You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 28, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR CEFTAZIDIME SODIUM


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for ceftazidime sodium

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00333385 ↗ Continuous Versus Short Infusions of Ceftazidime in Cystic Fibrosis Terminated Baxter Healthcare Corporation Phase 4 2001-10-01 The aim of this trial was to compare the safety and efficacy of courses of tobramycin and ceftazidime, administered intravenously as either thrice daily short infusions or 24 h continuous infusion, in cystic fibrosis patients with acute exacerbation of chronic pulmonary PA infection. In conventional treatment regimens, ceftazidime is administered in the form of thrice daily short infusions, but pharmacodynamic considerations suggest that continuous infusion could be more effective.
NCT00333385 ↗ Continuous Versus Short Infusions of Ceftazidime in Cystic Fibrosis Terminated GlaxoSmithKline Phase 4 2001-10-01 The aim of this trial was to compare the safety and efficacy of courses of tobramycin and ceftazidime, administered intravenously as either thrice daily short infusions or 24 h continuous infusion, in cystic fibrosis patients with acute exacerbation of chronic pulmonary PA infection. In conventional treatment regimens, ceftazidime is administered in the form of thrice daily short infusions, but pharmacodynamic considerations suggest that continuous infusion could be more effective.
NCT00333385 ↗ Continuous Versus Short Infusions of Ceftazidime in Cystic Fibrosis Terminated Roche Pharma AG Phase 4 2001-10-01 The aim of this trial was to compare the safety and efficacy of courses of tobramycin and ceftazidime, administered intravenously as either thrice daily short infusions or 24 h continuous infusion, in cystic fibrosis patients with acute exacerbation of chronic pulmonary PA infection. In conventional treatment regimens, ceftazidime is administered in the form of thrice daily short infusions, but pharmacodynamic considerations suggest that continuous infusion could be more effective.
NCT00333385 ↗ Continuous Versus Short Infusions of Ceftazidime in Cystic Fibrosis Terminated Vaincre la Mucoviscidose Phase 4 2001-10-01 The aim of this trial was to compare the safety and efficacy of courses of tobramycin and ceftazidime, administered intravenously as either thrice daily short infusions or 24 h continuous infusion, in cystic fibrosis patients with acute exacerbation of chronic pulmonary PA infection. In conventional treatment regimens, ceftazidime is administered in the form of thrice daily short infusions, but pharmacodynamic considerations suggest that continuous infusion could be more effective.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for ceftazidime sodium

Condition Name

Condition Name for ceftazidime sodium
Intervention Trials
Cystic Fibrosis 1
Hospital-acquired Bacterial Pneumonia and Ventilator-associated Bacterial Pneumonia 1
Melioidosis 1
Nephrotoxicity 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for ceftazidime sodium
Intervention Trials
Appendicitis 1
Pseudomonas Infections 1
Atrial Fibrillation 1
Fibrosis 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for ceftazidime sodium

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for ceftazidime sodium
Location Trials
China 2
France 1
Egypt 1
Brazil 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for ceftazidime sodium

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for ceftazidime sodium
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
PHASE3 1
PHASE2 1
Phase 4 2
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for ceftazidime sodium
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Enrolling by invitation 1
Suspended 1
Not yet recruiting 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for ceftazidime sodium

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for ceftazidime sodium
Sponsor Trials
Federal University of São Paulo 1
Zunyi Medical College 1
Arrevus Inc. 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for ceftazidime sodium
Sponsor Trials
Industry 6
Other 6
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Ceftazidime Sodium: Clinical Trial Landscape and Market Projections

Last updated: February 19, 2026

Ceftazidime sodium, a third-generation cephalosporin antibiotic, shows ongoing clinical development primarily focused on antibiotic resistance and novel formulations. The market is influenced by the rising prevalence of bacterial infections and the need for effective treatments against multidrug-resistant organisms.

What is the current status of ceftazidime sodium in clinical development?

Clinical trials involving ceftazidime sodium are primarily investigating its efficacy and safety in specific patient populations and against particular resistant pathogens. The drug’s established profile as an injectable antibiotic against Gram-negative bacteria, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa, underpins its continued exploration.

Recent patent filings and clinical trial registrations indicate a focus on combinations and improved delivery methods. For instance, trials are assessing ceftazidime in combination with avibactam, a beta-lactamase inhibitor, to broaden its spectrum of activity against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE).

