Last Updated: June 24, 2026

CLINICAL TRIALS PROFILE FOR CARISOPRODOL


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


All Clinical Trials for carisoprodol

Trial ID Title Status Sponsor Phase Start Date Summary
NCT00671502 ↗ A Study to Evaluate Two Formulations of Carisoprodol in Subjects With Musculoskeletal Spasm of the Lower Back Completed Meda Pharmaceuticals Phase 3 2008-04-01 The purpose of this study is to determine if two sustained released formulations of carisoprodol are more effective than placebo.
NCT00671879 ↗ Study to Evaluate Two Formulations of Carisoprodol in Subjects With Musculoskeletal Spasm of the Lower Back Completed Meda Pharmaceuticals Phase 3 2008-04-01 The purpose of this study is to determine if two sustained released formulations of carisoprodol are more effective than placebo.
NCT01421433 ↗ A Comparative Study Between Lysine Clonixinate+Cyclobenzaprine and Caffeine+Carisoprodol+Sodium Diclofenac+Paracetamol Unknown status Pharmagenix Projetos em Medicina Farmacêutica Ltda. Phase 3 2012-05-01 Non inferiority, multicentric, double blind study whose the primary objective is to compare the effectiveness of two products in pain reduction. Primary endpoint: reduction in pain average at day 7 compared to day 1(baseline), using Analogue Visual Scale (AVS) for pain evaluation. Secondary endpoint: to evaluate the products safety at the gastrointestinal system.
NCT01421433 ↗ A Comparative Study Between Lysine Clonixinate+Cyclobenzaprine and Caffeine+Carisoprodol+Sodium Diclofenac+Paracetamol Unknown status Farmoquimica S.A. Phase 3 2012-05-01 Non inferiority, multicentric, double blind study whose the primary objective is to compare the effectiveness of two products in pain reduction. Primary endpoint: reduction in pain average at day 7 compared to day 1(baseline), using Analogue Visual Scale (AVS) for pain evaluation. Secondary endpoint: to evaluate the products safety at the gastrointestinal system.
NCT03508167 ↗ Security and Efficacy of Dorilax® (Fixed Association of Paracetamol 350 mg, Carisoprodol 150 mg and Caffeine 50 mg) Plus Thermal Band Compared to Placebo Plus Thermal Band in the Treatment of Acute Low Back Pain. Withdrawn Ache Laboratorios Farmaceuticos S.A. Phase 3 2020-01-01 National clinical trial, phase III, monocentric, randomized, double-blind, controlled, parallel, study of superiority, in which two hundred and thirty four (234) participants of both sexes, aged equal or more than 18 years and equal or less than 54 years, will be randomly allocated in one of two treatment groups. The first group will use Dorilax® plus thermal band and the second group will use thermal band plus placebo. The results will show the efficacy and security of Dorilax® and compare the efficiency of Dorilax® and thermal band.
>Trial ID >Title >Status >Phase >Start Date >Summary

Clinical Trial Conditions for carisoprodol

Condition Name

Condition Name for carisoprodol
Intervention Trials
Low Back Pain 2
Lower Back Pain 2
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Condition MeSH

Condition MeSH for carisoprodol
Intervention Trials
Low Back Pain 4
Back Pain 4
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Locations for carisoprodol

Trials by Country

Trials by Country for carisoprodol
Location Trials
United States 48
Brazil 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Trials by US State

Trials by US State for carisoprodol
Location Trials
New Jersey 2
Michigan 2
Louisiana 2
Georgia 2
Florida 2
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Progress for carisoprodol

Clinical Trial Phase

Clinical Trial Phase for carisoprodol
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Phase 3 4
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Status

Clinical Trial Status for carisoprodol
Clinical Trial Phase Trials
Completed 2
Unknown status 1
Withdrawn 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Clinical Trial Sponsors for carisoprodol

Sponsor Name

Sponsor Name for carisoprodol
Sponsor Trials
Meda Pharmaceuticals 2
Pharmagenix Projetos em Medicina Farmacêutica Ltda. 1
Farmoquimica S.A. 1
[disabled in preview] 1
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial

Sponsor Type

Sponsor Type for carisoprodol
Sponsor Trials
Industry 4
Other 1
[disabled in preview] 0
This preview shows a limited data set
Subscribe for full access, or try a Trial
Last updated: May 1, 2026

Carisoprodol: Clinical Trial Update, Market Analysis, and Projection

What is carisoprodol and where is it used clinically?

Carisoprodol is an oral centrally acting skeletal muscle relaxant indicated for short-term relief of discomfort associated with acute, painful musculoskeletal conditions in adults. The product is marketed globally in multiple branded forms and is also available as generics in many markets.

Carisoprodol’s clinical value proposition is time-limited symptomatic treatment for acute muscle spasm and pain, not a disease-modifying therapy. Use is constrained by sedative and abuse-related risk signals seen historically for this class, which has affected prescribing patterns and regulatory positioning across markets.


What does the clinical trial pipeline look like?

No credible, current late-stage development programs with publicly registered pivotal endpoints were identified for carisoprodol in the major registries that drive investment-grade visibility (e.g., ClinicalTrials.gov and the EU clinical trials database) during the most recent reviewable window. Publicly accessible data for carisoprodol is dominated by older trials and post-marketing safety-related observations rather than ongoing phase 3 or phase 4 registrational studies.

Practical implication: carisoprodol’s near-term “clinical trial update” is primarily characterized by maintenance of existing product approvals, label management, and safety surveillance rather than a visible pipeline renewal.


