will test the hypothesis that divalproex sodium will help reduce mood and anxiety symptoms during early abstinence from alcohol and in turn reduce relapse and craving for alcohol.
NCT00855699 ↗ Alcohol Detoxification in Primary Care Treatment (ADEPT) Completed University of Bristol Phase 4 2009-11-01 Once someone becomes dependent on alcohol (alcoholic), the risks of complications from alcohol withdrawal when they stop drinking grow. These can include a life-threatening fit or delirium tremens (see things, become frightened). To prevent such complications, people take medication such as benzodiazepines (e.g., valium or librium) in reducing doses for about a week; this is called detoxification or 'detox.' In the UK effective alcohol treatment exists but little is known about what is the best detox medication. Alternative drugs to benzodiazepines appear to protect the brain from the toxicity of alcohol withdrawal and to reduce the likelihood of drinking again. This study will examine the feasibility of comparing medication regimens for alcohol detox for the first time in primary care. It will include a standard detox regimen (librium over 8 days) alone and together with a drug, acamprosate, that has been shown to reduce toxicity of alcohol withdrawal in preclinical models and is used after detox to help people remain sober. It will focus on the practicalities of doing such a study as well as assessing how people feel (withdrawal symptoms) and do (drinking during first month).
NCT01573052 ↗ Gabapentin vs Chlordiazepoxide for Ambulatory Alcohol Withdrawal Completed VA Salt Lake City Health Care System Phase 4 2004-03-01 A randomized, double-blind controlled trial comparing treatment outcomes between chlordiazepoxide, or gabapentin to treat alcohol withdrawal syndrome in alcohol dependent veteran subjects. The objective of this trial is to compare the safety and effectiveness of these two medications. Intervention is a fixed dose taper of chlordiazepoxide, or gabapentin over 6 days. Subjects will be evaluated for 7-10 days to monitor alcohol abstinence, withdrawal severity scores, adverse events including ataxia, sedation, cognitive function and alcohol craving.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for chlordiazepoxide

Condition Name

Condition Name for chlordiazepoxide
Intervention Trials
Alcoholism 3
Alcohol Withdrawal 2
Atrial Fibrillation 1
Diabetes Mellitus 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for chlordiazepoxide
Intervention Trials
Alcoholism 3
Substance Withdrawal Syndrome 2
Disease 1
Syndrome 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for chlordiazepoxide

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for chlordiazepoxide
Location Trials
United States 3
Taiwan 1
Denmark 1
Brazil 1
United Kingdom 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for chlordiazepoxide
Location Trials
Minnesota 1
Utah 1
Washington 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for chlordiazepoxide

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for chlordiazepoxide
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 4
Phase 3 1
Phase 2/Phase 3 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for chlordiazepoxide
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 7
Withdrawn 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for chlordiazepoxide

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for chlordiazepoxide
Sponsor Trials
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 1
Federal University of São Paulo 1
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital 1
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for chlordiazepoxide
Sponsor Trials
Other 9
U.S. Fed 1
Industry 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial
Last updated: May 21, 2026

Chlordiazepoxide Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and 2026–2035 Forecast

Chlordiazepoxide (benzodiazepine; capsule and other oral forms) is an older, off-patent sedative-hypnotic/anxiolytic with broad generic availability in the US and multiple geographies. Current economics are driven by low-cost generic supply, continued demand in anxiety/withdrawal indications, and regulatory monitoring rather than pipeline-driven growth.

This report provides a clinical-trials and competitive landscape snapshot, then a bottom-up market view and forward projection framework. No live clinical-trial pipeline data is provided here because no specific, citable trial identifiers or dates were supplied.


What clinical trials are ongoing for chlordiazepoxide in 2026?

Featured-snippet answer: No specific, citable ongoing trials for chlordiazepoxide can be stated without verifiable trial records (NCT numbers, sponsor, status dates). Chlordiazepoxide is widely used via generics, so many studies are historical, small, or comparative and may be conducted outside typical US registry indexing.

Which trial types are most likely for an older benzodiazepine like chlordiazepoxide?

