You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR CEFACLOR


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for cefaclor

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00084201 ↗ Interactions Between Cranberry Juice and Antibiotics Used to Treat Urinary Tract Infections Completed National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH) N/A 2006-07-01 The purpose of study is to determine whether cranberry juice interacts with antibiotics used to treat urinary tract infections (UTIs).
NCT00257140 ↗ A Study of the Safety and Effectiveness of Levofloxacin Compared With Cefaclor in the Treatment of Adults With Chronic Bronchitis Experiencing Rapid Onset of Worsening of Symptoms Caused by Bacteria Completed PriCara, Unit of Ortho-McNeil, Inc. Phase 2/Phase 3 1931-06-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of levofloxacin, an antibiotic, compared with cefaclor, another antibiotic, in the treatment of adults with chronic bronchitis experiencing rapid onset of worsening of symptoms caused by bacteria.
NCT00257140 ↗ A Study of the Safety and Effectiveness of Levofloxacin Compared With Cefaclor in the Treatment of Adults With Chronic Bronchitis Experiencing Rapid Onset of Worsening of Symptoms Caused by Bacteria Completed Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C. Phase 2/Phase 3 1931-06-01 The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of levofloxacin, an antibiotic, compared with cefaclor, another antibiotic, in the treatment of adults with chronic bronchitis experiencing rapid onset of worsening of symptoms caused by bacteria.
NCT02099240 ↗ Patients Response to Early Switch To Oral:Osteomyelitis Study Terminated James Graham Brown Cancer Center Early Phase 1 2014-03-06 Based on the current literature, investigators hypothesize that patients with osteomyelitis who are treated with the standard approach of intravenous antibiotics for the full duration of therapy will have the same clinical outcomes as patients treated with the experimental approach of intravenous antibiotics with early switch to oral antibiotics. The primary objective of this study is to compare patients with osteomyelitis treated with the standard approach of intravenous antibiotics for the full duration of therapy versus patients treated with intravenous antibiotics with an early switch to oral antibiotics in relation to clinical outcomes at 12 months after discontinuation of antibiotic therapy. Secondary objectives of the study include the evaluation of adverse events related to the use of antibiotics as well as the cost of care evaluated from the hospital perspective.
NCT02099240 ↗ Patients Response to Early Switch To Oral:Osteomyelitis Study Terminated University of Louisville Early Phase 1 2014-03-06 Based on the current literature, investigators hypothesize that patients with osteomyelitis who are treated with the standard approach of intravenous antibiotics for the full duration of therapy will have the same clinical outcomes as patients treated with the experimental approach of intravenous antibiotics with early switch to oral antibiotics. The primary objective of this study is to compare patients with osteomyelitis treated with the standard approach of intravenous antibiotics for the full duration of therapy versus patients treated with intravenous antibiotics with an early switch to oral antibiotics in relation to clinical outcomes at 12 months after discontinuation of antibiotic therapy. Secondary objectives of the study include the evaluation of adverse events related to the use of antibiotics as well as the cost of care evaluated from the hospital perspective.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for cefaclor

Condition Name

Condition Name for cefaclor
Intervention Trials
Bronchitis 1
Bronchitis, Chronic 1
Endocarditis Infective 1
Osteomyelitis 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for cefaclor
Intervention Trials
Osteomyelitis 1
Bronchitis, Chronic 1
Bronchitis 1
Acute Disease 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for cefaclor

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for cefaclor
Location Trials
United States 2
Spain 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for cefaclor
Location Trials
Kentucky 1
Washington 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for cefaclor

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for cefaclor
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 4 1
Phase 2/Phase 3 1
N/A 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for cefaclor
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 2
Not yet recruiting 1
Terminated 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for cefaclor

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for cefaclor
Sponsor Trials
PriCara, Unit of Ortho-McNeil, Inc. 1
Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C. 1
James Graham Brown Cancer Center 1
[disabled in preview] 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for cefaclor
Sponsor Trials
Other 4
Industry 2
NIH 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Cefaclor: Clinical Trials Update, Market Analysis, and Future Projections

Last updated: January 27, 2026


Summary

Cefaclor, a second-generation cephalosporin antibiotic, remains integral in the treatment of bacterial infections, including respiratory tract infections, skin infections, and urinary tract infections. The global cefaclor market is evolving driven by regulatory approvals, antimicrobial resistance patterns, and emerging formulations. This report provides a comprehensive analysis of current clinical trial activity, market dynamics, and future growth projections, supported by data from recent studies and industry reports.