Key areas of active clinical investigation include:

  • Ceftazidime-avibactam combinations: This combination targets difficult-to-treat Gram-negative infections, including those caused by extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae and P. aeruginosa with resistance mechanisms like ESBLs and KPC.
    • Phase 3 trials: Several Phase 3 trials have been completed or are ongoing, evaluating ceftazidime-avibactam for hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP), ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), and complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAI).
    • Phase 2 trials: These trials often explore optimal dosing and specific indications for the combination therapy.
  • Novel formulations and delivery systems: Research is exploring alternative delivery routes or sustained-release formulations to improve patient compliance and therapeutic outcomes, although these are at earlier stages of development.
  • Specific pathogen targeting: Studies continue to refine the role of ceftazidime sodium in treating infections caused by specific resistant bacteria where other options are limited.

What is the market potential for ceftazidime sodium and its formulations?

The market for ceftazidime sodium is driven by the increasing global burden of bacterial infections, particularly those caused by Gram-negative organisms that have developed resistance to older antibiotics. The emergence of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) and multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa creates a significant unmet medical need, bolstering demand for effective treatment options like ceftazidime-avibactam.

Market drivers include:

  • Rising incidence of antibiotic-resistant infections: Organizations like the World Health Organization (WHO) have identified antibiotic resistance as a major global health threat [1]. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) report millions of antibiotic-resistant infections annually in the United States, leading to thousands of deaths [2].
  • Limited treatment options for severe infections: For many resistant Gram-negative infections, treatment choices are severely restricted. This scarcity creates a demand for antibiotics with novel mechanisms or expanded spectrums of activity, such as ceftazidime-avibactam.
  • Hospital-acquired infections (HAIs): HAIs, often caused by opportunistic and resistant pathogens, represent a significant portion of ceftazidime's potential market. Conditions like HAP, VAP, and cIAI are frequently treated with broad-spectrum antibiotics.
  • Global aging population: Older individuals are often more susceptible to infections and may have compromised immune systems, increasing the risk and severity of bacterial infections.

Market segmentation for ceftazidime sodium and its advanced formulations:

The market can be segmented by indication, route of administration, and end-user.

  • Indications:
    • Complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAI)
    • Hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) and Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP)
    • Complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI)
    • Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections
    • Other resistant Gram-negative infections
  • Route of Administration:
    • Intravenous (IV)
    • (Future potential for inhaled or other novel delivery)
  • End-Users:
    • Hospitals
    • Clinics
    • Long-term care facilities

Projected Market Growth:

The market for advanced cephalosporins, including ceftazidime-avibactam, is projected to grow substantially. Reports indicate that the global antibiotics market, valued at approximately USD 45 billion in 2022, is expected to expand. Specific growth figures for ceftazidime-avibactam are linked to its efficacy against CRE and MDR P. aeruginosa. Analysts project the market for ceftazidime-avibactam to reach several billion dollars within the next five to ten years, driven by its approval for expanded indications and its crucial role in combating resistant pathogens [3].

Factors that could influence market growth include:

  • Regulatory approvals: Expanded indications and approvals in new geographical regions will drive adoption.
  • Reimbursement policies: Favorable reimbursement from payers is critical for market access and uptake.
  • Competition: The development of new antibiotics or alternative therapeutic approaches could impact market share.
  • Antimicrobial stewardship programs: Effective implementation of these programs can optimize antibiotic use, potentially influencing the duration and frequency of treatment cycles.

What are the key patent landscapes and intellectual property considerations?

The patent landscape for ceftazidime sodium is characterized by foundational patents on the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) and, more recently, patents covering novel formulations, combination therapies, and specific manufacturing processes. Manufacturers of generic ceftazidime sodium rely on the expiration of key composition of matter patents. However, innovators are extending market exclusivity through patents on these new developments.

Key patenting strategies observed:

  • Combination therapies: Patents are often filed for the combination of ceftazidime with beta-lactamase inhibitors like avibactam. These patents protect the synergistic effect of the combination and the specific ratios or administration regimens. For example, patents cover ceftazidime-avibactam for treating infections caused by specific resistant bacterial strains.
  • Formulations and delivery systems: Innovation in drug delivery is a significant area for patent protection. This includes:
    • Injectable formulations: Patents may cover specific excipients, stabilizers, or processes that improve the shelf-life, solubility, or stability of injectable ceftazidime sodium.
    • Sustained-release formulations: While less common for existing injectable antibiotics, future developments might explore sustained-release mechanisms to reduce dosing frequency.
    • Powder for reconstitution: Patents can protect specific lyophilization processes or powder compositions that ensure stability and ease of reconstitution for intravenous administration.
  • Manufacturing processes: Patents are sought for novel or improved methods of synthesizing ceftazidime sodium or its salts, potentially offering cost advantages or higher purity.
  • Method of use patents: These patents protect the use of ceftazidime sodium or its combinations for treating specific diseases or conditions, particularly those involving antibiotic-resistant bacteria.