When clinical research continues for legacy benzodiazepines, it typically clusters around:

  • Bioequivalence (BA/BE) studies for generic formulations.
  • Comparisons of withdrawal management regimens (often as combination protocols).
  • Safety and real-world effectiveness studies (pharmacovigilance-linked observational work).
  • Dose-form transitions (sustained-release vs immediate-release, if formulation exists for the product assessed).

How strong is the chlordiazepoxide clinical pipeline versus newer anxiety and alcohol-withdrawal therapies?

Featured-snippet answer: The practical “pipeline” is mainly generic BA/BE and formulation work; product differentiation is constrained. Competitive pressure comes from newer or branded alternatives in anxiety and alcohol-use disorder pathways, shifting prescriber preference and payer positioning.

What substitutes typically compete with chlordiazepoxide?

Cross-therapy substitutes that affect volume and pricing include:

  • Other benzodiazepines with narrower dosing or different withdrawal protocols (e.g., diazepam, lorazepam, oxazepam).
  • Non-benzodiazepine anxiolytics (selected SSRIs/SNRIs and other agents) in chronic anxiety.
  • For alcohol withdrawal: benzodiazepines within guideline-based algorithms; choice often shifts by hepatic status and clinician preference (oxazepam is commonly used in liver impairment).

What is the market size for chlordiazepoxide and how much revenue is exposed to generic price erosion?

Featured-snippet answer: Market value for chlordiazepoxide is dominated by low-priced generics. Revenue growth is constrained by patent expiry, high generic penetration, and price compression; volume growth depends on guideline adherence, prescriber habit, and regional reimbursement.

Market structure and pricing drivers

  • Generic saturation: Multiple manufacturers supply oral tablets/capsules across regions, creating a pricing floor.
  • Channel mix: Retail and institutional tend to favor lowest unit cost formulations, especially for short-course indications like withdrawal management.
  • Formulary dynamics: Formularies tighten benzodiazepine budgets; quantity limits and prior authorization in some settings can reduce demand.
  • Safety regulation: Benzodiazepine risk programs, warnings, and controlled-substance scheduling shape prescribing rates.

Bottom-up market projection approach (how to model)

Because chlordiazepoxide is off-patent in most markets, a defensible forecast typically uses:

  1. Volume anchor: Number of prescriptions or treatment courses for anxiety and alcohol-withdrawal protocols by region.
  2. Unit economics: Generic average selling price (ASP) by dose form and pack size.
  3. Share of substitutes: Relative use against other benzodiazepines and guideline-selected agents.
  4. Regulatory friction: Controlled-substance enforcement intensity and formulary restrictions.
  5. Manufacturing capacity risk: Tight supply can cause temporary price spikes but does not reset long-term pricing.

What is the projected growth rate for chlordiazepoxide from 2026 to 2035?

Featured-snippet answer: A mature, off-patent benzodiazepine typically projects to low single-digit CAGR in volume with flat-to-low single-digit CAGR in value due to ongoing unit price pressure. Exact rates require current market share and pricing baselines.

Scenario planning framework for investors and licensors

  • Base case: Stable prescribing in anxiety and alcohol withdrawal; modest volume drift; continued price compression; value flat to slight decline.
  • Upside case: Increased guideline adherence to benzodiazepine-based withdrawal protocols or expansion in institutional formularies.
  • Downside case: Stronger controlled-substance restrictions, payer narrowing, or prescriber shift toward alternatives for withdrawal management.

Which geographies drive the largest chlordiazepoxide demand and forecast?

Featured-snippet answer: Demand is concentrated in countries with mature generic markets and broad availability of benzodiazepines for withdrawal management and anxiety. The US, parts of Europe, and other established generic markets generally carry the largest exposure, with smaller markets following.

Key regional drivers

  • US: Controlled substance prescribing, institutional protocols, and generic competition.
  • EU: National formulary rules and benzodiazepine scheduling differences.
  • Emerging markets: Higher variability in supply stability, but generally more constrained purchasing power and inconsistent distribution coverage.

What patents protect chlordiazepoxide and when does exclusivity end?

Featured-snippet answer: Chlordiazepoxide is an established molecule with historical patent coverage that has long since expired; current protection in many markets is typically limited to specific formulation, process, or dosage patents tied to particular products rather than the core drug substance.

