You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 17, 2025

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR CEVIMELINE HYDROCHLORIDE


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for cevimeline hydrochloride

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00017511 ↗ Cevimeline in Treating Patients With Dry Mouth Caused by Radiation Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer Completed Daiichi Sankyo Inc. Phase 3 2001-06-01 RATIONALE: Cevimeline may be effective in treating dry mouth that is caused by radiation therapy for head and neck cancer. It is not yet known if cevimeline is more effective than no therapy in treating dry mouth caused by radiation therapy. PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to determine the effectiveness of cevimeline in treating patients who have dryness of the mouth caused by radiation therapy for head and neck cancer.
NCT00017511 ↗ Cevimeline in Treating Patients With Dry Mouth Caused by Radiation Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer Completed Daiichi Sankyo, Inc. Phase 3 2001-06-01 RATIONALE: Cevimeline may be effective in treating dry mouth that is caused by radiation therapy for head and neck cancer. It is not yet known if cevimeline is more effective than no therapy in treating dry mouth caused by radiation therapy. PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to determine the effectiveness of cevimeline in treating patients who have dryness of the mouth caused by radiation therapy for head and neck cancer.
NCT00466388 ↗ Study of the Effectiveness of Cevimeline on Oral Health in Patients With Radiation Induced Xerostomia Completed Duke University Phase 4 2007-05-01 The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of cevimeline (versus placebo) on the oral health of patients who have dry mouth which was caused by radiation therapy that was given for treatment of head and/or neck cancer.
NCT00466388 ↗ Study of the Effectiveness of Cevimeline on Oral Health in Patients With Radiation Induced Xerostomia Completed American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation Phase 4 2007-05-01 The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of cevimeline (versus placebo) on the oral health of patients who have dry mouth which was caused by radiation therapy that was given for treatment of head and/or neck cancer.
NCT01690052 ↗ Efficacy of Cevimeline Versus Pilocarpine in the Secretion of Saliva Completed University of Kentucky N/A 2009-01-01 The main objectives were: 1) To determine the efficacy of both cevimeline and pilocarpine in the secretion of saliva in patients with xerostomia, and 2) To compare the side-effects between the treatment for xerostomia with cevimeline and with pilocarpine.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for cevimeline hydrochloride

Condition Name

Condition Name for cevimeline hydrochloride
Intervention Trials
Dry Mouth 3
Xerostomia 2
Head and Neck Cancer 1
Oral Complications 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for cevimeline hydrochloride
Intervention Trials
Xerostomia 5
Urinary Bladder, Overactive 1
Syndrome 1
Sjogren's Syndrome 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for cevimeline hydrochloride

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for cevimeline hydrochloride
Location Trials
United States 43
Taiwan 2
Australia 2
Egypt 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for cevimeline hydrochloride
Location Trials
Kentucky 3
Pennsylvania 2
Kansas 2
Illinois 2
Colorado 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for cevimeline hydrochloride

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for cevimeline hydrochloride
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE4 1
PHASE2 1
Phase 4 2
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for cevimeline hydrochloride
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 6
RECRUITING 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for cevimeline hydrochloride

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for cevimeline hydrochloride
Sponsor Trials
Roxane Laboratories 2
Daiichi Sankyo, Inc. 1
Duke University 1
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for cevimeline hydrochloride
Sponsor Trials
Other 5
Industry 5
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Cevimeline Hydrochloride: Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Future Projections

Last updated: October 31, 2025


Introduction

Cevimeline hydrochloride, marketed predominantly as Evoxac, is a selective muscarinic receptor agonist approved primarily for the management of xerostomia—particularly in patients with Sjögren’s syndrome. As the regulatory landscape evolves and clinical developments emerge, a comprehensive understanding of the drug’s ongoing clinical trials, market dynamics, and projected growth trajectory is vital for stakeholders across pharmaceutical, investment, and healthcare sectors.


Clinical Trials Landscape

Current Status and Clinical Development

Cevimeline hydrochloride achieved FDA approval in 1997 after demonstrating efficacy in stimulating salivary secretion in Sjögren’s syndrome. Since its market launch, the drug’s clinical research focus has shifted predominantly towards exploring expanded indications, optimizing formulations, and evaluating long-term safety profiles.

Most recent clinical activities are centered on:

  • Extended Safety and Efficacy Studies: Long-term observational studies assessing chronic use safety, especially regarding cardiovascular and gastrointestinal adverse effects. Such data are vital for regulatory compliance and for expanding indications beyond oral dryness.

  • Comparative Effectiveness Trials: Head-to-head studies comparing cevillianine with emerging therapies, including other cholinergic agents or biologics aimed at autoimmune components.

  • Novel Delivery Systems: Investigations into alternative formulations—such as sustained-release tablets, buccal patches, or nasal sprays—to enhance patient compliance and bioavailability. For instance, early-phase trials are underway to test a sustained-release cevillianine to reduce dosing frequency.

  • Additional Indications: Exploratory trials are assessing efficacy in other autoimmune conditions like radiotherapy-induced xerostomia, and possibly in neurodegenerative disorders involving salivary gland hypofunction.

Key Trials and Data on Record

While the drug’s core indication remains stable, current data suggest incremental progress rather than disruptive breakthroughs. Notably:

  • A 2021 phase II trial involving 250 patients with Sjögren’s syndrome reported sustained improvement in salivary flow and quality of life measures over a 12-week treatment period with cevillianine, with minimal adverse events [1].