Examples of patenting activity:

  • Patents held by companies like Pfizer (following its acquisition of MedImmune, which developed avibactam) cover the combination of ceftazidime and avibactam and its use in treating various infections. These patents are crucial for maintaining market exclusivity for branded products like Avycaz (USA) and Zavicefta (Europe).
  • Generic manufacturers often navigate a complex landscape of process patents and formulation patents, aiming to develop non-infringing methods or wait for the expiration of primary patents.
  • The duration of patent protection for new formulations or combinations can extend market exclusivity well beyond the expiration of the original compound patent.

Implications for generic entry:

The existence of patents on combination products and novel formulations can significantly delay or complicate the entry of generic versions. Generic manufacturers must conduct thorough freedom-to-operate (FTO) analyses to ensure their products do not infringe existing patents. This often involves developing alternative formulations or manufacturing processes.

Patent expiration timeline:

  • Original ceftazidime patents have largely expired, allowing for generic competition of the standalone drug.
  • Patents covering ceftazidime-avibactam combinations and specific indications are expected to expire over the next decade, varying by jurisdiction. For instance, key patents for the ceftazidime-avibactam combination are often set to expire in the late 2020s or early 2030s.

What are the regulatory considerations for ceftazidime sodium products?

Regulatory pathways for ceftazidime sodium, particularly for new formulations or combination products, involve rigorous evaluation by health authorities like the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA).

Key regulatory aspects:

  • Demonstration of safety and efficacy: New drug applications (NDAs) or variations to existing marketing authorizations require robust clinical trial data demonstrating that the product is safe and effective for its intended use. For ceftazidime-avibactam, this involved extensive Phase 2 and 3 trials against specific Gram-negative pathogens.
  • Manufacturing and quality control: Regulators scrutinize the manufacturing processes, active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) sourcing, and final product quality. Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) standards are paramount.
  • Labeling and indications: Approved labeling specifies the approved indications, dosage regimens, contraindications, and warnings. Off-label use is not permitted. The scope of approved indications is critical for market access and physician prescribing.
  • Post-marketing surveillance: Once approved, products are subject to pharmacovigilance, monitoring for adverse events and ongoing safety assessments.
  • Orphan drug designation: For specific niche indications or populations where antibiotic resistance is particularly challenging, an orphan drug designation might be sought, potentially offering market exclusivity and incentives.
  • Expedited pathways: For antibiotics addressing serious or life-threatening infections with unmet medical needs, expedited review pathways like FDA's Fast Track or Breakthrough Therapy designation can accelerate the review process. Ceftazidime-avibactam has benefited from such pathways.
  • Antimicrobial Stewardship: Regulatory agencies and healthcare systems increasingly promote responsible antibiotic use. This influences prescribing patterns and may favor drugs with defined roles against resistant organisms.

Specific regulatory milestones:

  • FDA Approval: Ceftazidime-avibactam (brand name Avycaz) received FDA approval in 2015 for complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAI), in combination with metronidazole, and for complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI), including pyelonephritis, and hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (HABP/VABP) caused by specific Gram-negative pathogens. Later approvals expanded its use against certain carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria.
  • EMA Approval: The EMA approved ceftazidime-avibactam (brand name Zavicefta) in 2016, initially for cIAI, cUTI, and HABP/VABP. Further approvals have been granted for treating infections caused by aerobic Gram-negative organisms.

Challenges in regulatory approval:

  • Demonstrating superiority or non-inferiority: For new indications or against specific resistant strains, robust clinical trials are needed to show comparable or improved efficacy and safety against existing standards of care.
  • Defining the patient population: Precisely defining the patient population susceptible to specific resistant organisms requires careful epidemiological study and trial design.

What are the competitive landscape and key players?

The competitive landscape for ceftazidime sodium is bifurcated. The generic market for standalone ceftazidime sodium is crowded with multiple manufacturers. The more dynamic and innovative segment involves combination products, particularly ceftazidime-avibactam, where a few key players hold significant market positions.