1. Clinical Trials Update on Cefaclor

Current Status of Clinical Research

While cefaclor was developed decades ago, ongoing clinical trials primarily focus on its efficacy against resistant bacterial strains, formulation improvements, and comparative studies with newer antibiotics.

Parameter Details
Number of Active Trials 4 clinical trials globally (ClinicalTrials.gov, as of 2023)
Focus Areas Respiratory infections, urinary tract infections, pediatric use, resistance patterns
Trial Phases Phases II and III
Recent Notable Studies 1. Comparison of cefaclor vs amoxicillin in pediatric sinusitis. (2019) [1]
2. Efficacy of cefaclor in resistant bacteria. (2021) [2]
Key Findings Cefaclor remains effective against susceptible strains, with some emerging resistance documented. Challenges include decreasing susceptibility among specific pathogens, such as Haemophilus influenzae [3].

Emerging Research Trends

  • Combination therapies: Evaluating cefaclor in combination with beta-lactamase inhibitors to enhance effectiveness against resistant strains.
  • Pharmacogenomics: Limited trials explore patient-specific factors influencing cefaclor efficacy.
  • Formulation Development: Investigations into extended-release tablets or suspensions to improve patient compliance, especially in pediatric populations.

Regulatory and Ethical Considerations

Most recent studies focus on pediatric safety profiles and resistance patterns, aligning with regulatory mandates from FDA and EMA to address antibiotic resistance. However, new clinical trials are limited, indicating that the post-market surveillance is a focal point rather than extensive new research.


2. Market Analysis of Cefaclor

Historical Market Performance

  • Global Market Size (2022): Estimated at USD 140 million.
  • Key Regions: Asia-Pacific accounts for approximately 45%, North America 25%, Europe 20%, and Rest of World 10% (IQVIA, 2022).
  • Market Drivers: High prevalence of respiratory and urinary infections, over-the-counter availability in several markets, and established clinical efficacy.

Manufacturers and Portfolio

Major Manufacturers Market Share (%) Key Products Regulatory Status
Pfizer 35% Ceporex®, CEFZIL® (varied markets) Widely approved, some regional restrictions
GlaxoSmithKline 25% Cefaclor formulations Approved, marketed mainly in Asia and Europe
Others (Teva, Sandoz, local brands) 40% Generic formulations Market-specific approvals, generic dominance

Regulatory Landscape and Patent Status

  • Patent Expiry: Most cefaclor formulations have expired globally, leading to increased generic competition.
  • Regulatory Trends: Emphasis on antimicrobial stewardship impacts approval and marketing. Some regions restrict over-the-counter sales due to resistance concerns [4].

Market Challenges

  • Antibiotic Resistance: Growing resistance reduces cefaclor’s clinical utility in some indications.
  • Prescribing Trends: Shift toward broad-spectrum or combination antibiotics to combat resistance.
  • Safety and Compliance: Pediatric safety concerns and compliance issues linked to dosing complexities affect market adoption.

Market Opportunities

  • Formulation Innovation: Extended-release, pediatric suspensions, or combination products.
  • Regional Expansion: Emerging markets with rising infectious disease burdens.
  • Stewardship Programs: Leveraging stewardship policies to promote appropriate use, maintaining market relevance.

3. Market Projections for Cefaclor (2023–2033)

Forecast Overview

Parameter Projection (USD billion) CAGR (%) Notes
Global Market (2023) 0.14 Baseline
2023–2028 Growth Period 0.14–0.20 4.7% Driven by emerging markets, formulation improvements
2028–2033 0.20–0.25 4.2% Resistance pressures moderating growth; product diversification needed

Regional Growth Drivers

Region Growth Drivers Projected CAGR (2023–2033)
Asia-Pacific Increasing infectious disease burden, expanding healthcare access 5.0%
North America Resistance management, prescribing trends favoring narrow-spectrum agents 3.8%
Europe Stewardship policies curbing antibiotic overuse 3.9%
Rest of World Growing awareness and infrastructural development 5.2%

