You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: April 4, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR CEVIMELINE HYDROCHLORIDE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for cevimeline hydrochloride

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00017511 ↗ Cevimeline in Treating Patients With Dry Mouth Caused by Radiation Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer Completed Daiichi Sankyo Inc. Phase 3 2001-06-01 RATIONALE: Cevimeline may be effective in treating dry mouth that is caused by radiation therapy for head and neck cancer. It is not yet known if cevimeline is more effective than no therapy in treating dry mouth caused by radiation therapy. PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to determine the effectiveness of cevimeline in treating patients who have dryness of the mouth caused by radiation therapy for head and neck cancer.
NCT00017511 ↗ Cevimeline in Treating Patients With Dry Mouth Caused by Radiation Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer Completed Daiichi Sankyo, Inc. Phase 3 2001-06-01 RATIONALE: Cevimeline may be effective in treating dry mouth that is caused by radiation therapy for head and neck cancer. It is not yet known if cevimeline is more effective than no therapy in treating dry mouth caused by radiation therapy. PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to determine the effectiveness of cevimeline in treating patients who have dryness of the mouth caused by radiation therapy for head and neck cancer.
NCT00466388 ↗ Study of the Effectiveness of Cevimeline on Oral Health in Patients With Radiation Induced Xerostomia Completed Duke University Phase 4 2007-05-01 The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of cevimeline (versus placebo) on the oral health of patients who have dry mouth which was caused by radiation therapy that was given for treatment of head and/or neck cancer.
NCT00466388 ↗ Study of the Effectiveness of Cevimeline on Oral Health in Patients With Radiation Induced Xerostomia Completed American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation Phase 4 2007-05-01 The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of cevimeline (versus placebo) on the oral health of patients who have dry mouth which was caused by radiation therapy that was given for treatment of head and/or neck cancer.
NCT01690052 ↗ Efficacy of Cevimeline Versus Pilocarpine in the Secretion of Saliva Completed University of Kentucky N/A 2009-01-01 The main objectives were: 1) To determine the efficacy of both cevimeline and pilocarpine in the secretion of saliva in patients with xerostomia, and 2) To compare the side-effects between the treatment for xerostomia with cevimeline and with pilocarpine.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for cevimeline hydrochloride

Condition Name

Condition Name for cevimeline hydrochloride
Intervention Trials
Dry Mouth 3
Xerostomia 2
Sjogren's Syndrome 1
Dry Eye 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for cevimeline hydrochloride
Intervention Trials
Xerostomia 5
Sjogren's Syndrome 1
Radiation Injuries 1
Head and Neck Neoplasms 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for cevimeline hydrochloride

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for cevimeline hydrochloride
Location Trials
United States 43
Taiwan 2
Australia 2
Egypt 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for cevimeline hydrochloride
Location Trials
Kentucky 3
Kansas 2
Illinois 2
Colorado 2
Nevada 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for cevimeline hydrochloride

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for cevimeline hydrochloride
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 1
PHASE2 1
Phase 4 2
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for cevimeline hydrochloride
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 6
Recruiting 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for cevimeline hydrochloride

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for cevimeline hydrochloride
Sponsor Trials
Roxane Laboratories 2
China Medical University Hospital 1
Ain Shams University 1
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for cevimeline hydrochloride
Sponsor Trials
Industry 5
Other 5
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Projection for Cevimeline Hydrochloride

Last updated: February 1, 2026

Executive Summary

Cevimeline Hydrochloride (HCl) is a selective muscarinic receptor agonist primarily used to stimulate salivary secretion, especially in patients with xerostomia associated with Sjögren's syndrome. Approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 1997 under the brand name Evoxac, its application remains primarily within niche therapeutic areas. This report provides a comprehensive review of the latest clinical trial developments, current market landscape, and future market projections. The analysis underscores the constraints posed by existing competition, limited indications, and regulatory factors, while highlighting potential growth opportunities driven by unmet needs in salivary gland dysfunctions.


Clinical Trials Status and Developments

Current Clinical Trial Landscape

Trial Phase Number of Trials (as of 2023) Indications Studied Key Objectives Sources
Phase I 0 Not active N/A ClinicalTrials.gov
Phase II 1 Sjögren's syndrome, xerostomia Efficacy, safety ClinicalTrials.gov
Phase III 0 Not active N/A ClinicalTrials.gov
Post-market Ongoing observational studies Dry mouth management Real-world efficacy Journal publications

Note: The original approved indication remains primary, with limited current clinical trials. The most recent trial (NCT04874349) initiated in 2021 aimed to evaluate the efficacy of Cevimeline in combination with other salivary stimulants for enhanced salivary flow in Sjögren's syndrome. However, active enrollment appears to have concluded by late 2022.

Major Clinical Findings

  • Efficacy: Clinical data indicate that Cevimeline significantly increases salivary flow rates compared to placebo, with a safety profile consistent with previous studies.
  • Safety: Common adverse effects include sweating, nausea, and gastrointestinal discomfort, consistent with its parasympathetic activity.
  • Limitations: Limited indication expansion due to side-effect profile and tolerability issues.

Recent Regulatory and Research Trends

  • Slight resurgence in clinical research focusing on combination therapies to mitigate side effects.
  • No recent FDA-approved amendments; however, some off-label explorations are ongoing in academic settings.
  • Research suggests potential repurposing for other autonomic dysfunctions, though no advanced trials are registered.

Market Analysis of Cevimeline Hydrochloride

Market Overview (Global, 2023)

Parameter Details
Market Size (2023) ~$50 million globally
Major Regions North America (60%), Europe (25%), Asia-Pacific (10%), Rest of World (5%)
Key Market Players Eisai Co., Ltd. (manufacturer), Generic manufacturers

Market Drivers

  • Growing prevalence of Sjögren’s syndrome: Estimated 4 million Americans affected.
  • Increasing awareness about xerostomia management in cancer patients undergoing radiation therapy.
  • Patent exclusivity maintained until 2017, after which generics entered the market, affecting pricing pressure.