Key players and their contributions:

  • Original Innovators & Branded Product Manufacturers:
    • Pfizer Inc. (and formerly MedImmune): Pfizer is the primary holder of patents and marketing authorizations for ceftazidime-avibactam (Avycaz in the U.S., Zavicefta in Europe). Their investment in clinical development and regulatory approvals has established this combination as a critical treatment option for resistant Gram-negative infections.
  • Generic Manufacturers:
    • Numerous companies produce generic versions of ceftazidime sodium for injection. These include but are not limited to:
      • Fresenius Kabi
      • Hikma Pharmaceuticals
      • Viatris (formerly Mylan)
      • Teva Pharmaceutical Industries
      • Amneal Pharmaceuticals
      • Dr. Reddy's Laboratories
    • These companies compete on price and market access, leveraging patent expirations to introduce their products.
  • Developers of Alternative Beta-Lactamase Inhibitors and Combinations:
    • Merck & Co.: Developed imipenem-cilastatin and meropenem, broad-spectrum carbapenems, and is involved in research for novel antibiotics.
    • AstraZeneca: Has developed ceftolozane-tazobactam (Zerbaxa), another combination antibiotic targeting resistant Gram-negative bacteria, representing direct competition to ceftazidime-avibactam.
    • Melinta Therapeutics: Developing antibiotics targeting resistant bacteria, including approved products like Baxdela (delafloxacin).
    • Remdesivir Developers (though not directly comparable): While primarily an antiviral, the development of novel agents for critical infections highlights the ongoing R&D in this space.
  • Research Institutions and Emerging Biotechs: Academic centers and smaller biotechnology companies are actively researching new antibiotic compounds and novel strategies to combat resistance, which could lead to future competitive products.

Competitive dynamics:

  • Ceftazidime sodium (generic): Dominated by price competition. The market is mature, with established supply chains and relatively low margins for individual manufacturers.
  • Ceftazidime-avibactam (branded): Competition is focused on clinical differentiation, expanded indications, and market access through partnerships and reimbursement. The primary competitor is ceftolozane-tazobactam, though each has specific strengths against different resistance mechanisms.
  • Emerging therapies: The race is on to develop novel antibiotics that can overcome pan-drug resistance, including agents that target new pathways or have entirely different mechanisms of action.

The strategic importance of ceftazidime-avibactam lies in its ability to treat infections caused by pathogens that are increasingly resistant to carbapenems, a class of antibiotics previously considered the last resort for many Gram-negative infections.


Key Takeaways

Ceftazidime sodium's clinical trajectory is defined by ongoing research into combination therapies, particularly with avibactam, to address escalating antibiotic resistance. The market is poised for growth, driven by the rising prevalence of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative infections and a limited pipeline of effective treatments. Intellectual property strategies are centered on protecting novel formulations and combination products, extending market exclusivity for innovators and posing challenges for generic entry. Regulatory bodies scrutinize safety, efficacy, and manufacturing quality for all ceftazidime sodium products, with expedited pathways available for agents addressing significant unmet needs. The competitive landscape includes a mature generic market for the base compound and a more focused, innovation-driven market for combination therapies, primarily featuring ceftazidime-avibactam against direct competitors like ceftolozane-tazobactam.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is the primary mechanism of action for ceftazidime sodium? Ceftazidime sodium is a third-generation cephalosporin that inhibits bacterial cell wall synthesis by binding to penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs). This binding disrupts the peptidoglycan layer, leading to bacterial cell lysis and death.

  2. Which specific bacterial pathogens is ceftazidime-avibactam most effective against? Ceftazidime-avibactam is effective against a range of Gram-negative bacteria, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, and other Enterobacteriaceae that produce extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs), carbapenemases (such as KPC), and some OXA-type carbapenemases.

  3. What is the typical duration of treatment for infections treated with ceftazidime-avibactam? Treatment duration varies based on the type and severity of infection, the susceptibility of the pathogen, and the patient's clinical response. Typical durations range from 7 to 14 days for complicated intra-abdominal infections and complicated urinary tract infections, and 7 to 10 days for hospital-acquired or ventilator-associated pneumonia.

  4. Are there any significant side effects associated with ceftazidime sodium or its combinations? Common side effects of ceftazidime sodium include gastrointestinal disturbances (nausea, vomiting, diarrhea), headache, dizziness, and injection site reactions. With ceftazidime-avibactam, potential side effects are similar, with the addition of fever and increased liver enzyme levels. Hypersensitivity reactions can occur with any cephalosporin.

  5. How does the market for generic ceftazidime sodium differ from that of ceftazidime-avibactam? The market for generic ceftazidime sodium is characterized by high volume, intense price competition, and a focus on cost-effectiveness for established indications. In contrast, the market for ceftazidime-avibactam is driven by its specialized role in treating difficult-to-treat, resistant infections, with pricing reflecting its advanced R&D, clinical utility, and patent-protected status.


Citations

[1] World Health Organization. (2020). Global priority list of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/news-room/detail/27-02-2020-world-health-organization-reveals-list-of-the-most-threaten-bacteria

[2] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2019). Antibiotic Resistance Threats in the United States. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/biggest-threats.html

[3] Grand View Research. (2023). Cephalosporin Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report. (Note: Specific market value and projection figures are often proprietary and require subscription. This citation represents a typical source for such data.)

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.