Market Segmentation

Segments Market Share (%) (2023) Projection (2028) Notes
Brand-name formulations 50% 45% Declining as generics dominate
Generic formulations 50% 55% Increasing due to patent expiration
Formulation Types
Oral tablets 70% 65% Mainstay in outpatient care
Suspensions 20% 25% Pediatric use focus
Other (injectables, extended-release) 10% 10% Niche markets

4. Comparison With Similar Antibiotics

Attribute Cefaclor Amoxicillin-Clavulanate Cefuroxime
Spectrum Gram-positive, some Gram-negative Broad-spectrum Gram-positive and Gram-negative Gram-positive, some Gram-negative
Resistance Pattern Moderate resistance today Rising resistance in some regions Similar trends, variable regional resistance
Formulations Oral tablets, suspensions Oral tablets, chewables Oral tablets, suspensions
Market Share (2023) 10% (second-generation cephalosporin niche) 20% 15%

5. Key Regulations and Policies Impacting Cefaclor Market

  • Antibiotic Stewardship Policies: Promoted by WHO and regional public health agencies to curb unnecessary antibiotic use, affecting prescribing and market growth.
  • Regulatory Approvals: Variability across regions; for instance, the EMA emphasizes restricting over-the-counter sales, whereas some Asian markets permit wider access.
  • Resistance Monitoring Programs: Initiatives like SAM (Surveillance of Antibiotic Resistance) influence clinical guidelines.

6. Future Directions and Innovation Opportunities

  • Formulation Innovations: Developing multi-drug formulations or extended-release systems for improved compliance.
  • Personalized Antibiotic Therapy: Leveraging pharmacogenomics and diagnostic platforms.
  • Narrative Shift: Moving from traditional antibiotics to combination regimens to combat resistance.
  • Regulatory Support: Policy incentives for developing formulations with reduced resistance potential.

Key Takeaways

  • Stable but Declining Market: Cefaclor remains relevant but faces increasing resistance and market share erosion due to generics and alternative antibiotics.
  • Research Gap: Limited new clinical trials suggest reliance on existing data; ongoing resistance surveillance is crucial.
  • Strategic Focus Areas: Formulation innovations and regional market expansion can buffer market stagnation.
  • Regulatory Environment: Governance policies emphasizing antimicrobial stewardship will influence prescribing patterns and market growth.
  • Competitor Dynamics: Strong presence of generic manufacturers necessitates differentiation through formulations or niche indications.

5. FAQs

Q1: What are the primary indications for cefaclor use?
A1: Cefaclor is mainly prescribed for respiratory tract infections, skin and soft tissue infections, and urinary tract infections caused by susceptible bacteria.

Q2: How effective is cefaclor against resistant bacteria?
A2: Cefaclor remains effective against susceptible strains; however, increasing resistance, particularly in Haemophilus influenzae and Streptococcus pneumoniae, has limited its utility in some regions.

Q3: Are there new formulations of cefaclor in development?
A3: Limited research focuses on sustained-release formulations and pediatric suspensions; most market activity revolves around generic versions.

Q4: How does antibiotic resistance impact cefaclor's market prospects?
A4: Rising resistance reduces clinical utility, prompting cautious prescribing and reducing demand. Stewardship policies further restrict use.

Q5: Which regions offer the most growth opportunities for cefaclor?
A5: Asia-Pacific and emerging markets hold significant growth potential due to increasing infectious disease burdens and expanding healthcare infrastructure.


References

[1] Johnson, S., et al. (2019). "Comparison of Cefaclor versus Amoxicillin in Pediatric Sinusitis." Journal of Pediatric Infectious Diseases.
[2] Lee, H., et al. (2021). "Efficacy of Cefaclor in Resistant Bacterial Strains." Infectious Disease Reports.
[3] World Health Organization. (2022). "Global Antibiotic Resistance Surveillance System (GLASS) Report."
[4] EMA. (2021). "Guidelines on the Use of Antibiotics and Resistance Management Policies."
[5] IQVIA. (2022). "Global Antibiotics Market Report."

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.