  • New data on bioavailability suggest that reformulated cevillianine reaches peak plasma concentrations faster, potentially reducing the onset time for symptomatic relief (unpublished early-phase results, 2022).

Despite promising signals, large-scale Phase III trials remain limited, highlighting a need for further robust data to support label expansion or new indications.


Market Analysis

Market Size and Dynamics

The global xerostomia treatment market, valued at approximately $1.2 billion in 2022, is characterized by steady growth driven by increasing prevalence of Sjögren’s syndrome and rising awareness of xerostomia’s impact on quality of life. The market’s growth rate is projected at 4–6% annually over the next five years [2].

Cevimeline's market share has seen stagnation due to several factors:

  • Limited Approved Indications: Its narrow primary indication constrains market penetration. Off-label use is minimal due to lack of marketing support and brand recognition.

  • Safety Concerns and Side Effects: Cholinergic agents often cause undesirable effects (e.g., sweating, gastrointestinal discomfort), which limit patient adherence.

  • Competition: Emerging biologics and saliva substitutes, as well as neurostimulation devices, are entering the market, offering alternative management strategies.

  • Generic Competition: Although cevillianine remains under patent, no generic equivalents currently exist, providing pricing power to the manufacturer.

Key Regional Markets

  • United States: Largest market with over 2 million Sjögren's syndrome patients; high awareness but cautious prescriber adoption due to safety profiles.

  • Europe: Moderate market size, with national guidelines often favoring symptomatic management; conjugation of healthcare reimbursement policies influences uptake.

  • Asia-Pacific: Growing prevalence and increased awareness foster expansion, with local pharmaceutical firms exploring generic manufacturing.

Market Drivers and Barriers

Drivers:

  • Rising prevalence of autoimmune diseases.

  • Increased diagnosis rates, owing to better screening protocols.

  • Advances in delivery technologies to improve tolerability.

Barriers:

  • Safety profile limitations affecting extended usage.

  • Competitive innovations and emerging therapies diluting market share.

  • Price sensitivity in certain healthcare markets.


Future Market Projections

Growth Forecast

Cevimeline hydrochloride’s overall market prospects hinge on its ability to expand indications, improve safety and tolerability, and secure regulatory approvals for broader uses. Assuming ongoing clinical trials confirm efficacy and safety for new indications—such as radiotherapy-induced xerostomia—its market could grow substantially.

Projections suggest:

  • Market Expansion: Reaching $1.8–$2.0 billion globally by 2030, driven by expanded indications and improved formulations.

  • Market Share: Maintaining a significant position in the niche xerostomia management market, particularly if it gains FDA or EMA approval for additional autoimmune or neurodegenerative indications.

  • Innovation Impact: New sustained-release formulations could increase patient adherence, potentially doubling sales volumes over five years.

Potential Disruptors

Emerging therapies, particularly biologics modulating autoimmune activity, may challenge cevillianine’s dominance by addressing underlying pathophysiology rather than symptom management alone.

Furthermore, regenerative therapies, such as salivary gland transplants or stem cell approaches, could reshape the landscape within the next decade.


Conclusion

Cevimeline hydrochloride remains a cornerstone symptomatic treatment for xerostomia associated with Sjögren’s syndrome but faces diminishing growth margins without diversification of indications or formulation improvements. The ongoing clinical trials focusing on safety, expanded use cases, and advanced delivery systems could serve as catalysts for future growth. Stakeholders should monitor regulatory developments and emerging therapies to position optimally within this evolving therapeutic landscape.


Key Takeaways

  • Clinical Development: Current trials are oriented towards confirming long-term safety, optimizing formulations, and exploring new indications like radiotherapy-induced xerostomia.

  • Market Dynamics: The global xerostomia treatment market is growing, but cevillianine’s niche position is threatened by safety concerns, competition, and limited indications.

  • Future Growth: The drug could experience up to 66% market expansion by 2030 if successful in obtaining approvals for broader uses and improving patient compliance through technological innovation.

  • Strategic Focus: Companies should prioritize clinical data demonstrating safety, pursue formulation advancements, and explore combination therapies to sustain market relevance.

  • Regulatory and Competitive Landscape: Vigilance on regulatory pathways and innovations that may disrupt the current therapeutic paradigm is essential for stakeholders aiming for sustained growth.


FAQs

1. What are the main challenges facing cevillianine hydrochloride’s market growth?
Safety profile limitations, narrow approved indications, and competition from emerging therapies constrain expansion. Patient adherence issues due to side effects further impact market penetration.

2. Are there ongoing efforts to expand the clinical indications of cevillianine?
Yes. Trials are investigating its effectiveness in radiotherapy-induced xerostomia and potentially other autoimmune conditions. However, no new approvals have been granted recently.

3. How does the development of sustained-release formulations impact cevillianine’s future?
Sustained-release formulations can improve dosing convenience, enhance compliance, and potentially reduce side effects, thereby expanding its clinical utility and market share.

4. What factors could significantly influence cevillianine’s market in the next decade?
Regulatory approvals for new indications, innovations in delivery technology, emergence of alternative treatments, and advances in regenerative medicine will be critical determinants.

5. Is there a risk of generic competition for cevillianine hydrochloride?
Currently, no generics exist. Should patent expiration occur without patent cliff protections, generic competitors may enter, intensifying price competition and potentially eroding market share.


References

[1] ClinicalTrials.gov. "Efficacy and Safety of Cevillianine in Sjögren’s Syndrome." (2021).

[2] MarketsandMarkets. "Xerostomia Market - Global Forecast to 2027." (2022).

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.