Last Updated: August 9, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR CEFAZOLIN SODIUM


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for cefazolin sodium

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00867295 ↗ Effectiveness of Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Totally Implantable Venous Access Device Completed Istanbul University Phase 3 2008-09-01 This randomized trial is determining the role of antibiotic prophylaxis in the prevention of the infectious complications in patients carrying out totally implantable venous access device.
NCT01127880 ↗ Role of Antibiotics to Reduce Infectious Complications in Tube Thoracotomy Management of Traumatic Hemopneumothorax Completed St. Luke's Hospital, Pennsylvania Phase 2/Phase 3 2005-07-01 The purpose of this study is to examine the efficacy of prophylactic antibiotics in patients with chest tubes for management of thoracic injuries in the reduction of the incidence of empyema as compared to placebo.
NCT01273818 ↗ Effectiveness of Topical Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Inguinal Hernia Repair Completed Diskapi Teaching and Research Hospital Phase 4 2011-01-01 Aim of this study is to measure the effectiveness of topical gentamicin to prevent post-operative infection in inguinal tension-free hernia repair operation.Secondary aim is, if it is effective as a prophylactic agent, to compare it's effect with intra venous single dose cefazolin sodium prophylaxis.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for cefazolin sodium

Condition Name

Condition Name for cefazolin sodium
Intervention Trials
Surgical Site Infection 2
Inguinal Hernia 1
Microbial Colonization 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for cefazolin sodium
Intervention Trials
Surgical Wound Infection 3
Infections 2
Infection 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for cefazolin sodium

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for cefazolin sodium
Location Trials
Turkey 2
Japan 1
United States 1
Egypt 1
Brazil 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for cefazolin sodium
Location Trials
Pennsylvania 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for cefazolin sodium

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for cefazolin sodium
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 2
Phase 3 1
Phase 2/Phase 3 2
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for cefazolin sodium
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 6
Not yet recruiting 1
Unknown status 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for cefazolin sodium

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for cefazolin sodium
Sponsor Trials
Ito Hospital 1
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 1
Federal University of São Paulo 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for cefazolin sodium
Sponsor Trials
Other 9
Industry 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Cefazolin Sodium Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis and Forecast 2026-2036

Last updated: July 28, 2026

Cefazolin sodium is an established, off-patent first-generation cephalosporin antibiotic with long-standing clinical use in perioperative prophylaxis and treatment of susceptible bacterial infections. Current growth is driven by baseline procedural volumes, hospital antibiotic stewardship policies, and supply reliability. New “clinical trials” are typically limited to comparative effectiveness, dosing/PK studies, line extension studies (e.g., pediatrics), and formulation or manufacturing characterization work rather than late-stage pivotal development. A precise, evidence-grade “latest trials” and “market forecast” cannot be produced from the information available in this session.

What is the current clinical trials landscape for cefazolin sodium?

Answer: Cefazolin sodium trials are usually incremental (PK/PD, dosing, safety in special populations, and comparative perioperative prophylaxis), not brand-defining Phase 3 programs typical of late-stage pipeline assets.

What types of cefazolin sodium studies show up most often?

  • Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in special populations (renal impairment, pediatrics, obesity).
  • Surgical prophylaxis comparisons (cefazolin timing, dose adjustments, alternatives in specific settings).
  • Microbiologic susceptibility and resistance surveillance protocols that include cefazolin readouts.
  • Bioequivalence and bridging studies for generic cefazolin products and formulation changes.

Where do cefazolin sodium trials typically run?

Most cefazolin studies are conducted in hospitals and academic centers under standard-of-care perioperative and infectious disease protocols, with sites concentrated in regions where perioperative antibiotic standardization is active and stewardship is measured.

What do we know about new cefazolin sodium Phase 3 or pivotal studies?

Answer: No definitive, “latest pivotal Phase 3” dataset can be enumerated here without a connected trial database and drug-specific registry pull.

What to expect if new pivotal trials were launched

When cefazolin is studied in a way that could support a new label (rather than characterization), it usually focuses on:

  • A new route or regimen (less common for cefazolin).
  • A new patient cohort with a dosing rationale (pediatrics, neonates, renal impairment).
  • A specific surgical category with outcome endpoints (SSI rates, organism profiles).

How big is the cefazolin sodium market and what drives demand?

Answer: Demand tracks hospital procedures, orthopedic and cardiovascular surgery volumes, trauma care volumes, and antibiotic stewardship protocols that favor narrow-spectrum agents when appropriate.

Key commercial demand drivers

  • Elective and emergency surgery volumes.
  • Label-concordant perioperative prophylaxis adoption.
  • Resistance pressure favoring guideline-concordant cefazolin use where microbiology supports it.
  • Supply stability and pricing dynamics in hospital procurement.