What is the regulatory and safety framing shaping demand?

Carisoprodol has historically been positioned with controlled-risk communication due to central nervous system effects and abuse potential. In the United States, the drug is regulated as a prescription medicine with risk-focused labeling; in other jurisdictions it also carries warnings that can constrain adoption.

Key consequences for market dynamics:

  • Short-term use limitation: directly caps the addressable duration per patient episode.
  • Sedation-related risk management: can reduce suitability for certain patient populations and drive clinician preference toward non-sedating alternatives.
  • Generic penetration: lowers price and shifts growth toward volume, regional reimbursement, and formulary access rather than unit price expansion.

How big is the carisoprodol market and what drives it?

Market structure

Carisoprodol is largely a generic-first market in most major geographies. Branded market shares have contracted over time, with demand sustained by generic availability, guideline usage for acute musculoskeletal pain, and ongoing symptomatic treatment use cases.

Market demand is driven by:

  • Acute care episode volume: increases during seasons and with broad musculoskeletal presentations in primary care and urgent settings.
  • Formulary inclusion and substitution rates: generic availability supports reimbursement, but safety warnings can steer prescribers toward alternative muscle relaxants.
  • Competition across class: competing agents (other centrally acting muscle relaxants and non-sedating alternatives in some settings) compete for the same short-term prescribing window.

Pricing and erosion dynamics

In generic categories, growth typically hinges on:

  • Volume stability rather than pricing
  • Regional reimbursement rules and pharmacy benefit design
  • Relative tolerability perceptions among prescribers

Carisoprodol’s price is typically subject to rapid declines post-generic entry, which reduces revenue elasticity and pushes revenues toward stable demand and controlled supply chains.


What does the evidence base say about utilization trends?

Public utilization signals for muscle relaxants over time show a shift toward drugs with more favorable safety-perception profiles and toward shorter or more conservative prescribing. Carisoprodol’s sedative and dependence-associated concerns have supported substitution, which tends to suppress long-term brand expansion. The net effect in mature markets is a “maintenance” demand shape: persistent but not accelerating.


What is the near-term market projection for carisoprodol?

Base-case projection (5-year horizon)

Given:

  • maturity and generic penetration,
  • absence of a clearly visible late-stage clinical pipeline,
  • ongoing safety and substitution pressure from competitive muscle relaxants,

the base-case projection is low single-digit annual revenue growth or flat-to-declining revenue in mature markets, with modest volume growth offset by pricing pressure.

Directionality by region (high level):

  • North America: flat to low-growth, pricing compression dominates, volume largely maintained but capped by short-term use and substitution.
  • Europe: similar maturity profile with variable reimbursement and prescribing behavior, usually stable but not growth-led.
  • Emerging markets: potential for modest volume growth tied to acute care utilization, but revenue growth is moderated by generic penetration and regulatory normalization.

Revenue drivers and constraints

Revenue drivers

  • stable generic availability
  • acute musculoskeletal care volume
  • formulary inclusion where it remains competitive

Revenue constraints

  • prescriber substitution to alternatives
  • conservative guideline behavior and stewardship
  • safety communications affecting patient eligibility

Competitive landscape: where carisoprodol sits

Carisoprodol competes within the broader skeletal muscle relaxant class. Its distinguishing factor is a specific centrally acting profile, but in practice, prescribers choose based on sedation burden, tolerability, and formulary access. In many formularies, carisoprodol faces competition from other muscle relaxants that may show better perceived safety or convenience.

Business implication: in the absence of pipeline differentiation, growth depends on distribution economics, payer dynamics, and market access rather than new clinical differentiation.


Key Takeaways

  • Clinical trial update: carisoprodol’s current public profile is dominated by maintenance of existing approvals and safety surveillance rather than visible, registrational late-stage trials.
  • Market outlook: mature, generic-driven markets with constrained prescribing duration and substitution pressure support flat-to-low-growth revenue expectations.
  • Projection: base-case is low single-digit growth or stability over a multi-year horizon in mature geographies, with emerging markets offering volume-led but price-moderated growth potential.
  • Investment lens: value creation is unlikely to come from new clinical efficacy milestones in the near term; it is more likely to come from supply, distribution, and formulary access economics.

FAQs

1) Is carisoprodol undergoing major late-stage clinical development right now?
Publicly available evidence is not consistent with an active late-stage registrational program with prominent endpoints.

2) Why is carisoprodol demand capped versus chronic pain drugs?
Its use is oriented to short-term relief of acute painful musculoskeletal conditions, limiting episode duration and repeat exposure patterns.

3) What most affects carisoprodol sales in generic markets?
Pricing erosion, pharmacy benefit design, formulary inclusion, and prescriber substitution.

4) How does safety framing influence utilization?
Sedation and abuse-related risk communication reduces eligibility and increases preference for competing muscle relaxants in many settings.

5) What is the best indicator of near-term market stability for carisoprodol?
Formulary access and generic competitive intensity in the top reimbursed markets, since clinical differentiation is not a near-term growth lever.


References

[1] FDA. Carisoprodol (drug label and prescribing information resources). U.S. Food and Drug Administration. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/
[2] ClinicalTrials.gov. Search results for carisoprodol clinical studies. U.S. National Library of Medicine. https://clinicaltrials.gov/
[3] WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology. Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification data for carisoprodol. https://www.whocc.no/
[4] European Medicines Agency (EMA). Carisoprodol-related information and product pages where applicable. https://www.ema.europa.eu/

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.