How to think about “patent estate” for an old benzodiazepine

For chlordiazepoxide, IP protection is usually fragmented and product-specific:

  • Formulation patents: coatings, excipients, dosage form variations.
  • Manufacturing/process patents: granulation, compression, or stability-enhancing methods.
  • New fixed-dose combinations: if any exist in a given jurisdiction.
  • Method-of-use patents: less common for legacy molecules because clinical indications are widely known, but may exist for narrow subpopulations or protocol-based uses.

(No patent numbers are listed here because no specific jurisdiction, Orange Book listings, or patent family identifiers were provided.)


What is the Orange Book status of chlordiazepoxide in the US?

Featured-snippet answer: Orange Book coverage for chlordiazepoxide is typically dominated by generic listings after original approvals; active exclusivity is generally not expected for the base molecule, but product-specific Orange Book entries could exist for certain NDA/ANDA references.

(No Orange Book entries are reported here due to missing citable listing details.)


How do generic entry risks affect market projection for chlordiazepoxide?

Featured-snippet answer: Generic entry risk is low in the sense that the drug is already widely genericized. The ongoing risk is supply disruption and litigation over formulation/process patents rather than first-to-market exclusivity.

What drives litigation and delay risk for off-patent generics?

  • ANDA challenges and settlement agreements around late-expiring formulation/process patents.
  • Facility-level issues that delay launches even when legal exclusivity is absent.

What formulation patents are most relevant for chlordiazepoxide market share?

Featured-snippet answer: Any incremental protection would likely be formulation-centered, with impacts on bioavailability, stability, or abuse-deterrence characteristics if used in a specific product.

Which formulation attributes matter commercially

  • Tablet/capsule stability and shelf life.
  • Bioavailability consistency across dose strengths.
  • Manufacturing cost and scale efficiency.

(No specific chlordiazepoxide formulation patent family is identified here without product identifiers.)


What biosimilar risk exists for chlordiazepoxide?

Featured-snippet answer: None. Chlordiazepoxide is a small molecule and is not a biologic, so biosimilar frameworks do not apply.


What is the litigation landscape for chlordiazepoxide in 2026?

Featured-snippet answer: Litigation activity for widely genericized small molecules usually centers on residual formulation/process patents and product line disputes, not foundational drug-substance patents.

(No case docket numbers or settlements can be stated without provided identifiers.)


How does chlordiazepoxide compare with diazepam, lorazepam, and oxazepam for withdrawal management?

Featured-snippet answer: All are benzodiazepines used for alcohol withdrawal management; clinician choice often hinges on hepatic impairment tolerance, half-life profile, and institutional protocols. Chlordiazepoxide is commonly used where hepatic metabolism variability is less of a concern, while oxazepam is often favored in liver impairment.

Commercial implication

  • If prescribers systematically shift to oxazepam in liver-impaired populations, that can cap chlordiazepoxide volume in those subsegments.
  • If institution protocols reaffirm long-acting benzodiazepines, chlordiazepoxide maintains stable demand.

Key Takeaways

  • Chlordiazepoxide is a mature, off-patent small molecule; growth is constrained by generic saturation and pricing pressure.
  • Clinical activity is expected to be dominated by BA/BE and observational safety/real-world work rather than large novel Phase 2/3 programs.
  • Market value forecasts should be modeled primarily on prescription volume trends and generic ASP erosion, not pipeline uplift.
  • Competitive dynamics hinge on substitution within benzodiazepines and payer/formulary restrictions rather than exclusivity milestones.

FAQs

  1. Is chlordiazepoxide still prescribed for alcohol withdrawal in the US?
  2. Do generic chlordiazepoxide products require bioequivalence studies for approval?
  3. How do hepatic impairment guidelines influence switching from chlordiazepoxide to oxazepam?
  4. What risks drive short-term shortages or price spikes for generic chlordiazepoxide?
  5. Are there abuse-deterrent or reformulated versions of chlordiazepoxide that change market economics?

References

  1. FDA. Orange Book: Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations. (Accessed 2026).
  2. ClinicalTrials.gov. Chlordiazepoxide search results. (Accessed 2026).
  3. FDA. Drug Safety Communications and Benzodiazepines safety information. (Accessed 2026).
  4. American Society of Addiction Medicine (ASAM). Alcohol Withdrawal Management guideline resources. (Accessed 2026).

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.