Key demand headwinds

  • Substitution by other perioperative agents (e.g., anti-staphylococcal penicillins, broader-spectrum cephalosporins, vancomycin strategies where indicated).
  • Allergy and cross-reactivity considerations affecting clinician selection.
  • Generic price compression and tendering effects.

What is the forecast for cefazolin sodium through 2030 and 2036?

Answer: A robust forecast cannot be calculated in this environment without current market sizing, unit demand baselines, and procurement pricing assumptions.

Typical forecast mechanics for older hospital antibiotics

A credible projection requires:

  • Procedure volume forecasts (country and facility segment).
  • SSI incidence trend assumptions and guideline adherence rates.
  • Average dosing per course and patient-weight distribution.
  • Share shifts among perioperative antibiotic classes.
  • Generic price evolution and tender compression.
  • Supply disruptions and manufacturing capacity effects.

Which regions offer the largest cefazolin sodium opportunity?

Answer: The largest absolute markets are in high-procedure-volume geographies with active hospital formularies and broad use of perioperative prophylaxis.

Region-level factors that change share

  • Guideline adoption strength for prophylaxis timing and dosing.
  • Formularies and contracting structures (single-winner vs multi-source).
  • Antibiotic stewardship enforcement and reporting.
  • Competitive intensity from multiple generic suppliers.

How does cefazolin sodium pricing and tendering affect market projections?

Answer: Pricing is typically procurement-driven with significant variability by geography and contracting cycle. Forecast accuracy depends on tender results and supplier capacity.

What procurement trends usually matter

  • Conversion of purchases to contracted multi-year agreements.
  • Replacement of higher-cost options during shortages.
  • Competitive bidding among generic manufacturers and disruptions that temporarily lift prices.
  • Regulatory or quality events that can change supplier eligibility.

What are the competitive dynamics in cefazolin sodium generics?

Answer: The competitive landscape is usually dominated by multiple approved generic manufacturers, with competition expressed through price, availability, and bid responsiveness.

What typically differentiates suppliers

  • Manufacturing scale and sterile fill-finish reliability.
  • Lead times, distribution coverage, and hospital contracting track records.
  • Compliance quality and low rejection rates.
  • Ability to maintain consistent lot release timelines.

What “clinical trial updates” matter to commercial planning for cefazolin sodium?

Answer: For cefazolin, the operationally relevant updates are usually not novel efficacy endpoints, but label-adjacent evidence that influences dosing standards, stewardship protocols, or safety monitoring.

Commercial impact pathways

  • New dosing guidance affecting average doses per prophylaxis course.
  • Updated safety signals impacting perioperative or inpatient protocols.
  • Pediatric or renal impairment dosing rationales that change clinician behavior.
  • Evidence shaping restrictions or preferred-agent lists in hospital formularies.

What regulatory and FDA status considerations affect market access?

Answer: Cefazolin sodium is widely available; regulatory impact usually centers on product-specific approvals, labeling consistency, and generic interchangeability at the formularies level.

What to track for market risk

  • Product recalls, sterility assurance issues, or GMP enforcement actions.
  • Shortages and allocation patterns.
  • Label updates affecting dosing or contraindications.
  • Any changes to guidance on perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis.

Key takeaways

  • Cefazolin sodium is an established perioperative antibiotic with demand tied to surgical volume and guideline adherence rather than late-stage pipeline breakthroughs.
  • “Clinical trial updates” for cefazolin typically come from dosing/PK, comparative prophylaxis, and incremental studies rather than a brand-defining pivotal program.
  • Market growth and forecast outcomes depend primarily on procedure volumes, stewardship adoption, competitive generic pricing, and supply stability.
  • A precise latest-trials summary and quantified market forecast require a drug-specific, up-to-date data pull that is not present in this session.

FAQs

1. Are there active FDA or global trials for cefazolin sodium perioperative prophylaxis?
Cefazolin perioperative studies commonly exist as comparative or dosing-focused trials, but a current active-trials list cannot be generated here without a registry query.

2. Do cefazolin sodium generics have bioequivalence studies that affect supply?
Yes, bioequivalence and product bridging studies are standard for generics, but the specific set and any recent approvals are not enumerated here.

3. What patient groups most often receive cefazolin sodium clinical dosing studies?
Renal impairment, pediatrics, obesity, and special surgical populations are typical focus areas.

4. How do antibiotic stewardship programs influence cefazolin sodium volume?
They influence formulary preference and perioperative timing and dosing adherence, which affects unit demand per course.

5. What risks most affect cefazolin sodium market continuity?
Manufacturing capacity constraints, sterile product quality events, and bid/tender dynamics are the usual drivers of supply and price volatility.


References

  1. (No sources were provided or retrievable within this session.)

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.