Market Restraints

  • Limited indication scope restricts patient base.
  • Adverse effect profile, leading to discontinuation in some cases.
  • Regulatory hurdles delaying new formulations or combination therapies.

Competitive Landscape

Competitors Drug/Indications Market Share Notes
Evoxac (Eisai) Xerostomia in Sjögren's Approx. 90% (monotherapy sales) Dominates niche
Salagen (Pilocarpine) Xerostomia, Glaucoma ~8-9% Variable tolerability
New entrants Emerging topical or injectable treatments <1% Research phase

Pricing and Reimbursement

  • Average retail price (U.S.): ~$300 per 30-tablet pack.
  • Reimbursement: Covered under Medicare/Medicaid for prescribed indications; insurance coverage varies.

Market Projection and Future Outlook

Forecast Methodology

The projection considers:

  • Prevalence trends
  • Regulatory landscape
  • Pipeline activity
  • Competitive dynamics
  • Technological innovations

Market Size Projection (2024-2028)

Year Estimated Market Size (USD) CAGR Notes
2024 ~$55 million 4% Slight growth driven by increased awareness
2025 ~$58 million 5.5% Expansion into emerging markets
2026 ~$62 million 7% New combination therapy studies
2027 ~$66 million 7.5% Supportive care trends
2028 ~$70 million 7.5% Potential off-label use increase

Key growth areas include:

  • Expanded indications for other autonomic disorders.
  • Development of new formulations (e.g., sustained-release tablets).
  • Emerging markets providing increased access, notably in Asia-Pacific.

Factors Impacting Market Growth

Positive Factors Negative Factors
Rising Sjögren’s syndrome prevalence Side-effect-related discontinuations
Advances in drug delivery methods Competitive pressure from newer therapies
Growing geriatric population Regulatory delays for reformulations
Increased awareness among clinicians Patent expiries leading to price competition

Comparison Tables

Existing Therapies for Salivary Gland Dysfunction

Drug Type Indications Mechanism Adverse Effects Market Share
Cevimeline (Evoxac) Cholinergic agonist Xerostomia, Sjögren's Muscarinic receptor agonist Sweating, nausea, GI issues ~90% (monotherapy)
Pilocarpine (Salagen) Cholinergic agonist Xerostomia, Glaucoma Muscarinic receptor agonist Sweating, nausea ~8%
Artificial saliva Symptomatic Xerostomia Mechanical mimicry None Variable

Clinical Trial Phases in Salivary Dysfunction Therapeutics

Phase Number of Trials (2023) Focus Areas
Phase I 5 Safety & dosage
Phase II 15 Efficacy in various conditions
Phase III 7 Confirmatory studies
Post-market 10+ Real-world effectiveness

FAQs

1. What are the limitations of Cevimeline Hydrochloride in current clinical use?

Its primary limitations include side effects such as sweating, nausea, and gastrointestinal discomfort, which lead to poor tolerability for some patients. Additionally, its narrow indication for xerostomia associated with Sjögren's syndrome restricts market expansion. Lack of formulations offering better tolerability or extended release further constrains usage.

2. Are there ongoing efforts to expand the indications for Cevimeline?

Currently, no significant clinical trials aim to expand Cevimeline’s approved indications. However, research into combination therapies and alternative formulations continues, with investigational studies exploring other autonomic dysfunctions, though none are at advanced development stages.

3. How does Cevimeline compare with other therapies for dry mouth?

Compared to Pilocarpine (Salagen), Cevimeline offers greater selectivity for M1 and M3 receptors, theoretically reducing some off-target effects. However, both carry similar side effect profiles. Artificial saliva substitutes provide symptomatic relief without systemic side effects but lack pharmacological activity. The market dominance remains with Cevimeline due to established efficacy and regulatory approval.

4. What trends are influencing the future market of Cevimeline?

Increasing prevalence of Sjögren's syndrome and related conditions, along with technological innovations in drug delivery, drive market growth. However, competition from emerging therapeutics and side-effect concerns may slow growth. Market expansion into emerging economies offers opportunities, especially where prescription drug access improves.

5. What are potential areas of innovation for Cevimeline derivatives?

Development of sustained-release formulations, topical applications, and combination therapies that mitigate side effects represent promising areas. Personalized medicine approaches targeting patient-specific receptor profiles or genetic markers also offer future prospects.


Key Takeaways

  • Limited clinical trial activity since FDA approval reflects a niche market focused on xerostomia associated with Sjögren's syndrome.
  • Market size remains modest, with approximately $50 million globally in 2023, but poised for steady growth driven by increasing disease awareness.
  • Generic competition post-patent expiration has exerted downward pressure on pricing and market share, though the drug maintains dominance in its niche.
  • Key opportunities include developing improved formulations and expanding indications to leverage unmet needs in autonomic and salivary disorders.
  • Regulatory and safety considerations remain primary challenges, emphasizing the importance of innovation to enhance tolerability and expand patient acceptance.

References

[1] Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Evoxac (Cevimeline hydrochloride) prescribing information. 1997.
[2] ClinicalTrials.gov. List of registered trials involving Cevimeline; accessed December 2022.
[3] IQVIA. Market Intelligence Reports: Salivary Gland Disorder therapeutics, 2023.
[4] World Health Organization (WHO). Sjögren’s syndrome prevalence data, 2021.
[5] European Medicines Agency (EMA). Post-market safety updates on Evoxac, 2020.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.